자료
세계시민교육에 대한 이해를 넓히고 연구, 옹호 활동, 교수, 학습 등을 향상시킬 수 있는 다양하고 유용한 자료를 찾아보세요.
2,668 건의 결과가 검색되었습니다
Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates 발행 연도: 2012 저자: Paula Cowan, Henry Maitles 단체 저자: Continuum Cet ouvrage propose un tour d'horizon des débats actuels que soulève la question de savoir s'il faut enseigner des sujets controversés à l’école primaire et au collège. L’auteur analyse également les changements engendrés par ce type d’expérience d’apprentissage et leur contribution aux programmes scolaires, particulièrement d’histoire et d’éducation civique.Les principaux thèmes abordés sont les suivants : A quel âge peut-on commencer à discuter de sujets controversés ? - L’agenda citoyen - Parler de l'Iraq avec les collégiens et lycéens - Enseigner l'Holocauste à une classe marquée par la diversité culturelle – L'islamophobie. 
The Global Civil Society and the Global Citizenship Education 발행 연도: 2014 저자: Feng Jianjun The globalization era generates the global civil society, and the global civil society requires the global citizen. Global citizens not only live in the era of globalization, but also should have global awareness and human care, being willing to act positively for world peace, human development, global equity, justice and sustainable development of human and nature. Cultivating responsible global citizens is the mission given by the new era of globalization for education of civilization. The purpose of global civic education is training responsible civic education which has global awareness and takes positive action for global and human development. The global civic education includes human rights along with humanitarian education, global consciousness along with global responsibility education, environment along with sustainable development education, and international understanding education along with multicultural education. 全球公民社会与全球公民教育 발행 연도: 2014 저자: Feng Jianjun 全球化时代产生全球公民社会，全球公民社会需要全球公民。全球公民不仅生活在全球化时代，更要具有全球意识和人类关怀，并愿意为世界的和平与人类的发展、全球的公平与正义、人与自然的可持续发展采取积极的行动。培养负责任的全球公民，是全球化时代赋予公民教育的新使命。全球公民教育，就是培养具有全球意识并愿意为全球和人类的发展而积极行动的负责任的公民的教育，包括人权和人道主义教育、全球意识和全球责任教育、环境和可持续发展教育、国际理解教育与多元文化教育。 
The Concept, Values and Implementation Models of GCED 발행 연도: 2013 저자: Lu Lihua, Jiang Junhe “Global Citizenship education” aims to cultivate global citizens with an international perspective and global awareness. At present, there are more and more countries focusing on developing the core education value including” equity and justice”, “survival and development” and “democracy and rationality” and builds the global citizenship education network. “全球公民”教育基本内涵、价值诉求与实践模式 발행 연도: 2013 저자: Lu Lihua, Jiang Junhe “全球公民”教育旨在培养具有国际视野和全球意识的世界公民。当前，世界各国逐渐确立了以“公平与正义”、“生存与发展”、“民主与理性”为核心的“全球公民”教育价值诉求，实施“全球公民”教育的立体化教育网络也正在一些国家和地区悄然形成。 
The National Youth White Paper on Global Citizenship 발행 연도: 2015 단체 저자: Centre for Global Citizenship Education and Research (CGCER) On March 20, 2015, over 400 students from five high schools across Canada, in partnership with the Centre for Global Citizenship Education, The Centre for Global Education and TakingITGlobal, came together to collaborate, through the use of technology, in a Virtual Town Hall to discuss the youth’s vision for Global Citizenship Education. From Alberta to Ontario, downtown Toronto to Yellowknife, the youth of Canada exchanged ideas, debated alternatives, and ultimately created a document that represents their voice on the relationship Canadians should have with the rest of the world. The Virtual Town Hall, an “archetype of grassroots democracy,” (Senator Grant Mitchell) was the culmination of over a month of online teamwork, 2000 hours of student collaboration, over 100 hours of teacher facilitation, and the passion of over 1000 youth to engage in a national conversation and have their voices heard.In the month prior to the Virtual Town Hall, student leaders, systematically chosen from each school to represent Canada’s diverse geographic and demographic population, met on a weekly basis to exchange ideas, work with and listen to experts, and create a common framework. Concurrently, the students were trained to use an arsenal of Web 2.0 tools (YouTube, Twitter, cell phone voting, Google Docs, H.323 Video Conference, discussion boards, blogs, etc.) to collaborate, build consensus, and create community regardless of time or location.Equipped with this knowledge and empowered through online technology, the student leaders facilitated a full-day virtual town hall. In the morning, 400 youth peers engaged in a dialogue with local and international experts. Following this session, the youth participated in breakout groups to address three critical questions: What are our obligations as global citizens? What are the rights and responsibilities that we have? To what extent can well-intentioned global citizenship initiatives reinforce or resist power inequities? What types of policies/practices will enable/facilitate global citizenship? The National Youth White Paper on Global Citizenship, written collaboratively by Canadian students, is the direct result of this full-day, interactive event. The evolution of the document involved equipping leaders with knowledge and technology, having those leaders facilitate a larger conversation among their peers, taking the data generated to their community at large for feedback and direction, and then synthesizing the results in the student white paper. It represents the voices of over one thousand youth, introduced to the complexities of global citizenship education, unified through the power of 21st century technology, and sharing a passion to contribute to the dialogue taking place on the future of Canada and its relationship to the rest of the world. Le Livre blanc de la jeunesse nationale sur la citoyenneté mondiale 발행 연도: 2015 단체 저자: Centre for Global Citizenship Education and Research (CGCER) Le 20 Mars, 2015, plus de 400 élèves de cinq écoles secondaires à travers le Canada, en partenariat avec le Centre d'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale, le Centre for Éducation globaleet TakingITGlobal, se sont réunis pour collaborer, par l'utilisation de la technologie, dans une salle virtuelle ville pour discuter de la vision de la jeunesse pour l'éducation sur la citoyenneté mondiale. De l'Alberta à l'Ontario, le centre-ville de Toronto à Yellowknife, la jeunesse du Canada a échangé des idées, débattre des solutions de rechange, et, finalement, a créé un document qui représente leur voix sur les relations Canadiens devraient avoir avec le reste du monde. Le Virtual Town Hall, un «archétype de la démocratie de base» (le sénateur Grant Mitchell) est l'aboutissement de plus d'un mois de travail d'équipe en ligne, 2000 heures de la collaboration des élèves, plus de 100 heures de facilitation des enseignants, et la passion de plus de 1000 jeunes engager dans une conversation nationale et faire entendre leurs voix dans le mois précédant l'Hôtel virtuel Ville, les leaders étudiants, systématiquement choisis parmi chaque école pour représenter la diversité population géographique et démographique du Canada, se sont réunis sur une base hebdomadaire pour échanger des idées, travailler avec et écouter les experts, et de créer un cadre commun. En même temps, les étudiants ont été formés à l'utilisation d'un arsenal d'outils Web 2.0 (YouTube, Twitter, téléphone cellulaire vote, Google Docs, H.323 Vidéo Conférence, forums de discussion, les journaux, etc.) pour collaborer, établir un consensus et créer une communauté quelle que soit de temps ou de lieu. Equipé de cette connaissance et le pouvoir grâce à la technologie en ligne, les leaders étudiants ont facilité une mairie virtuelle d'une journée complète. Dans la matinée, 400 pairs de jeunes engagés dans un dialogue avec des experts locaux et internationaux. Suite à cette session, les jeunes ont participé à des groupes de petits groupes pour répondre à trois questions essentielles: 1. Quelles sont nos obligations en tant que citoyens du monde? Quels sont les droits et les responsabilités que nous avons? 2. Pour les initiatives de citoyenneté mondiale dans quelle mesure peut bien intentionnés renforcer ou résister à des inégalités de pouvoir? 3. Quels types de politiques / pratiques permettront / faciliter la citoyenneté mondiale. Le Livre blanc de la jeunesse nationale sur la citoyenneté mondiale, écrite en collaboration par les étudiants canadiens, est le résultat direct de cette journée complète, événement interactif. L'évolution du document impliqué équipant les dirigeants ayant des connaissances et de la technologie, ayant ces dirigeants facilitent une plus grande conversation entre leurs pairs, en prenant les données générées à leur communauté dans son ensemble pour la rétroaction et la direction, et ensuite la synthèse des résultats dans le livre blanc de l'étudiant. Elle représente les voix de plus de mille jeunes, présenter à la complexité de l'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale, unifiée par la puissance de la technologie du 21e siècle, et le partage de la passion de contribuer au dialogue qui se déroule sur l'avenir du Canada et de sa relation avec le reste du monde. 
Global citizenship education: the school as a foundation for a fair world 발행 연도: 2009 단체 저자: Conectando Mundos Consortium (Cidac, inizjamed, Intermon Oxfam, Ucodep) This publication is based on an initiative about the development education, intercultural education, popular education, the education of values, human rights education, education for sustainability, education for peace, education for gender equality, etc. The pedagogical proposal of Global Citizenship Education aspires to integrate in a coherent and challenging vision all these themes, keeping them in a close relationship with one another and taking into consideration the (increasing) interdependence of human beings living in a planet whose sustainability is under threat. This book is the fruit of a process that was triggered off by the joint effort of four European development NGOs, namely Cidac, Inizjamed, Intermón Oxfam and Ucodep within the frame of a project co-financed by the European Commission. These organisations set for themselves the objective to promote the acknowledgment and the inclusion of the contents and the methodology of Global Citizenship Education in the formal educational contexts in their respective countries, in order to kick-start a process of change in attitudes, values, and the beliefs of the pupils. Thanks to the initiative and efforts of the above-mentioned four organisations, and through various meetings and seminars carried out over the last three years in Spain, Italy, Portugal and Malta, groups of educators have been able to come face-to-face with each other, exchange experiences and reflect on the role of formal education with respect to the challenges of our times. Among the other experiences, the publication contains that of a key moment in the process. This took place in July 2008 in Cortona, a small and beautiful Tuscan city close to the border with Umbria, and in which many educators shared the benefit of what was the first international encounter of educators for global citizenship. The Cortona experience, in which around ninety teachers coming from Spain, Portugal, Malta, Italy, the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica have participated, was one of the stages – the starting point, in fact – of a process and a relationship that it is our aim to develop at the regional, national and international levels. In this publication, therefore, one can find theoretical cues put forward at Cortona that encourage educators to share their experiences and to compare the work done by different groups.This publication has two parts. The first part contains contributions of a theoretical type, whereas the second part concentrates on the educational experiences of the participants in the Cortona meeting. Global citizenship education: the school as a foundation for a fair world 발행 연도: 2009 단체 저자: Conectando Mundos Consortium (Cidac, inizjamed, Intermon Oxfam, Ucodep) Cette publication est basée sur une initiative sur l'éducation au développement, l'éducation interculturelle, l'éducation populaire, l'éducation des valeurs, l'éducation des droits de l'homme, l'éducation pour le développement durable, l'éducation pour la paix, l'éducation pour l'égalité des sexes, etc. La proposition pédagogique de l’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale aspire d'intégrer dans une vision cohérente et stimulante, tous ces thèmes, les maintenir dans une relation étroite avec l'autre et en tenant compte de la (augmentation) interdépendance des êtres humains vivant dans une planète dont la pérennité est menacée. Ce livre est le fruit d'un processus qui a été déclenché par l'effort conjoint de quatre ONG européennes de développement, à savoir Cidac, Inizjamed, Intermon Oxfam et Ucodep dans le cadre d'un projet cofinancé par la Commission européenne. Ces organisations se sont données pour objectif de promouvoir la reconnaissance et la prise en compte du contenu et de la méthodologie de l’Éducation à la Citoyenneté Mondiale dans les contextes éducatifs formels dans leurs pays respectifs, afin de démarrer un processus de changement dans les attitudes, les valeurs et les croyances des élèves. Merci à l'initiative et les efforts des quatre organisations mentionnées ci-dessus, et par le biais de diverses réunions et séminaires réalisés au cours des trois dernières années en Espagne, Italie, Portugal et Malte, des groupes d'éducateurs ont été en mesure de venir en face-à-face avec les uns des autres, d'échanger des expériences et réfléchir sur le rôle de l'éducation formelle par rapport aux défis de notre temps. Parmi les autres expériences, la publication contient celle d'un moment clé dans le processus. Cela a eu lieu en Juillet 2008 à Cortona, une petite et belle ville Toscane près de la frontière avec l'Ombrie, et dans lequel de nombreux éducateurs partagent le bénéfice de ce qui était la première rencontre internationale des éducateurs pour la citoyenneté mondiale. L'expérience Cortona, dans lequel près de quatre-vingt dix enseignants venant d'Espagne, le Portugal, Malte, l'Italie, la République dominicaine et le Costa Rica ont participé, a été l'une des étapes - le point de départ, en fait - d'un processus et d'une relation avec pour objectif de développer aux niveaux régional, national et international. Dans cette publication, par conséquent, on peut trouver des indices théoriques mis en avant à Cortona qui encouragent les éducateurs à partager leurs expériences et de comparer le travail accompli par les différents groupes. Cette publication comporte deux parties. La première partie contient des contributions d'un type théorique, alors que la deuxième partie se concentre sur les expériences éducatives des participants à la réunion Cortona. Monitoring education for global citizenship: a contribution to debate 발행 연도: 2015 저자: Harm-Jan Fricke | Cathryn Gathercole | Amy Skinner 단체 저자: DEEEP | CONCORD DARE Forum 1. This report aims to provide a stimulus for further thought, work and debate in the design of assessment frameworks for an education that supports people in leading fulfilling lives in a changing, globalised world, and in particular within the context of debates around post-2015 universal targets and indicators that are relevant to an education for global citizenship (EfGC). 2. In providing that stimulus the report addresses the following questions: a. What are the key differences and similarities between diverse forms of ‘adjectival educations’ that contribute to, or generally express themselves as allied to an ‘education for global citizenship’? b. What do they contribute to an education for global citizenship? c. How, if at all, do they interpret the notion of ‘transformation’? d. What do practitioners consider to be the major challenges and opportunities for monitoring (transformative) education for global citizenship? e. Which approaches and means of monitoring and assessing transformative education for global citizenship appear to be feasible? 3. The report is based on information obtained from: a. Literature reviews; b. Workshops, involving 65 educators in total, held in Brazil, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and three locations in Europe; c. Responses to a questionnaire completed by 218 educators working in more than 50 countries, albeit with a predominance of respondents based in Europe. 4. The origins and key characteristics of development education, global education and global learning, human rights education, and education for sustainable development are explored, leading to statements about their commonalities and contributions to an education for global citizenship. These commonalties appear to be particularly in the areas of their shared global orientation, pursuit of personal and/or societal transformation, active and enquiry based teaching and learning methodologies, and overlapping content. 5. The commonalities which the discussed educations contribute to - and share with – education for global citizenship appear to be particularly around: a. values and dispositions which enable a response to, and advocacy for, change, b. engagement with diverse ideas, opinions and understandings, c. a stimulus to investigate and develop creativity by means of learning, d. building skills and capacities as part of a process of lifelong learning, e. a generic educational approach that aims at involvement in an explicit process of change. 6. Within such a context differences appear amongst practitioners and theoreticians in the use, meaning and function of the term ‘global citizenship’, with some seeing it primarily as a tool in advocacy while others view it primarily as a means of explanation of human relations globally. 7. Critique on the usefulness and use of the terms ‘global citizenship’ is outlined and the world-wide, universal, use of the term ‘education for global citizenship’ is questioned. However, its intentions as an approach of transformative education for critical and active engagement in a globalised society are seen as having universal relevance. 8. That approach is described as “a learning process for people’s critical and active engagement in and with global society, involving people in developing their capacities, capabilities and motivation to be actively engaged in personal and collective human development. It does this by drawing on a critical understanding and consideration of global processes and interdependencies, of other people’s perspectives and interests, of environmental opportunities and limitations, and of universal rights.” 9. The approach is further defined by a number of ‘core signifiers’ (which can form the basis for indicators of achievement) relating to: a. pedagogy – characteristics of the teaching process, b. capacities and capabilities – regarding the learner’s competence, c. values – as exhibited in the teaching and learning process, d. content – the learner’s acquisition of core understandings, e. outcome – regarding the learner’s dispositions, f. social transformation – regarding the learner’s contributions to community and wider society. 10. The report continues by providing a summary review of selected literature regarding the design of monitoring frameworks that appear pertinent to an education for global citizenship. It discusses work done in relation to universal targets and indicators, country based frameworks, education institutional monitoring, educator competence, and learner outcomes. It draws particular attention to the importance of quality assessment, the need to involve the range of education stakeholders in the design, application and interpretation of indicators, and the need to enable learning from experiences. 11. Further information about the challenges and opportunities for monitoring education for global citizenship is obtained from ideas and opinions given by workshop participants and questionnaire respondents. Respondents recognise that developing a universal monitoring framework can help to clarify the purpose and meaning of EfGC for both practitioners and policy makers. However, they also recognise that there is a risk that agreement might be reached around a lowest common denominator approach. The importance of participation by practitioners in, and their ownership of, the monitoring content and process is highlighted. The potential uses of monitoring data and analyses in demonstrating the impact of EfGC on broader cross-curricular outcomes and educational achievements, is seen by respondents as a means to gain further recognition of the value of EfGC. 12. Based on the foregoing, the final chapter of the report provides a number of suggestions as a stimulus for further work, thought and debate. These suggestions focus on: a. a monitoring framework that addresses the holistic nature of EfGC; b. an assessment framework to do with learning outcomes that exemplify the core signifiers mentioned in paragraph 9 above; c. indicators and a monitoring approach that is applicable at national levels, enabling monitoring of progress for specific sectoral aspects of EfGC (teacher education is given as an example of such a sectoral aspect); d. a universal target that builds on the description of EfGC given in paragraph 8 above; e. indicator groupings that can show progress against such a universal target.