الموارد
استكشف مجموعة واسعة من الموارد القيمة حول تعليم المواطنة العالمية لتعميق فهمك وتعزيز البحث والمناصرة والتعليم والتعلم.
تم العثور على 1,396 نتيجة
Evaluation of UNESCO's Programme Interventions on Girls' and Women's Education سنة النشر: 2017 المؤلف: Michael Reynolds, Martina Rathner, Estelle Loiseau المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO Internal Oversight Service (IOS) Since 2008, Gender Equality has been one of two global priorities for UNESCO. In May 2011, UNESCO launched the Global Partnership for Girls’ and Women’s Education, also known as “Better Life, Better Future”, which aims to increase learning opportunities for adolescent girls and women and to find solutions to some of the biggest obstacles to their education. To further advance the global priority of Gender Equality, since 2015 a dedicated Section of Education for Inclusion and Gender Equality specifically addresses the gender dimensions in education that contribute to differential access, participation, completion, and learning outcomes by boys and girls, and men and women. The evaluation examines UNESCO’s programme interventions in girls’ and women’s education during the period 2015 to 2017, in particular to ascertain the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of initiatives, and to clarify the strategic role and positioning of the Organization in supporting girls’ and women’s education at regional and country levels.The evaluation found that although UNESCO’s efforts for enhancing girls’ and women’s education are clearly aligned to SDG 4 and SDG 5 and also broadly in line with the overall principle of leaving no one behind, there is at times a trade-off between targeting the hardest to reach and other donor priorities, and UNESCO needs to more clearly position its efforts in support of girls’ and women’s education and its niche in the 2030 Agenda. Furthermore, continued efforts are required to scale up and/or replicate small-scale interventions, to better ensure sustainability and to consolidate mechanisms for coordination and information sharing among different interventions to seize synergies and enhance organizational learning. 
Chile: Artificial Intelligence Readiness Assessment Report سنة النشر: 2023 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO The Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) is a diagnostic tool intended to assist Member States in upholding their commitment to the Recommendation by helping them understand how prepared they are to implement AI ethically and responsibly for all their citizens. The RAM questionnaire forms the basis for the first section of this readiness assessment report, providing a comprehensive but detailed overview of laws, institutions, and the cultural, social, and human capital landscape shaping AI. This is then complemented in the second section by a summary of concerns and priorities raised during a national multistakeholder consultation that was conducted in 2023. Finally, the third section presents a roadmap and recommendations for building capacities across national institutions, laws and policies, and human capital, to achieve a responsible AI ecosystem aligned with the UNESCO Recommendation. As the very first country to complete the RAM and the country report, Chile is blazing the trail not only for Latin America but the world. We applaud the initiative the Chilean government has taken to update its AI strategy putting ethics and governance front and centre, and thank them for inviting UNESCO to assist in this endeavour. The report presented here reveals a complex and rapidly-changing landscape. In the legal and regulatory dimension, the 2021 National Artificial Intelligence Policy (NAIP) represents a substantive and wide-ranging commitment to developing AI. One of the key recommendations of this report is to fully integrate the UNESCO Recommendation into the NAIP’s axis of Ethics, Regulation, and Socioeconomic Impacts. Notably, the RAM reveals the pressing need to update legislation around data protection and cybersecurity to meet the challenges of AI. It also highlights several areas the Chilean government is actively working to develop. [...] Overall, this report presents a fundamentally optimistic vision that we at UNESCO share: that ethical governance and responsible regulation of AI is entirely consistent with innovation and economic growth, and is essential for ensuring a technological ecosystem that benefits the public good. In drawing a clear line from the RAM data through to the multistakeholder consultations and the recommendations, Chile has a clear roadmap for how to get there. (This text has been extracted from the Foreword of the publication) 
High Level Ministerial Dialogue on Education for Peace سنة النشر: 2023 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO This High-level event brought together voices from around the world to discuss what quality and relevant education needs to look like today to bring about real and lasting peace. 
National Distance Learning Programmes in Response to the COVID-19 Education Disruption: Case Study of the Republic of Korea سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO This document is one of several case studies on national distance learning programmes in response to the COVID-19 education disruptions. The case of the Republic of Korea was drawn from the 2020 edition of Mobile Learning Week, organized online in October 2020 under the theme of 'Beyond Disruption: Technology Enabled Learning Futures'. Envisaged to be a continuously enriched mechanism for knowledge sharing and dissemination, the case studies aim to surface best practices worldwide in leveraging digital technology to build inclusive and crisis-resilient learning systems, and to inform the planning of digital transformation of education towards SDG 4 and the futures of learning. Each case study documents governance and funding mechanisms, needs-driven planning of distance learning solutions, evaluation of digital learning’s effects on mitigating disruptions and ensuring inclusion, and pedagogical innovations to maintain or improve the quality of learning. 
[Summary] Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state Actors in Education; Who Chooses? Who Loses? سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO يمتد دور الجهات الفاعلة غير الحكومية إلى ما هو أبعد من توفير التعليم ليشمل التدخلات على مستويات التعليم المختلفة ومجالات التأثير. إلى جانب استعراضه للتقدم المحرز نحو الهدف 4 من أهداف التنمية المستدامة ، بما في ذلك الأدلة الناشئة على تأثير جائحة COVID-19 ، يحث التقرير العالمي لرصد التعليم 2021/2 الحكومات على رؤية جميع المؤسسات والطلاب والمعلمين كجزء من نظام واحد. يجب أن تساعد المعايير والمعلومات والحوافز والمساءلة الحكومات على حماية واحترام وإعمال الحق في التعليم للجميع ، دون إبعاد أعينهم عن الامتيازات أو الاستغلال. لا يلزم توفير التعليم الممول من القطاع العام بشكل عام ولكن يجب معالجة التفاوت في عمليات التعليم ونتائج الطلاب وظروف عمل المعلم. الكفاءة والابتكار ، بدلا من أن يكونا أسرارا تجارية ، ينبغي نشرها وممارستها من قبل الجميع. وتحقيقا لهذه الغاية ، يجب الحفاظ على الشفافية والنزاهة في عملية سياسة التعليم العام لمنع المصالح المكتسبة. نداء التقرير - من يختار؟ من يخسر؟ - يدعو صانعي السياسات إلى التشكيك في العلاقات مع الجهات الفاعلة غير الحكومية من حيث الخيارات الأساسية: بين الإنصاف وحرية الاختيار ؛ بين تشجيع المبادرة ووضع المعايير ؛ بين مجموعات مختلفة من الوسائل والاحتياجات ؛ بين الالتزامات الفورية بموجب الهدف 4 من أهداف التنمية المستدامة وتلك التي يتعين تحقيقها تدريجياً (مثل التعليم ما بعد الثانوي) ؛ وبين التعليم والقطاعات الاجتماعية الأخرى. [Summary] Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state Actors in Education: Who Chooses? Who Loses? سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO Non-state actors’ role extends beyond provision of schooling to interventions at various education levels and influence spheres. Alongside its review of progress towards SDG 4, including emerging evidence on the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact, the 2021/2 Global Education Monitoring Report urges governments to see all institutions, students and teachers as part of a single system. Standards, information, incentives and accountability should help governments protect, respect and fulfill the right to education of all, without turning their eyes away from privilege or exploitation. Publicly funded education does not have to be publicly provided but disparity in education processes, student outcomes and teacher working conditions must be addressed. Efficiency and innovation, rather than being commercial secrets, should be diffused and practiced by all. To that end, transparency and integrity in the public education policy process need to be maintained to block vested interests. The report’s rallying call – Who chooses? Who loses? – invites policymakers to question relationships with non-state actors in terms of fundamental choices: between equity and freedom of choice; between encouraging initiative and setting standards; between groups of varying means and needs; between immediate commitments under SDG 4 and those to be progressively realized (e.g. post-secondary education); and between education and other social sectors. [Resumen] Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2021/2: Los actores no estatales en la educación; ¿quién elige? ¿quién pierde? سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO El papel de los actores no estatales se extiende más allá de la escolarización a las intervenciones en diferentes niveles educativos y esferas de influencia. Junto con su revisión del progreso hacia el ODS 4, incluida la evidencia emergente sobre el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19, el Informe de Seguimiento de la Educación en el Mundo 2021/2 insta a los gobiernos a considerar a todas las instituciones, estudiantes y docentes como parte de un solo sistema. Los estándares, la información, los incentivos y la rendición de cuentas deberían ayudar a los gobiernos a proteger, respetar y cumplir el derecho a la educación para todos, sin apartar la vista de los privilegios o la explotación. La educación financiada por el estado no tiene que ser proporcionada por el estado, pero se debe abordar la disparidad en los procesos educativos, los resultados de los estudiantes y las condiciones de trabajo de los maestros. La eficiencia y la innovación, en lugar de ser secretos comerciales, deben ser compartidos y practicados por todos. Con este fin, se debe mantener la transparencia e integridad del proceso de formulación de políticas de educación pública para bloquear los intereses creados. El grito de guerra del informe: ¿Quién elige? ¿Quién pierde? – invita a los responsables de la toma de decisiones políticas a cuestionar las relaciones con los actores no estatales en términos de elecciones fundamentales: entre equidad y libertad de elección; entre fomentar la iniciativa y establecer estándares; entre grupos de diferentes medios y necesidades; entre los compromisos inmediatos bajo el ODS 4 y los que se lograrán gradualmente (por ejemplo, educación postsecundaria); y entre la educación y otros sectores sociales. [Résumé] Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation, 2021-2022: Les acteurs non étatiques dans l’éducation; Qui décide? qui est perdant? سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO Le rôle des acteurs non étatiques s'étend au-delà de la scolarisation à des interventions à différents niveaux d'éducation et sphères d'influence. Parallèlement à son examen des progrès vers l'ODD 4, y compris les preuves émergentes sur l'impact de la pandémie de COVID-19, le Rapport mondial de suivi sur l'éducation 2021/2 exhorte les gouvernements à considérer tous les établissements, étudiants et enseignants comme faisant partie d'un système unique. Les normes, l'information, les incitations et la responsabilité devraient aider les gouvernements à protéger, respecter et réaliser le droit à l'éducation de tous, sans détourner les yeux des privilèges ou de l'exploitation. L'éducation financée par l'État n'a pas à être fournie par l'État, mais la disparité dans les processus éducatifs, les résultats des élèves et les conditions de travail des enseignants doit être abordée. L'efficacité et l'innovation, plutôt que d'être des secrets commerciaux, doivent être diffusées et pratiquées par tous. À cette fin, la transparence et l'intégrité du processus d'élaboration des politiques d'éducation publique doivent être maintenues pour bloquer les intérêts acquis. Le cri de ralliement du rapport – Qui choisit ? Qui perd ? – invite les décideurs politiques à questionner les relations avec les acteurs non étatiques en termes de choix fondamentaux : entre équité et liberté de choix ; entre l'incitation à l'initiative et l'établissement de normes ; entre des groupes aux moyens et aux besoins variés ; entre les engagements immédiats au titre de l'ODD 4 et ceux à concrétiser progressivement (par exemple, l'enseignement postsecondaire) ; et entre l'éducation et les autres secteurs sociaux. [요약본] 세계 교육 현황 보고서 2021/2: 비국가 행위자의 교육 참여; 누가 선택을 하는가? 누가 손해를 보는가? سنة النشر: 2022 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO 비국가 행위자는 학교 교육 제공을 넘어 다양한 교육단계 및 영향력 있는 영역에까지 그 역할을 확장하고 있다. 2021/2022 『세계 교육 현황 보고서』는 SDG4의 진행 상황을 검토하고 더불어 코로나19 팬데믹의 영향에 대한 새로운 증거를 포함하고 있다. 본 보고서는 정부가 모든 교육기관, 학생 및 교사를 하나의 시스템으로 인식해야 한다고 촉구하고 있다. 표준, 정보, 인센티브 및 책무성은 정부가 특권이나 착취로부터 눈을 돌리지 않으면서 모든 사람의 교육권을 보호, 존중, 이행하는 데 도움이 되어야 한다. 공적 자금을 지원받은 교육이 반드시 공교육일 필요는 없지만, 교육 과정과 학업 성취도, 교사 근무 여건의 불균형은 해결되어야 한다. 효율성과 혁신은 상업적인 비밀이 되어서는 안 되고, 오히려 모든 사람이 공유하고 실행해야 한다. 이를 달성하기 위해서는 공교육 정책 과정의 투명성과 청렴성을 유지해야 한다.이 보고서가 외치고 있는 구호인 “누가 선택을 하는가? 누가 손해를 보는가?”는 정책 입안자가 선택의 자유와 형평성 사이, 이니셔티브 장려와 표준 설정 사이, 수단과 요구가 다른 인구 집단 사이, 즉각적인 약속과 점진적으로 실현되어야 할 약속 사이, 교육부문과 다른 사회부문 사이에서의 기본적인 선택의 관점에서 비국가 행위자와의 관계에 대해 의문을 제기할 것을 요청한다. 
Implementation of Sexuality Education in Middle Schools in China سنة النشر: 2018 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO Beijing | United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) This research report describes the current situation and problems with the implementation of sex education in schools in China, and makes relevant recommendations for policy makers and schools.