์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

2,199 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

A Case Study on the Possible Contribution of Global Citizenship Concept to Education for Sustainable Development (Environmental Education; Vol. 31, No.1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Seyoung Hwang ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society for Environmental Education The aim of this study was to explore the ways in which the recent discussion on global citizenship education could contribute to the discursive possibility of education that addresses cultural diversity and co-existence which had not been considered much in the education for sustainable development (ESD) field. For that, the study showed how the formative experience of global citizen identity as the core concept of global citizenship can be a significant learning experience for ESD. The case studies included UNESCO school activity, school club activity, international volunteering activity and local cultural exchange activity. Based on the interviews with participants, the study found out that they were in the state of accepting or orienting themselves toward global citizen identity. The study also identified the kinds of qualitative experiences affecting such identity formation as facing and reflecting on oneโ€™s own cultural bias, intercultural sympathy, participation and action beyond mere knowledge acquisition, self-directed participation and achievement, lack of reflection in the oneโ€™ own life context as a global citizen, and conflict with the values embedded in the competition-driven lifestyle. Based on the result, the potential and meanings of the ESD focused on global citizen identity were discussed.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹ ๊ฐœ๋…์˜ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์—ฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์งˆ์  ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ (ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ต์œก; Vol. 31, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ์ €์ž: Seyoung Hwang ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society for Environmental Education ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜์™€ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ด ๊ทธ๊ฐ„ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๊ต์œก์—์„œ ๊ฐ„๊ณผ๋˜์–ด์™”๋˜ ๋ฌธํ™” ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์กด์ค‘๊ณผ ๊ณต์กด๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ต์œก์  ๋…ผ์˜๋ฅผ ํ™•์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฐœ๋…์ธ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ(global citizen identity)์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๊ต์œก์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ•™์Šต ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ”ํ•™๊ตํ™œ๋™, ๋™์•„๋ฆฌ, ํ•ด์™ธ์ž์›๋ด‰์‚ฌํ™œ๋™, ์ง€์—ญ๋ฌธํ™”๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ™œ๋™ ๋“ฑ์˜ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ์„ ์ˆ˜์šฉ ๋˜๋Š” ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์— ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์งˆ์  ๊ฒฝํ—˜์—๋Š” ๋ฌธํ™”์  ํŽธ๊ฒฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง์‹œ์™€ ์„ฑ์ฐฐ, ํƒ€๋ฌธํ™”๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค๊ณผ์˜ ์ •์„œ์  ๊ต๊ฐ, ์ง€์‹๋งŒ์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์™€ ์‹ค์ฒœ, ์ž๊ธฐ ์ฃผ๋„์  ์ฐธ์—ฌ์™€ ์„ฑ์ทจ, ๊ฐœ์ธ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์‚ฌ์™€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ, ๋‚ด ์‚ถ ์•ˆ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์„ฑ์ฐฐ ๋ถ€์กฑ, ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์œ„์ฃผ์˜ ์‚ถ์˜ ์–‘์‹๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๊ต์œก์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ์‚ผ๋Š” ๊ต์œก์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  Do the Conditions in Chinese Secondary School Education Imply a Need for Global Citizenship Education? an Exploration of Six Secondary Schools in Jiangsu (Asia Pacifc Education Review; Rev. 21) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Yi Hong ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Seoul National University. Education Research Institute Global citizenship education (GCE), an educational advocacy for students to attain the competencies of being aware of and actively engaged in defending social justice, equity and sustainable development at both local and global levels, is difficult to achieve in practice. The failure can be attributed to inadequate knowledge of different effects of GCE when it is used to meet specific needs of local schools. Identifying local schoolsโ€™ needs for GCE may help educators put GCE to good use. However, few studies explore and justify the role of a local insight in assisting in GCE implementation, especially regarding the situation in China where inconsistencies are found across curriculum documents, research and educational practices. The present study fills the gap by investigating the schoolsโ€™ needs for GCE at secondary level within the Chinese education system. With the assistance of principals (nโ€‰=โ€‰6) and teachers (nโ€‰=โ€‰10) from six participating schools in an anonymous city in Jiangsu province, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and then analysed abductively using the grounded theory approach. Analysis was initially framed by employing criteria from a curriculum development method, namely situational analysis, based on which further analysis was conducted to synthesise more abstract themes. As a result, four general conditions emerged from the data, including three restrictive conditions that may prevent GCE integration (i.e. โ€˜compliance and commitmentโ€™, โ€˜social mobilityโ€™ and โ€˜administrative constraintsโ€™) and one condition that can encourage GCE implementation (i.e. โ€˜competency-based educationโ€™). Since GCE is a complex idea linked to many possible applications, the four key conditions revealed from the small sample in the present study can enrich researchersโ€™ understanding of the potentiality of GCE implementation in similar moderately developed cities on the east coast of China.  The Theoretical Foundation and Ideological Background of the Citizenship Curriculum Reform in England (Studies in Foreign Education; Vol. 46, No. 7) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Chen Lin ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Northeast Normal University Citizenship became part of the compulsory courses of secondary schools in England in 2002. The guideline was revised in 2014. Fierce academic debates shaped the curriculum reform. Political theory of political conflict mediation and political participative equality played an important role in promoting the legalization of Citizenship education. The wide acceptance of social capital theory also helps to win the necessary support. The current curriculum is a mixture of various ideologies such as socialism, republicanism and communitarianism. This multi-feature provides both pragmatic conditions for the curriculumโ€™s legalization and challenges for its implementation.  International Exchange and Cooperation Programs as Global Citizenship Education: A Case Study of the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (Journal of Education for International Understanding; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: Inyoung Lee | Youyeon Kim | Jeongmin Moon | Kyubin Lee | Sungsang Yoo ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This study examines the implementation of international exchange programs conducted within public education, focusing on the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education from the standpoint of global citizenship education. It also proposes the feasibility and direction of international exchange programs based on the analytical framework that analyses the global citizenship education as the competency-based approach, moral approach, and critical approach. The research questions are: first, 'what is the aspects of the implementation of international exchange programs in terms of global citizenship education?' and second, 'what is the possibility of implementing international exchange programs as global citizenship education?' To find the answer to the questions, documents related to the international exchange program and data from interviews with the person in charge and the participants of programs were analyzed. This paper found that there is a feasibility for implementing the competency-based approach and moral approach in the international exchange programs. However, in order to invigorate international exchange as the practice of global citizenship education, it is recommended that: first, international exchange from the viewpoint of critical approach should be developed. Second, every student should have the opportunity to participate in the programs regardless of their economic status. Lastly, target nations for international exchange should be chosen not only from the competency-based approach but from the various perspective of global citizenship education.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ: ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 14, No. 2) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2019 ์ €์ž: ์ด์ธ์˜ | ๊น€์œ ์—ฐ | ๋ฌธ์ •๋ฏผ | ์ด๊ทœ๋นˆ | ์œ ์„ฑ์ƒ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œกํ•™ํšŒ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต๊ต์œก ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์„ํ‹€์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์„œ ๋ฐ ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž, ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์™€์˜ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ ์ฒซ์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹œํ–‰ ์–‘์ƒ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™, ๋‘˜์งธ, โ€˜์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ๊ฐ€?โ€™์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„๊ต์œก์ฒญ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๊ณผ ๋„๋•์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ตญ์ œ๊ต๋ฅ˜ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์— ๊ฐ€์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์— ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•™์ƒ์ด ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์šด์˜๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์— ํ•œ์ •๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋ฅ˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  Global Citizenship Education: Critical and International Perspectives ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Abdeljalil Akkari | Kathrine Maleq ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Springer Nature | Swiss National Science Foundation This open access book takes a critical and international perspective to the mainstreaming of the Global Citizenship Concept and analyses the key issues regarding global citizenship education across the world. In that respect, it addresses a pressing need to provide further conceptual input and to open global citizenship agendas to diversity and indigeneity.Social and political changes brought by globalisation, migration and technological advances of the 21st century have generated a rise in the popularity of the utopian and philosophical idea of global citizenship. In response to the challenges of todayโ€™s globalised and interconnected world, such as inequality, human rights violations and poverty, global citizenship education has been invoked as a means of preparing youth for an inclusive and sustainable world.In recent years, the development of global citizenship education and the building of studentsโ€™ global citizenship competencies have become a focal point in global agendas for education, international educational assessments and international organisations. However, the concept of global citizenship education still remains highly contested and subject to multiple interpretations, and its operationalisation in national educational policies proves to be challenging.This volume aims to contribute to the debate, question the relevancy of global citizenship educationโ€™s policy objectives and to enhance understanding of local perspectives, ideologies, conceptions and issues related to citizenship education on a local, national and global level. To this end, the book provides a comprehensive and geographically based overview of the challenges citizenship education faces in a rapidly changing global world through the lens of diversity and inclusiveness.  Instructional Design Based on Ecological Multiple Citizenship for Elementary Social Studies Classroom: Focusing on National Citizenship, Global Citizenship and Sustainable Development Education (Social studies education; Vol. 55, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2016 ์ €์ž: Kwangtaek Sim ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Korean Social Studies Association An instructional model for national citizenship, global citizenship, and sustainable development education was developed. Four lesson plans in the elementary 5thgrade social studies were suggested to show the practice of the instructional model. Three outcomes are reported. First, identity as a citizen of a nation, global citizenship, communications are interrelated. National citizenship and communications in the network society can result in a stronger vision of oneโ€™s global citizenship. This is especially the case when the wellbeing and happiness of people in neighboring countries who live across the national boundary are viewed within the domain of community- economy- ecology. Each prepares citizens through knowledge and skills that enable them to empathize, criticize constructively, and live together sustainably. The educational methods recommended to attain global citizenship perspectives are critical thinking, comparative studies, and teaching controversial issues. Those methods tend to result in a commitment to guarantee of non-domination freedom and tolerance of others. Second, discussions regarding sustainable development focused largely on deliberative engagement as a teaching method. Issues discussed were: speculative banking and its regulation; medical treatment and education as value goods; the steps necessary for households and businesses to attain sustainability; and environmental justice and social equity. The educational methods recommended to live together sustainably are planning and practice for grassroots democratic communitiesโ€™ solidarity by applying back-casting strategy and systematic thinking. Thirdly, social studies classrooms intent on to enhance national citizenship, global citizenship, and sustainable development have a five step task. They, should emphasize comparison and critiqueโ†’ discussionโ†’ empathyโ†’ planning and lastly the engagement of learners in content critical to ecological multiple citizenship.  ์ƒํƒœ์  ๋‹ค์ค‘์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์ดˆ๋“ฑ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ณผ ๊ต์‹ค์ˆ˜์—… ์„ค๊ณ„: ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „ ๊ต์œก์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ (์‚ฌํšŒ๊ณผ๊ต์œก; Vol. 55, No. 1) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2016 ์ €์ž: ์‹ฌ๊ด‘ํƒ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ํ•œ๊ตญ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ณผ๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•™ํšŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์  ๋‹ค์ค‘์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „ ๊ต์œก์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ˆ˜์—…๋ชจํ˜•์— ์ดˆ๋“ฑ์‚ฌํšŒ 5-1 ํ•™์Šต๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต์žฌ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์—…์•ˆ์„ ์˜ˆ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต์— ๊ด€ํ•ด ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์‹œ๋Œ€์˜ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ์€ ์ง€์—ญ ์‚ฌํšŒ-๊ฒฝ์ œ-์ƒํƒœ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฏผ์กฑ๊ณผ ๊ตญ๊ฒฝ์„ ๋„˜์–ด ์ด์›ƒ์˜ ์•ˆ๋…•๊ณผ ํ–‰๋ณต์„ ๋‹ด๋ณดํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์  ์ •์ฒด์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต์œก๋‚ด์šฉ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ณต๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฏผ, ๋น„ํŒ์  ์‹œ๋ฏผ, ์ƒํƒœ์  ์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ง€์‹์ดํ•ด, ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ, ๊ฐ€์น˜ํƒœ๋„ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ต์œก๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ์ž์œ  ๋ณด์žฅ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ๋ก , ๊ด€์šฉ๊ณผ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์‚ฌ๊ณ , ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋…ผ์Ÿ์„ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ์‚ฌํšŒ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ˆ™์˜์— ๊ด€ํ•ด ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ต์œก๋‚ด์šฉ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ํ†ต์น˜์ฒด์ œ๋Š” ํˆฌ๊ธฐ์„ฑ ๊ธˆ์œตํ™œ๋™์„ ๊ทœ์ œํ•˜๊ณ , ์˜๋ฃŒ์™€ ๊ต์œก์„ ๊ฐ€์น˜์žฌ๋กœ ์ธ์ •ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ€๊ณ„์™€ ๊ธฐ์—…์€ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์ œํ™œ๋™์„ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฏผ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •์˜์™€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ต์œก๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ์„œ ํ•™์Šต์ž๋Š” ํŒŒ๋ฆฌํ˜‘์ •๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฐฑ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ์ „๋žต๊ณผ ์ง€ ๊ตฌ์ดŒ ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ์ •์น˜, ๊ฒฝ์ œ, ์‚ฌํšŒ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๊ฐ„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์  ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์— ํ† ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ’€๋ฟŒ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ๊ณต๋™์ฒด ๊ฐ„ ์ƒํ˜ธ์—ฐ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ค์ฒœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ƒํƒœ์  ๋‹ค์ค‘์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „ ๊ต์œก์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ณผ ๊ต์‹ค์ˆ˜์—…์€ ํ•™๋ฌธ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์ƒํƒœ์  ๋‹ค์ค‘์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ์„ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜๋Š” ํ•™์Šต๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ์—์„œ ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์‹œ๋ฏผ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋น„ํŒโ†’ ํ† ๋ก โ†’ ๊ณต๊ฐโ†’ ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ์‹ค์ฒœ ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.  Transitional Justice and Education: Learning Peace (Advancing Transitional Justice Series) ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2017 ์ €์ž: Clara Ramรญrez-Barat | Roger Duthie ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: Social Science Research Council (SSRC) | United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) After periods of conflict and authoritarianism, education institutions often need to be reformed or rebuilt. But in settings where education has been used to support repressive policies and human rights violations, or where conflict and abuses have resulted in lost educational opportunities, legacies of injustice may pose significant challenges to effective reform. Peacebuilding and development perspectives, which normally drive the reconstruction agenda, pay little attention to the violent past. Transitional Justice and Education: Learning Peace presents the findings of a collaborative research project of the International Center for Transitional Justice and UNICEF on the relationship between transitional justice and education in peacebuilding contexts. The book examines how transitional justice can shape the reform of education systems by ensuring programs are sensitive to the legacies of the past, how it can facilitate the reintegration of children and youth into society, and how education can engage younger generations in the work of transitional justice.