ุงูู ูุงุฑุฏ
ุงุณุชูุดู ู ุฌู ูุนุฉ ูุงุณุนุฉ ู ู ุงูู ูุงุฑุฏ ุงูููู ุฉ ุญูู ุชุนููู ุงูู ูุงุทูุฉ ุงูุนุงูู ูุฉ ูุชุนู ูู ููู ู ูุชุนุฒูุฒ ุงูุจุญุซ ูุงูู ูุงุตุฑุฉ ูุงูุชุนููู ูุงูุชุนูู .
ุชู ุงูุนุซูุฑ ุนูู 3,502 ูุชูุฌุฉ
Integrating Gender into Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2019 ุงูู
ุคูู: Hyeseung Cho ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the contents of global citizenship education(GCE) from a gender perspective, and to lay the theoretical foundation to integrate gender issues into GCE. To this end, this research analyzes GCE textbooks published by four Metropolitan City Offices of Education employing content analysis. As results, GCE textbooks rarely include contents related to gender (in)equality by representing 5.26%, 3.81%, and 8.97% of the textbooks of elementary, middle and high school respectively. In terms of topics, although a word of gender (in)equality is mentioned as an international agenda or a global problems in textbooks, the specific concept of it or various worldwide gender inequalities issues such as gender-based violence, women in poverty, reproductive rights were excluded. In terms of format aspects of the textbooks, the textbooks present gender perspective by describing woman as an independent global citizen, and by ensuring the equality of gender composition of characters. In some cases, however, the roles of women and men in textbooks are still divided, and gender stereotype was recognized through sex=segregated activities. Based on these results, this research argues that it is required to expand the contents of GCE by including the importance of gender equality and global structural gender inequality problems, and that it is necessary to review the discourse and practice of GCE in Korea from a gender perspective.
์ ๋ ๊ด์ ์์ ๋ณธ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 14, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2019 ุงูู
ุคูู: ์กฐํ์น ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๊ตญ๋ด ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ์ ์ ๋ ๊ด์ ์์ ๋ถ์ํ์ฌ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ ์ ๋ ์ด์๋ฅผ ํฌํจํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ๋
ผ์์ ํ ๋๋ฅผ ๋ง๋ จํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ์ต๊ทผ ์๋๊ต์ก์ฒญ์์ ๋ฐ๊ฐํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต๊ณผ์ 3์ข
์ ๋ํด ๋ด์ฉ๋ถ์(content analysis)์ ์ค์ํ์ฌ ๋ด์ฉ์ธก๋ฉด๊ณผ ํ์์ธก๋ฉด์ผ๋ก ๋๋์ด ์ดํด๋ณด์๋ค. ๋ถ์๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต๊ณผ์ ๋ด ์ฑ(๋ถ)ํ๋ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์์๋ 5.26%, ์คํ๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์์๋ 3.81%, ๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์์๋ 8.97%์ ๋น์ค์ผ๋ก ํฌํจ๋์ด ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ต๊ณผ์ ๋ด ์ฑ(๋ถ)ํ๋ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๋ฎ์ ๋น์ค์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋๊ณ ์์๋ค. ๋ํ ์ฑ(๋ถ)ํ๋ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๊ตญ์ ์์ ๋ค ํน์ ์ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ก ๋ช
์๋๊ณ ๋ ์์ผ๋, ์ ๋ํญ๋ ฅ, ์ ๋์ ๋น๊ณค, ์ฌ์์ฐ๊ถ ๋ฑ์ ์ฑ๋ถํ๋ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๊ตญ๋ด์ธ ์ด์๋ค์ด ๋ฐฐ์ ๋๊ณ ์์๋ค. ๊ต๊ณผ์์ ํ์์ ์ธก๋ฉด์ ์ดํด๋ณด๋ฉด ์ฃผ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ผ๋ก์์ ์ฌ์ฑ์์ ์ ์ํ๊ณ ๋ฑ์ฅ์ธ๋ฌผ์ ์ฑ๋ณ ๊ตฌ์ฑ์ ํํ์ฑ์ ํ๋ณดํ๋ ๋ฑ ์ฑํ๋ฑํ ๊ด์ ์ ๋๋ฌ๋ด๊ธฐ๋ ํ์์ผ๋, ์ผ๋ถ ์ฌ๋ก์์๋ ์ฌ์ ํ ์ฌ์ฑ๊ณผ ๋จ์ฑ์ ์ญํ ์ ๊ตฌ๋ถํ๋ฉฐ ์ฑ ๋ถ๋ฆฌ์ ํ๋์ ํตํ ์ฑ์ฐจ๋ณ์ ์ธ์์ ๋ณด์ด๊ธฐ๋ ํ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ ๋๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด ์ฑํ๋ฑ ์ด์์ ์ค์์ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ฑ๋ถํ๋ฑ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋ณ์ ๋ํ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ํ๋๋์ด์ผ ํจ์ ์ฃผ์ฅํ๋ฉฐ, ๊ตญ๋ด ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์ค์ฒ์ ์ ๋์ ๊ด์ ์์ ์ฌ๊ฒํ ํ๋ ์์
์ด ํ์ํ๋ค๊ณ ์ ์ํ์๋ค.
๊ตญ๋ด ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ํฅ ๋ถ์ (๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 16, No.2) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2023 ุงูู
ุคูู: ๋จ๊ฒฝ์ง ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: ํ๊ตญ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ํฅํ ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ๊ตญ๋ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ํฅ์ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ธฐ ์ํ์ฌ 2012๋
๋ถํฐ 2023๋
๊น์ง ํ๊ตญ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฌ๋จ์ ๋ฑ์ฌ์ง ๋ฐ ๋ฑ์ฌํ๋ณด์ง์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ค ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ๋ํ 31ํธ์ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ์ ์ ํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๋๋ณ ์ถ์ด, ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฃผ์ , ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์ ๋ฑ์ ๋ถ์ํ๋ก ํ์ฌ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ํฅ ๋ฐ ํน์ง์ ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ ๋ค์๊ณผ ๊ฐ๋ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๊ด๋ จ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ 2012๋
๋ถํฐ ์ง์์ ์ผ๋ก ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์ด์์ผ๋ฉฐ 2018๋
๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ง์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ ์ด๋ฃจ์ด์ก์ผ๋ ์ดํ ๋ค์ ๊ฐ์ํ์๋ค. ๋์งธ, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๊ด๋ จ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ค์ ์ฃผ๋ก ๋ค๋ฌธํ, ๊ต์ก, ํ์ต์๋ฅผ ๋ค๋ฃจ๋ ๊ต์กํ ๊ด๋ จ ํ์ ์ง์ ์ฃผ๋ก ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ณ ์์๋ค. ์
์งธ, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๊ด๋ จ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฃผ์ ๋ ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ํ ์์ธ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ ํ์ด ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ง์๋ค. ๋ท์งธ, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ฃผ๋ก ์์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ์ฉํ์ฌ ์ด๋ฃจ์ด์ก๋ค. ๋ค์ฏ์งธ, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์์ ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ๊ต์ฌ๋ฅผ ๋์์ผ๋ก ํ๋ ์๋๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ง์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๊ฒ์ฆ๋์๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ ๋๋ก ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ํฅํ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ๋ํด ๋
ผ์ํ์์ผ๋ฉฐ ๋ค์ํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ์ ํ์ฉํ ํ์๊ฐ ์๋ค๋ ์ ์ ์์ฌํ์๋ค.
Critical Analysis of World Geography and Travel Geography Curriculum through the Viewpoints of Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 2) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: Kyeonghan Yi ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) In this study I analysed world geography and travel geography curriculum through neo-liberal and critical viewpoints of global citizenship education(GCED). They have many contents about the understanding of diversity which deals in GCED importantly. Two geography curriculums provide many contents of GCED with neo-liberal viewpoint. World geography includes critical viewpoint based on regional conflicts, desertification problems, regional separation movements, righteous distribution of resources etc. The critical viewpoint of GCED in world geography emphasizes the critical understanding of disputes, regional issues, distribution etc. with structural aspect, and guides the realization of justice with problems solutions of these. Travel geography guides studentsโ identification about unfairness and injustice of travel, and emphasizes travelersโ responsibility, fairness and alternatives. But this travel geography is in circle of neo-liberalism viewpoint mainly. The understanding of diversity in two geographies provides important contents for GCED in schools. Geography make a understanding of diversity with otherโs perspectives objectively, but it can neglect the critical and structural understanding about diverse landscape, culture, environment, issues, and travel etc. So geography is necessary to deal critical viewpoint also, because geography has mainly neo-liberal viewpoint. Geography teachers should have the harmony of neo-liberal viewpoint and critical viewpoint to contribute on development of global citizens. Geography teachers should critically re-conceptualize geography curriculum and reconstruct the contents of textbook. And students is necessary to aim transformative learning to understand global diversity and critically participate with global issues in everyday life.
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๊ด์ ์์ ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ฌํ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๋นํ์ ๋ถ์ (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 2) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: ์ด๊ฒฝํ ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ์์ ์ฃผ์์ ๊ด์ ๊ณผ ๋นํ์ ๊ด์ ์ผ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ฌํ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ๋ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์์ ๋งค์ฐ ์ค์ํ๊ฒ ๋ค๋ฃจ๋ ๋ค์์ฑ์ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์ ํ์ต ๋ด์ฉ์ผ๋ก ๋ด๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ฌํ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ๋ด์ฉ๋ฉด์์ ์ ์์ ์ฃผ์์ ๊ด์ ์ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ฝํ
์ธ ๋ฅผ ํ๋ถํ๊ฒ ์ ๊ณตํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ฉด ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ์ง์ญ ๋ถ์, ์ฌ๋งํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง์ญ ๋ฌธ์ , ์ง์ญ ๋ถ๋ฆฌ ์ด๋, ์์์ ์ ์๋ก์ด ๋ถ๋ฐฐ ๋ฑ์ ๋นํ์ ๊ด์ ๋ ๋ด๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋นํ์ ๊ด์ ์ ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ์์ ๋ถ์, ์ง์ญ๋ฌธ์ , ๋ถ๋ฆฌ, ๋ถ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธก๋ฉด์์์ ๋นํ์ ์ธ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์กฐํ๋ฉด์, ์ด์ ํด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก ์ ์์ ์คํ์ ์ ์ํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ฌํ์ง๋ฆฌ์์๋ ์ฌํ์ ๋ถ๊ณต์ ๊ณผ ๋ถ์ ์๋ ์ดํด๋ณด๋๋ก ์ ๋ํ๊ณ ์ฌํ์์ ์ฑ
๋ฌด์ฑ, ๊ณต์ ๊ณผ ๋์์ ๊ฐ์กฐํ์ง๋ง ์ฌํ์ ํน์ฑ์ ์ ์์ ์ฃผ์์ ๊ด์ ์ ๋ฒ์ด๋์ง ๋ชปํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ฌํ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ๋ค์์ฑ ์ดํด๋ ํ๊ต ์์
์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ํ ์ค์ํ ์ฝํ
์ธ ๋ฅผ ์ ๊ณตํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ ํ์์ ์
์ฅ์์ ๋ค์์ฑ์ ๊ด์กฐํ๊ฒ ๋ง๋ค๊ณ ์ง๋์น๊ฒ ๊ฐ๊ดํํจ์ผ๋ก์จ ๋ค์ํ ๊ฒฝ๊ด, ๋ฌธํ, ํ๊ฒฝ, ์ง์ญ๋ฌธ์ , ์ฌํ ๋ฑ์ ๋ํ ์ฌ์ธต์ ์ด๊ณ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ๋นํ์ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ์ํํ ํ ์๋ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋์ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ์ ์์ ์ฃผ์์ ๊ด์ ์ ์ฃผ๋ก ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์์ด์ ๋นํ์ ๊ด์ ๋ ํจ๊ป ๋ค๋ฃฐ ํ์๊ฐ ์๋ค. ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต์ฌ๋ ์ ์์ ์ฃผ์์ ๊ด์ ๊ณผ ๋นํ์ ๊ด์ ์ ๊ท ํ ์๊ฒ ๊ฐ์ง ์ญ๋ ์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ ์ก์ฑํ๋๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ฌํด์ผ ํ๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด์ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต์ฌ๋ ๋นํ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ์ฌ๊ฐ๋
ํํ๊ณ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต๊ณผ์์ ๋ด์ฉ์ ์ฌ๊ตฌ์ฑํ์ฌ ํ์๋ค์ด ์ผ์์ ์ถ ์์์ ์ธ๊ณ ๋ค์์ฑ์ ์ดํด์ ์ธ๊ณ ์์ ์์ ๋นํ์ ์ฐธ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ค์ฒํ ์ ์๋๋ก ๋ณํ์ ํ์ต์ ์งํฅํ ํ์๊ฐ ์๋ค.
An Exploratory Study on Applying Cooperative Learning in Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: Jonghun Kim ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the validity of cooperative learning as an effective teaching and learning model of Global Citizenship Education(GCED) and to suggest lesson plan that can be used in an educational setting. With the inclusion of GCED as part of global education agenda through the UN SDG 4.7, its role and importance has been highlighted globally and many countries started to reflect GCED into their national curriculum. However, there is lack of practical research on the appropriate teaching and learning model of GCED that can be applied in primary and secondary school education. Therefore, this study, through theoretical review, analyzed and identified that cooperative learning is more appropriate in fostering global citizenship in comparison with other teaching and learning models because of its efficient learning structure which includes positive interdependence, individual accountability, group processing, promotive interaction, interpersonal and small group social skills as its essential elements. On the basis of this, jigsaw model, among various cooperative learning models, was applied and a lesson plan on GCED based on UNESCO World Heritage, an important repository of the history of humankind and nature, was developed and presented. The proposed lesson plan would strengthen learnersโ ability to shape identities, understand others, raise sense of responsibility, link knowledge and action related to issues affecting interaction and connectedness of communities at local, national and global levels in an educational setting, and thus it will be useful in actualizing the learner-centered transformative objective of GCED.
ํ๋ํ์ต์ ์ ์ฉํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ฐฉ์ ํ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: ๊น์ข
ํ ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์ ํ๋๋ก ํ๋ํ์ต์ ํ๋น์ฑ์ ํ์ํด ๋ณด๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ํ์ฉ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ์ ์ํ๋ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ ๋์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ์(UN) ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ๋ฐ์ ๋ชฉํ(SDGs) 4.7์ ํฌํจ๋ ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ๊ต์ก์์ ๋ก ๊ทธ ์ญํ ๊ณผ ์ค์์ฑ์ด ์ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ถ๊ฐ๋จ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ๋ง์ ๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ค์ด ์๊ตญ์ ๊ณต๊ต์ก ๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ฐ์ํ๊ธฐ ์์ํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ผ์๋ ๋ถ๊ตฌํ๊ณ ์ดยท์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ์ ์ฉํ ์ ์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ํฉํ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๋ํ ์ค์ฒ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ถ์กฑํ ์ํฉ์ด๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ด๋ก ์ ๊ฒํ ๋ฅผ ํตํด ํ๋ํ์ต์ ๊ธ์ ์ ์ํธ์์กด์ฑ, ๊ฐ์ธ ์ฑ
๋ฌด์ฑ, ์ง๋จ๊ณผ์ , ์ด์ง์ ์ํธ์์ฉ, ๋์ธ๊ด๊ณ ๋ฐ ์ฌํ์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ ๋ณธ์ง์ ์์๋ก ํ๋ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ๋ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์ผ๋ก ๊ทธ ์์ฒด์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ํจ์ํ๋ ๋ฐ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ์ต๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์์ด ๋ค๋ฅธ ์ด๋ค ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๋ณด๋ค ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ํฉํ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์์ ๋ถ์ยท๊ท๋ช
ํ๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ ๋๋ก ๋ค์ํ ํ๋ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๋ค ์ค์์ ์ง์ ๋ชจํ์ ์ ์ฉํ์ฌ ์ธ๋ฅ ๋ฐ ์์ฐ์ ์ญ์ฌ๊ฐ ์ง์ฝ๋ ์ ๋ค์ค์ฝ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ฐ์ ์์ฌ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๊ฐ๋ฐยท์ ์ํ๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ์ ์ํ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ์์ ์ ์ ์ฒด์ฑ ํ์ฑ, ํ์ธ์ ๋ํ ์ดํด, ์ฑ
์์์ ํจ์, ์ง์ญยท๊ตญ๊ฐยท์ธ๊ณ์ฐจ์์์ ๊ณต๋์ฒด๊ฐ์ ์ํธ์์ฉ๊ณผ ์ฐ๊ณ์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ด์์ ๋ํ ์ง์๊ณผ ํ๋์ ์ฐ๊ณ๋ฅผ ๊ฐํํ์ฌ ํ์ต์ ์ค์ฌ์ ๋ณํ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ตฌํ์ ์ ์ฉํ๊ฒ ํ์ฉํ ์ ์์ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค.
An Analysis of the Global Citizenship of Youth Participated in Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: Kyunghee Park | Hwanbo Park | Namsoon Kim ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to analysis characteristics of the global citizenship for youth participated in global citizenship education and the factors influencing for global citizenship. To achieve this, the study surveyed around 300 youth participated in global citizenship education. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, global citizenship of youth participated in global citizenship education are generally higher than those of ordinary youth. Second, it was analyzed that the global citizenship was significantly higher for girls than boys; for the lower school level than higher; and for the ones having the greater experience with the mass media, overseas visits, and family communication. Factors influencing the global citizenship of youth participated in global citizenship education were influenced by school class, experience in mass media, gender, communication with family, and experience of visiting abroad. The results suggest that there is a need to think about ways to educate the global citizenship through everyday life, such as using various media and communicating with family as well as participating in education programs to improve the level of global citizenship.
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ฐธ์ฌ ์ฒญ์๋
์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ํฅ ๋ถ์ (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 1) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2018 ุงูู
ุคูู: ๋ฐ๊ฒฝํฌ | ๋ฐํ๋ณด | ๊น๋จ์ ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ฐธ์ฌ ์ฒญ์๋
์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ฒญ์๋
๋ค์ ๊ฒฝํ๊ณผ ํน์ฑ์ ํ์ธํ๋๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ๋์๋ฆฌ ํํ์ ํ์ตํ๋์ ๊ฒฝํํ ์ ๊ตญ์ ์ฒญ์๋
300๋ช
์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ์ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ค์ํ์ฌ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์๊ณผ ์ํฅ์์ธ๋ค์ ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ๋ถ์๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ฐธ์ฌ ์ฒญ์๋
๋ค์ ์ธ๊ณ ์๋ฏผ์์์ด ์ผ๋ฐ ์ฒญ์๋
๋ค์ ๋นํด ์ ์ํ๊ฒ ๋์ ์์ค์ธ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ํ์ธ๋์๋ค. ๋ค์์ผ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ์ฌํ์์ด ๋จํ์์ ๋นํด ๋์๊ณ , ํ๊ต๊ธ์ด ๋์์ง์๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ๋ฎ์์ก์ผ๋ฉฐ, ๋์ค๋งค์ฒด๋ฅผ ํตํ ์ ์ด ๊ฒฝํ๊ณผ ํด์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ ๊ฒฝํ, ๊ฐ์กฑ ๊ฐ ์์ฌ์ํต ์ ๋๊ฐ ๋ง์์๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ด ๋์์ง๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ฐธ์ฌ ์ฒญ์๋
์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์์ธ์ ํ๊ต๊ธ, ๋์ค๋งค์ฒด์์์ ์ ์ด ๊ฒฝํ, ์ฑ๋ณ, ๊ฐ์กฑ๊ฐ ์์ฌ์ํต, ํด์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ ๊ฒฝํ ์์ผ๋ก ์ํฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๋์๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ ์ฒญ์๋
๋ค์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์ ์์ค์ ๋์ด๋๋ฐ ์์ด ๊ต์ก ํ๋ก๊ทธ๋จ์์ ์ฐธ์ฌ ๋ฟ ์๋๋ผ ๋์ค๋งค์ฒด ํ์ฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ์กฑ ๊ฐ ์์ฌ์ํต ํ์ฑํ ๋ฑ ์ฒญ์๋
์ฃผ๋ณ์ ํํ ๋ณํ์ ๋ํ ๋
ธ๋ ฅ์ด ๋ณํ๋์ด์ผ ํจ์ ์์ฌํ๋ค.
The Institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education as a Global Policy Agenda (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณูุฉ ุงููุดุฑ: 2020 ุงูู
ุคูู: Jonghun Kim ุงูู
ุคูู ุงูู
ุคุณุณู: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study was to examine the driving forces that affect the global diffusion and institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education (GCED), which is rapidly emerging as an important global education agenda. In order to achieve the objective of this study, driving forces affecting the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED were categorized into three perspectives, namely, sociocultural perspective, international economic perspective and institutional perspective. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the degree of sociocultural diversity that represents sociocultural perspective did not have a statistically significant effect on education policies, curriculum and teacher education on GCED in each country. Second, the degree of dependence on international economic relations, which shows international economic perspective, had a positive statistically significant effect on the curriculum of GCED in countries around the world but it did not have a statistically significant effect on education policy and teacher education of GCED. Third, the degree of linkage to the global civil society that represents institutional perspective has a positive statistically significant effect on the GCED education policies, curricula and teacher education of different countries around the world. The results of this study show that institutional perspectives are more persuasive drivers of the spread and institutionalization of GCED in individual countries than from sociocultural perspective and international economic perspective. The result of this study shows that the adoption of policies for GCED is an institutional embodiment reflecting education norms and values at the global level embedded in an institutional environment of the world society rather than instrumental means that meet immediate and concrete socioeconomic needs and demands of individual countries. This study is of significance in that it has identified the driving forces for the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED through empirical analysis. 