์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

16 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

International Exchange and Cooperation Programs as Global Citizenship Education: A Case Study of the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Inyoung Lee | Youyeon Kim | Jeongmin Moon | Kyubin Lee | Sungsang Yoo ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study examines the implementation of international exchange programs conducted within public education, focusing on the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education from the standpoint of global citizenship education. It also proposes the feasibility and direction of international exchange programs based on the analytical framework that analyses the global citizenship education as the competency-based approach, moral approach, and critical approach. The research questions are: first, 'what is the aspects of the implementation of international exchange programs in terms of global citizenship education?' and second, 'what is the possibility of implementing international exchange programs as global citizenship education?' To find the answer to the questions, documents related to the international exchange program and data from interviews with the person in charge and the participants of programs were analyzed. This paper found that there is a feasibility for implementing the competency-based approach and moral approach in the international exchange programs. However, in order to invigorate international exchange as the practice of global citizenship education, it is recommended that: first, international exchange from the viewpoint of critical approach should be developed. Second, every student should have the opportunity to participate in the programs regardless of their economic status. Lastly, target nations for international exchange should be chosen not only from the competency-based approach but from the various perspective of global citizenship education.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ: ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: ์ด์ธ์˜ | ๊น€์œ ์—ฐ | ๋ฌธ์ •๋ฏผ | ์ด๊ทœ๋นˆ | ์œ ์„ฑ์ƒ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์„ํ‹€์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์„œ ๋ฐ ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž, ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์™€์˜ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ ์ฒซ์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™, ๋‘˜์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๊ณผ ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์— ๊ฐ€์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์— ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•™์ƒ์ด ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์šด์˜๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์— ํ•œ์ •๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋ฅ˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  ์ค‘ํ•™์ƒ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 18, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2023 ์ €์ž: ์ž„์ง„์˜ | ๋ฐ•ํ™˜๋ณด ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์‹ค์ฒœ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด D๊ด‘์—ญ์‹œ ์†Œ์žฌ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ํ•™์ƒ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ตํ•œ ํ•™์ƒ 890๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์‹ค์ฒœ ์š”์ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด ๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋ฐ›๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์ •์˜์  ์˜์—ญ์€ ์‹ค์ฒœ์  ์˜์—ญ์— ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ธ์ง€์  ์˜์—ญ์€ ์‹ค์ฒœ์  ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ธ์ง€์  ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋กœ ํ•œ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ๊ฐ„์ ‘ํšจ๊ณผ, ์ฆ‰ ๋งค๊ฐœํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ๋†’์ผ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. The Achievements and Tasks of the Global Citizenship Education University Course Development Project ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Eegyeong Kim | Soobin Min | Semi Lee | Haeryun Kim ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study seeks to analyze the achievements and tasks of the ใ€ŒGCED University Course Development Projectใ€ promoted by APCEIU. Using such research methods as literature review, workshops, and expert consultation, we analyzed the four-year project surrounding course providers, course contents, and student learning and satisfaction. The findings show that the project has heightened universitiesโ€™ interest in GCED through 33 courses involving 1,572 students from 21 universities. It was also confirmed that a variety of supports allowed students to have meaningful learning experiences. However, large class sizes, disparity among universities, and the absence of performance measuring tools seemed to limit the success of the project. As a strategy for overcoming these limitations, we suggested the tasks in terms of both quantitative and qualitative aspects.  A Study on the Objectives and Contents of ESD Reflected in the 2015 Revised Curriculum of Primary School (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 15, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: ๊น€๋‹ค์› ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study analyzed the objectives, core contents, and terms of use of sustainable development education reflected in elementary school curriculum to find ways to effectively implement ESD in conjunction with the curriculum. For this purpose, the contents described in objectives and achievement standards of the 2015 revised curriculum were analyzed, focusing on 8 subjects. Based on the results of the previous studies, the contents of ESD were selected and used as a reference. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, all eight subjects analyzed in this study include ESD-related goals in curriculum objectives. This shows that ESD can be implemented in the subject. Second, the terms reflected in the curriculum were used as โ€˜sustainable global villageโ€™, โ€˜sustainable future constructionโ€™, and โ€˜sustainable future societyโ€™ in social studies and practical arts. This shows positiveness in learning from the perspective of sustainable development. However, in both subjects, sustainable development is focused on future society, and it has a limitation in that sustainable development is a concept that looks at both the present and future generations at the same time. Third, the eight subjects include all the core contents except for โ€˜gender equalityโ€™ among 22 core contents of ESD. This is a positive indicator that ESD can be implemented in the curriculum.  The Development of a Middle School Social Studies Instructional Module for Place-Based Global Citizenship Education: The Case of Jeju Island (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Han Sanghee ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study aims to develop an instructional module for middle school social studies as part of place-based global citizenship education. The main contents of this study are as follows:first, the methods used in developing an instructional module for middle school social studies in global citizenship education; second, the method applied in the module for middle school classes. The study was mainly based on reference research and action research. The place-based class module developed for this study is the case of Jeju Island and is focused on middle school social studies classes as oriented to the integrated curriculum. The results are as follows: First, I developed a class module for place-based global citizenship education. For this module, I created principles for the class module for place-based global citizenship education and compose the class module by focusing on the case of Jeju Island. The design of this module went through 3 stages. The first stage explores regional issues by considering mutual relationships and the context from which suitable themes to foster global citizenship in the region are uncovered. The second stage explores the geological, historical, social, and cultural contexts of the place-based issues. The third stage expands on the contexts of the regional issues and practice to exercise global citizenship. Through the application of the principles and developmental stages for the class module, I then compose three Jeju-based modules. Second, I developed and conducted a Jeju-based instructional module for global citizenship education. For the themes and Jeju cases of the place-based module, I present sympathy for universal values through the life of Kim Mandeok who gave aid to the poor in the late Joseon era; respect for diversity and difference through the history of Haenamcheon, the Jeju immigrant community during early industrialization; and solidarity and practice through the Jeju 4ยท3 Uprising and Massacre. These three class modules can be utilized independently or stage by stage. I concede that this study has spatial and content limitations due to the fact that the Jeju cases are only presented among domains relating to global citizenship education which means that follow-up research is required to expand into relating domains and other regions. In addition, this study has other limits in that it hasnโ€™t been verified quantitatively by presenting the effects of global citizenship education only through the stories of students who attended this class and the follow-up educational activities through this module.  Integrating Gender into Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Hyeseung Cho ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the contents of global citizenship education(GCE) from a gender perspective, and to lay the theoretical foundation to integrate gender issues into GCE. To this end, this research analyzes GCE textbooks published by four Metropolitan City Offices of Education employing content analysis. As results, GCE textbooks rarely include contents related to gender (in)equality by representing 5.26%, 3.81%, and 8.97% of the textbooks of elementary, middle and high school respectively. In terms of topics, although a word of gender (in)equality is mentioned as an international agenda or a global problems in textbooks, the specific concept of it or various worldwide gender inequalities issues such as gender-based violence, women in poverty, reproductive rights were excluded. In terms of format aspects of the textbooks, the textbooks present gender perspective by describing woman as an independent global citizen, and by ensuring the equality of gender composition of characters. In some cases, however, the roles of women and men in textbooks are still divided, and gender stereotype was recognized through sex=segregated activities. Based on these results, this research argues that it is required to expand the contents of GCE by including the importance of gender equality and global structural gender inequality problems, and that it is necessary to review the discourse and practice of GCE in Korea from a gender perspective.  Critical Analysis of World Geography and Travel Geography Curriculum through the Viewpoints of Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Kyeonghan Yi ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) In this study I analysed world geography and travel geography curriculum through neo-liberal and critical viewpoints of global citizenship education(GCED). They have many contents about the understanding of diversity which deals in GCED importantly. Two geography curriculums provide many contents of GCED with neo-liberal viewpoint. World geography includes critical viewpoint based on regional conflicts, desertification problems, regional separation movements, righteous distribution of resources etc. The critical viewpoint of GCED in world geography emphasizes the critical understanding of disputes, regional issues, distribution etc. with structural aspect, and guides the realization of justice with problems solutions of these. Travel geography guides studentsโ€™ identification about unfairness and injustice of travel, and emphasizes travelersโ€™ responsibility, fairness and alternatives. But this travel geography is in circle of neo-liberalism viewpoint mainly. The understanding of diversity in two geographies provides important contents for GCED in schools. Geography make a understanding of diversity with otherโ€™s perspectives objectively, but it can neglect the critical and structural understanding about diverse landscape, culture, environment, issues, and travel etc. So geography is necessary to deal critical viewpoint also, because geography has mainly neo-liberal viewpoint. Geography teachers should have the harmony of neo-liberal viewpoint and critical viewpoint to contribute on development of global citizens. Geography teachers should critically re-conceptualize geography curriculum and reconstruct the contents of textbook. And students is necessary to aim transformative learning to understand global diversity and critically participate with global issues in everyday life.  Critical Understanding on Shrinkage and Limitation of UKโ€™s Global Citizenship Education in the Era of Brexit (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Jinhee Kim ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study aims to analyze the shrinkage and limitation of Global Citizenship Education in the epoch of Brexit. It also attempts to examine a feature of positioning and direction of Global Citizenship Education which is confronted with a sceptical criticism of its' educational impact. In this vein, the major findings and arguments showed the practice and implementation of Global Citizenship Education under the pressure of Brexit faces complicated challenges across Europe including UK, since Brexit highly pursues national centred hegemony and nationalistic bloc. It could hinder the structural restriction of implementing of Global Citizenship Education in UK. Apparently, this study indicated that the phenomenon of Brexit and it's impact is functioning as dynamic learning contents, not for a teaching-learning resource. It has been discussed that Citizens of UK have strived to deal Brexit as a learning experience in life-world. Finally, this study suggests a direction to move forward of Global Citizenship Education in an ever-shrinking world of Brexit.  An Exploratory Study on Applying Cooperative Learning in Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Jonghun Kim ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the validity of cooperative learning as an effective teaching and learning model of Global Citizenship Education(GCED) and to suggest lesson plan that can be used in an educational setting. With the inclusion of GCED as part of global education agenda through the UN SDG 4.7, its role and importance has been highlighted globally and many countries started to reflect GCED into their national curriculum. However, there is lack of practical research on the appropriate teaching and learning model of GCED that can be applied in primary and secondary school education. Therefore, this study, through theoretical review, analyzed and identified that cooperative learning is more appropriate in fostering global citizenship in comparison with other teaching and learning models because of its efficient learning structure which includes positive interdependence, individual accountability, group processing, promotive interaction, interpersonal and small group social skills as its essential elements. On the basis of this, jigsaw model, among various cooperative learning models, was applied and a lesson plan on GCED based on UNESCO World Heritage, an important repository of the history of humankind and nature, was developed and presented. The proposed lesson plan would strengthen learnersโ€™ ability to shape identities, understand others, raise sense of responsibility, link knowledge and action related to issues affecting interaction and connectedness of communities at local, national and global levels in an educational setting, and thus it will be useful in actualizing the learner-centered transformative objective of GCED.