Resources
Explore a wide range of valuable resources on GCED to deepen your understanding and enhance your research, advocacy, teaching, and learning.
328 Results found
SDG4 이행 촉진을 위한 지표 연구 Year of publication: 2025 Author: 박근영 | 주형미 | 문무경 | 오예진 | 류기락 | 조혜승 | 변종임 | Sunmi Ji | 이슬비 | 박기웅 | 안해정 | 서무계 Corporate author: Korean National Commission for UNESCO 지속가능발전목표(SDGs) 이행의 전환점을 맞아 국내 교육의 현황과 과제를 SDG4 지표를 통해 진단하고 향후 방향을 탐색한 연구 보고서 <목차> 발간사 ‘SDG4 이행 촉진을 위한 지표 연구’ 보고서를 발간하며 서론 현 시점의 SDG4 이행 수준 점검과 개선 방향 탐색의 당위성 SDG 4.1 공평하고 양질의 초·중등 교육 이수 보장에 대한 한국 현황 및 향후 과제 SDG 4.2 영유아 교육과 보육 지표 검토와 향후 과제 SDG 4.3 고등교육의 수월성과 형평성 논의 및 향후 과제 SDG 4.4 고용을 위한 스킬: SDG 4.4의 이행 현황과 과제 SDG 4.5 교육 형평성 실현을 위한 SDG 4.5 지표 검토와 이행 현황 분석 SDG 4.6 한국의 SDG 4.6 이행 현행과 과제: 성인 문해력 SDG 4.7 더불어 살기 위한 학습을 향하여: 세계시민교육 및 지속가능발전교육 이행 현황과 모니터링 개선 방안 탐색 SDG 4.a SDG 4.a.1과 한국 디지털 교육 이행 현황: 접근성, 사용도, 스킬 SDG 4.b 공적개발원조(ODA) 장학금 확대 SDG 4.c 자격을 갖춘 교사의 공급 관련 이행 현황 및 개선 방안 결론 엄격한 현실 인식에 기반한 다음 목표로의 이행 준비 
A Comparative Study on Global Citizenship Education between Korea and ASEAN Year of publication: 2015 Corporate author: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) This research is the second-year study for a three-year project (2013-2015) focused on the global citizenship education of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). In the first-year study (2013), the current global citizenship education presented in the social studies curriculum of each country was analyzed based on literature research, and the global citizenship of students from each country was examined through surveys. Based on the analysis of the current global citizenship education of Korea and ASEAN overall and the characteristics of global citizenship of students from each country, this study is designed to make an in-depth analysis of global citizenship education and to seek direction for the joint global citizenship education programs between Korea and ASEAN to be employed in the third-year research.The students from the two countries, Indonesia and Thailand, among the 10 ASEAN countries are selected as participants because these two countries also participated in the previous international comparison study. The purposes of this study are as follows; (1) comparing the current global citizenship education of the national-level curriculum of Korea, Indonesia, and Thailand, (2) finding the similarities and differences by analysing the characteristics of global citizenship education of Korean, Indonesian, and Thai students, and (3) proposing the direction and themes of global citizenship education which will be mutually applied in Korea and ASEAN countries based on the research results.To conduct this study, various methods including literature study, interviews through visits to local schools, conferences for specialists, and international seminars were used. First, the meaning and goals of global citizenship education were established by reviewing literature and the concepts of ‘Humanity’, ‘Global Identity’, and ‘Global Participation’, which are the three sub-indices for global citizenship extracted from the first-year study, were used. Based on this framework, interview protocols for students, teachers, and policy makers were composed.The research team visited Indonesia and Thailand, carried out semi-structured interviews with students, teachers, and policy makers of national-level curriculum and classroom observations, and collected data related to global citizenship education. In addition, by conducting an international seminar with policy makers of curriculum of each country’s Ministry of Education and UNESCO specialists, we aimed to seek direction for joint global citizenship education in Korea and ASEAN and to reinforce educational cooperation.The major findings of this research can be suggested according to the research purposes in the following way.First, in the analysis of the national-level curriculum made for the comparison of current global citizenship education of Korea, Indonesia, and Thailand, the curriculum of each country is found to include elements of global citizenship education. However, countries show discrepancies in their actualization of curriculum, and citizenship education is still centered on national citizenship rather than global citizenship. Therefore, a more systematic attempt is needed for the advancement of citizenship education from nation-centered to globally oriented.Second, the findings from the interviews with students of each country carried out to define the characteristics of global citizenship of Korean, Indonesian, and Thai students indicate that while students’ responses showed a number of similarities in general, differences were found in specific answers as well. High school students provided more logical answers with greater depth compared to middle school students, and their responses differed based on their cultural contexts and experiences rather than their gender or religion. Therefore, while taking an approach which considers the level of students’ cognitive development as well as the cultural distinctiveness of each country, a way to expand opportunities for specific activities and experiences rather than an abstract way of teaching should be considered.Third, based on the analysis results, the directions and themes for global citizenship education to be jointly applied in Korea and ASEAN countries are proposed as follows: (1) The curriculum for global citizenship education should be focused on reinforcing the competency of citizens to participate in communities rather than that of individuals to ensure international competitiveness. (2) It is necessary to educate students to confront various conflicts and solve them by themselves rather than teaching them the abstract answers to the conflicts. (3) Global citizenship education should move beyond knowledge-based education and aim to lead bring changes in students’ behavior thereby empowering them to settle global issues. (4) For the actual implementation of curriculum, the cultural distinctiveness of each country and the differences by groups should be considered. (5) It is important to help students spread their interest to diverse countries beyond Western countries or ‘developed countries’.With these points in consideration, the objective of global citizenship education to be jointly promoted in Korea and ASEAN is suggested as the following: “Citizens are cultivated to form their identity as Asians based on their interest and knowledge of Asia and to participate in settling global issues. Through this, their qualities to participate in issues concerning all humanity are eventually cultivated.” The specific themes may include understanding Asia and ASEAN, social justice and equality, diversity, globalization and interdependence, conflict and peace, as well as sustainable development and environment. To improve effectiveness of joint global citizenship education of Korea and ASEAN and to reinforce educational cooperation, we made the following three suggestions.First, the standardization of global citizenship education across the nation is required. Having defined global citizenship education as the cultivation of the qualities of citizens based on the perception of human rights (Humanity) and with the identity as a global citizen (Global Identity) who can participate in settling the issues of global society (Participation), global citizenship education will yield the greatest efficiency when carried out together by all beyond national boundaries. Therefore, it is suggested that research for developing and expanding the joint curriculum by regions be supported and close cooperation be formed between policy makers of national curriculum and officials of International Training and Cooperation.Second, the reinforcement of global citizenship education through teacher training is required. For the effective implementation of joint global citizenship education in each country through the standardization of global citizenship education, the cultural diversity and distinctiveness of each country should be reflected. For these reasons, various practical bottom-up strategies are needed. Teacher training is a mandatory prerequisite for global citizenship education that is appropriate for the situations and contexts of each country. Therefore, it is suggested that researchers find out how to reinforce global citizenship education in teacher training based on solid research.Third, global citizenship education should be expanded by the exchange of human resources. As confirmed in this study, the exchange itself can bring a positive influence on the cultivation of global citizenship, and the sharing of the strategies for global citizenship education in each country can contribute to the development of a model for better global citizenship education. Therefore, it is suggested that the research for the joint promotion of project-based global citizenship education and the opportunities for mutual exchange of students and teachers between Korea and ASEAN countries should be expanded. Une Étude Comparative sur L'éducation à la Citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) entre le Coréen et l'ASEAN Year of publication: 2015 Corporate author: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) Pour réaliser cette étude, diverses méthodes, y compris l'étude de la littérature, des entrevues par des visites dans les écoles locales, des conférences pour les spécialistes et séminaires internationaux ont été utilisés. Premièrement, le sens et les objectifs de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) ont été établies en examinant la littérature et les concepts de «l'humanité», «Global Identity» et «Participation globale», qui sont les trois sous-indices pour mondiale la citoyenneté extraite de l'étude de première année, ont été utilisés. Sur la base de ce cadre, les protocoles d'entrevue pour les étudiants, les enseignants et les responsables politiques ont été composées.L'équipe de recherche a visité l'Indonésie et de la Thaïlande, a mené des entretiens semi-structurés avec les étudiants, les enseignants et les décideurs des observations du curriculum et de la classe au niveau national, et a recueilli des données relatives à l'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale. En outre, en procédant à un séminaire international avec les décideurs du curriculum du ministère de l'Éducation et de l'UNESCO spécialistes de chaque pays, nous avons cherché à obtenir des directives pour joint L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) en Corée et l'ASEAN et de renforcer la coopération éducative.Les principaux résultats de cette recherche peuvent être proposées en fonction des fins de recherche de la manière suivante.Tout d'abord, dans l'analyse du programme au niveau national fait pour la comparaison du courant L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) de la Corée, l'Indonésie et la Thaïlande, le programme d'études de chaque pays se trouve à inclure des éléments d'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale. Toutefois, les pays montrent des divergences dans leur actualisation du programme, et de l'éducation à la citoyenneté est toujours centrée sur la citoyenneté nationale plutôt que la citoyenneté mondiale. Par conséquent, une tentative plus systématique est nécessaire pour l'avancement de l'éducation à la citoyenneté d'un pays centré à vocation mondiale.Deuxièmement, les résultats des entrevues avec les étudiants de chaque pays menées pour définir les caractéristiques de la citoyenneté mondiale de la Corée, l'Indonésie, et les étudiants thaïlandais indiquent que, bien que les réponses des élèves ont montré un certain nombre de similitudes en général, des différences ont été trouvées dans des réponses précises que bien. Les élèves du secondaire ont fourni des réponses plus logiques avec une plus grande profondeur par rapport aux élèves des écoles moyennes, et leurs réponses différaient en fonction de leurs contextes et des expériences culturelles plutôt que de leur sexe ou de religion. Par conséquent, tout en adoptant une approche qui tient compte du niveau de développement cognitif des élèves, ainsi que les particularités culturelles de chaque pays, un moyen d'accroître les possibilités pour les activités et les expériences spécifiques plutôt que d'une manière abstraite de l'enseignement devrait être considéré.Troisièmement, sur la base des résultats d'analyse, les orientations et les thèmes de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale(ECM) à appliquer conjointement en Corée et les pays de l'ASEAN sont proposées comme suit: (1) Le programme de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) devrait se concentrer sur le renforcement de la compétence des citoyens à participer à des communautés plutôt que celle des individus pour assurer la compétitivité internationale. (2) Il est nécessaire d'éduquer les étudiants pour faire face à divers conflits et de les résoudre par eux-mêmes plutôt que de leur enseigner les réponses abstraites aux conflits. (3) L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) devrait aller au-delà de la connaissancel'éducation et visent à entraîner apporter des changements dans le comportement des élèves autonomisation qui leur permet de régler les problèmes mondiaux. (4) Pour la mise en œuvre effective du programme, la spécificité culturelle de chaque pays et les différences par groupes devraient être considérés. (5) Il est important d'aider les élèves propagent leur intérêt de divers pays au-delà de l'Ouestpays ou «pays développés».Avec ces points en considération, l'objectif de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) pour être promu conjointement en Corée et l'ASEAN est proposé comme suit: «Les citoyens sont cultivées pour former leur identité en tant Asiatiques en fonction de leur intérêt et de connaissance de Asie et de participer dans le règlement des problèmes mondiaux. Grâce à cela, leurs qualités de participer à des questions concernant toute l'humanité sont finalement cultivées. "Les thèmes spécifiques peuvent inclure la compréhension de l'Asie et de l'ASEAN, la justice sociale et l'égalité, la diversité, la mondialisation et l'interdépendance, les conflits et la paix, ainsi que le développement durable et l'environnement. Pour améliorer l'efficacité de l'articulation L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) de Corée et l'ASEAN etde renforcer la coopération éducative, nous avons fait les trois suggestions suivantes. Premièrement, la normalisation de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) à travers le pays est nécessaire. Après avoir défini L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) comme la culture des qualités de citoyens fondées sur la perception des droits de l'homme (l'humanité) et de l'identité en tant que citoyen du monde (GlobalIdentity) qui peut participer au règlement des problèmes de la société globale (Participation), L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) donnera la plus grande efficacité lorsqu'elle est effectuée conjointement par tous au-delà des frontières nationales. Par conséquent, il est suggéré que la recherche pour le développement et l'expansion du programme commun par les régions être soutenu et une coopération étroite se former entre les décideurs du curriculum national et les responsables de la formation et la coopération internationale.Deuxièmement, le renforcement de L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) à travers la formation des enseignants est nécessaire. Pour la mise en œuvre effective de l'articulation L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) dans chaque pays grâce à la normalisation de l'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale, la diversité culturelle et la spécificité de chaque pays doivent être pris en compte. Pour ces raisons, diverses stratégies ascendantes pratiques sont nécessaires. La formation des enseignants est une condition préalable obligatoire pour L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) qui est approprié pour les situations et les contextes de chaque pays. Par conséquent, il est suggéré que les chercheurs découvrent comment renforcer L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) dans la formation des enseignants sur la base de recherche solide.Troisièmement, L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) devrait être élargi par l'échange des ressources humaines. Comme l'a confirmé dans cette étude, l'échange lui-même peut apporter une influence positive sur la culture de la citoyenneté mondiale, et le partage des stratégies pour L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) dans chaque pays peut contribuer au développement d'un modèle pour une meilleure éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale. Par conséquent, il est suggéré que la recherche pour la promotion conjointe de par projet L'éducation à la citoyenneté Mondiale (ECM) et les possibilités d'échange mutuel d'étudiants et d'enseignants entre les pays de l'ASEAN et la Corée devrait être élargi. 
The Role of UNESCO in the Search for Peace Year of publication: 2019 Author: Inuk Kang | Sunghae Kim | Jihon KIM | Jieun Seong | Seongsang YOO | Dongjoon Jo | Dongju Choi | Kyungkoo Han Corporate author: Korean National Commission for UNESCO UNESCO's international intellectual cooperation for peace has achieved substantive tangible results in education and culture. Though some problems have been politicized and have produced limitations along the way, UNESCO has played a leading role in education and culture while setting the direction of international cooperation and activities in this regard.UNESCO has regretfully not played an active role in fostering broader, more diverse, and more extensive new research and practices related to peace, even with the international Cold War realities. While UNESCO was an international organization created explicitly for peace, it has neither led to momentous peace-related academic discourse nor does it lead to theoretical development in this regard. The concept of a "Culture of Peace," for example, was first mentioned in the Ivory Coast (Cote d'Ivoire) in 1989. However, it was not until 1997 that UNESCO started its "Toward a Culture of Peace Program" and the U.N. General Assembly declaring 2000 as the "Year of Peace."UNESCO's situation provides an opportunity for South Korea to play a more active role. South Korea needs to break with its history of taking a passive stance focused on short-term national interests and its preoccupation with "situational tracking" responses aimed at fostering national prestige when such opportunities present themselves. Instead, while prioritizing a "global community" founded on world peace and the well-being of humanity-as long-term shared benefits to all nations-and by sharing the financial burdens involved, the country can increase its international status and become a moral leader raising a "global citizenship power." 
Seoul Declaration on Media and Information Literacy for Everyone and by Everyone: A Defence Against Disinfodemics Year of publication: 2020 Corporate author: UNESCO On the 10th anniversary of Global Media and Information Literacy Week, stakeholders from all over the world gave a resounding affirmation as to the urgency to strengthen people’s media and information literacy competencies. The number of celebratory events increased from one hundred events in 2019 to over three hundred events in 2020.The outcomes of the deliberations in the Feature Conference and Youth Agenda Forum have been immortalized in the Seoul Declaration on Media and Information Literacy for Everyone and by Everyone: A Defence against Disinfodemics. This Seoul Declaration benefited from a consultation with close to one thousand registered participants.Through the Seoul Declaration, partners and participants called for media and information literacy for all. They:Emphasized that “media and information literacy (MIL) is a core competency for addressing the disinfodemic, and that MIL also contributes to access to information, freedom of expression, protection of privacy, prevention of violent extremism, promotion of digital security and combating hate speech and inequality”.Recognized “UNESCO’s effort to promote a Global MIL Cities Framework to stimulate creative learning about MIL in city spaces and the involvement of non-traditional actors in promoting MIL”.Called on duty bearers at the national to city levels to “commit to advancing ‘Media and Information Literacy for Everyone and by Everyone’ through policy and resource allocation across all relevant areas, including education, health, elections, child protection, climate, gender equality, governance and regulation, to mention some examples”.Urged technological intermediaries to “play an accountable role, through institutionalized multi-stakeholder systems, as part of the social endeavor to tackle disinformation and to build communities that are media and information literate”.Requested UNESCO, in cooperation with other UN Agencies, to “maintain a focus on inclusion of disadvantaged groups in MIL engagements, and to continue to foster gender equality in relation to MIL.” 
Education for Sustainable Devleopment: Sourcebook Year of publication: 2013 Corporate author: UNESCO The target audiences for the Education for Sustainable Development Sourcebook are primary and secondary teachers and mid-level decision-makers, who have responsibility for primary and secondary education. Another primary audience is teacher educators who work with pre-service and in-service primary and secondary school teachers. The purpose of the publication is to describe ways in which education for sustainable development (ESD) can be integrated into primary and secondary schooling. This collection of briefs is designed to complement other ESD materials published by UNESCO. The topics for the briefs were selected in consultation with UNESCO Field Offices and Institutes. The briefs for primary and secondary teachers are specifically written for professional educators who work in formal education settings. The briefs for teachers as well as those for decision-makers address “gaps” in the UNESCO ESD literature. 
지속가능발전교육 렌즈: 정책 및 실행 평가도구 Year of publication: 2013 Corporate author: 유네스코 The Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Lens has been prepared to support UN Member States to respond to these challenges through implementation of the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD, 2005- 2014). The ESD Lens supports the goals of the DESD, and encourages policy-makers and practitioners in Member States to initiate the process of re-orienting education, particularly the formal education system, towards sustainable development. The overall goal of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) is for countries to integrate the understandings, skills and values inherent in sustainable development into all aspects of national education plans to encourage changes in lifestyles and behaviour that allow for a more sustainable and just society for all. This complements existing Education for All initiatives, and strengthens the objectives of the Millennium Development Goals. Education for Sustainable Development has the potential to improve the quality and relevance of education everywhere. 
글로벌시민교육: 새로운 교육의제 Year of publication: 2014 Corporate author: 유네스코 본 문서는 2013년 9월 9-10일 서울에서 개최된, 우리 정부(외교부, 교육부)와 유네스코가 공동 주최하고 유네스코 아시아태평양 국제이해교육원이 실행 기관으로 참여한 ‘글로벌 시민교육 전문가회의(Technical Consultation on Global Citizenship Education)에 기초하여 작성되었다. 본 문서에는 a) 사전 설문지에 대한 전문가들의 응답, b) 전문가들의 회의 발표(프레젠테이션) 내용, 3) 회의에서의 토론 내용 및 d) 참고 자료 및 레퍼런스가 수록되어 있다. 본 문서의 최종본은 파리 유네스코 본부의 ‘평화와 지속 가능 발전을 위한 교육(Education for Peace and Sustainable Development)’ 부서가 작성하였다. 
글로벌시민교육: 21세기 새로운 인재 기르기 Year of publication: 2014 Corporate author: 유네스코 이 보고서는 글로벌시민교육을 주제로 열렸던 두 차례의 국제회의 - 글로벌시민교육 전문가회의(2013년 9월 9-10일, 대한민국 서울)와 제1차 유네스코 글로벌시민교육 포럼(2013년 12월 2-4일, 태국 방콕) - 결과를 토대로 교육정책 입안자, 교육 실천가, 시민사회단체 및 청소년 리더들을 위해 만들어졌다. 글로벌시민교육을 처음 접하거나 이미 실천하고 있는 모든 독자들에게 유용한 지침서가 될 것이다. 머리말감사의 말약어개요배경1. 글로시민교육의 기본 개념과 논의 1.1 글로벌시민교육이란 무엇인가 1.2 글로벌시민교육의 개념을 둘러싼 갈등 1.3 글로벌시민교육을 가능케 하는 요소2. 글로벌시민교육의 실제 2.1 교과과정을 통한 접근 2.2 정보통신기술의 활용 2.3 스포츠나 예술에 기초한 접근법 2.4 공동체에 기초한 접근법 2.5 교사 훈련 2.6 청소년 주도의 창의적 활동 2.7 글로벌시민교육 모니터링과 측정3. 앞으로의 과제 참고문헌 Global Citizenship Education: An Emerging Perspective Year of publication: 2014 Corporate author: UNESCO This document draws on inputs to, and common perspectives emerging from, a Technical Consultation on Global Citizenship Education organized by UNESCO and the Republic of Korea (i.e., the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and of Education, and the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding) in Seoul on 9-10 September 2013 . Informing this draft document are: a) responses from the expert participants to a questionnaire circulated by UNESCO in advance of the consultation; b) presentations from experts during the consultation; c) discussions during the consultation; and d) reference material contributing to, and prepared for, the consultation. The final draft of this document was prepared by UNESCO’s Division of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development at Headquarters in Paris, with the assistance of a drafting team.