์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

248 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ -์ „ํ•™๊ต์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU '์ „ํ•™๊ต์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก'์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ถ€์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณธ ๋„์„œ๋Š” ํ•™๊ต ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•  ๋•Œ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์€ ์ง€์‹๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ด€, ํƒœ๋„, ํ–‰๋™์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊นŒ์ง€ ์•„์šฐ๋ฅด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต์‹ค์„ ๋„˜์–ด ํ•™๊ต, ๊ฐ€์ •, ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ทธ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๋”์šฑ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋„์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ํ™•์žฅ์‹œ์ผœ ์ „ํ•™๊ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „๋žต๊ณผ ํ™œ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš ๊ตฌ์ถ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ˜„์žฅ์˜ ๋ชฉ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ด์•„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฒช์—ˆ๋˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€, ๊ณ ๋ฏผ, ๊ทน๋ณต ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ, ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  ์—ฌ๋Š” ๊ธ€PART I. ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ทธ๋ ค๋ณด๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต์˜ ๋น„์ „Step 1_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ์™œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ๊ฐ€์š”?Step 2_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?Step 3_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?Step 4_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ๋ฌด์—‡์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๋‚˜์š”? PART II. ํ•™๊ต์— ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋ฐ”๋žŒStory 1_์•„์ด๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ต์‚ฌ Story 2_ํ•™๊ต ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋””์ž์ด๋„ˆ, ๊ต์žฅStory 3_๋‹ค์‹œ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํ•™๊ต์˜ ์—ญํ•      APCEIU-MNUAC Joint Research on Establishing the Foundation for Promoting Global Citizenship Education in Higher Education Institutions in Mongolia ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2025 ์ €์ž: Daehoon Jho | Jihyang Lee | Odsuren Dagmid | Mandukhai Baldandorj | Tumennast Dashtsenden | Amartuvshin Myagmarsuren | Delgertsetseg Choijilsuren | Punsaldulam Binderiya ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | Mongolia National University of Arts and Culture (MNUAC) This report reviews the integration of global citizenship education (GCED) in higher education and examines various approaches to establishing a foundation for promoting GCED in Mongolian HEIs. To this end, the study conducted a situational analysis on the current status of GCED at MNUAC. Based on this analysis, the report proposes a GCED integration roadmap for MNAUC, outlining a sequenced pathway that begins with achievable initiatives while also offering insights for other HEIs in Mongolia. The report is available in both English and Mongolian. Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2025 ์ €์ž: Suyeon Park | Sunmi Ji | Yoonyoung Lee ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU APCEIU is pleased to announce the release of its new publications, Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit, which shares key findings from the research conducted in Australia and the Republic of Korea. The two reports, based on case studies from two countries, build upon the three-phase Asia-Pacific GCED Monitoring Project (2022โ€“2024) jointly undertaken by ACER and APCEIU to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of GCED and support progress toward SDG 4.7 across the region. The three phases of the initiative identified enabling conditions for GCED, validated the regional GCED Monitoring Framework, and developed the ACER-APCEIU GCED Monitoring Toolkit. The reports for each phase can be found here: Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. The newly released reports move the project forward by examining how the Toolkit can be practically applied in real educational settings. The study aimed to examine how the Toolkit could be used to support collaboration among key education stakeholdersโ€”teachers, school leaders, and education supervisorsโ€”in 1) goal setting, 2) planning, 3) implementing, and 4) reflecting on GCED practices. Through this process, the research sought to understand how the Toolkit could help strengthen the connection between policy commitments and everyday educational practice, supporting teachers, school leaders, and system leaders to embed GCED more systematically and sustainably within their existing framework. Both studies conducted in Australia and the Republic of Korea have been guided by the following research questions:  1. How does the GCED Monitoring Toolkit support key stakeholder groups to collaboratively embed GCED in policy and practice?      a. What aspects of the Toolkit enable or challenge stakeholders to achieve their GCED goals and objectives?      b. How do key stakeholders perceive its usefulness?  2. Are there any aspects of the Toolkit that stakeholders would change to improve its usefulness in supporting the implementation and contextualisation of GCED in policy and practice?The reports demonstrate how a GCED Monitoring Toolkit can be translated into actionable processes within real educational settings. It offers valuable insights for policymakers, school leaders, teachers, and researchers aiming to monitor and strengthen GCED implementation and systematically embed GCED within their educational ecosystems. Global Citizenship Concepts in the Curricula of Four Countries ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2017 ์ €์ž: Natalie Browes ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) | APCEIU This report details the presence of Global Citizenship Education (GCED) concepts in the education systems of four countries: Cambodia, Colombia, Mongolia and Uganda. It highlights the main findings of eight reports: four expert reports, which predominately analyse curriculum content, and four situational analysis reports, which take a broader view and detail some of the country-specific challenges and opportunities with regard to GCED. Findings reveal the presence of GCED concepts across the curricula of the four countries. In addition to cognitive content related to GCED, competency-based content is also found present within the curricula of these countries. However, the majority of this content can only be indirectly linked to GCED, and it is better interpreted as part of the more traditional civics or citizenship education approach. As such, it generally lacks a global perspective and does not engage with all key themes of GCED. Furthermore, this content is often concentrated at the lower and upper secondary levels, instead of being equally distributed across all grade levels. This is particularly true in the case of behaviour-based competencies. Findings also reveal challenges beyond the curriculum. These include lack of teacher training and lack of support to implement GCED, which are concerns expressed by stakeholders in all four countries. A lack of GCED content in textbooks and lack of supplementary materials were also found to be issues. The report concludes with recommendations regarding the effective implementation of GCED within curricula. Among others, the report suggests the transversal integration of GCED - across the curriculum at all grade levels, while at the same time, actors from all levels of the education system, ranging from central government to teachers, should be engaged to ensure the use of complementary learning materials, pedagogies and assessment techniques. ์ง€์—ญ์  ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์†์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก (์ƒ์ƒ ์ œ50ํ˜ธ 2018๋…„ ์—ฌ๋ฆ„ํ˜ธ) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU 3 ๋ฐœ๊ฐ„์‚ฌ4 ์ŠคํŽ˜์…œ ์นผ๋Ÿผ: ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋จธ๋ฆฌ์™€ ๋งˆ์Œ์„ ์‚ฌ๋กœ์žก๋Š” ๊ต์œก8 ํฌ์ปค์Šค: ์ง€์—ญ์  ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์†์—์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก8 ๋‚œ๊ด€ ์†์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์ˆ˜์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ12 ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€๋ฅด์น˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก15 ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์ •๋œ ์บ„๋ณด๋””์•„ ์—ญ์‚ฌ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •19 ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ง€๋„์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋งˆ์Œ ์†์— ํ‰ํ™”์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒฝ ์Œ“๊ธฐ 22 ์ŠคํŽ˜์…œ ๋ฆฌํฌํŠธ: ์™œ ํ•™๊ต์—์„œ ๋งŒํ™”๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ผ๊นŒ?26 ๋ชจ๋ฒ”์‚ฌ๋ก€26 ์ข€๋น„ ์žฌ์•™์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ30 ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ๋œป๊นŠ์€ ๋ฐฐ์›€์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋กœ ํƒˆ๋ฐ”๊ฟˆํ•˜๋‹ค34 ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ: ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ๋ Œ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์ณ, ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋งˆ์Œ์—๊ฒŒ38 APCEIU์— ๋ณด๋‚ด๋Š” ํŽธ์ง€ : ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์นœํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํ‰ํ™”๋กญ๊ณ , ์ •์˜๋กœ์šด ์„ธ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€๊ธฐ 40 ์œ ์Šค ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ: ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๊ณ , ์ฃผ๊ณ  ๋ฐ›๊ณ , ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๊ณ , ํ–‰๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒญ๋…„๋“ค43 ๋‚ด ๊ธฐ์–ต ์†์˜ ํ‰ํ™”: ์ž๊ธฐ ๋•…์—์„œ ํ™˜์˜ ๋ฐ›์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€47 ์•„์‹œ์•„-ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ง€์—ญ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ: ํƒ€ํˆฌ : ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฌ์ •50 ๊ต์œก์› ํ™œ๋™  Global Citizenship Education Tools and Piloting Experiences of Four Countries: Cambodia, Colombia, Mongolia and Uganda ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Opertti Renato | Hyekyung Kang | Magni Giorgia ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) | APCEIU This report analyses the progresses made by Cambodia, Colombia, Mongolia and Uganda in the development and piloting of GCED tools, designed within the framework of UNESCO Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU)โ€™s and International Bureau of Education (IBE)โ€™s three-year cooperation project, โ€œGlobal Citizenship Education Curriculum Development and Integrationโ€. Based on the needs identified through the situational analyses carried out during Phase I, the four countries have developed tailored tools to mainstream GCED in their own context and piloted them during Phase II. Through an in-depth analysis of the tools as well as of their piloting processes, this report aims at understanding the extent to which GCED concepts are embedded and integrated into these tools and the way in which these tools contribute to the overall GCED teaching and learning practices in each context. What results from the findings is that the four countries, despite some setbacks due mainly to the strict timeline, have made significant progress in developing innovative strategies to integrate GCED principles into their education policies and practices. Finally, this report concludes with the suggestions for these tools to be effectively implemented during Phase III, particularly for this project, and for any further initiative around GCED areas. Electronic resources on education for sustainable development ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok The Asia-Pacific Programme of Educational Innovation for Development (APEID) of UNESCO Bangkok and the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU) collaborated to produce this document listing these electronic resources. The value of such resources is not limited to teachers alone; it is also useful to policy and decision makers, teacher educators, researchers and academics as well as students themselves. Les ressources รฉlectroniques sur l'รฉducation pour le dรฉveloppement durable ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok Le Programme d'innovation รฉducative en vue du dรฉveloppement en Asie et dans le Pacifique(APEID)e l'UNESCO ร  Bangkok et le Centre d'Asie-Pacifique pour la Comprรฉhension Internationale(APCECI) ont collaborรฉ pour produire ce document รฉnumรฉrant ces ressources รฉlectroniques. La valeur de ces ressources ne se limite pas aux seuls enseignants; il est รฉgalement utile pour les politiques et les dรฉcideurs, formateurs d'enseignants, des chercheurs et des universitaires ainsi que des รฉtudiants eux-mรชmes. [Video] Global Citizenship Education: Taking it Local! ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO | APCEIU Societies across the world have long lived according to principles that emphasize solidarity, dialogue and respect for diversity. It is from this rich well of practices that UNESCOโ€™s Global Citizenship Education (GCED) programme draws inspiration -- to instill in learners the skills, values, attitudes and behaviors to โ€˜live togetherโ€™ and help shape more peaceful, sustainable societies and world. GCED is not a new concept, but an aspiration long-held across the world. 4th Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED: Final Report ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU This report provides an overview of the activities and outcomes of the 4th Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED held in Seoul, Republic of Korea from 20 - 26May 2018.The 4th Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED invited 48 dynamic youth leaders around the world including those from developing countries and representatives of marginalized groups, and focused on developing effective advocacy strategies to maximize youth contribution in achieving SDG 4.7 through promotion of global citizenship.