์๋ฃ
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ํ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ๋ํ๊ณ ์ฐ๊ตฌ, ์นํธ ํ๋, ๊ต์, ํ์ต ๋ฑ์ ํฅ์์ํฌ ์ ์๋ ๋ค์ํ๊ณ ์ ์ฉํ ์๋ฃ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์๋ณด์ธ์.
2 ๊ฑด์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ ๊ฒ์๋์์ต๋๋ค
Securitising Education to Prevent Terrorism or Losing Direction? ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2016 ์ ์: Bill Durodie ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Society for Educational Studies | Taylor & Francis This article examines the growing relationship between security and education, particularly in the light of the UK governmentโs Prevent Duty that seeks to tackle radicalization in a variety of milieus, including universities. However, rather than seeing this process as being merely one-way, through a so-called securitization of education, what is explored here is the dialectic between these two spheres. It is suggested that a heightened sensitivity to the supposed consequences of inflammatory rhetoric on the well-being of supposedly suggestible or vulnerable students has been in existence within education for quite some time. Securitising Education to Prevent Terrorism or Losing Direction? ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2016 ์ ์: Bill Durodie ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Society for Educational Studies | Taylor & Francis Cet article examine le lien grandissant entre la sรฉcuritรฉ et l'รฉducation, ร la lumiรจre, en particulier, du programme ยซ Prevent Duty ยป du gouvernement britannique, qui vise ร lutter contre la radicalisation dans diffรฉrents milieux, tels que les universitรฉs. Cependant, plutรดt que de voir un simple processus de sรฉcurisation de l'รฉducation, il sโagit ici dโexplorer la dialectique entre ces deux รฉlรฉments. On pose comme hypothรจse qu'une sensibilitรฉ accrue aux soi-disant consรฉquences dโun discours enflammรฉ sur le bien-รชtre des รฉlรจves prรฉtendus influenรงables ou vulnรฉrables existe au sein de l'รฉducation depuis un certain temps.