์ž๋ฃŒ

์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ์˜นํ˜ธ ํ™œ๋™, ๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์Šต ๋“ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š”.

  • Searching...
๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
ยฉ APCEIU

2,194 ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

EIU Best Practice Series No. 5: Peace and human rights education through education for sustainable development: lessons from four case studies in the Philippines ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2007 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์› The four case studies showed that EIU through peace and human rights education in the context of education for sustainable development can build a critical mass of Filipinos who will reject wars and promote social security. Education can play a role to direct the children, youth, and adults toward peace building and better understanding of cultural differences. It should also be noted that when institutions adopt a peace culture, establishing local and international organizations and putting up resources for various peace-building initiatives become possible. Educational intervention can effect changes in the minds of men and build a lasting and substantive foundation for peace based on justice and respect for human rights. Final Report: 18th Asia-Pacific Training Workshop on EIU ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU This report is the summary of the 18th Asia-Pacific Workshop on EIU (APTW) held in the Republic of Korea from 20 to 28 July 2018. Designed as TOT (Training of Trainers), the Workshop has invited 31 teacher educators/trainers from the Asia-Pacific region, strengthening their capacities to carry out Global Citizenship Education in their respective institutions and countries.  Final Report: 2018 Sub-regional Workshop on SDG 4.7 and GCED ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU This report is the summary of the Sub-regional Workshop on SDG 4.7 and GCED in South Asia. Implemented by two occasions, the Workshop has offered the platform for the key educators from the South Asian region to discuss GCED in the regional context of achieving SDG 4.7. The report provides the overview of the two workshops held in India and Afghanistan in 2018.   ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ -์ „ํ•™๊ต์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์› '์ „ํ•™๊ต์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก'์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ถ€์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณธ ๋„์„œ๋Š” ํ•™๊ต ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•  ๋•Œ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์€ ์ง€์‹๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ด€, ํƒœ๋„, ํ–‰๋™์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊นŒ์ง€ ์•„์šฐ๋ฅด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต์‹ค์„ ๋„˜์–ด ํ•™๊ต, ๊ฐ€์ •, ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ทธ ์‹ค์ฒœ ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๋”์šฑ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋„์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ํ™•์žฅ์‹œ์ผœ ์ „ํ•™๊ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „๋žต๊ณผ ํ™œ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš ๊ตฌ์ถ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ˜„์žฅ์˜ ๋ชฉ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ด์•„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฒช์—ˆ๋˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€, ๊ณ ๋ฏผ, ๊ทน๋ณต ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ, ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.  ์—ฌ๋Š” ๊ธ€PART I. ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ทธ๋ ค๋ณด๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต์˜ ๋น„์ „Step 1_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ์™œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ๊ฐ€์š”?Step 2_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?Step 3_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?Step 4_์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ํ•™๊ต, ๋ฌด์—‡์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๋‚˜์š”? PART II. ํ•™๊ต์— ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋ฐ”๋žŒStory 1_์•„์ด๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ต์‚ฌ Story 2_ํ•™๊ต ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋””์ž์ด๋„ˆ, ๊ต์žฅStory 3_๋‹ค์‹œ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํ•™๊ต์˜ ์—ญํ•      ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ’ˆ๋‹ค - ์ œ์ฃผ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ž์—ฐ์œ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ํ•ด๋…€๋ฌธํ™”๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2018 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์› ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์›์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ต์žฌ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ โ€œ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ, ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ’ˆ๋‹คโ€๋ฅผ ์ถœ๊ฐ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฑ…์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ๊ด€๊ด‘์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ํ˜„์žฅ์ฒดํ—˜, ํ† ๋ก , ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ™œ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์ด ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๊ฐ€์น˜์™€ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๊นจ๋‹ฌ์•„ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‚ด์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค.  ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด, ํ‰ํ™”, ์ธ๊ถŒ, ๋ฌธํ™”๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ, ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฐœ์ „ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ณดํŽธ์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๊ณ  ๋‚ด์žฌํ™”ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๊ต์žฌ์ด๋‹ค.ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ด๋ฒˆ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ œ์ฃผ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์ฃผ๋„๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์„ธ๊ณ„์ž์—ฐ์œ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ์ธ๋ฅ˜๋ฌดํ˜•๋ฌธํ™”์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฑ…์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ž์—ฐ์œ ์‚ฐ โ€˜์ œ์ฃผ ํ™”์‚ฐ์„ฌ๊ณผ ์šฉ์•”๋™๊ตดโ€™๊ณผ ์ธ๋ฅ˜๋ฌดํ˜•๋ฌธํ™”์œ ์‚ฐ โ€˜์ œ์ฃผ ํ•ด๋…€๋ฌธํ™”โ€™์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต์œกํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜์‹ ํ•จ์–‘์˜ ๊ธธ์žก์ด๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์œ ํ˜•์œ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ๋ฌดํ˜•์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.์ด ์ฑ…์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์€ ์ œ์ฃผ์„ธ๊ณ„์ž์—ฐ์œ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ์ œ์ฃผ ํ•ด๋…€๋ฌธํ™”์˜ ๊ณต๋™์ฒด ์˜์‹์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์ฑ…์€ ํ•™๊ต ํ˜„์žฅ์˜ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•  ๋•Œ ํ•™์Šต์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ์„œ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ•™์ƒ์ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์œ ์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.   A Study on the Monitoring Framework of GCED in South Korea ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: Hwanbo Park | Daehoon Jho | Kyunghee Park | Jeongmin Eom ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU The purpose of this study is to establish a feasible monitoring system for the implementation of Global Citizenship Education (GCED) in South Korea that can both align itself with the global indicator (SDG 4.7.1) and reflect the domestic context and feasibility. The study further builds upon previous studies carried out by the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU). Particularly, it aims to refine and validate the GCED indicator system for domestic monitoring as proposed in the previous studies, which are also in line with SDG 4.7.1, the global indicator to monitor the mainstreaming of GCED/ESD.To this end, the study involved a Delphi survey and expert consultation to build the refined list and classification of GCED related thematic areas and keywords contextualized in Korea, and aligned these with global indicators so that it could establish a set of sub-indicators for the South Korean context. Then, it pilot-tested the sub-indicators by codifying and statistically analyzing key policy documents and the curricula of Teacher Education Institutes (TEIs) to validate the sub-indicators and to examine the extent to which GCED is mainstreamed in the given domains of the Korean context. Case analyses with focused interviews for some TEI curricula were also added to enrich the study. Lastly, the study draws key implications and proposes some recommendations for the establishment of a feasible and sustainable GCED monitoring system in South Korea. Considering the importance of national input in initiating the SDG agenda, the research concluded with a proposal on how to manage the global citizenship indicators in South Korea.   2020 ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ฒด์ œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ์ €์ž: ๋ฐ•ํ™˜๋ณด | ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ›ˆ | ๋ฐ•๊ฒฝํฌ | ์—„์ •๋ฏผ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„์‹œ์•„ํƒœํ‰์–‘ ๊ตญ์ œ์ดํ•ด๊ต์œก์› ์œ ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ” ์•„ํƒœ๊ต์œก์›์€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก์˜ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ผํ™˜์œผ๋กœ โ€œ2020 ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ฒด์ œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ์—ฐ๊ตฌโ€๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œ, ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋กœ ๋ฐœ๊ฐ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ๋ฐœ์ „๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒ ์ง€ํ‘œ(4.7.1)์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๋งฅ๋ฝ๊ณผ ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐ˜์˜๋œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ดํ–‰ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ฒด์ œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒซ์งธ, ์•„ํƒœ๊ต์œก์›์˜ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ง€ํ‘œ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ธํŒŒ์ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ํ˜‘์˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ •๊ตํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ํƒ€๋‹น๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ณ ๋„ํ™”๋œ ํ•˜์œ„์ง€ํ‘œ ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๊ต์œก์ •์ฑ… ๋ฐ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์žˆ์–ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ฃผ๋ฅ˜ํ™” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ํ†ต๊ณ„์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ถ„์„ ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฒ”์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ์ •์ฑ… ๋ฐ ๊ต์›์–‘์„ฑ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ฒด์ œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ SDGs์—์„œ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ณ„ ์ž์œจ์  ์ดํ–‰์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ, ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์„ธ๊ณ„์‹œ๋ฏผ๊ต์œก ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ธ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ œ์–ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. GCED Learning and Assessment: An Analysis of Four Case Studies in Asia ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok โ€œGCED Learning and Assessment: An Analysis of Four Case Studies in Asiaโ€ is a result report of research jointly led by UNESCO Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau for Education, the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU) and the Asia-Pacific Regional GCED Network. The report encompasses four case studies of GCED Learning in the region and its assessment. Four leading researchers in the field of GCED, Satya Bushan from the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), India; Sayaka Matsukura of Ageo Oishi Junior High School, Japan; Dawon Kim from Gwangju National University of Education, Republic of Korea; and Le Anh Vinh from the Vietnam National Institute of Educational Science (VNIES), Viet Nam, contributed to this research. Through presenting and sharing the cases of India, Japan, Republic of Korea and Viet Nam, the publication is expected to shed light on the assessment on how GCED is implemented in the region and further inspire and encourage the GCED practitioners on the ground to take another step forward to reflect GCED in their respective educational systems. <List of Contents>ForewordAcknowledgementsAcronymsExecutive summaryChapter 1: IntroductionChapter 2: Schoollevel approaches at integrating GCEDChapter 3: Assessment of GCED learning Chapter 4: Reflections on GCED learning assessment Chapter 5: Conclusions and recommendations References Understanding GCED in Asia-Pacific: A How-to Guide for โ€˜Taking It Localโ€™ ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2020 ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: APCEIU | UNESCO Bangkok The Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU), in partnership with UNESCO Bangkok, has published โ€œUnderstanding GCED in Asia-Pacific: A How-To Guide for โ€˜Taking It Localโ€™โ€, a guidebook for GCED-themed workshop organizations in the region. The publication is developed by UNESCO Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau for Education under the framework of the Asia-Pacific Regional GCED Network that is coordinated by UNESCO Bangkok and APCEIU. Taking stock of the key data from the 2019 publication titled โ€œGCED: Taking it Local in Asia-Pacificโ€, the guidebook presents full-detailed guidelines on preparing and conducting a โ€˜Taking it Localโ€™ workshop on GCED with particular focuses on the three core notions of GCED โ€“ respect for diversity, solidarity and a shared sense of humanity. The purpose of the publication is to promote GCED in local contexts and support active GCED practitioners on the ground to design and carry out GCED workshops that are translated and designed fully within the local context of the Asia-Pacific region. <Contents>Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 What is GCED?1.2 Purpose of the Guidebook1.3 Pedagogical ApproachChapter 2: Preparing a โ€˜Taking it Localโ€™ Workshop on GCED2.1 Workshop Objectives2.2 Target Audiences2.3 Workshop Preparation2.4 Tips for a Successful Workshop2.5 Sample Agenda for the WorkshopChapter 3: Conducting a โ€˜Taking it Localโ€™ Workshop on GCED3.1 Welcome, Overview, and Agreements3.2 Introduction Exercise: Story Circles3.3 GCED in AsiaPacific Exercise3.4 Optional Activities for the Workshop 3.5 Application Exercise 3.6 Closing 3.7 Final Reflection and Workshop Evaluation 3.8 Sharing Reflections 3.9 FollowUp of the WorkshopReferences Global Citizenship Concepts in the Curricula of Four Countries ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: 2017 ์ €์ž: Natalie Browes ๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) | APCEIU This report details the presence of Global Citizenship Education (GCED) concepts in the education systems of four countries: Cambodia, Colombia, Mongolia and Uganda. It highlights the main findings of eight reports: four expert reports, which predominately analyse curriculum content, and four situational analysis reports, which take a broader view and detail some of the country-specific challenges and opportunities with regard to GCED. Findings reveal the presence of GCED concepts across the curricula of the four countries. In addition to cognitive content related to GCED, competency-based content is also found present within the curricula of these countries. However, the majority of this content can only be indirectly linked to GCED, and it is better interpreted as part of the more traditional civics or citizenship education approach. As such, it generally lacks a global perspective and does not engage with all key themes of GCED. Furthermore, this content is often concentrated at the lower and upper secondary levels, instead of being equally distributed across all grade levels. This is particularly true in the case of behaviour-based competencies. Findings also reveal challenges beyond the curriculum. These include lack of teacher training and lack of support to implement GCED, which are concerns expressed by stakeholders in all four countries. A lack of GCED content in textbooks and lack of supplementary materials were also found to be issues. The report concludes with recommendations regarding the effective implementation of GCED within curricula. Among others, the report suggests the transversal integration of GCED - across the curriculum at all grade levels, while at the same time, actors from all levels of the education system, ranging from central government to teachers, should be engaged to ensure the use of complementary learning materials, pedagogies and assessment techniques.