Recursos
Exploren una amplia gama de recursos valiosos en GCED para profundizar su comprensión y promover su búsqueda, incidencia, enseñanza y aprendizaje.
1,725 resultados encontrados
Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report Año de publicación: 2024 Autor corporativo: United Nations (UN) The United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on AI’s Final Report, “Governing AI for Humanity,” builds on months of work, including extensive global consultations, and the publication of an interim report in December 2023. Proposals for Global Governance on AI This report outlines a blueprint for addressing AI-related risks and sharing its transformative potential globally, including by:• Urging the UN to lay the foundations of the first globally inclusive and distributed architecture for AI governance based on international cooperation;• Proposing seven recommendations to address gaps in current AI governance arrangements;• Calling on all governments and stakeholders to work together in governing AI to foster development and protection of all human rights. This includes light institutional mechanisms to complement existing efforts and foster inclusive global AI governance arrangements that are agile, adaptive and effective to keep pace with AI’s evolution. Extensive Global Consultations The report is the product of extensive consultations, involving more than 2,000 participants across all regions of the world, including via: • 18 deep-dive discussions on key issues with top experts• More than 50 consultation sessions across all regions• More than 250 written submissions from over 150 organizations and 100 individuals The Advisory Body also commissioned an AI Risk Global Pulse Check – the most comprehensive global horizon scanning exercise on AI risks to date – and an AI Opportunity Scan to crowdsource expert assessments of emerging AI trends. 
유네스코 이슈 브리프 2024년 제1호: 유네스코 「인공지능 윤리 권고」 이행을 위한 한국의 ‘준비도 평가’ 및 ‘윤리 영향 평가’ 대비 현황과 전망 Año de publicación: 2024 Autor: 이상욱 Autor corporativo: 유네스코한국위원회 Ⅰ. 유네스코 「인공지능 윤리 권고」 (2021)의 의의Ⅱ. 준비도 평가의 국제 현황 및 국내 대응Ⅲ. 윤리 영향 평가의 국제 현황 및 국내 대응Ⅳ. 인공지능 국제 거버넌스 현황과 「권고」 대응 전략 
United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech: Detailed Guidance on Implementation for United Nations Field Presences Año de publicación: 2020 Autor corporativo: United Nations (UN) The Strategy and Plan of Action acknowledges that hate speech has the potential to incite violence and undermine social unity. It recognizes that hate speech has been a precursor to atrocity crimes, including genocide, over the past 75 years. This approach to coordinating efforts across the UN system to identify, prevent and confront hate speech is grounded in international human rights standards, including the right to freedom of opinion and expression, principles of equality and non-discrimination, as well as other fundamental rights. The Strategy aims to give the United Nations the room and the resources to address hate speech, which poses a threat to UN principles, values and programmes. It guides the UN system on how to address hate speech and includes ways to support United Nations Resident Coordinators’ action in addressing and countering hate speech on the ground. 
The UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI: Shaping the Future of Our Societies Año de publicación: 2023 Autor corporativo: German Commission for UNESCO | Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO | Slovenian National Commission for UNESCO The UNESCO commissions of Germany, the Netherlands and Slovenia with the support of IRCAI have jointly published a brochure on the UNESCO recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. It summarizes the most important content in a compact manner and presents the central demands from the areas of health, culture, the environment, gender equality as well as education and research. The recommendation with its diverse topics is not only relevant for political experts, but it offers one for various areas of application of the ethical framework and thus serves as an orientation for dealing with AI in general. The brochure is available for the wider public in a number of formats including the original Adobe InDesign file that allows translations to be inserted and format pages, resulting in new versions of the brochure. Therefore, we strongly encourage all UNESCO Commissions from across all UNESCO regions Africa, Arab States, Asia and the Pacific, Europe and North America, Latin America and the Caribbean to use the text in the basic files and translate the content into their own languages, including using the graphic file to setup their own designs of the brochure. 
No Fear at School: Prevention of Violence Against Children in Educational Settings; Colombia Country Report Año de publicación: 2024 Autor corporativo: Aulas en Paz | Red Papaz This report presents an overview of progress in preventing and responding to violence against children and adolescents (NNA) in educational settings in Colombia, using the framework developed by Safe to Learn. This document is part of the initiatives led by the Latin American Hub for the Prevention of Violence Against Children in Schools, in which six Latin American countries participate and which is coordinated by Aulas en Paz. Sin miedo en la escuela: Prevención de la violencia contra la niñez en entornos educativos; Informe país Colombia Año de publicación: 2024 Autor corporativo: Aulas en Paz | Red Papaz Este informe presenta el panorama respecto a los avances en la prevención y respuesta a la violencia contra niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA) en entornos educativos en Colombia, usando el marco desarrollado por Safe to Learn. Este documento es parte de las iniciativas lideradas por el Nodo Latinoamericano de Prevención de Violencia Contra la Niñez en la Escuela, en el que participan seis países de Latinoamérica y que es coordinado por Aulas en Paz. 
[Summary] Education Under Attack 2024 Año de publicación: 2024 Autor: Jerome Marston | Felicity Pearce Autor corporativo: Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA) This study is published by the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), formed in 2010 by organizations working in the areas of education in emergencies and conflict, higher education, protection, international human rights law and international humanitarian law, in response to the persistence of attacks on educational institutions, their students and staff in countries affected by conflict and insecurity. Attacks on Education 2024 was developed based on independent research conducted by GCPEA. The report was carried out separately from and does not necessarily reflect the views of the various member organizations that make up the GCPEA Steering Committee. [Resumen] Ataques a la educación 2024 Año de publicación: 2024 Autor: Jerome Marston | Felicity Pearce Autor corporativo: Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA) Este estudio es publicado por la Coalición Global para Proteger la Educación de Ataques (Global Coalición to Protect Education from Attack, GCPEA), formada en 2010 por organizaciones dedicadas a las áreas de educación en emergencias y en contextos de conflicto, educación superior, protección, derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y derecho internacional humanitario, en respuesta ante la persistencia de los ataques contra instituciones educativas, sus estudiantes y su personal en países afectados por conflictos e inseguridad. Ataques a la educación 2024 se elaboró a partir de investigaciones independientes realizadas por GCPEA. El informe se llevó a cabo separadamente de las distintas organizaciones miembros que integran el Comité Directivo de GCPEA y no refleja necesariamente la opinión de estas. 
The “Hate Speech” Policies of Major Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic Año de publicación: 2021 Autor corporativo: UNESCO Montevideo This document reports an increase in so-called “hate speech” posts on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although dissimilar, such an increase can be observed in the transparency reports of the different platforms and the surge in content moderation since March 2020.During the same period—as a result of the lockdown measures adopted in most countries around the world—platforms increased the use of AI tools for content moderation. Therefore, we can’t fully say whether the interannual growth is linked to increased posts or changes in monitoring systems. Las políticas de las grandes plataformas sobre discurso de odio durante el Covid-19 Año de publicación: 2021 Autor corporativo: UNESCO Montevideo Este documento da cuenta de un aumento de posteos considerados discurso de odio a partir de la llegada de la pandemia COVID-19 en Facebook, Twitter y YouTube. Aunque dispar, ese aumento puede establecerse a partir de los informes de transparencia de las distintas plataformas y los crecimientos registrados en la moderación de esos contenidos a partir de marzo de 2020.Dado que en ese mismo período, y como consecuencia de las medidas de aislamiento tomadas ven la mayoría de los países del mundo, las plataformas tomaron la decisión de aumentar el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en sus procesos de moderación no es posible asegurar a ciencia cierta que ese crecimiento se haya registrado por un aumento en la creación y publicación de mensajes o a partir de un cambio en los sistemas de detección que afectó los resultados entre un año y otro.