الموارد
استكشف مجموعة واسعة من الموارد القيمة حول تعليم المواطنة العالمية لتعميق فهمك وتعزيز البحث والمناصرة والتعليم والتعلم.
تم العثور على 3,448 نتيجة
Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education; All Means All سنة النشر: 2020 المؤلف المؤسسي: Global Education Monitoring Report Team | UNESCO The 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report looks at social, economic and cultural mechanisms that discriminate against disadvantaged children, youth and adults, keeping them out of education or marginalized in it. Spurred by their commitment to fulfil the right to inclusive education, countries are expanding their vision of inclusion in education to put diversity at the core of their systems. Yet implementation of well-meaning laws and policies often falters. Released at the start of the decade of action to 2030, and in the middle of the Covid-19 crisis, which has exacerbated underlying inequalities, the Report argues that resistance to addressing every learner’s needs is a real threat to achieving global education targets. Inclusion and education: All means all identifies the practices in governance and finance; curricula, textbooks and assessments; teacher education; school infrastructure; and relations with students, parents and communities that can unlock the process to inclusion. It provides policy recommendations to make learner diversity a strength to be celebrated, a force for social cohesion. Two new websites complement the fourth edition of the Global Education Monitoring Report. PEER describes how countries approach inclusion, serving as a resource for policy dialogue. SCOPE offers an opportunity to interact with the data and explore selected SDG 4 indicators.
Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation 2020: Inclusion et éducation ; Tous, sans exception سنة النشر: 2020 المؤلف المؤسسي: Global Education Monitoring Report Team | Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO) L’édition 2020 du Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation examine les mécanismes sociaux, économiques et culturels qui discriminent les enfants, les jeunes et les adultes défavorisés, les tenant à l’écart de l’éducation ou les marginalisant en son sein. Encouragés par leur engagement à réaliser le droit à l’éducation inclusive, les pays élargissent leur vision de l’inclusion dans l’éducation afin de placer la diversité au cœur de leurs systèmes. Pourtant, la mise en œuvre de lois et de politiques bien intentionnées échoue souvent. Publié au début de la décennie d’action à l’horizon 2030, et en pleine crise de COVID-19 qui a exacerbé les inégalités existantes, rapport affirme que la résistance à la prise en compte des besoins de chaque apprenant constitue une menace réelle pour la réalisation des objectifs mondiaux d’éducation. Inclusion et éducation : Tous, sans exception recense les pratiques en matière de gouvernance et de financement, de programmes, de manuels et d’évaluations, de formation des enseignants, d’infrastructures scolaires et de relations avec les élèves, les parents et les communautés, qui peuvent enclencher le processus menant à l’inclusion. Il fournit des recommandations stratégiques pour faire de la diversité des apprenants une force à célébrer, une force de cohésion sociale. Deux nouveaux sites web complètent cette quatrième édition du Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation. PEER décrit la manière dont les pays abordent l’inclusion, et sert de ressource pour le dialogue sur les politiques. SCOPE offre la possibilité d’interagir avec les données et d’explorer un choix d’indicateurs de l’ODD 4.
[Summary] Global Education Monitoring Report Summary 2019: Migration, Displacement and Education: Building Bridges, Not Walls سنة النشر: 2018 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO | Global Education Monitoring Report Team This Report points directly to a major challenge: How can teachers be supported to practise inclusion? It offers us fascinating insights into humanity and the age-old phenomenon of migration. I invite you to consider its recommendations and to act on them. This report is a vital toolkit for these compacts. It covers policy issues that address seasonal migrants, rural school consolidation, intercultural curricula, refugee inclusion in national education systems and elimination of segregation, qualifications recognition, targeting of school funding, more effective humanitarian education aid and teacher preparedness for diverse classrooms in emergency, protracted and “new normal” contexts. This summary of the 2019 GEM Report calls on countries to see education as a tool to manage migration and displacement and an opportunity for those needing one.
Monitoring the implementation of the Lisbon Recognition Convention - Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 23 سنة النشر: 2019 المؤلف المؤسسي: UNESCO | Council of Europe In accordance with the Lisbon Recognition Convention, the Committee of the Convention shall oversee its implementation and guide the competent authorities in implementing the convention and in their consideration of applications for the recognition of foreign qualifications. The Rules of procedure (adopted by the Committee in Vilnius in 1999) reiterate this role – the function of the Committee is to promote the application of the convention and oversee its implementation. Article II. of the convention states that where the central authorities of a party are competent to make decisions in recognition cases, that party shall be immediately bound by the provisions of the convention and shall take the necessary measures to ensure the implementation of its provisions on its territory. Where the competence to make decisions in recognition matters lies with individual higher education institutions or other entities, each party, according to its constitutional situation or structure, shall transmit the text of this convention to those institutions or entities and shall take all possible steps to encourage the favourable consideration and application of its provisions. The provisions of Article II. are central to determining the obligations of the parties to the convention. This article places upon these parties an obligation to make sure that information on the provisions is disseminated to all competent recognition authorities, and that these institutions are encouraged to abide by the convention (Explanatory report to the convention). The objective of this monitoring exercise has been to oversee the implementation of the main provisions of the convention and to report to parties on the outcome of this monitoring, presenting the main findings and recommendations. This monitoring report is also a contribution to the commitment set out in the Yerevan Communiqué (2015) to review national legislation to ensure full compliance with the convention, and to ask the Convention Committee, in co-operation with the ENIC (Council of Europe and UNESCO European Network of National Information Centres on academic recognition and mobility) and NARIC (EU Network of National Academic Recognition Information Centres) networks, to prepare an analysis of the national legislation reports by the end of 2017, taking due account of this monitoring report. This is the first monitoring of implementation of the Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) since its signature in 1997. The questionnaire used for the monitoring exercise was drawn up by the Bureau of the Convention Committee, namely Gunnar Vaht, President of the Committee, Gayane Harutyunyan, Vice-President, Allan Bruun Pedersen, Vice-President, and Baiba Ramina, Rapporteur, together with the joint Council of Europe/UNESCO Secretariat. The monitoring covers the 10 main provisions of the convention and comprises 22 questions relating to implementation of the main principles. The questions focus primarily on how the convention requirements are regulated at national level and to what extent the rules are reflected in national legislation. In cases where some or all of the provisions are not regulated at national level and where the higher education institutions have total autonomy in establishing the principles of the convention, the aim has been to discover how national authorities oversee implementation of the principles of the convention at institutional level. As stated above, the objective of this monitoring report is to monitor implementation of the convention by the parties to the convention. The executive summary focuses on the key findings and the conclusions focus on the recommendations made by the Convention Committee Bureau, which will require political decisions from the Convention Committee and from national authorities for follow-up action. The various chapters of the report elaborate further on both the key findings and the recommendations. The questionnaire was sent to 53 states parties to the LRC, and replies were received from 50 countries. The initial deadline given was 15 February 2015, but this was extended to June 2015. The analysis by the members of the Convention Committee Bureau took place from June to November 2015 and was assisted and reviewed by the Council of Europe and UNESCO, the joint Secretariat of the LRCC Bureau. 