Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
2 Results found
SDG4 이행 촉진을 위한 지표 연구 Year of publication: 2025 Author: 박근영 | 주형미 | 문무경 | 오예진 | 류기락 | 조혜승 | 변종임 | Sunmi Ji | 이슬비 | 박기웅 | 안해정 | 서무계 Corporate author: Korean National Commission for UNESCO 지속가능발전목표(SDGs) 이행의 전환점을 맞아 국내 교육의 현황과 과제를 SDG4 지표를 통해 진단하고 향후 방향을 탐색한 연구 보고서 <목차> 발간사 ‘SDG4 이행 촉진을 위한 지표 연구’ 보고서를 발간하며 서론 현 시점의 SDG4 이행 수준 점검과 개선 방향 탐색의 당위성 SDG 4.1 공평하고 양질의 초·중등 교육 이수 보장에 대한 한국 현황 및 향후 과제 SDG 4.2 영유아 교육과 보육 지표 검토와 향후 과제 SDG 4.3 고등교육의 수월성과 형평성 논의 및 향후 과제 SDG 4.4 고용을 위한 스킬: SDG 4.4의 이행 현황과 과제 SDG 4.5 교육 형평성 실현을 위한 SDG 4.5 지표 검토와 이행 현황 분석 SDG 4.6 한국의 SDG 4.6 이행 현행과 과제: 성인 문해력 SDG 4.7 더불어 살기 위한 학습을 향하여: 세계시민교육 및 지속가능발전교육 이행 현황과 모니터링 개선 방안 탐색 SDG 4.a SDG 4.a.1과 한국 디지털 교육 이행 현황: 접근성, 사용도, 스킬 SDG 4.b 공적개발원조(ODA) 장학금 확대 SDG 4.c 자격을 갖춘 교사의 공급 관련 이행 현황 및 개선 방안 결론 엄격한 현실 인식에 기반한 다음 목표로의 이행 준비 
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea Year of publication: 2025 Author: Suyeon Park | Sunmi Ji | Yoonyoung Lee Corporate author: APCEIU APCEIU is pleased to announce the release of its new publications, Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit, which shares key findings from the research conducted in Australia and the Republic of Korea. The two reports, based on case studies from two countries, build upon the three-phase Asia-Pacific GCED Monitoring Project (2022–2024) jointly undertaken by ACER and APCEIU to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of GCED and support progress toward SDG 4.7 across the region. The three phases of the initiative identified enabling conditions for GCED, validated the regional GCED Monitoring Framework, and developed the ACER-APCEIU GCED Monitoring Toolkit. The reports for each phase can be found here: Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. The newly released reports move the project forward by examining how the Toolkit can be practically applied in real educational settings. The study aimed to examine how the Toolkit could be used to support collaboration among key education stakeholders—teachers, school leaders, and education supervisors—in 1) goal setting, 2) planning, 3) implementing, and 4) reflecting on GCED practices. Through this process, the research sought to understand how the Toolkit could help strengthen the connection between policy commitments and everyday educational practice, supporting teachers, school leaders, and system leaders to embed GCED more systematically and sustainably within their existing framework. Both studies conducted in Australia and the Republic of Korea have been guided by the following research questions: 1. How does the GCED Monitoring Toolkit support key stakeholder groups to collaboratively embed GCED in policy and practice? a. What aspects of the Toolkit enable or challenge stakeholders to achieve their GCED goals and objectives? b. How do key stakeholders perceive its usefulness? 2. Are there any aspects of the Toolkit that stakeholders would change to improve its usefulness in supporting the implementation and contextualisation of GCED in policy and practice?The reports demonstrate how a GCED Monitoring Toolkit can be translated into actionable processes within real educational settings. It offers valuable insights for policymakers, school leaders, teachers, and researchers aiming to monitor and strengthen GCED implementation and systematically embed GCED within their educational ecosystems.