์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

87 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

Integrating education for sustainable development & education for international understanding: conceptual issues and pedagogical principles for teacher education to address sustainability ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2006 ์ €์ž: Swee-Hin Toh ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok It is in this spirit that this essay seeks to โ€œintegrateโ€ two active and expanding fields of 2 educational innovation and transformation worldwide, namely ESD (education for sustainable development or sustainability) and EIU (education for international understanding). The key conceptual issues and themes of both of these movements will be clarified and shared values and understandings highlighted. It will also be argued that both ESD and EIU , in order to effectively fulfill their goals of building a peaceful, just and sustainable world order, rests on some key common pedagogical principles and processes. Another introductory caveat is also essential here, namely the question of paradigm. Among policy-makers, theorists and practitioners, there may well be and often are distinct differences in conceptualization according to their paradigmatic interpretations, with consequently alternative implications for policies and practices. Integrating education for sustainable development & education for international understanding: conceptual issues and pedagogical principles for teacher education to address sustainability ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2006 ์ €์ž: Swee-Hin Toh ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok Il est dans cet esprit que cet essai vise ร  ยซintรฉgrerยป deux champs actifs et en expansion de 2 innovations pรฉdagogiques et de transformation dans le monde entier, ร  savoir l'EDD (รฉducation pour le dรฉveloppement durable ou la durabilitรฉ) et ECI (รฉducation pour la comprรฉhension internationale). Les principaux problรจmes conceptuels et les thรจmes de ces deux mouvements seront clarifiรฉs et des valeurs et une comprรฉhension partagรฉes mis en รฉvidence. Il sera fait รฉgalement valoir que les deux EDD et ECI, en vue de remplir efficacement leurs objectifs de construction, un ordre pacifique juste et durable monde, repose sur quelques principes pรฉdagogiques communs clรฉs et des processus. Une autre mise en garde d'introduction est รฉgalement essentiel ici, ร  savoir la question de paradigme. Parmi les dรฉcideurs, les thรฉoriciens et les praticiens, il pourrait bien รชtre souvent des diffรฉrences distinctes dans la conceptualisation en fonction de leurs interprรฉtations paradigmatiques, ayant des implications en consรฉquence alternatives pour les politiques et les pratiques. ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์˜ ํ†ตํ•ฉ: ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์  ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€ ๊ต์œกํ•™์  ์›์น™ ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2006 ์ €์ž: Swee-Hin Toh ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ESD(์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ๋ฐœ์ „ ํ˜น์€ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ต์œก)์™€ EIU(๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก)์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ต์œก ํ˜์‹ ๊ณผ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”, ์ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ™•์žฅ ๊ฐœ๋…๊ณผ ํ™œ๋™์„ โ€˜ํ†ตํ•ฉโ€™ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ์ด ๋‘ ์šด๋™์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฐœ๋…์  ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋˜๊ณ , ๊ณต์œ ๋œ ๊ฐ€์น˜์™€ ์ดํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ‰ํ™”๋กญ๊ณ  ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ์งˆ์„œ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ, ESD์™€ EIU๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณตํ†ต ๊ต์ˆ˜๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๊ทธ ์„ฑํŒจ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ ค์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ž…๋ฌธ์ฃผ์˜ ์‚ฌํ•ญ(introductory caveat), ์ฆ‰ ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ •์ฑ… ์ž…์•ˆ์ž, ์ด๋ก ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์‹ค๋ฌด์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์ฑ…๊ณผ ๊ด€ํ–‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์  ํ•จ์˜์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„ ํ•ด์„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐœ๋…ํ™”์˜ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์ด ์ข…์ข… ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. Two concepts, one goal: education for international understanding and education for sustainable development ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok EIU and ESD are not dogmas but evolving concepts that can contribute to social learning and transformation. EIU and ESD share many common issues, supporting each otherโ€™s scope of work and focus. This series of information sheets has been prepared to highlight key complementary areas and synergies. Two concepts, one goal: education for international understanding and education for sustainable development ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok ECI et l'EDD ne sont pas des dogmes, mais l'รฉvolution des concepts qui peuvent contribuer ร  l'apprentissage et de transformation sociale. ECI et EDD partagent de nombreux points communs, en soutenant la portรฉe du travail et de concentration de l'autre. Cette sรฉrie de fiches d'information a รฉtรฉ prรฉparรฉ pour mettre en รฉvidence les complรฉmentaritรฉs et synergies clรฉs. ๋‘ ๊ฐœ๋…๋“ค, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ: EIU์™€ ESD ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok ๋ณธ ์ฑ…์ž๋Š” 2007๋…„, ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์›(APCEIU)๊ณผ ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘์ง€์—ญ ๋ฐœ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ต์œกํ˜์‹  ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(UNESCO APEID)์—์„œ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ EIU์™€ ESD์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…๊ณผ ํ•ต์‹ฌ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹œ๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ํŒŒํŠธ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ ์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณธ ์ฑ…์ž๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ EIU์™€ ESD, ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ต์œก, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ต์œก, ํ‰ํ™”๊ต์œก ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์–‘์„ฑ ํ‰๋“ฑ ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ๋“ฑ์žฅ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ, ์˜์˜, ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋“ฑ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ ํŒŒํŠธ ๋์—๋Š” ๋” ์‹ฌ๋„ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ๊ต์œก๋“ค๊ณผ EIU, ESD๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋งž๋‹ฟ์•„ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์„œ์ˆ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ๋…์ž๋“ค์€ EIU์™€ ESD๋ผ๋Š” ํฐ ๊ฐœ๋…๊ณผ ๊ทธ ํ•˜์œ„ ๊ต์œก๋“ค์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜๋Š”์ง€ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค Developing Holistic Indicators to Promote the Internationalization of Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Da Wan Chang ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok The internationalization of higher education has been emphasized by the global community to improve access and quality in higher education (SDG4.3), as well as to achieve other global goals by promoting cross-cultural understanding and tolerance. Even though the internationalization of higher education has diverse dimensions, โ€˜student mobilityโ€™ has been a predominant indicator and there are conceptual and methodological challenges in the existing sources of data and statistics. In addition to student mobility, this document proposes a holistic set of indicators to capture other important dimensions of the internationalization of higher education, such as alignment with international normative instruments, international networking, governance and management, as well as the mobility of academics and programmes, etc. The suggested indicators are categorized into domains on two levels: system and institutional. It is hoped that this policy brief will help users better understand and adapt the indicators for use in their local contexts, so as to promote the internationalization of higher education.  Transforming teaching and learning in Asia and the Pacific: case studies from seven countries ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2015 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok This publication grew out of the Third Regional High-Level Expert Meeting Beyond 2015: Transforming Teaching and Learning in the Asia-Pacific Region, held from 16 to 18 October 2013 in Bangkok, Thailand. At the meeting, over 40 experts from countries across Asia and the Pacific came together to exchange views on issues and challenges in teaching and learning and to reflect on pedagogical approaches for the future. The chapters in this publication originate from seven case studies presented at the meeting. The authors thank all the participants of the meeting for the valuable thoughts and comments they shared on that occasion.  Pursuing quality in early learning, vol. 1: Early childhood care and education (ECCE) teacher competency framework for Southeast Asia (SEA) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) | UNESCO Bangkok With the United Nationโ€™s (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a platform for achieving quality early childhood care and education outcomes by 2030, ECCE policy-makers, practitioners, and academicians from Asia-Pacific countries gathered at the second Asia-Pacific Regional Policy Forum on Early Childhood Care and Education in Putrajaya, Malaysia in 2016 to share experiences, innovations, and lessons learned in developing and implementing ECCE policies and initiatives. This document first provides a brief background, and discusses the purposes and intended audience for which the framework was developed (Section I). A succeeding section reflects on the regional ECCE landscape (Section II), before proceeding to a discussion of the ECCE teacher competency framework for Southeast Asia (Section III). Section IV suggests possible uses of the ECCE teacher competency framework; a final section concludes with areas for future action.  Digital kids Asia-Pacific: insights into childrenโ€™s digital citizenship ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Taeseob Shin | Hyeyoung Hwang | Jonghwi Park | Jian Xi Teng | Toan Dang ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO Bangkok This report responds to the growing needs of Member States in the Asia-Pacific region to understand childrenโ€™s knowledge, behaviour and attitudes in a hyper-connected digital world. It aims to create a data-driven, conducive educational and policy environment that maximizes opportunities that Information and Communications Technology (ICT) offers, while minimizing potential threats that the same may pose. The report was also developed in the context of the Education 2030 Agenda identifying digital skills as one of the key competencies for youth and adults to achieve and monitor until 2030.