ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุฑุฏ

ุงุณุชูƒุดู ู…ุฌู…ูˆุนุฉ ูˆุงุณุนุฉ ู…ู† ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุฑุฏ ุงู„ู‚ูŠู…ุฉ ุญูˆู„ ุชุนู„ูŠู… ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุทู†ุฉ ุงู„ุนุงู„ู…ูŠุฉ ู„ุชุนู…ูŠู‚ ูู‡ู…ูƒ ูˆุชุนุฒูŠุฒ ุงู„ุจุญุซ ูˆุงู„ู…ู†ุงุตุฑุฉ ูˆุงู„ุชุนู„ูŠู… ูˆุงู„ุชุนู„ู….

  • Searching...
ุจุญุซ ู…ุชู‚ุฏู…
ยฉ APCEIU

ุชู… ุงู„ุนุซูˆุฑ ุนู„ู‰ 2,255 ู†ุชูŠุฌุฉ

Critical Understanding on Shrinkage and Limitation of UKโ€™s Global Citizenship Education in the Era of Brexit (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2018 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Jinhee Kim ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study aims to analyze the shrinkage and limitation of Global Citizenship Education in the epoch of Brexit. It also attempts to examine a feature of positioning and direction of Global Citizenship Education which is confronted with a sceptical criticism of its' educational impact. In this vein, the major findings and arguments showed the practice and implementation of Global Citizenship Education under the pressure of Brexit faces complicated challenges across Europe including UK, since Brexit highly pursues national centred hegemony and nationalistic bloc. It could hinder the structural restriction of implementing of Global Citizenship Education in UK. Apparently, this study indicated that the phenomenon of Brexit and it's impact is functioning as dynamic learning contents, not for a teaching-learning resource. It has been discussed that Citizens of UK have strived to deal Brexit as a learning experience in life-world. Finally, this study suggests a direction to move forward of Global Citizenship Education in an ever-shrinking world of Brexit.  ๋ธŒ๋ ‰์‹œํŠธ ์‹œ๋Œ€ ์˜๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์œ„์ถ•๊ณผ ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ถ„์„: ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์ด ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐˆ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2018 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊น€์ง„ํฌ ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์˜๊ตญ์˜ ๋ธŒ๋ ‰์‹œํŠธ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดํ›„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์ด ์–ด๋–ค ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ, ์–ด ๋–ค ์Ÿ์ ๊ณผ ์ด์Šˆ๋กœ ์œ„์ถ•๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์œ„์ƒ์„ ๋‹ค์‹œ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ๋ธ”๋กํ™”๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ธŒ๋ ‰์‹œํŠธ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต ์œก๊ณผ ์–ด๋–ค ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š”์ง€ ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ์ œ์•ฝ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ์ง€ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜๊ตญ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ณผ์ •์— ์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹œ ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์˜๊ตญ์˜ ๋ธŒ๋ ‰์‹œํŠธ ์‚ฌํƒœ๋Š” โ€˜๊ฐ€๋ฅด์นจโ€™์œผ๋กœ์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ(text) ๋ฌธ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์น˜๋ถ€๋˜๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์‹œ๋ฏผ๋“ค์ด ํ•™์Šต ์ฃผ ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ ํƒˆ(่„ซ)์œ ๋Ÿฝํ™”๋ผ๋Š” ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ์ž๊ธฐ ์•ž์— ๋‹น๋„ํ•œ ์‚ถ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ, ๋ธŒ๋ ‰์‹œํŠธ๋ผ๋Š” ์‚ฌํƒœ๊ฐ€ ์‚ด์•„์žˆ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ(content) ์œผ๋กœ ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ํ”๋“ค๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ๊ต์œก์˜ ์œ„์ƒ๊ณผ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์„ฑ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  The Institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education as a Global Policy Agenda (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Jonghun Kim ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study was to examine the driving forces that affect the global diffusion and institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education (GCED), which is rapidly emerging as an important global education agenda. In order to achieve the objective of this study, driving forces affecting the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED were categorized into three perspectives, namely, sociocultural perspective, international economic perspective and institutional perspective. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the degree of sociocultural diversity that represents sociocultural perspective did not have a statistically significant effect on education policies, curriculum and teacher education on GCED in each country. Second, the degree of dependence on international economic relations, which shows international economic perspective, had a positive statistically significant effect on the curriculum of GCED in countries around the world but it did not have a statistically significant effect on education policy and teacher education of GCED. Third, the degree of linkage to the global civil society that represents institutional perspective has a positive statistically significant effect on the GCED education policies, curricula and teacher education of different countries around the world. The results of this study show that institutional perspectives are more persuasive drivers of the spread and institutionalization of GCED in individual countries than from sociocultural perspective and international economic perspective. The result of this study shows that the adoption of policies for GCED is an institutional embodiment reflecting education norms and values at the global level embedded in an institutional environment of the world society rather than instrumental means that meet immediate and concrete socioeconomic needs and demands of individual countries. This study is of significance in that it has identified the driving forces for the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED through empirical analysis.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊น€์ข…ํ›ˆ ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ… ์˜์ œ๋กœ ๊ธ‰๋ถ€์ƒํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ , ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค์ค‘ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์ˆ˜์ค€์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์กด ์ •๋„๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์—๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค์œผ๋‚˜, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์—๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์‚ฌํšŒ์™€์˜ ์—ฐ๊ณ„ ์ •๋„๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์ด ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์˜ ๋™์ธ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŽ์€ ์„ค๋“๋ ฅ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ •์ฑ… ๋„์ž…๊ณผ ์ถ”์ง„์ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ํŠน์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์ ยท๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ํ•„์š”์™€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ์ด๋ผ๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ธ๊ณ„์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ์ œ๋„์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์†์—์„œ ๋ฐฐํƒœ๋œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ทœ๋ฒ”๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œ๋„์  ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฌผ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ์‹ค์ฆ์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  Discourse on Peace-Oriented Citizenship in the Korean Peninsula: Form Unification Education in the Divided Society Into the Citizenship Education in the Peaceful Coexistence Era (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Soonwon Kang ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This paper puts emphasis on designing the peace-oriented citizenship education towards the peaceful coexistent era beyond unification education in the divided society, analyzing the limits and possibility of democratic citizenship education connected with unification education which has been reflected by the peace process of present governments since liberation from the colonial period in 1945. According to the changes of unification education connected the peace process of each government, the name of historical subjects to take the initiative to overcome the division has been changed from civics saving the country to patriotic nation and onto the democratic citizen. Since Yushin reformation period, raising the democratic citizenship has been set up as the goal of unification education. But some critics of democratic citizenship were given to the limitation of the democratic citizen on overcoming the division and realizing peaceful coexistence and to the birth of hybrid citizenship with national commonality, Asian citizenship and global citizenship to challenge Korean peninsula agenda. Thus peaceยทunification education beyond division should be reconceptualized on the ground of the discourse of peace-oriented citizenship, which is applied to North Korea and South Korea as a global peace education framework.  ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๊ต์œก๋‹ด๋ก : ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‹œ๋Œ€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊ฐ•์ˆœ์› ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•ด๋ฐฉ ํ›„ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ณ€์ฒœ์‚ฌ์— ๋ฐ˜์˜๋œ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ์ ‘๋ชฉ๋œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์—ฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋‹ด๊ธธ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๋‹ด๋ก ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •๊ถŒ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ‰ํ™”ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ง์ ‘์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค๊ณ  ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ขŒ์šฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋‹จ๋œ ํ•œ๊ตญ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•  ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ ํ˜ธ๊ตญ๊ณต๋ฏผ์—์„œ ์• ๊ตญ์• ์กฑ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์„œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋…์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ ์œ ์‹ ์‹œ๋Œ€์ด๋ž˜ ์„ค์ •๋œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ์ž์งˆ ํ•จ์–‘์ด ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ ์žก์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•  ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์ด ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ทน๋ณต์„ ์ฃผ๋„ํ•  ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋…์ธ๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ฉด์„œ, ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•  ์‹œ๋ฏผ์€ ๋ฏผ์กฑ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ ์œ„์— ์•„์‹œ์•„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๊ทธ ์œ„์— ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ํ˜ผ์ข…ํ•œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ํ•จ์–‘ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹ด๋ก ์˜ ์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‹œ๋Œ€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„  ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์  ํƒœ์ธ ํ‰ํ™”ยทํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋„ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๋‹ด๋ก ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.  An Analysis of the Factors Affecting East-Asian Adultsโ€™ Global Citizenship: Social capital, Threat Recognition, Information Media Utilization (Journal of Education for International Understanding; vol.16, no.3) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2021 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Seongkyeong Jeong | Yura Lee | Hwanbo Park ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This paper puts an in-depth study on identifying the characteristics of factors related to global citizenship in adults from South Korea, China, and Japan and analyzing the elements affecting them. For this purpose, data from the 7th World Value Survey which was undertaken in South Korea, China, and Japan were used, and they were examined with three different perspectives of social capital, threat recognition, and information media utilization to get to know the influence of variables from various aspects. Multiple regression was applied for this and the results are as follows. Firstly, the global citizenship of adults was high in the order of China, Japan, and South Korea, and the factors influencing global citizenship depend on the country. This implies that contextual factors are acting differently in the formation of the global citizenship of adults even they are from the same East Asian region. Secondly, simple contact with immigrants and foreigners in China and Japan has negative effects while having a positive effect on trust in foreigners. This suggests that an educational mechanism is required to raise trust and empathy beyond understanding immigrants simply to foster global citizenship among Chinese and Japanese adults. Thirdly, depending on the hierarchy of the sense of belonging, the impact on global citizenship was different in South Korea. Educational activities and programs should be implemented to establish the sense of global citizenship of adults in South Korea. Fourthly, the treat perception of social safety and employment insecurity in South Korea and China did not have statistical significance to global citizenship. While the higher the social safety perception the heavier the employment insecurity, adults in Japan had higher global citizenship awareness. This implies that Japanese adults perceive the problems of immigration as a matter of national or social situation and structure. Finally, the utilization of information media in all countries revealed statistical significance, which means that attitude for immigrants would vary depending on which information medica is used from those three countries.   ๋™์•„์‹œ์•„ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹ ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ ๋ถ„์„: ์‚ฌํšŒ์ž๋ณธ, ์œ„ํ˜‘์ธ์‹, ์ •๋ณด๋งค์ฒดํ™œ์šฉ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; vol.16, no.3) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2021 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ์ •์„ฑ๊ฒฝ | ์ด์œ ๋ผ | ๋ฐ•ํ™˜๋ณด ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ, ์ค‘๊ตญ, ์ผ๋ณธ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹ ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ  ์ด์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์„ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ธ๊ณ„๊ฐ€์น˜๊ด€์กฐ์‚ฌ 7์ฐจ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ํ•œ๊ตญ, ์ค‘๊ตญ, ์ผ๋ณธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ์ž๋ณธ, ์œ„ํ˜‘์ธ์‹, ์ •๋ณด๋งค์ฒดํ™œ์šฉ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ค‘๋‹คํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š”๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์€ ์ค‘๊ตญ, ์ผ๋ณธ, ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์ˆœ์„œ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์š”์ธ์€ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ณ„๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ™์€ ๋™์•„์‹œ์•„ ์ง€์—ญ์ด๋”๋ผ๋„ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์š”์ธ์ด ๊ฐ๊ธฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ผ๋ณธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ฏผ์ž, ์™ธ๊ตญ์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ์ ‘์ด‰์€ ๋ถ€์ •์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„, ์™ธ๊ตญ์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋Š” ๊ธ์ •์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ผ๋ณธ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์ด๋ฏผ์ž๋ฅผ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์™€ ๊ณต๊ฐ์„ ๋Œ์–ด๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ต์œก์  ๊ธฐ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ์†๊ฐ์˜ ์œ„๊ณ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ƒ์ดํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•œ๊ตญ ์„ฑ์ธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ ์†Œ์†๊ฐ์„ ๊ต์œก ํ™œ๋™๊ณผ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์— ์ ๊ทน ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋„ท์งธ, ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ค‘๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ์•ˆ์ „์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๊ณ ์šฉ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์œ„ํ˜‘์ธ์‹์ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์— ์•„๋ฌด๋Ÿฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ผ๋ณธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ์•ˆ์ „์ธ์‹์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ณ ์šฉ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ด ์•‰์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์ด ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ผ๋ณธ ์„ฑ์ธ์€ ์ด๋ฏผ์ž ์ˆ˜์šฉ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋‚˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ƒํ™ฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์—์„œ ์ •๋ณด๋งค์ฒดํ™œ์šฉ์ด ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์„ธ ๋‚˜๋ผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์–ด๋–ค ์ •๋ณด๋งค์ฒด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋А๋ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด๋ฏผ์ž ํƒœ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.   Discourses on Global Citizenship Education in Africa: Questioning and Answering from a Post-Colonial Perspective (Journal of Education for International Understanding; vol.16, no.3) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2021 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Yoonjung Choi | Yeji Kim ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) Theoretically framed by post-colonialism and critical global citizenship education(GCED), this study explored major discourses on and practices of GCED in African countries through the use of a systematic review method. The findings demonstrated that studies related to GCED in African countries pointed out the limitations of state-centered civic education based on uncritical patriotism and passive citizenship, and further emphasize the importance of promoting more critical and reflective GCED. In addition, research emphasized the implementation of alternative and unique GCED education unique built on indigenous African knowledge and philosophy. This study provides significant insights into GCED in the context of South Korea and discusses the pursuit of globally oriented, sustainable GCED aiming for peace and solidarity around the world.  ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋™ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„์ „: ํƒˆ์‹๋ฏผ์ฃผ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ์—์„œ ๋ฌป๊ณ  ๋‹ตํ•˜๋‹ค (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; vol.16, no.3) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2021 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ์ตœ์œค์ • | ๊น€์˜ˆ์ง€ ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํƒˆ์‹๋ฏผ์ฃผ์˜ ์ธ์‹๋ก ๊ณผ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ด๋ก ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋™ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋ก€, ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹ด๋ก ์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์  ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณ ์ฐฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ฌด๋น„ํŒ์  ์• ๊ตญ์‹ฌ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ค‘์‹ฌ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ง€์ ํ•˜๊ณ , ํƒˆ์‹๋ฏผ์ฃผ์˜์  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์‹ค์ฒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„œ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ด๋ก ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋‹ต์Šตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํƒˆ์‹๋ฏผ์ฃผ์˜์™€ ํ† ์ฐฉ ์ง€์‹์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์„ ๋‘”, ์ง€์—ญ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งฅ๋ฝํ™”๋œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์—ญ์„คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋‹ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ด ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์— ์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ๊ณผ ์˜์˜๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ํ‰ํ™”์™€ ๊ณต์กด, ์—ฐ๋Œ€, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„โ€™์ ์ธ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.