์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

4 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

5th UNESCO Forum on Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Global Citizenship, Health and Well-being (Strand 4) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2021 ์ €์ž: Alexander Leicht | Nilantha Gunasekara | Aaron Benavot | Umair Mushtaq | Elena Diryugina | Libby Giles | Mรณnika Rรฉti | Le Anh Vinh ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO | APCEIU Strand 4 โ€“ What does progress in transformative education look like โ€“ conclusions and next steps Plenary session 4The Strand assessed how to best capture progress including possible benchmarks and success indicators in addressing different aspects of transformative education and discussed the way forward.Moderator: Ms Vibeke Jensen, Director, Division of Peace and Sustainable Development, UNESCOPresentation of the key ideas for recommendation:Mr Alexander Leicht, Chief of Section of Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCODiscussants:Mr Nilantha Gunasekara, Deputy Director, School Health and Nutrition Branch, Ministry of Education, Sri LankaMs Chandrika Bahadur, Director, SDG AcademyMs Katarina Popovic, Professor, Department of Andragogy, University of Belgrade, Serbia & Secretary General, the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE)Mr Hyun Mook Lim, Director, APCEIUMr Aaron Benavot, Professor, University of Albany, USA Concurrent sessions 4In the concurrent sessions, concrete policy recommendations on advancing transformative education and creating enabling conditions were formulated by policymakers, practitioners and monitoring experts. Session 4.1 โ€“ Policy makersModerator: Mr Sam Loni, Programme Director, UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, USASpeakers:Ms Catherine Matara, Assistant Director of Education, Ministry of Education, KenyaMs Sandra Allison Soria Mendoza, Head of the Environmental Education Unit and Environmental Education Specialist, Ministry of Education of PeruMs Saher Baig, Representative, Youth4Climate Session 4.2 โ€“ PractitionersModerator: Ms Monica Froehler, CEO, Ban Ki-moon Centre for Global CitizensSpeakers:Mr Umair Mushtaq, Project Manager, The Little Art, PakistanMs Elena Diryugina, Head of methodology and evaluation department, Investment to the Future, Russian FederationMs Libby Giles, Head of Global Citizenship, St Cuthbertโ€™s College, Director, New Zealand Centre for Global Studies, New Zealand Session 4.3 โ€“ Monitoring experts on measurement frameworks, M&E, and dataModerator: Mr Ralph Carstens, Senior Research Advisor, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)Speakers:Ms Mรณnika Rรฉti, Representative of Hungary, UNECE working group on monitoring of the ESD strategyMr Le Anh Vinh, Deputy Director General, Viet Nam Institute of Educational Sciences (VNIES)Mr Hilaire Hounkpodotรฉ, Coordinator of the Programme for the Analysis of Education Systems (PASEC), CONFEMENMr Guy-Roger Kaba, Coordinator of the Observatory on the Quality of Education, CONFEMEN Links to Strand 1 / Strand 2 & Special Session / Strand 3   Climate Change and Sustainability in Science and Social Science Secondary School Curricula ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2024 ์ €์ž: Marcia McKenzie | Aaron Benavot ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO There is an urgent need to transform the way climate change and sustainability are taught in classrooms and at schools. Learners must grasp the environmental impacts of climate change, how climate change relates to their own context and what actions can be undertaken and contribute to making societies more sustainable, equitable, just and climate-resilient. The findings presented in this publication indicate that accelerated efforts are needed. In a study of over 530 Grade 9 science and social science curricula from 85 countries worldwide, we found that 69 per cent of curricula contained no references to climate change, while 66 per cent had no references to sustainability. Furthermore, while 69 per cent of surveyed teachers from eight of the countries studied reported that environment, sustainability and climate change topics were included in the science and social science curricula in their schools only 50 per cent included them in their teaching. While there is a notable inclusion of environment, sustainability and climate change in science and social science curricula across countries, the depth of focus of this inclusion varies widely. Cognitive learning prevails over social and emotional or action-oriented learning. Climate change and sustainability in school practices must be strengthened, with teachers playing a key role in enhancing integration through teaching methods and materials. NISSEM Global Briefs: Educating for the Social, the Emotional and the Sustainable ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Andy Smart | Margaret Sinclair | Aaron Benavot | Jean Bernard | Colette Chabbott | S. Garnett Russell | James Williams ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Networking to Integrate SDG Target 4.7 and SEL skills into Educational Materials (NISSEM) The NISSEM global briefs are a collection of peer-reviewed essays from over 60 contributors with standing within the field of education. At the junction of SDG Target 4.7, SEL, and education in post conflict and low-resource settings, the NISSEM global briefs are a key resource for current research and practice.NISSEM is a Networking to Integrate SDG Target 4.7 and SEL(Social and emotional learning) into Educational Materials launched in March, 2018.   Feasibility Study on Monitoring Global Citizenship Competences in the Asia-Pacific Region (Phase I) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Aaron Benavot ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU In accordance with SDG 4.7, countries are promoting GCED and other aspects of Target 4.7. It is necessary to measure learner levels and progress in global citizenship competencies to assess the extent to which learners are acquiring knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to global citizenship.This report is organized into three substantive sections. Section II discusses existing definitions and conceptualization of GCED and GCC drawing on different sources. Section III describes which Asia-Pacific countries are included in this feasibility study and how relevant policy and curriculum documents are identified and analyzed. This section also discusses some common and share features of GCED that emerge from an analysis of country documents. Section IV briefly reviews existing measurement approaches of GCED or related concepts and then proposes a Measurement Framework of GCC for possible use in the A-P region. Section V of the report provides some forward-looking suggestions.