Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
3,451 Results found
Addressing Hate Speech on Social Media: Contemporary Challenges; Discussion Paper 01 Year of publication: 2021 Corporate author: UNESCO | Oxford Internet Institute | European Union (EU) This paper is part of a collection of discussion papers, commissioned and produced by UNESCO and the United Nations Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide (OSAPG). The papers are a direct contribution to the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action and are published in the context of the Multistakeholder Forum and Ministerial Conference on Addressing Hate Speech through Education in September and October 2021. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the pertinence of the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action, generating a wave of hate speech across the world –further exacerbating intolerance and discrimination towards particular groups and destabilizing societies and political systems. The discussion papers seek to unpack key issues related to this global challenge and propose possible responses and recommendations. 
5th UNESCO Forum on Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Global Citizenship, Health and Well-being (Strand 3) Year of publication: 2021 Author: Carmel Cefai | Dy Samsideth | Mieke van Ingelghem | Kiichi Oyasu Corporate author: 유네스코 | 유네스코 아시아태평양 국제이해교육원 Strand 3– What does progress in transformative education look like – the crucial role of teachers Plenary session 3Based on the findings of two global studies conducted by UNESCO and its partners, this session discussed what can be done to support teachers to feel more confident in their role and to effectively facilitate transformative education. Moderators: Ms Antonia Wulff, Director of Policy, Advocacy and Research, Education International, Mr Christophe Cornu, Senior Project Officer, Section of Education for Health and Well-being, UNESCOMr William Gaudelli, Dean, College of Education & Vice Provost for innovation in education, Lehigh University, USAMr Carmel Cefai, Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Malta, MaltaPanelists:Mr Anil Ramdewor, Ministry of Education, MauritiusMr Souphap Khounvixay, Advisor, Cabinet Office of the Minister for Education and Sports, Lao People's Democratic RepublicMs Miri Yemini, Professor, Department of Educational Policy and Administration, the Jaime and Joan Constantiner School of Education, Tel Aviv University, IsraelMr Bert Tuga, President, Philippines Normal University, PhilippinesMs Anh Duong Phuong, Teacher and youth activist for gender equality and girls’ rights, Viet NamMr Renato Jiménez Cabrera, teacher trainer, the Benemérita Escuela Nacional de Maestros, Mexico Concurrent sessions 3The session addressed key action areas in view of advancing the role and building the capacities of teachers to deliver ESD, GCED and education for health and well-being. Session 3.1 – Teacher preparednessModerator: Dr Jim Taylor, Research Associate, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaSpeakers:Dr Dy Samsideth, Deputy Director General for Education, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, CambodiaDr Mieke van Ingelghem, Lecturer, UC Leuven Limburg Teacher Education (UNESCO Associated Schools Network member), Belgium Session 3.2 – Teaching and learning resources and materialsModerator: Ms Yumiko Yokozeki, Director, UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA)Speakers:Mr Dennis Sinyolo, Director, Education International’s African Regional OfficeMs Mary Sichangi, Head of Department, Partnerships & Linkages, Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa (CEMASTEA)Mr Temechegn Engida, Program Officer, UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA) Session 3.3 – School and community supportModerator: Mr Carlos Vargas, Chief of Section of Teacher Development, UNESCOMr Carlos Enrique Rodoriguez Rivas, Head, National Teacher Training Institute, Ministry of Education, El SalvadorDr James Williams, Professor, School of Education and Human Development at George Washington University, USAMr Kiichi Oyasu, Director, Education Cooperation Department of Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU), Japan Links to Strand 1 / Strand 2 & Special Session / Strand 4 
5th UNESCO Forum on Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Global Citizenship, Health and Well-being (Strand 4) Year of publication: 2021 Author: Alexander Leicht | Nilantha Gunasekara | Aaron Benavot | Umair Mushtaq | Elena Diryugina | Libby Giles | Mónika Réti | Le Anh Vinh Corporate author: Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO) | Centre Asie-Pacifique d'éducation pour la compréhension internationale (APCEIU) Strand 4 – What does progress in transformative education look like – conclusions and next steps Plenary session 4The Strand assessed how to best capture progress including possible benchmarks and success indicators in addressing different aspects of transformative education and discussed the way forward.Moderator: Ms Vibeke Jensen, Director, Division of Peace and Sustainable Development, UNESCOPresentation of the key ideas for recommendation:Mr Alexander Leicht, Chief of Section of Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCODiscussants:Mr Nilantha Gunasekara, Deputy Director, School Health and Nutrition Branch, Ministry of Education, Sri LankaMs Chandrika Bahadur, Director, SDG AcademyMs Katarina Popovic, Professor, Department of Andragogy, University of Belgrade, Serbia & Secretary General, the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE)Mr Hyun Mook Lim, Director, APCEIUMr Aaron Benavot, Professor, University of Albany, USA Concurrent sessions 4In the concurrent sessions, concrete policy recommendations on advancing transformative education and creating enabling conditions were formulated by policymakers, practitioners and monitoring experts. Session 4.1 – Policy makersModerator: Mr Sam Loni, Programme Director, UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, USASpeakers:Ms Catherine Matara, Assistant Director of Education, Ministry of Education, KenyaMs Sandra Allison Soria Mendoza, Head of the Environmental Education Unit and Environmental Education Specialist, Ministry of Education of PeruMs Saher Baig, Representative, Youth4Climate Session 4.2 – PractitionersModerator: Ms Monica Froehler, CEO, Ban Ki-moon Centre for Global CitizensSpeakers:Mr Umair Mushtaq, Project Manager, The Little Art, PakistanMs Elena Diryugina, Head of methodology and evaluation department, Investment to the Future, Russian FederationMs Libby Giles, Head of Global Citizenship, St Cuthbert’s College, Director, New Zealand Centre for Global Studies, New Zealand Session 4.3 – Monitoring experts on measurement frameworks, M&E, and dataModerator: Mr Ralph Carstens, Senior Research Advisor, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)Speakers:Ms Mónika Réti, Representative of Hungary, UNECE working group on monitoring of the ESD strategyMr Le Anh Vinh, Deputy Director General, Viet Nam Institute of Educational Sciences (VNIES)Mr Hilaire Hounkpodoté, Coordinator of the Programme for the Analysis of Education Systems (PASEC), CONFEMENMr Guy-Roger Kaba, Coordinator of the Observatory on the Quality of Education, CONFEMEN Links to Strand 1 / Strand 2 & Special Session / Strand 3 
From Rights to Country-Level Action: Results of the Tenth Consultation of Member States on the 1960 Convention and Recommendation Year of publication: 2022 Author: Rolla Moumné | Sharlene Bianchi Corporate author: UNESCO The year 2020 marked a turning point for education worldwide. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic not only amplified the difficulties and revealed existing weaknesses, but also brought the unpreparedness and lack of resilience of national education systems to the fore.The tenth consultation on the 1960 Convention against Discrimination in Education was conducted in precisely this context.Providing a valuable opportunity for States to take stock of the progress made in implementing Convention and sharing interesting national practices, the Consultation revealed continuous and new challenges the education sector faces. The unique timing of the consultation also created an opportunity to report on actions taken to faceadverse effects of the pandemic. This report analyzes and presents the Consultation findings, draws trends, and provides guidance for action. It shows how, by implementing the provisions of the Consultation, States can accelerate progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4, while invites a reflection on possibly reviewing the framework of the right to education to further respond to new challenges and put an end to increased inequalities worldwide. 
K-12 AI Curricula: A Mapping of Government-Endorsed AI Curricula Year of publication: 2022 Corporate author: UNESCO Regulations on their own are insufficient to ensure AI as a common good for education and for humanity. All citizens need to be equipped with some level of AI literacy covering the values, knowledge and skills relating to AI. This report features key findings and recommendations of UNESCO’s global survey on AI curricula for K-12. It reveals that only 11 countries have developed and endorsed K-12 AI curricula and another four countries have AI curricula in development. This is a strong call for Member States to develop AI curricula for K-12 students, and to build stronger mechanisms to validate non-governmental AI curricula offered to balance the private-driven approach. The report also reveals that the learning outcomes of AI curricula need to be more focused on fostering creativity in crafting AI technologies and on contextual ethics. Teacher training is key to ensure the implementation of AI curricula, and teachers need to be trained on designing and facilitating project-based learning which is the most commonly used pedagogical methodology in existing AI curricula. The report also advises an ‘agnostic approach’ towards AI brands and products when introducing domain-specific AI technologies. 
5th UNESCO Forum on Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Global Citizenship, Health and Well-being (Strand 1) Year of publication: 2021 Author: Shadreck Majwabe | Thomas Greiner | Taka Horio | Niveen Jouhar | Arjen Wals | Lynndina Essack | Didier Jourdan | James O’Higgins Norman | Bolorchimeg Dagva Corporate author: UNESCO | APCEIU Plenary session 1In this first plenary, countries shared their vision, practice and progress underpinning their understanding of “transformative education”. The impact of current practices related to learners’ behavior and the educational system was discussed, highlighting success indicators.Moderator: Ms Krista Pikkat, Director, UNESCO Almaty OfficeMr Shadreck Majwabe, Director of the Department of Curriculum Development and Evaluation, Ministry of Basic Education, BotswanaMr Thomas Greiner, Head of Subdivision, Lifelong Learning, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, GermanyMs Taka Horio, Assistant Secretary-General, the Japanese National Commission for UNESCO & ASP National Coordinator, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JapanMs Niveen Jouhar, Member of Directorate of Curricula, Ministry of Education, Jordan Concurrent sessions 1Following the plenary session, the concurrent sessions discussed the different components that need to be transformed in the education system, and how to bring about these changes and further advance. Session 1.1 – PolicyModerator: Ms Akpezi Ogbuigwe, Founder, Anpez Centre for Environment and Development, Nigeria Mr Arjen Wals, UNESCO Chair, Social Learning and Sustainable Development, University of Wageningen, Netherlands Ms Anna-Karin Johansson, Swedish National Commission for UNESCO, Ministry of Education, Sweden Mr Felipe de Souza Costa, São Paulo Municipal Secretariat of Education, Brazil Mr El Hadji Gueye, Founder, Banlieu UP, Senegal Session 1.2 – Curricula, pedagogy and assessmentModerator: Mr Yao Ydo, Director, UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE)Dr Esther Care, Professor, University of Melbourne, AustraliaMs Lynndina Essack, Senior Education Officer, Department of Education Services, Ministry of Education, SeychellesMr Daehoon Jho, Professor, Sungshin Women's University, Republic of KoreaDr Jinan Karameh Chaya, Principal, Al Manar Modern School (UNESCO Associated Schools Network member), Lebanon Session 1.3 – Learning environmentModerator: Mr Chris Castle, Chief of Section of Education for Health and Well-being, UNESCOProf Didier Jourdan, UNESCO Chair and Head of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center "Global Health & Education"Prof James O’Higgins Norman, Director of the National Anti-Bullying Centre, the Dublin City University, Ireland & UNESCO Chair on Tackling Bullying in Schools and CyberspaceMs Bolorchimeg Dagva, Adolescents and HIV Specialist, UNICEF, Mongolia Links to Strand 2 & Special session / Strand 3 / Strand 4 
5th UNESCO Forum on Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Global Citizenship, Health and Well-being (Strand 2 & Special Session) Year of publication: 2021 Author: Miho Taguma | Leanne Riley | Valeria Damiani | Nandini Chatterjee | Valerie Shapiro | Pablo Pincheira | Nicolas Jonas | Denis Barrett | Doug McCall | Antoine Marivin | Cheoljin Yang | Sunkyung Lee Corporate author: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO) | Centro de Asia y el Pacífico de Educación para el Entendimiento Internacional (APCEIU) Strand 2 – What does progress in transformative education look like – a look at recent global and regional data Plenary session 2Building upon Strand 1, this session examined transformative education through the lens of regional and global comparative data in relation to SDG Target 4.7. The discussion identified the progress made, and remaining gaps in existing monitoring and assessment frameworks.Moderator: Mr Sobhi Tawil, Director, Future of Learning and Innovation, UNESCOMs Miho Taguma, Senior Policy Analyst on OECD Learning Compass 2030 and SDG 4.7Ms Leanne Riley, Unit Head, Surveillance, Monitoring and Reporting, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCDs), World Health OrganizationMs Valeria Damiani, Associate Professor, La Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (LUMSA) University, ItalyMr Carlos Henríquez Calderon, Coordinator of the Latin American Laboratory for Assessment of the Quality Education (LLECE), Regional Bureau for Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (OREALC), UNESCO Santiago Office Concurrent sessions 2The concurrent sessions engaged in an in-depth discussion on three selected major gaps in transformative education, identified opportunities and made suggestions on the way forward. Session 2.1 – How to address social and emotional dimensions of learning in assessment?The increasing integration of social and emotional learning (SEL) into curricula has raised questions regarding feedback and assessment. Drawing on research, policy and practice, this session examined possibilities and gaps in SEL.Moderator: Ms Cecilia Barbieri, Chief, Section of Education for Global Citizenship & Peace, UNESCOMs Nandini Chatterjee, Senior National Project Officer, UNESCO Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (MGIEP)Ms Valerie Shapiro, Associate Professor, University of California Berkeley, USAMr Pablo Pincheira, Training Director, Forja Chile, Chile Session 2.2 – Making adult learning and education visible within lifelong learning: strengthening non-formal education for individual, social and system level transformationThis session presented local initiatives that have embedded ESD and GCED into lifelong learning systems through policy/strategy development and project implementation, as well as progress made in building learning cities. Moderator: Mr Jose Roberto Guevara, President, International Council for Adult EducationSpeakers:Mr Nicolas Jonas, Programme Specialist, UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL)Ms Mo Winnie Wang, Programme Specialist, UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL)Mr Denis Barrett, Coordinator of Cork Learning City, Ireland Session 2.3 – What do we need to monitor/measure/assess in transformative education - gaps and opportunities?The session focused on promising practices and remaining gaps in capturing the transformation of individuals, societies and education. The key question addressed was how quality teaching and learning can be guided based on the evidence available.Moderator: Dr Marcia McKenzie, Director, MEECE Project and SEPN, and Professor, the University of Melbourne, AustraliaMr Doug McCall, Executive Director, International School Health NetworkMr Antoine Marivin, Project Manager, UNICEF-East Asia and Pacific Regional Office (EAPRO)Dr Julia Kim, Programme Director, the Gross National Happiness Centre, Bhutan Special Session by the Host Country (Plenary) – Experiences from the Republic of Korea and Beyond: Progress, Challenges and New VisionsThe Special Session discussed the Korean experience on SDG Target 4.7, at the domestic and international level. Good practices, emerging trends and lessons learnt were shared, suggesting key agendas, challenges, and visions towards 2030 and transformative education.Moderator: Mr Soon-yong Pak, Professor, Yonsei University, Republic of KoreaSpeakers:Mr Hwanbo Park, Professor, Chungnam University, Republic of KoreaMr Cheol-Jin Yang, Teacher at Songwoo Middle School & Co-Founder/Director of Neuroo, Republic of KoreaDiscussants:Ms Sun-Kyung Lee, Professor, Cheongju National University of Education, Republic of KoreaMr Aaron Benavot, Professor, University of Albany, USA Links to Strand 1 / Strand 3 / Strand 4 
ПЕРЕОСМЫСЛИМ НАШЕ БУДУЩЕЕ Year of publication: 2021 Corporate author: International Commission on the Futures of Education | UNESCO Наше человечество, наша планета находятся в опасности, пандемия лишь подтвердила нашу хрупкость и взаимозависимость, чтобы изменить ход вещей и переосмыслить наше будущее, необходимы неотложные совместные действия; в этом докладе Международной комиссии по перспективам образования подтверждается способность образования к осуществлению коренных изменений. Перед нами стоит двойная задача – выполнить невыполненное обещание обеспечить право на качественное образование для каждого ребёнка, молодого человека и взрослого и полностью реализовать преобразующий потенциал образования, способного проложить путь к устойчивому коллективному будущему. Для этого нам нужен новый общественный договор в области образования, который сможет устранять проявления несправедливости, преобразуя будущее.Этот новый общественный договор должен основываться на принципах прав человека, недопущения дискриминации, социальной справедливости, уважения жизни, человеческого достоинства и культурного разнообразия. Он должен включать в себя этику заботы о людях, взаимности и солидарности. Он должен укреплять позиции образования как общественного дела и общего блага.Этот доклад, который готовился два года на основе глобального процесса консультаций с участием миллиона человек, предлагает правительствам, учреждениям, организациям и гражданам всего мира разработать новый общественный договор в области образования, который поможет нам построить мирное, справедливое и устойчивое будущее, отвечающее всеобщим интересам.Представленные здесь концепции, принципы и предложения являются лишь отправной точкой. Их воплощение в практику в конкретных условиях – это коллективная работа. Уже есть много положительных моментов, и в настоящем докладе предпринята попытка их отразить и развить. Это не инструкция и не план, а начало жизненно важного разговора. 
Metodología de evaluación del estadio de preparación: una herramienta de la Recomendación sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial Year of publication: 2023 Corporate author: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO) En noviembre de 2021, los 193 Estados Miembros de la UNESCO aprobaron la Recomendación sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial, primer instrumento normativo mundial en este ámbito. Esta Recomendación constituye un marco completo y práctico para el desarrollo y el uso éticos de la IA, abarcando todo el espectro de los derechos humanos. Para ello, toma en cuenta todas las etapas del ciclo de vida de los sistemas de IA. Más allá de elaborar los valores y principios que deben guiar el diseño, desarrollo y uso ético de la inteligencia artificial, la recomendación establece las acciones requeridas por los Estados miembros para garantizar el cumplimiento de dichos valores y principios, a través de la promoción de una regulación efectiva y la provisión de recomendaciones en varias áreas políticas esenciales, como el género, el medio ambiente y la comunicación e información. Teniendo en cuenta estos valores, principios y ámbitos políticos, la Secretaría de la UNESCO elaboró un programa para la aplicación de la Recomendación, con el objetivo principal de crear capacidades nacionales para llevar a cabo las actuaciones definidas en la Recomendación y reforzar los marcos regulatorios. Las recomendaciones exigieron el desarrollo de las herramientas clave: la Metodología de Evaluación del Estadio de Preparación (RAM, por sus siglas en inglés) y la Evaluación de Impacto Ético (EIA, por sus siglas en inglés), que constituyen los pilares fundamentales de la implementación. Estas herramientas tienen como objeto evaluar y promover la resistencia de las leyes, las políticas y las instituciones existentes para a la aplicación de la IA en el país, así como la conformidad de los sistemas de inteligencia artificial con los valores y principios establecidos en la Recomendación. El presente documento tiene por objeto proporcionar más información acerca de la metodología de evaluación del estadio de preparación, exponer sus diversas dimensiones y detallar el plan de trabajo para los países implementadores, incluyendo el tipo de entidades que deben participar, las responsabilidades de cada una de ellas y la división del trabajo entre la UNESCO y el país ejecutante. Méthode d’évaluation de l’état de préparation : un outil de la Recommandation sur l’éthique de l’intelligence artificielle Year of publication: 2023 Corporate author: Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO) En novembre 2021, les 193 États membres de l’UNESCO ont signé la Recommandation sur l’éthique de l’intelligence artificielle, premier instrument normatif de portée internationale consacré à cette question. La Recommandation établit un cadre opérationnel complet et fondé sur l’ensemble des droits de l’homme en vue du développement et de l’utilisation éthiques de l’IA. Elle accorde à cette fin une attention particulière à tous les stades du cycle de vie du système de l’IA. Au-delà de l'élaboration des valeurs et des principes qui devraient guider la conception, le développement et l'utilisation éthiques de l'IA, la Recommandation indique aux États membres les mesures à prendre pour garantir le respect de ces valeurs et principes en préconisant une réglementation efficace et en formulant des recommandations dans divers domaines stratégiques clés tels que le genre, l’environnement, la communication et l’information. Guidé par ces valeurs, principes et domaines stratégiques, le Secrétariat de l’UNESCO a conçu un programme de mise en œuvre de la Recommandation en s’attachant avant tout à renforcer les capacités nationales nécessaires pour donner suite aux mesures énoncées dans la Recommandation et renforcer les cadres réglementaires. Les Recommandation demande le développement de deux outils clés qui sont les principaux fondements sur lesquels repose la mise en œuvre : la méthode d’évaluation de l’état de préparation et l’évaluation de l’impact éthique. Ces outils visent tous deux à évaluer et à renforcer la résilience des lois, politiques et institutions en vigueur en vue de la mise en œuvre de l’IA dans le pays mais aussi à rendre les systèmes d’IA conformes aux valeurs et aux principes énoncés dans la Recommandation. Ce document a pour objet d’expliquer plus clairement la méthode d’évaluation de l’état de préparation, de présenter ses différentes dimensions et d’exposer en détail le plan de travail à l’intention des pays concernés, en précisant notamment le type d’entités appelées à intervenir, les responsabilités de chacune d’entre elles et le partage des tâches entre l’UNESCO et les pays participants.