Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
3,217 Results found
Global Citizenship Education: How to Measure and Improve the Impact Year of publication: 2020 Author: Jan Van Ongevalle Corporate author: Frame Voice Report! Project | Civil Society in Development (CISU) | European Union (EU) This guide presents 4 methods and tools that can help organisations set up an easy-to-use monitoring system for learning about the effects of global citizenship education (GCE) projects. The methods can be used for planning as well as monitoring and evaluating the changes a project has contributed to. At best the methods can keep on strengthening the project in the implementation phase thereby contributing to greater change.
Latin America and the Caribbean 2020: Inclusion and Education; All Means All (Global Education Monitoring Report) Year of publication: 2020 Corporate author: Global Education Monitoring Report Team | UNESCO | Laboratory of Education Research and Innovation for Latin America and the Caribbean (SUMMA) Latin America and the Caribbean has the largest and most challenging socio-economic inequalities in the world, which have shaped its education systems over the decades. This report looks at everyone both in and excluded from education in the region, pinpointing barriers facing learners, especially when multiple disadvantages intersect. The report also explores challenges in education posed by COVID-19 and the need for urgent action to prevent an exacerbation of inequalities. Produced by the Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report team, in partnership with the UNESCO Regional Bureau for Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (OREALC) and the Laboratory of Education Research and Innovation for Latin America and the Caribbean (SUMMA), the report assesses key solutions for greater inclusion through several case studies from the region. It provides in-depth analysis on challenges to inclusion in education arising from migration and displacement in Colombia and Costa Rica; remoteness in Brazil and Suriname; disability in Cuba and Nicaragua; gender in Peru and Jamaica; sexual orientation, gender identity and expression in Chile and Mexico; poverty in the Dominican Republic and Honduras; ethnicity in Bolivia and Ecuador; and incarceration in El Salvador and Uruguay. Building on the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report, this regional edition concludes that strong laws and policies in Latin America and the Caribbean demonstrate a commitment to inclusion, but that the daily realities faced by learners suggest implementation is lagging. Recommendations are aimed at promoting more inclusive education systems to benefit all children and youth, no matter their background, identity or ability. The recommendations provide a systematic framework for identifying and dismantling barriers for vulnerable populations, according to the principle that ‘every learner matters and matters equally’.
América Latina y el Caribe 2020: Inclusión y educación; Todos y todas sin excepción (Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo) Year of publication: 2020 Corporate author: Global Education Monitoring Report Team | UNESCO | Laboratory of Education Research and Innovation for Latin America and the Caribbean (SUMMA) América Latina y el Caribe es la región con las mayores y más tenaces desigualdades socioeconómicas del mundo. Durante decenios estas desigualdades se han reflejado en sus sistemas educativos. El presente informe examina a quiénes incluyen y a quiénes excluyen estos sistemas y llama la atención sobre las barreras que enfrentan los educandos, especialmente cuando están expuestos a múltiples desventajas. El informe también explora los nuevos retos educativos que plantea la pandemia de la Covid-19 y la necesidad de actuar sin dilación para evitar que se agraven las desigualdades. El informe, elaborado por el equipo del Informe de Seguimiento de la Educación en el Mundo (Informe GEM), en colaboración con la Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe (OREALC/ UNESCO Santiago) y el Laboratorio de Investigación e Innovación en Educación para América Latina y el Caribe -SUMMA, evalúa algunas de las principales iniciativas emprendidas para mejorar la inclusión, basándose en varios estudios de casos de la región. Analiza en profundidad algunos ejemplos de los grandes desafíos que amenazan la inclusión en la educación: migración y desplazamiento en Colombia y Costa Rica; aislamiento rural en el Brasil y Suriname; discapacidad en Cuba y Nicaragua; discriminación de género en el Perú y Jamaica; orientación sexual e identidad y expresión de género en Chile y México; pobreza en la República Dominicana y Honduras; etnicidad en Bolivia y el Ecuador; y jóvenes en situación de privación de libertad en El Salvador y el Uruguay. Esta edición regional del Informe de Seguimiento de la Educación en el Mundo 2020 concluye que, si bien las leyes y políticas de América Latina y el Caribe demuestran la firme determinación de promover la inclusión, la realidad cotidiana de los alumnos y las alumnas sugiere que la aplicación práctica lleva retraso. Se formulan recomendaciones con el objeto de promover sistemas de educación más inclusivos en beneficio de todos los niños, niñas y jóvenes, sin distinción de origen, identidad o capacidad. Las recomendaciones brindan un marco sistemático que permite identificar y eliminar barreras para las poblaciones marginadas, conforme al principio de que “cada alumno es importante y todos los alumnos importan por igual”.
Analysis of the 2015 Revised Korean Languages Curriculum in Terms of the OECD Education 2030 Competencies (Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation; Vol. 23. No. 3) Year of publication: 2020 Author: Jongyun Kim | Hyounjin Ok | Jaeyoon Cho Corporate author: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the Korean language curriculum through curriculum content mapping (CCM) in the OECD Education 2030 project, which is later compared with the international curricular of the national languages. The CCM framework consists of a “competency code” that presents OECD competencies and a “content code” that contains the content of the curriculum. In this study, the degree of the competencies in the Korean language curriculum is analyzed and compared with the international curricular in terms of the OECD perspective. The result is analyzed as follows. First, foundational literacies of Korean were similar to the international national language curricular. Second, in the competencies of skills, attitudes and values, “problem-solving” and “learning about learning” were higher in the Korean language curriculum than the OECD average, “critic thinking” was similar to, and “persistence” was lower than the OECD average. Third, in terms of key concepts, both “student agency” and “co-agency” were higher in the Korean language curriculum. Fourth, “creating values” and “solving dilemmas” in terms of the degree of reflection of CCM framework competency related to transformational competencies, the Korean Language was higher than the average of OECD member countries in terms of “creating new values” and “resolving tensions and dilemmas” were higher but “taking responsibilities” were lower than the OECD countries. Fifth, the competencies in the compound literacies were also compared. These comparison results provide as reference materials that describes the suitability of the Korean language curriculum and contributes to future revisions of the Korean language curriculum for the students in 2030s.
2015 개정 국어과 교육과정의 OECD Education 2030 역량 반영 양상 분석 (교육과정평가연구; Vol. 23, No. 3) Year of publication: 2020 Author: 김종윤 | 옥현진 | 조재윤 Corporate author: 한국교육과정평가원 본 연구는 2015 개정 국어과 교육과정과 OECD가 새롭게 제안한 Education 2030 역량틀을 비교하는 교육과정 매핑(curriculum mapping)을 통해 우리 국어과 교육과정의 특성을 분석하고, OECD Education 2030 프로젝트로부터 향후 국어과 교육과정의 설계 및 실행을 위한 시사점을 파악하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 OECD 교육과정 내용 매핑(CCM) 프레임워크에 반영된 국어과와 OECD 참여국의 자국어 교과의 역량 반영 정도를 비교하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기초 소양은 국어과와 OECD 2030 역량 반영 정도가 유사하였다. 둘째, 기능, 태도, 가치 중 국어과는 ‘문제해결력’과 ‘학습에 대한 학습’에서는 OECD 참여국 평균보다 높으나, ‘비판적 사고’는 유사하게, ‘끈기/회복력’은 OECD 참여국 평균보다 낮게 나타났다. 셋째, 주요 개념 측면에서 국어과는 ‘학생 주도성’과 ‘협력적 주도성’에서 모두 OECD 참여국 평균보다 높았다. 넷째, 변혁적 역량에서 국어과는 ‘새로운 가치 창조하기’와 ‘긴장과 딜레마 해소하기’에서는 OECD 참여국 평균보다 높으나 ‘책임감 가지기’는 낮게 나타났다. 다섯째, 복합 소양 반영 정도에서 국어과는 ‘미디어 리터러시, 컴퓨팅 사고력/프로그래밍/코딩’에서 OECD 참여국 평균보다 높게 나타났으나, ‘기업가 정신, 금융 소양, 글로벌 역량, 지속 가능한 발전을 위한 소양’은 OECD 참여국 평균보다 낮았다. 이러한 비교는 추후 국어과 적용(활용)의 적합성과 정합성을 검토할 근거 자료, 현장교사들의 교육과정 재구성의 타당성 근거, 타 교과와의 융합 교육을 실시할 때의 근거, 교육과정을 개정할 때 추구하는 인재상, 핵심역량, 목표와 내용(성취기준) 등을 구체화하여 문서화하는 참고 자료가 된다는 점에서 시사하는 바가 있다.
Educación para el Desarrollo y la Ciudadanía Global (EpDCG): Guía para su integración en centros educativos Year of publication: 2016 Corporate author: InteRed | Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID) InteRed presenta en este documento un marco teórico de referencia para acompañar los procesos y acciones de integración de la Educación para el Desarrollo y la Ciudadanía Global como un enfoque integral en los proyectos educativos de los Centros. 