Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
331 Results found
๋ธ๋ ์ํธ ์๋ ์๊ตญ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์์ถ๊ณผ ์ ์ฝ ๋ถ์: ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ด ๋์๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํฅ (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 2) Year of publication: 2018 Author: ๊น์งํฌ Corporate author: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ์๊ตญ์ ๋ธ๋ ์ํธ ๊ฒฐ์ ์ดํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ด ์ด๋ค ๋งฅ๋ฝ์์, ์ด ๋ค ์์ ๊ณผ ์ด์๋ก ์์ถ๋๊ณ ์๋์ง๋ฅผ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ณ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์์์ ๋ค์ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ๋ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ด๋ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ค์ฌ์ ๋ธ๋กํ๋ฅผ ์ถ์งํ๋ ๋ธ๋ ์ํธ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต ์ก๊ณผ ์ด๋ค ๊ด๊ณ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง๋์ง ์ด๊ฒ์ด ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฐ์ ๊ณผ ์ ์ฝ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ๊ด๊ณ๊ฐ ๋ฌด์์ธ์ง ํ์
ํ๊ณ ์๊ตญ ์ฌ๋ก๊ฐ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ค์ฒ ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ฃผ๋ ์ ์ฌ์ ์ ๋ถ์ํ๊ณ ์ ํ๋ค. ๋ํ ์๊ตญ์ ๋ธ๋ ์ํธ ์ฌํ๋ โ๊ฐ๋ฅด์นจโ์ผ๋ก์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๊ต๊ณผ์(text) ๋ฌธ๊ฑด์ผ๋ก ์น๋ถ๋๋ ์๋๋ผ, ์๋ฏผ๋ค์ด ํ์ต ์ฃผ ์ฒด๋ก์ ํ(่ซ)์ ๋ฝํ๋ผ๋ ์ด์๋ฅผ ์๊ธฐ ์์ ๋น๋ํ ์ถ์ ๊ฒฝํ์ผ๋ก ์ดํดํ๊ณ ๋์ํ๋ฉด์, ๋ธ๋ ์ํธ๋ผ๋ ์ฌํ๊ฐ ์ด์์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ด์ฉ(content) ์ผ๋ก ๋๋ค๋ ์ ์ ๋
ผ์ํ์๋ค. ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํตํด์ ์ค๋๋ ํ๋ค๋ฆฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ ๊ต์ก์ ์์๊ณผ ํฅํ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ฑ์ ๋ฐ์ฑ์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ์๋ค.
An Exploratory Study on Applying Cooperative Learning in Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 1) Year of publication: 2018 Author: Jonghun Kim Corporate author: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the validity of cooperative learning as an effective teaching and learning model of Global Citizenship Education(GCED) and to suggest lesson plan that can be used in an educational setting. With the inclusion of GCED as part of global education agenda through the UN SDG 4.7, its role and importance has been highlighted globally and many countries started to reflect GCED into their national curriculum. However, there is lack of practical research on the appropriate teaching and learning model of GCED that can be applied in primary and secondary school education. Therefore, this study, through theoretical review, analyzed and identified that cooperative learning is more appropriate in fostering global citizenship in comparison with other teaching and learning models because of its efficient learning structure which includes positive interdependence, individual accountability, group processing, promotive interaction, interpersonal and small group social skills as its essential elements. On the basis of this, jigsaw model, among various cooperative learning models, was applied and a lesson plan on GCED based on UNESCO World Heritage, an important repository of the history of humankind and nature, was developed and presented. The proposed lesson plan would strengthen learnersโ ability to shape identities, understand others, raise sense of responsibility, link knowledge and action related to issues affecting interaction and connectedness of communities at local, national and global levels in an educational setting, and thus it will be useful in actualizing the learner-centered transformative objective of GCED.
ํ๋ํ์ต์ ์ ์ฉํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ฐฉ์ ํ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 1) Year of publication: 2018 Author: ๊น์ข
ํ Corporate author: ํ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์ ํ๋๋ก ํ๋ํ์ต์ ํ๋น์ฑ์ ํ์ํด ๋ณด๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ํ์ฉ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ์ ์ํ๋ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ ๋์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ์(UN) ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ๋ฐ์ ๋ชฉํ(SDGs) 4.7์ ํฌํจ๋ ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ๊ต์ก์์ ๋ก ๊ทธ ์ญํ ๊ณผ ์ค์์ฑ์ด ์ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ถ๊ฐ๋จ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ๋ง์ ๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ค์ด ์๊ตญ์ ๊ณต๊ต์ก ๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ฐ์ํ๊ธฐ ์์ํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ผ์๋ ๋ถ๊ตฌํ๊ณ ์ดยท์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ์ ์ฉํ ์ ์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ํฉํ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๋ํ ์ค์ฒ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ถ์กฑํ ์ํฉ์ด๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ด๋ก ์ ๊ฒํ ๋ฅผ ํตํด ํ๋ํ์ต์ ๊ธ์ ์ ์ํธ์์กด์ฑ, ๊ฐ์ธ ์ฑ
๋ฌด์ฑ, ์ง๋จ๊ณผ์ , ์ด์ง์ ์ํธ์์ฉ, ๋์ธ๊ด๊ณ ๋ฐ ์ฌํ์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ ๋ณธ์ง์ ์์๋ก ํ๋ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ๋ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์ผ๋ก ๊ทธ ์์ฒด์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ํจ์ํ๋ ๋ฐ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ์ต๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์์ด ๋ค๋ฅธ ์ด๋ค ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๋ณด๋ค ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ํฉํ ๊ต์ํ์ต ๋ชจํ์์ ๋ถ์ยท๊ท๋ช
ํ๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ ๋๋ก ๋ค์ํ ํ๋ํ์ต ๋ชจํ๋ค ์ค์์ ์ง์ ๋ชจํ์ ์ ์ฉํ์ฌ ์ธ๋ฅ ๋ฐ ์์ฐ์ ์ญ์ฌ๊ฐ ์ง์ฝ๋ ์ ๋ค์ค์ฝ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ฐ์ ์์ฌ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๊ฐ๋ฐยท์ ์ํ๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ์ ์ํ ๊ต์ํ์ต(์)์ ๊ต์ก ํ์ฅ์์ ์์ ์ ์ ์ฒด์ฑ ํ์ฑ, ํ์ธ์ ๋ํ ์ดํด, ์ฑ
์์์ ํจ์, ์ง์ญยท๊ตญ๊ฐยท์ธ๊ณ์ฐจ์์์ ๊ณต๋์ฒด๊ฐ์ ์ํธ์์ฉ๊ณผ ์ฐ๊ณ์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ด์์ ๋ํ ์ง์๊ณผ ํ๋์ ์ฐ๊ณ๋ฅผ ๊ฐํํ์ฌ ํ์ต์ ์ค์ฌ์ ๋ณํ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ตฌํ์ ์ ์ฉํ๊ฒ ํ์ฉํ ์ ์์ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค.
Global Citizenship Education in South Korea through Civil Society Organizations: Its Status and Limitation (Asian Journal of Education, Vol.17, Special Issue) Year of publication: 2016 Author: HeeJung Raina Sim Corporate author: Asia Development Institute of Seoul National University This study aims to analyze global citizenship education (GCED) content programming offered by civil society organizations (CSOs) in South Korea. Drawing from Andreottiโs (2006) two strands of proposed concept on GCED, the paper identifies the current status and limitations of the GCED programs offered in Korea; thus, draws recommendation for the future GCED program development. The study finds that many GCED programs are heavily focused on humanistic towards a justice-oriented perspective or โsoftโ approach rather than balancing the fundamental structures that enable learners to recognize global power imbalances, or critical approach. The study argues that providing a well balanced program that integrates two strands of GCED is imperative as CSOs to play a key role through non-formal and informal education that complements formal educationโs provision. The study thus suggests that a complex web of cultural and material local/global contexts needs to be examined during the GCED program design in order to further foster โcriticalโ practice of GCED that was identified by Andreotti.
A Comparative Analysis on Content Elements of Global Citizenship Education in 2009 and 2015 Revised Middle School Social Studies Curriculum (Education Research; Vol. 74) Year of publication: 2019 Author: Kyunghee Sung | Soyeon Lee Corporate author: Sungshin Women's University Educational Research Institute This study is a follow-up study of the 2017 research which analyzed content elements of global citizenship education in elementary school Social Studies. Based on the global citizenship education index, the content elements of are analyzed in the 2009 and 2015 revised middle school Social Studies curriculum, and then it was compared to the results of previous research in elementary school. As a result, it can be found that the content elements of global citizenship education in the middle school Social Studies are not increased or strengthened. In terms of 'strong connection', there was almost no change in the proportion of the cognitive domain and the socio-emotional domain, but rather it decreased in the behavioral domain. Compared with the results of elementary school, it is appeared that elementary school showed a larger increase than the middle school in the proportion of content elements depending on the change of curriculum. Through this, it can be confirmed that the global citizenship education was strengthened in elementary school in the 2015 revised Social Studies curriculum. At the time of next curriculum revision, it will be necessary to consider adding and revising the content elements related to global citizenship education to meet the needs of international community.
2009 ๊ฐ์ ๊ณผ 2015 ๊ฐ์ ์คํ๊ต โ์ฌํโ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ํ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ์์ ๋น๊ต ๋ถ์ (๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 74) Year of publication: 2019 Author: Kyunghee Sung | Soyeon Lee Corporate author: Sungshin Women's University Educational Research Institute ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต โ์ฌํโ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ์์๋ฅผ ๋ถ์ํ2017๋
์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ํ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ก, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์งํ์ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ์ฌ 2009 ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ 2015 ๊ฐ์ ์คํ๊ต โ์ฌํโ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ํ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์์๋ฅผ ๋ถ์ํ๊ณ , ๋์๊ฐ ์ด์ ์ ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์๋ ๋น๊ตโ
๋ถ์์ ์ํํ์๋ค. ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 2009 ๊ฐ์ ๋๋น 2015 ๊ฐ์ ์ ์คํ๊ตโ์ฌํโ์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ์์์ ๋น์ค์ด ์ฆ๊ฐํ๊ฑฐ๋ ๊ฐํ๋๋ ๋ชจ์ต์ ๋ฐ๊ฒฌํ ์์์๋ค. ๊ฐํ ๊ด๋ จ์ฑ์ ์ค์ฌ์ผ๋ก ์์ญ๋ณ๋ก ์ดํด๋ณด๋ฉด, ์ธ์ง ์์ญ๊ณผ ์ฌํโ
์ ์์ ์์ญ์๋น์ค ๋ณํ๋ ๊ฑฐ์ ์์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ํ๋์ ์์ญ์์๋ ์คํ๋ ค ๊ฐ์ํ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต โ์ฌํโ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ๋น๊ตํ๋ฉด, ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ๋ณํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ด์ฉ์์ ๋น์ค์ ์ฆ๊ฐ ํญ๊ณผ ๋ด์ฉ ์ฌํ๊ฐ์คํ๊ต๊ธ๋ณด๋ค ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต๊ธ์ด ๋ ํฐ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํตํด 2015 ๊ฐ์ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์์๋ ์ด๋ฑํ๊ต๊ธ์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ด ๊ฐํ๋์์์ ํ์ธํ ์ ์์๋ค. ํฅํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ฐจ์์์ ์คํ๊ต โ์ฌํโ๊ฐ ์๋์ ํ๋ฆ ๋ฐ ๊ตญ์ ์ฌํ์ ์๊ตฌ์ ๋ถ์ํ ์ ์๋๋ก์ฐจ๊ธฐ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ๊ฐํธ ์ ๋ด์ฉ์์ ์ถ๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์์ ์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋ ํ์๊ฐ ์์ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค.
A Critical Analysis of Global Citizenship in 2015 Revised Elementary Social Studies Curriculum (Theory and Research in Citizenship Education; Vol. 50, No. 1) Year of publication: 2018 Author: Kyunghwan Mo | Sunah Kim Corporate author: Korea Association of Social Education The purpose of this study was to examine how global citizenship is reflected in the 2015 revised social studies curriculum. The study used the conceptual framework of Merryfield(1998) to analyze the national curriculum. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, in terms of understanding of the world as interdependent systems, contents on politics and culture as well as economy increased. Second, more global issues and problems were included. Third, contents on sustainable development increased. Fourth, the scope of diversity expanded. Fifth, interconnectedness of humans through time was inadequately reflected in the current social studies curriculum. Sixth, contents on values and attitudes, and actions were strengtened. Sixth, contents of cross-cultural understanding, interaction, and communication are not adequately included. The elementary social studies curriculum should strengthen cross-cultural understanding and interaction and prejudice reduction. Also, more instructional methods for global citizenship education should be developed and teacher education programs should be overhauled.
2015 ๊ฐ์ ์ด๋ฑ ์ฌํ๊ณผ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ํ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ ๋ถ์ (์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 50, No. 1) Year of publication: 2018 Author: ๋ชจ๊ฒฝํ | ๊น์ ์ Corporate author: ํ๊ตญ์ฌํ๊ณผ๊ต์กํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ชฉ์ ์ 2015 ๊ฐ์ ์ด๋ฑ ์ฌํ๊ณผ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ์ ์๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ด์ฉ์ ๋ถ์ํ๊ณ ๋ฐ์ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ํ์ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด Merryfield์ ๊ฐ๋
ํ์ ์ฌ์ฉํ์๋๋ฐ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ผ๊ณฑ ์์ญ์ผ๋ก ๋ฒ์ฃผํํ์๋ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ธ๋ฅ์ ์ธ๊ณ๋ฅผ ์ญ๋์ , ์ ๊ธฐ์ , ์ํธ์์กด์ ์ธ ์ฒด๊ณ๋ก ์ดํดํ๊ธฐ, ๋์งธ, ์ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ์์ ์ดํดํ๊ธฐ, ์
์งธ, ๋ค์ํ ๋ฌธํ์ ๊ด์ ์ดํดํ๊ธฐ, ๋ท์งธ, ์ง์ญ์ ยท์ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ์ฐจ์์์ ์์ฌ๊ฒฐ์ ์ ๋ด๋ฆฌ๊ณ ํ๋ํ๋ ๋ฐ ํ์ํ ์ง์ยท๊ธฐ๋ฅยท์ฑ
์๊ฐ ๊ฐ๊ธฐ, ๋ค์ฏ์งธ, ์ญ์ฌ์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์์์ ์ธ๋ฅ์ ์ํธ์ฐ๊ณ์ฑ ์ดํดํ๊ธฐ, ์ฌ์ฏ์งธ, ๊ฐ๋ฌธํ์ ์ดํดยท์ํธ์์ฉยท์์ฌ์ํต, ์ผ๊ณฑ์งธ, ๋นํ์ ์ธ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์์ ํธ๊ฒฌ ํด์์ ๋๋ ๊ต์ก์ ์ค์์ฑ ์ธ์ํ๊ธฐ ๋ฑ์ด๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ ๋ค์๊ณผ ๊ฐ๋ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ด์ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ๊ณผ๋ ๋ฌ๋ฆฌ ์ง๊ตฌ์ด์ ์ญ๋์ , ์ ๊ธฐ์ , ์ํธ์์กด์ ์ธ ์ฒด๊ณ๋ก ์ดํดํ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๊ฐํ๋์๊ณ , ๊ฒฝ์ ์ธ์ ๋ฌธํ, ์ ์น ๋ถ์ผ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋์๋ค. ๋์งธ, ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ์์ ๊ณผ ์ด์๋ฅผ ํฌํจํ๊ณ , ๋ค์ํ ๋ฌธํ, ๊ด์ , ์ธ๊ณ๊ด์ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๊ฐํ๋์๋ค. ์
์งธ, ์ง์ญ์ ยท์ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ์ฐจ์์์ ์์ฌ๊ฒฐ์ ์ ๋ด๋ฆฌ๊ณ ํ๋ํ๋ ๋ฐ ํ์ํ ์ญ๋์ด ๊ฐ์กฐ๋์๋ค. ๋ท์งธ, ๊ฐ๋ฌธํ์ ์ดํด์ ์ํธ์์ฉ, ์์ฌ์ํต ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๋ฏธํกํ๊ณ ๋นํ์ ์ธ ๊ด์ ์์ ํธ๊ฒฌ์ ํด์ํ๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๋ถ์กฑํ๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ๋ค์๊ณผ ๊ฐ์ ๊ณผ์ ๋ฅผ ์ ์ํ์๋ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด์ฉ ์์๋ค์ ๊ณ์ด์ฑ์ ๋์ด๋๋ก ๊ตฌ์ฑํด์ผ ํ๋ค. ๋์งธ, ๊ฐ๋ฌธํ์ ์ดํด์ ์ํธ์์ฉ, ์์ฌ์ํต ๋ด์ฉ์ ๊ฐํํ๊ณ ์๋ฏผ์กฑ ์ค์ฌ์ฃผ์, ๊ณ ์ ๊ด๋
๋ฐ ์ธ๊ตญ์ธ ํ์ค๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ ์ ์๋ ๋ด์ฉ์ ๊ฐํํด์ผ ํ๋ค. ์
์งธ, ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ์คํํ ์ ์๋ ๊ต์ยทํ์ต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ์ ๊ฐ๋ฐ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐ ์ก์ฑ์ ์ํ ํ๋ก๊ทธ๋จ ๊ฐ๋ฐ์ด ํ์ํ๋ค.
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ๋ํ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ์์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ (Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning; Vol. 9, No. 4) Year of publication: 2019 Author: ์ดํจ์ | ๊น๊ฐ์ Corporate author: ์ญ์ค๋ํ๊ต ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ๋ํ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ์์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ก ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๊ฐํ๋ฅผ ์ํ ๊ต์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ์ ์ํ๋๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์์ ์์ธ๊ณผ ์ธ์ฒ์์ 4๋
์ ์ ์๊ต์ก๊ณผ 4ํ๋
์ ์ฌํ ์ค์ธ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ 200๋ช
๊ณผ 24๊ฐ์ ์ ์๊ต์ก๊ธฐ๊ด์ ์ฌ์ง ์ค์ธ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ 200๋ช
์ ์ ์ ํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ 2018๋
9์ 11์ผ๋ถํฐ ์ผ์ฃผ์ผ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ฐ๊ตฌ์๊ฐ ์ง์ ์ค๋ฌธ์ง๋ฅผ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ ๋ฐ ํ์ํ๋ ์ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ค์ํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒซ์งธ, ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ ๋ชจ๋ ์ ์์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ๋นํด ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ญ๋์ ๋ค์ ๋๊ฒ ์ธ์ํ๊ณ ์์๋ค. ๋ณด๋ค ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋์ ํ์์์ธ์ธ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ญ๋๊ณผ ์ ์์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๋ชจ๋์์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ ๋ณด๋ค ๋๊ฒ ์ธ์ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋์งธ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๊ฒฝํํ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ญ๋๊ณผ ์ ์์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๋ชจ๋์์ ๊ทธ๋ ์ง ์์ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ ๋ณด๋ค ๋๊ฒ ์ธ์ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ฉด, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๊ฒฝํํ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ญ๋๊ณผ ์ ์์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ญ๋ ๋ชจ๋์์ ์ธ์์ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ ๋ํ๋์ง ์์๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ํ ์๋น์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ ์๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ์์ ๋ฐํ๋์ผ๋ก์ ์ค์ ๋ก ์ ์๊ต์ฌ ์์ฑ๊ณผ์ ์ ๊ต์ฌ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ๊ณผ ์ ์๊ต์กํ์ฅ์์ ์ด๋ฃจ์ด์ง๋ ๊ต์ฌ์ฌ๊ต์ก ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ๊ตฌ์ํด์ผ ํ๋์ง์ ๋ํ ์ ๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ ๊ณตํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๊ธฐ๋ํ๋ค.
Perception on Global Citizenship Education Competence between Pre-service Teachers and In-service Teachers in Kindergarten (Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning; Vol. 9, No. 4) Year of publication: 2019 Author: Hyojeong Lee | Kabsoon Kim Corporate author: Soongsil University. Research Institute for Gifted & Talented Education The purpose of this study was to establish the direction of teacher education based on global citizenship education competence studying the perception of pre-service teachers and in-service teachers on global citizenship education competence. The 2018 survey was conducted for a week beginning September 11. The respondents who were 200 pre-service teachers and 200 in-service teachers were selected from Seoul and Incheon. The researcher distributed and collected the questionnaire directly. The results of the study were as follows. First, pre-service teachers showed higher cognition than in-service teacher in both global citizenship competence and early childhood global citizenship competence. Second, among pre-service teachers, ones who had experienced global citizenship education showed higher cognition level in both categories than others. On the other hand, in-service teachers who had experienced global citizenship education did not show any difference of cognition in both global citizenship competence and early childhood global citizenship competence. This study was expected to reveal the perceptions of pre-service teachers and when training teachers, the data provided more specific details for early childhood educator curriculums about global citizenship education. 