Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
2,199 Results found
A Media Literacy Framework for Australia Year of publication: 2020 Corporate author: Australian Media Literacy Alliance (AMLA) AMLA define media literacy as the ability to critically engage with media in all aspects of life.Media literacy complements Digital Literacy and Digital Safety – and all three are required to thrive in a digital world. Digital literacy focuses on the skills and knowledge required to access and use digital technologies. Digital Safety focuses on issues like online hate and abuse, bullying, the protection of personal information and online scams.Media Literacy encourages people to ask critical questions about the media and media technologies using a set of six key concepts. For any example of media (an advertisement, a news story, a film or television program, a YouTube video, video game or a social media post), we can ask the following questions:Institutions: who made this media and why did they make it?Audiences: who was this media made for and how are they likely to respond to it?Representations: how are people, places or ideas portrayed in this media, and what are the impacts of this?Technologies: what technology was used to produce, access and circulate this media? Does the technology gather personal data from users?Languages: how does this media communicate using image, sounds and written text?Relationships: what kind of relationships are being developed through the distribution and use of this media?These questions will have very different answers and follow-on questions depending on the media example, but the process of asking and answering these questions leads to critical understandings, and forms the basis for more successful media experiences. These questions can be asked during the process of consuming, sharing or creating media. They can be integrated as part of any Digital Literacy and Digital Safety learning program.
교육과정 연계 디지털 리터러시 교육 가이드라인 개발 연구 Year of publication: 2023 Author: 김진숙 | 김묘은 | 박일준 | 배현순 | 이지은 | 임동신 | 임지영 | 홍선주 Corporate author: 한국교육학술정보원 본 연구는 본격적인 2022 개정 교육과정의 시행에 앞서 1차적으로 2015 교육과정과 연계된 디지털 리터러시 교수학습 자료 개발 및 확산을 지원하기 위한 이론적 기초를 확보하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해 2022 개정 교육과정에서 명시된 디지털 소양(Digital lteracy)의 개념을 구조화하고, 2022 개정 정보과교육과정 시안 개발 연구(교육부 외, 2022.12.31)에서 도출된 디지털 리터러시 내용 체계의 대영역, 세부 요소 내용 등을 학습 요소와 수행 기대로 구체화하였다. 또한 교육과정의 교과 연계를 기반으로, 교과 성취기준을 분석하고 향후 디지털 리터러시 교육을 실천하기 위한 교수학습 자료 개발 방향을 제시하는 데 목적을 두었다.이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 디지털 리터러시 구성 체계 정립, 교과 교육과정과 디지털 리터러시 내용 기준 연계, 디지털 리터러시 경험 및 교수학습 사례 분석과 교과 연계 디지털 리터러시 교육 방안 수립을 연구 내용으로 하여 결과를 도출하였다. 이를 위한 기본 연구 방법으로는 디지털 리터러시의 구성 요소 도출을 위한 문헌 분석과 키워드 네트워크 분석이 이루어졌으며, 현장 교사 심층면담(FGI)과 월드카페테리아 형식의 전문가 워크숍 등을 통해 디지털 리터러시 구성 체계의 타당성을 확보하였다. * 본 저작물은 '한국교육학술정보원'에서 2023년 작성하여 공공누리 제4유형으로 개방한 '교육과정 연계 디지털 리터러시 교육 가이드라인 개발 연구(작성자:김진숙 외)'을 이용하였으며, 해당 저작물은 한국교육학술정보원 홈페이지(https://www.keris.or.kr/)에서 무료로 다운받으실 수 있습니다.
[Executive Summary] Climate Change and Girls' Education: Barriers, Gender Norms and Pathways to Resilience Year of publication: 2023 Corporate author: Plan International This is the Executive Summary for the report: Climate Change and Girls’ Education: Barriers, Gender Norms and Pathways to Resilience. The full technical report and accompanying synthesis report are also available.
[Résumé analytique] Changement climatique et éducation des filles: entraves, normes sexistes et chemins vers la resilience Year of publication: 2023 Corporate author: Plan International This is the Executive Summary for the report: Climate Change and Girls’ Education: Barriers, Gender Norms and Pathways to Resilience. The full technical report and accompanying synthesis report are also available.
[Resumen Ejecutivo] Cambio climático y educación de las niñas: barreras, normas de género, y rutas hacia la resiliencia Year of publication: 2023 Corporate author: Plan International This is the Executive Summary for the report: Climate Change and Girls’ Education: Barriers, Gender Norms and Pathways to Resilience. The full technical report and accompanying synthesis report are also available.
Nepal: lessons from integrating peace, human rights, and civic education into social studies curricula and textbooks Year of publication: 2015 Author: Melinda Smith Corporate author: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) | United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) | Education Above All (Qatar) This case study examines the process undertaken by the Ministry of Education (MoE) in collaboration with development partners to revise the social studies curriculum in Nepal. The aim was to promote education for peace, human rights, and civic education (PHRCE) in the wake of a 10-year Maoist insurgency and the transition to a democratic republic. It provides a critical analysis of the process, synthesizing information from two assessments of the initiative, and makes recommendations for the future based on challenges and gaps identified by stakeholders. The study also provides recommendations to countries in post-conflict transition which are interested in undertaking similar curriculum reform initiatives.Information is drawn from a number of reports and programme documents developed by the implementing partners, as well as 12 interviews with individuals involved in the process of curriculum reform. Interviewees included representatives of the major agencies involved in the revision process: the MoE’s Curriculum Development Centre, the National Centre for Education Development, Save the Children, UNESCO, and UNICEF. In addition, interviews were conducted with representatives of civil society and non-governmental agencies supporting peace education and representing marginalized groups, and the external international consultant who provided technical assistance.
Népal: leçons tirées de l'intégration de la paix, des droits de la personne et de l'éducation civique dans les programmes d'études et les manuels scolaires Year of publication: 2015 Author: Melinda Smith Corporate author: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) | United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) | Education Above All (Qatar) Cette étude de cas examine le processus entrepris par le Ministère de l'Éducation (MdE) en collaboration avec les partenaires au développement pour réviser le programme d'études sociales au Népal. L'objectif était de promouvoir l'éducation pour la paix, les droits humains et l'éducation civique (PDHEC) à la suite d'une insurrection maoïste de 10 ans et la transition vers une république démocratique. Il fournit une analyse critique du processus, synthétise l'information à partir de deux évaluations de l'initiative et formule des recommandations pour l'avenir en fonction des défis et des lacunes identifiés par les intervenants. L'étude fournit également des recommandations aux pays en transition post-conflit qui sont intéressés à entreprendre des initiatives de réforme du curriculum similaires. L'information provient d'un certain nombre de rapports et de documents de programme élaborés par les partenaires d'exécution, ainsi que de 12 entrevues avec des personnes impliquées dans le processus de réforme du curriculum. Les personnes interrogées comprenaient des représentants des principaux organismes impliqués dans le processus de révision: Centre de développement, le Centre national pour le développement Education Curriculum MdE, Save the Children, l'UNESCO et l'UNICEF. En outre, des entrevues ont été menées avec des représentants de la société civile et les organisations non gouvernementales qui soutiennent l'éducation de la paix et représentant des groupes marginalisés, et le consultant international externe qui a fourni une assistance technique. 