์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

3,457 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

Critical Analysis of World Geography and Travel Geography Curriculum through the Viewpoints of Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 13, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Kyeonghan Yi ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) In this study I analysed world geography and travel geography curriculum through neo-liberal and critical viewpoints of global citizenship education(GCED). They have many contents about the understanding of diversity which deals in GCED importantly. Two geography curriculums provide many contents of GCED with neo-liberal viewpoint. World geography includes critical viewpoint based on regional conflicts, desertification problems, regional separation movements, righteous distribution of resources etc. The critical viewpoint of GCED in world geography emphasizes the critical understanding of disputes, regional issues, distribution etc. with structural aspect, and guides the realization of justice with problems solutions of these. Travel geography guides studentsโ€™ identification about unfairness and injustice of travel, and emphasizes travelersโ€™ responsibility, fairness and alternatives. But this travel geography is in circle of neo-liberalism viewpoint mainly. The understanding of diversity in two geographies provides important contents for GCED in schools. Geography make a understanding of diversity with otherโ€™s perspectives objectively, but it can neglect the critical and structural understanding about diverse landscape, culture, environment, issues, and travel etc. So geography is necessary to deal critical viewpoint also, because geography has mainly neo-liberal viewpoint. Geography teachers should have the harmony of neo-liberal viewpoint and critical viewpoint to contribute on development of global citizens. Geography teachers should critically re-conceptualize geography curriculum and reconstruct the contents of textbook. And students is necessary to aim transformative learning to understand global diversity and critically participate with global issues in everyday life.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ์™€ ์—ฌํ–‰์ง€๋ฆฌ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๋ถ„์„ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 13, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: ์ด๊ฒฝํ•œ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ ์ž์œ ์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ์™€ ์—ฌํ–‰์ง€๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์š” ํ•™์Šต ๋‚ด์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ์™€ ์—ฌํ–‰์ง€๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์€ ๋‚ด์šฉ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‹ ์ž์œ ์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ ์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋ฅผ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์€ ์ง€์—ญ ๋ถ„์Ÿ, ์‚ฌ๋ง‰ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง€์—ญ ๋ฌธ์ œ, ์ง€์—ญ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ์šด๋™, ์ž์›์˜ ์ •์˜๋กœ์šด ๋ถ„๋ฐฐ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๊ด€์ ๋„ ๋‹ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๊ด€์ ์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์Ÿ, ์ง€์—ญ๋ฌธ์ œ, ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ, ๋ถ„๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์ ์ธ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ, ์ด์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜์˜ ์‹คํ˜„์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌํ–‰์ง€๋ฆฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌํ–‰์˜ ๋ถˆ๊ณต์ •๊ณผ ๋ถ€์ •์˜๋„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋„๋ก ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฌํ–‰์ž์˜ ์ฑ…๋ฌด์„ฑ, ๊ณต์ •๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์—ฌํ–‰์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ์‹ ์ž์œ ์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ณ„์ง€๋ฆฌ์™€ ์—ฌํ–‰์ง€๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์ดํ•ด๋Š” ํ•™๊ต ์ˆ˜์—…์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์€ ํƒ€์ž์˜ ์ž…์žฅ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์„ ๊ด€์กฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ณ  ์ง€๋‚˜์น˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ๊ด€ํ™”ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€, ๋ฌธํ™”, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ, ์ง€์—ญ๋ฌธ์ œ, ์—ฌํ–‰ ๋“ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์†Œํ™€ํžˆ ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ์‹ ์ž์œ ์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๊ด€์ ๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‹ค๋ฃฐ ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ต์‚ฌ๋Š” ์‹ ์ž์œ ์ฃผ์˜์  ๊ด€์ ๊ณผ ๋น„ํŒ์  ๊ด€์ ์„ ๊ท ํ˜• ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ ์œก์„ฑํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ต์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋น„ํŒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์„ ์žฌ๊ฐœ๋…ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง€๋ฆฌ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์ด ์ผ์ƒ์˜ ์‚ถ ์†์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์˜ ์ดํ•ด์™€ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ์Ÿ์ ์—์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ณ€ํ˜์  ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  Do the Conditions in Chinese Secondary School Education Imply a Need for Global Citizenship Education? an Exploration of Six Secondary Schools in Jiangsu (Asia Pacifc Education Review; Rev. 21) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Yi Hong ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Seoul National University. Education Research Institute Global citizenship education (GCE), an educational advocacy for students to attain the competencies of being aware of and actively engaged in defending social justice, equity and sustainable development at both local and global levels, is difficult to achieve in practice. The failure can be attributed to inadequate knowledge of different effects of GCE when it is used to meet specific needs of local schools. Identifying local schoolsโ€™ needs for GCE may help educators put GCE to good use. However, few studies explore and justify the role of a local insight in assisting in GCE implementation, especially regarding the situation in China where inconsistencies are found across curriculum documents, research and educational practices. The present study fills the gap by investigating the schoolsโ€™ needs for GCE at secondary level within the Chinese education system. With the assistance of principals (nโ€‰=โ€‰6) and teachers (nโ€‰=โ€‰10) from six participating schools in an anonymous city in Jiangsu province, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and then analysed abductively using the grounded theory approach. Analysis was initially framed by employing criteria from a curriculum development method, namely situational analysis, based on which further analysis was conducted to synthesise more abstract themes. As a result, four general conditions emerged from the data, including three restrictive conditions that may prevent GCE integration (i.e. โ€˜compliance and commitmentโ€™, โ€˜social mobilityโ€™ and โ€˜administrative constraintsโ€™) and one condition that can encourage GCE implementation (i.e. โ€˜competency-based educationโ€™). Since GCE is a complex idea linked to many possible applications, the four key conditions revealed from the small sample in the present study can enrich researchersโ€™ understanding of the potentiality of GCE implementation in similar moderately developed cities on the east coast of China.  The Theoretical Foundation and Ideological Background of the Citizenship Curriculum Reform in England (Studies in Foreign Education; Vol. 46, No. 7) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Chen Lin ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Northeast Normal University Citizenship became part of the compulsory courses of secondary schools in England in 2002. The guideline was revised in 2014. Fierce academic debates shaped the curriculum reform. Political theory of political conflict mediation and political participative equality played an important role in promoting the legalization of Citizenship education. The wide acceptance of social capital theory also helps to win the necessary support. The current curriculum is a mixture of various ideologies such as socialism, republicanism and communitarianism. This multi-feature provides both pragmatic conditions for the curriculumโ€™s legalization and challenges for its implementation.  International Exchange and Cooperation Programs as Global Citizenship Education: A Case Study of the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Inyoung Lee | Youyeon Kim | Jeongmin Moon | Kyubin Lee | Sungsang Yoo ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study examines the implementation of international exchange programs conducted within public education, focusing on the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education from the standpoint of global citizenship education. It also proposes the feasibility and direction of international exchange programs based on the analytical framework that analyses the global citizenship education as the competency-based approach, moral approach, and critical approach. The research questions are: first, 'what is the aspects of the implementation of international exchange programs in terms of global citizenship education?' and second, 'what is the possibility of implementing international exchange programs as global citizenship education?' To find the answer to the questions, documents related to the international exchange program and data from interviews with the person in charge and the participants of programs were analyzed. This paper found that there is a feasibility for implementing the competency-based approach and moral approach in the international exchange programs. However, in order to invigorate international exchange as the practice of global citizenship education, it is recommended that: first, international exchange from the viewpoint of critical approach should be developed. Second, every student should have the opportunity to participate in the programs regardless of their economic status. Lastly, target nations for international exchange should be chosen not only from the competency-based approach but from the various perspective of global citizenship education.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ: ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: ์ด์ธ์˜ | ๊น€์œ ์—ฐ | ๋ฌธ์ •๋ฏผ | ์ด๊ทœ๋นˆ | ์œ ์„ฑ์ƒ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์„ํ‹€์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์„œ ๋ฐ ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž, ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์™€์˜ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ ์ฒซ์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™, ๋‘˜์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๊ณผ ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์— ๊ฐ€์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์— ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•™์ƒ์ด ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์šด์˜๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์— ํ•œ์ •๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋ฅ˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  Global Citizenship Education: Critical and International Perspectives ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Abdeljalil Akkari | Kathrine Maleq ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Springer Nature | Swiss National Science Foundation This open access book takes a critical and international perspective to the mainstreaming of the Global Citizenship Concept and analyses the key issues regarding global citizenship education across the world. In that respect, it addresses a pressing need to provide further conceptual input and to open global citizenship agendas to diversity and indigeneity.Social and political changes brought by globalisation, migration and technological advances of the 21st century have generated a rise in the popularity of the utopian and philosophical idea of global citizenship. In response to the challenges of todayโ€™s globalised and interconnected world, such as inequality, human rights violations and poverty, global citizenship education has been invoked as a means of preparing youth for an inclusive and sustainable world.In recent years, the development of global citizenship education and the building of studentsโ€™ global citizenship competencies have become a focal point in global agendas for education, international educational assessments and international organisations. However, the concept of global citizenship education still remains highly contested and subject to multiple interpretations, and its operationalisation in national educational policies proves to be challenging.This volume aims to contribute to the debate, question the relevancy of global citizenship educationโ€™s policy objectives and to enhance understanding of local perspectives, ideologies, conceptions and issues related to citizenship education on a local, national and global level. To this end, the book provides a comprehensive and geographically based overview of the challenges citizenship education faces in a rapidly changing global world through the lens of diversity and inclusiveness.  Integrating Gender into Global Citizenship Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Hyeseung Cho ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) The purpose of this study is to explore the contents of global citizenship education(GCE) from a gender perspective, and to lay the theoretical foundation to integrate gender issues into GCE. To this end, this research analyzes GCE textbooks published by four Metropolitan City Offices of Education employing content analysis. As results, GCE textbooks rarely include contents related to gender (in)equality by representing 5.26%, 3.81%, and 8.97% of the textbooks of elementary, middle and high school respectively. In terms of topics, although a word of gender (in)equality is mentioned as an international agenda or a global problems in textbooks, the specific concept of it or various worldwide gender inequalities issues such as gender-based violence, women in poverty, reproductive rights were excluded. In terms of format aspects of the textbooks, the textbooks present gender perspective by describing woman as an independent global citizen, and by ensuring the equality of gender composition of characters. In some cases, however, the roles of women and men in textbooks are still divided, and gender stereotype was recognized through sex=segregated activities. Based on these results, this research argues that it is required to expand the contents of GCE by including the importance of gender equality and global structural gender inequality problems, and that it is necessary to review the discourse and practice of GCE in Korea from a gender perspective.  ์  ๋” ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ณธ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 14, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: ์กฐํ˜œ์Šน ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์  ๋” ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์— ์  ๋” ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜์˜ ํ† ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ์‹œ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฐ„ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ 3์ข…์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‚ด์šฉ๋ถ„์„(content analysis)์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ธก๋ฉด๊ณผ ํ˜•์‹์ธก๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ ๋‚ด ์„ฑ(๋ถˆ)ํ‰๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ์ดˆ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์—๋Š” 5.26%, ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์—๋Š” 3.81%, ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์—๋Š” 8.97%์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์œผ๋กœ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ ๋‚ด ์„ฑ(๋ถˆ)ํ‰๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋น„์ค‘์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ(๋ถˆ)ํ‰๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ๊ตญ์ œ ์•„์  ๋‹ค ํ˜น์€ ์ „์ง€๊ตฌ์  ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ๋ช…์‹œ๋˜๊ณ ๋Š” ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์  ๋”ํญ๋ ฅ, ์  ๋”์™€ ๋นˆ๊ณค, ์žฌ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ถŒ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ถˆํ‰๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ตญ๋‚ด์™ธ ์ด์Šˆ๋“ค์ด ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์˜ ํ˜•์‹์  ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด ์ฃผ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์—ฌ์„ฑ์ƒ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋“ฑ์žฅ์ธ๋ฌผ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ณ„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์„ฑํ‰๋“ฑํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์„ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์—ฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‚จ์„ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์„ฑ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ์  ํ™œ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์„ฑ์ฐจ๋ณ„์  ์ธ์‹์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋‚ด ์„ฑํ‰๋“ฑ ์ด์Šˆ์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์„ฑ๋ถˆํ‰๋“ฑ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•จ์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋‹ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ์  ๋”์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์žฌ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  Desempeรฑos de educaciรณn para la paz ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2016 ์ €์ž: Enrique Chaux | Josรฉ Fernando Mejรญa | Juanita Lleras | David Guรกqueta | Andrea Bustamante | Gloria Inรฉs Rodrรญguez | Paula Andrea Pineda | Alexander Ruiz-Silva | Carolina Valencia | Charlotte Greniez | Daniel Garcรญa | Sara Victoria Alvarado | Ana Marรญa Velรกsquez ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Colombia. Ministerio de Educaciรณn Nacional Este documento presenta una propuesta de desempeรฑos de Educaciรณn para la Paz para los grados transiciรณn a 11ยบ. Esta propuesta busca servir de ilustraciรณn de cรณmo podrรญa ser un diseรฑo curricular consistente con las Orientaciones para la Implementaciรณn de la Cรกtedra de la Paz.