ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุฑุฏ

ุงุณุชูƒุดู ู…ุฌู…ูˆุนุฉ ูˆุงุณุนุฉ ู…ู† ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุฑุฏ ุงู„ู‚ูŠู…ุฉ ุญูˆู„ ุชุนู„ูŠู… ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุทู†ุฉ ุงู„ุนุงู„ู…ูŠุฉ ู„ุชุนู…ูŠู‚ ูู‡ู…ูƒ ูˆุชุนุฒูŠุฒ ุงู„ุจุญุซ ูˆุงู„ู…ู†ุงุตุฑุฉ ูˆุงู„ุชุนู„ูŠู… ูˆุงู„ุชุนู„ู….

  • Searching...
ุจุญุซ ู…ุชู‚ุฏู…
ยฉ APCEIU

ุชู… ุงู„ุนุซูˆุฑ ุนู„ู‰ 331 ู†ุชูŠุฌุฉ

Development of Global Citizenship Education Competence Scale for Early Childhood Teacher (The Journal of Korean Teacher Education; Vol.35, No.4) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2018 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Jeoungsook Kim | Kyeonghwa Lee ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education The study aims to develop a scale to identify and measure the early childhood teacherโ€™s competence for global citizenship education. In order to construct the factors of the teacherโ€™s competence for global citizenship education, conceptualization of the competence was made based on the review of literatures, and then the preliminary scale was constructed through 3 time-Delphi survey of 34 expert panels. The content analysis and statistical analysis (content validity, consensus, and convergence) of the data collected through the Delphi survey revealed that the final version of the scale with 2 domains, 5 factors and 33 items was derived. Then, in order to validate the final version of the scale, the tests with early childhood teachers were carried out. The data collected through the final test of 294 early childhood teachers were statistically analyzed through the ratio of content reliability, validity, and reliability. The analysis was confirmed that the scale was a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the early childhood teacherโ€™s competence for global citizenship education. In conclusion, the scale developed in this study consisted of two domains: the competence as a global citizen and the competence as a early childhood teacher to carry out global citizen education for young children. The global citizenship competence consists of 3 factors and 20 items, and the global citizenship education competence for young children consists of 2 factors and 13 items. Lastly, the possibility of using the scale for early childhood teacher education was discussed.  ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฒ™๋„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ (ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ต์›๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol.35, No.3) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2018 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊น€์ •์ˆ™ | ์ด๊ฒฝํ™” ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ต์›๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‘์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰ ์š”์ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ํ›„, 3 ํšŒ์— ๊ฑธ์นœ 34๋ช… ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ํŒจ๋„์˜ ๋ธํŒŒ์ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฒ™๋„ ์‹œ์•ˆ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 1์ฐจ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉํ˜• ์กฐ ์‚ฌ์™€ 2์ฐจ ๋ฐ 3์ฐจ์˜ 5์  ์ฒ™๋„ํ˜• ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 2๊ฐœ ์˜์—ญ, 5์š”์ธ, 33 ๊ฐœ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ฒ™๋„์˜ ์ตœ์ข…์‹œ์•ˆ์ด ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒ™๋„์˜ ์ตœ์ข…์‹œ์•ˆ์„ ํƒ€๋‹นํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์œ ์น˜์› ๋ฐ ์–ด๋ฆฐ์ด์ง‘ ์žฌ์ง ์ค‘์ธ ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ๋น„์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๋ณธ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€ ๋‹ค. 60๋ช…์˜ ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œํ•œ ์˜ˆ๋น„์กฐ์‚ฌ์™€ 294๋ช…์˜ ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์–ป์€ ๋ณธ์กฐ์‚ฌ ์ž ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์–‘ํ˜ธ๋„, ๊ตฌ์ธํƒ€๋‹น๋„, ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋“ฑ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ์„œ ์–‘ํ˜ธํ•œ ์ฒ™๋„์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ฒ™๋„๋Š” ์œ ์•„๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰(์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰)๊ณผ ์œ ์•„์—๊ฒŒ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ต์‚ฌ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰(์œ ์•„์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰)์˜ 2๊ฐœ ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜ ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ์ดํ•ด, ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ํƒœ๋„ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ฒœ์˜ 3์š”์ธ, 20๊ฐœ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์œ ์•„์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์œ ์•„์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์šด์˜, ์œ ์•„์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์‹ค์ฒœ์˜ 2์š”์ธ, 13๊ฐœ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฒ™๋„์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์ธ์˜ ์˜๋ฏธ์™€ ์ฒ™๋„์˜ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์  ํ™œ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€ํ•ด ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  Discourse on Peace-Oriented Citizenship in the Korean Peninsula: Form Unification Education in the Divided Society Into the Citizenship Education in the Peaceful Coexistence Era (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Soonwon Kang ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This paper puts emphasis on designing the peace-oriented citizenship education towards the peaceful coexistent era beyond unification education in the divided society, analyzing the limits and possibility of democratic citizenship education connected with unification education which has been reflected by the peace process of present governments since liberation from the colonial period in 1945. According to the changes of unification education connected the peace process of each government, the name of historical subjects to take the initiative to overcome the division has been changed from civics saving the country to patriotic nation and onto the democratic citizen. Since Yushin reformation period, raising the democratic citizenship has been set up as the goal of unification education. But some critics of democratic citizenship were given to the limitation of the democratic citizen on overcoming the division and realizing peaceful coexistence and to the birth of hybrid citizenship with national commonality, Asian citizenship and global citizenship to challenge Korean peninsula agenda. Thus peaceยทunification education beyond division should be reconceptualized on the ground of the discourse of peace-oriented citizenship, which is applied to North Korea and South Korea as a global peace education framework.  ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๊ต์œก๋‹ด๋ก : ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‹œ๋Œ€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊ฐ•์ˆœ์› ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•ด๋ฐฉ ํ›„ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ณ€์ฒœ์‚ฌ์— ๋ฐ˜์˜๋œ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ์ ‘๋ชฉ๋œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์—ฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋‹ด๊ธธ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๋‹ด๋ก ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •๊ถŒ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ‰ํ™”ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ง์ ‘์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค๊ณ  ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ขŒ์šฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋‹จ๋œ ํ•œ๊ตญ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•  ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ ํ˜ธ๊ตญ๊ณต๋ฏผ์—์„œ ์• ๊ตญ์• ์กฑ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์„œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋…์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ ์œ ์‹ ์‹œ๋Œ€์ด๋ž˜ ์„ค์ •๋œ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ์ž์งˆ ํ•จ์–‘์ด ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ ์žก์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•  ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฏผ์ด ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ทน๋ณต์„ ์ฃผ๋„ํ•  ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋…์ธ๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ฉด์„œ, ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•  ์‹œ๋ฏผ์€ ๋ฏผ์กฑ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ ์œ„์— ์•„์‹œ์•„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๊ทธ ์œ„์— ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ํ˜ผ์ข…ํ•œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ํ•จ์–‘ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹ด๋ก ์˜ ์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ถ„๋‹จ์‹œ๋Œ€ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„  ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋Œ€ ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์  ํƒœ์ธ ํ‰ํ™”ยทํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋„ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ‰ํ™”์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ ๋‹ด๋ก ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.  The Institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education as a Global Policy Agenda (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Jonghun Kim ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study was to examine the driving forces that affect the global diffusion and institutionalization of Global Citizenship Education (GCED), which is rapidly emerging as an important global education agenda. In order to achieve the objective of this study, driving forces affecting the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED were categorized into three perspectives, namely, sociocultural perspective, international economic perspective and institutional perspective. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the degree of sociocultural diversity that represents sociocultural perspective did not have a statistically significant effect on education policies, curriculum and teacher education on GCED in each country. Second, the degree of dependence on international economic relations, which shows international economic perspective, had a positive statistically significant effect on the curriculum of GCED in countries around the world but it did not have a statistically significant effect on education policy and teacher education of GCED. Third, the degree of linkage to the global civil society that represents institutional perspective has a positive statistically significant effect on the GCED education policies, curricula and teacher education of different countries around the world. The results of this study show that institutional perspectives are more persuasive drivers of the spread and institutionalization of GCED in individual countries than from sociocultural perspective and international economic perspective. The result of this study shows that the adoption of policies for GCED is an institutional embodiment reflecting education norms and values at the global level embedded in an institutional environment of the world society rather than instrumental means that meet immediate and concrete socioeconomic needs and demands of individual countries. This study is of significance in that it has identified the driving forces for the diffusion and institutionalization of GCED through empirical analysis.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 15, No. 2) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2020 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ๊น€์ข…ํ›ˆ ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ… ์˜์ œ๋กœ ๊ธ‰๋ถ€์ƒํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ , ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค์ค‘ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์ˆ˜์ค€์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์กด ์ •๋„๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์—๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค์œผ๋‚˜, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์—๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์‚ฌํšŒ์™€์˜ ์—ฐ๊ณ„ ์ •๋„๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ๋„์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์ด ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ด€์ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์˜ ๋™์ธ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŽ์€ ์„ค๋“๋ ฅ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ •์ฑ… ๋„์ž…๊ณผ ์ถ”์ง„์ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ํŠน์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์ ยท๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ํ•„์š”์™€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ์ด๋ผ๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ธ๊ณ„์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ์ œ๋„์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์†์—์„œ ๋ฐฐํƒœ๋œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ทœ๋ฒ”๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œ๋„์  ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฌผ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋„ํ™”์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์ธ์„ ์‹ค์ฆ์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  The Status and Issues of Peace Education: Focussing on Its Interactions with Unification Education ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2019 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Jeongah Cho | Ellie Kim | Ahyoung Moon | Boyoung Yoon ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: Korea Institute for National Unification To lay the groundwork to explore the accessibility of peace education and unification education in an era of peace cooperation on the Korean Peninsula, this study takes a look at the history of peace education and the current situation and issues of both peace education and unification education. Against the backdrop of the division on the Korean Peninsula, unification education and peace education have been established as educational sectors of conflict resolution between the North and the South and of means of mediation for violence caused by the division. The two sectors have developed commonalities along the way. The origin of peace education and unification education is rooted on the division of the Korean Peninsula and the subsequent unification issues. In the current educational practices, there are different characteristics and emphasis in terms of the direction, contents, and subject of education between peace education and unification education. Efforts of creating โ€œpeaceยทunification educationโ€ are recently being made which focuses more on issues of peace than existing unification education. Peace education and unification education exhibit differences when it comes to the relationship between peace and unification in realizing a peaceful Korean Peninsula, whether unification is justified as an ultimate goal, how issues of โ€˜positive peaceโ€™ and security are handled, and how much initiatives the learners have. This study asserts that the issues between peace education and unification education should be clarified and that the two sectors should expand the overlapping areas under the principal of dealing with unification issues on the basis of value of peace.  ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹คํƒœ์™€ ์Ÿ์ : ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์˜ ์ ‘์ ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2019 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: ์กฐ์ •์•„ | ๊น€์—˜๋ฆฌ | ๋ฌธ์•„์˜ | ์œค๋ณด์˜ ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: ํ†ต์ผ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์› ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์˜ ์‹œ๋Œ€์— ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž‘์—…์ด๋‹ค. ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‰ํ™” ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ์‹คํƒœ์™€ ์Ÿ์ ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์€ ๋ถ„๋‹จ์˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ ์†์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋‹จ๊ณผ ๋‚จ๋ถ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ, ๋ถ„๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํญ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„ํ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•ด์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ๋งค๊น€ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ ‘์ ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณต๋™์˜ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์™”๋‹ค. ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์€ ๊ทธ ํƒœ์ƒ์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ถ„๋‹จ์˜ ๊ทน๋ณต๊ณผ ๋ฏผ์กฑํ™”ํ•ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ๋†“์•˜๋‹ค. ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์€ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ํญ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ๋ถ„๋‹จ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ฏผํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ ์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์€ ํƒœ์ƒ์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„์˜ ๋ถ„๋‹จ๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ถœ๋ฐœ์ ์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ด๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ต์œก์‹ค์ฒœ๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ด๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ต์œก์‹ค์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ชจ์Šต ์†์—๋Š” ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ, ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์ฃผ์ฒด ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ•์กฐ์ ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ตœ๊ทผ ํ‰ํ™”โ€ง ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ช…์นญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์˜ ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ํ‰ํ™”์—์„œ ํ†ต์ผ์˜ ์œ„์ƒ, ํ†ต์ผ์˜ ๋‹น์œ„์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ, ์ ๊ทน์  ํ‰ํ™”์™€ ์•ˆ๋ณด๋ฌธ์ œ, ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ์ฃผ๋„์„ฑ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์—, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ์ค‘ ์–ด๋А ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ชฝ์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์–‘์ž๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š”, ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ ๊ต์œก์ด ์–‘์ž์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜์‹์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ๋ถ„๋‹จ๊ณผ ํ†ต์ผ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ‰ํ™”์˜ ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์น˜์— ์ž…๊ฐํ•ด์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹คํƒœ์™€ ์Ÿ์ : ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์˜ ์ ‘์ ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๋กœ โ‘  ๊ต์œก ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๋…ผ์˜, โ‘ก ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก ๋ฐ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์šฉ์ฒด๊ณ„ ๊ฐœํŽธ, โ‘ข ๋ฏผ๊ฐ„ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์ž์œจ์„ฑ ํ™•๋Œ€์™€ ๊ฑฐ๋ฒ„๋„Œ์Šค ๊ตฌ์ถ•, โ‘ฃ ์‹œ๋Œ€์  ๊ณผ์ œ์™€ ํ‰ํ™”์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ ํ†ต์ผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ฒ•๋ น ์ •๋น„๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  Europe and North America Regional GCED Network Meeting: Final Report (21-22 November 2018, Lisbon, Portugal) ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2018 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: APCEIU This meeting report is for the meeting, held on 21-22 November 2018 in Lisbon, Portugal, which aimed to strengthen global action on Global Citizenship Education. The event was jointly organized by the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU) under the auspices of UNESCO, the UNESCO Venice Office and ANGEL project partners GENE.The meeting brought together over 50 GCED-related stakeholders, including those from academia, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), intergovernmental organizations, ministries, and the National Commissions for UNESCO. The meeting featured a range of presentations and reflections from partners and provided a platform to discuss action to strengthen GCED networking strategies within and beyond the region. It also offered participants the opportunity to share experiences, insights and knowledge with one another, and encouraged them to explore areas of collaboration in the future.  EIU Best Practice Series No.8: Integrating international human rights standards into school curriculum, textbooks, teachers' guides and school climate in Cambodia ุณู†ุฉ ุงู„ู†ุดุฑ: 2007 ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู: Seungmi Lee | Hyewon Jung ุงู„ู…ุคู„ู ุงู„ู…ุคุณุณูŠ: APCEIU It goes without saying that the aftermath of the war brings various challenges such as poverty, displacement, disability, destroyed culture, etc. and it is of critical importance that it should be well-remedied to preclude its recurrence. In this regard, value education and human rights education are considered crucial and to my mind, so is the educational role that religion can play. Although religions have harmonized the impaired society, but generally they have not been appreciated by their ignorant disciples or followers. Thus, value education is considered to be able to play a crucial role. It is in this context that human rihts education is gaining currency in Cambodia in recent years and has been implemented gradually.