์๋ฃ
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ํ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ๋ํ๊ณ ์ฐ๊ตฌ, ์นํธ ํ๋, ๊ต์, ํ์ต ๋ฑ์ ํฅ์์ํฌ ์ ์๋ ๋ค์ํ๊ณ ์ ์ฉํ ์๋ฃ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์๋ณด์ธ์.
328 ๊ฑด์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ ๊ฒ์๋์์ต๋๋ค
A Study on Variables Related to Global Citizenship Teaching Efficacy of Secondary School Pre-service Teachers and In-service Teachers (Global studies Education; Vol. 9, No. 3) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2017 ์ ์: MiSeok Yang | JeongKyoum Kim | KiDuck Kim ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) This study explores relations between global citizenship and global citizenship education attitude of pre-service and in-service secondary teachers and their global citizenship education teaching efficacy. The subjects of this study were 233 students majoring in education of University C as pre-service secondary teachers and 216 teachers of 11 middle schools in City D as in-service teachers. of whom questionnaires were used for final analysis. The final analytic methods of data include frequency analysis. reliability analysis. T-test. correlations and multiple regression analysis. First. the result of difference analysis of the two groups of pre-service and in-service teachers shows that in-service teachers are more scored in social responsibility. global capacity and global participation among the lower factors of the global citizenship and in teacher role attitude and global citizenship education teaching efficacy among the lower factors of the global citizenship education attitude than pre-service teachers are. Second. the result of analysis of correlations among global citizenship. global citizenship education attitude and global citizenship education teaching efficacy for pre-service teachers shows that the factors of pre-service teachers have mutually significant correlations except for curriculum attitude among the lower factors of the global citizenship education teaching efficacy and of the global citizenship education attitude. Furthermore. global citizenship and global citizenship education attitude of pre-service teachers affect significantly their global citizenship education teaching efficacy. Third. the result of analysis of correlations among global citizenship. global citizenship education attitude and global citizenship education teaching efficacy for in-service teachers shows that all the factors of in-service teachers have mutually significant correlations. And global citizenship of in-service teachers has significant influence on their global citizenship education teaching efficacy. The results of this study are expected to help provide fundamental data for curriculums required in teacher training courses and enhance teachersโ professionalism on global citizenship education in the future.
์ค๋ฑ ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ณ์ธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ (๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 9, No. 3) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2017 ์ ์: ์๋ฏธ์ | ๊น์ ๊ฒธ | ๊น๊ธฐ๋ ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ค๋ฑ ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ๊ณผ์ ๊ด๊ณ๋ฅผ ์์๋ณด๊ณ ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ํํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์์ ์ค๋ฑ ์๋น๊ต์ฌ๋ C๋ํ์ ์ฌ๋ฒ๋์ 233๋ช
, ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ๋ D์์ 11๊ฐ ์คํ๊ต์ ๊ต์ฌ 216๋ช
์ ์ค๋ฌธ์ง๋ฅผ ์ต์ข
๋ถ์์ ์ฌ์ฉํ์๋ค. ์ต์ข
์๋ฃ ๋ถ์์ ๋น๋๋ถ์, ์ ๋ขฐ๋๋ถ์, t๊ฒ์ , ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ, ์ค๋คํ๊ท๋ถ์ ๋ฑ์ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ ๋ ์ง๋จ ๊ฐ ์ฐจ์ด๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ๊ฐ ์๋น๊ต์ฌ๋ณด๋ค ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ํ์๋ณ์ธ ์ค ์ฌํ์ ์ฑ
๋ฌด์ฑ, ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ญ๋, ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ฐธ์ฌ๊ฐ ๋์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋์ ํ์๋ณ์ธ ์ค ๊ต์ฌ์ญํ ํ๋์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ์ด ๋์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋์งธ, ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ๊ณผ์ ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์๋น๊ต์ฌ๋ ๋ณ์ธ๋ค ๊ฐ ์๋ก ์ ์ํ ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ๊ฐ ๋ํ๋ฌ์ผ๋, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋์ ํ์๋ณ์ธ ์ค ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ํ๋์์๋ง ์ ์ํ ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ๊ฐ ๋ํ๋์ง ์์๋ค. ๋ํ, ์๋น๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋๊ฐ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ์ ์ ์ํ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ์
์งธ, ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํ๋, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ๊ณผ์ ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ์ ๋ชจ๋ ๋ณ์ธ์์ ์๋ก ์ ์ํ ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ๊ฐ ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ํ, ํ์ฅ๊ต์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ต์ํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ์ ์ ์ํ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ํฅํ, ๊ต์์์ฑ๋จ๊ณ์์ ํ์ํ ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๊ธฐ์ด์๋ฃ์ ๊ณต๊ณผ ์ค์ ํ๊ตํ์ฅ์์ ์๊ตฌ๋๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๊ต์ฌ์ ๋ฌธ์ฑ์ ๋์ด๋๋ฐ ๋์์ ์ฃผ๊ณ ์ ํ๋ค.
Comparison on Educational Discourses About Global Citizenship Education Using Network Text Analysis (Global Studies Education; Vol. 11, No. 2) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2019 ์ ์: Kyunghee Park | JiEun Shin ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Association of | Global Studies Education The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences between โglobal citizenship educationโ, โdemocratic civic educationโ, โmulticultural educationโ, โeducation for international understandingโ, and โpeace educationโ. For this, 3,072 research papers from 2000 to 2018 selected, and network text analysis(NTA) was conducted to confirm the characteristics and changes of the five educational discourses. As a result, the commonness and specificities of them were derived through the โcloseness centralityโ and โbetweenness centralityโ on the NTA. โGlobal citizenship educationโ, โmulticultural educationโ, and โeducation for international understandingโ have crossed the content area. And โeducation for international understandingโ was based on a multicultural society. The values-oriented between โglobal citizenship educationโ and โdemocratic civic educationโ were distinguished. Finally, it is suggested that the five educational discourses need to be on the approach of lifelong learning, and they are education oriented toward change in consciousness.
๋คํธ์ํฌ ํ
์คํธ ๋ถ์์ ํ์ฉํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๊ด๋ จ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ๋น๊ต (๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 11, No. 2) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2019 ์ ์: ๋ฐ๊ฒฝํฌ | ์ ์ง์ ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌํํ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จํ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ๋ค์ ๋ํด ๊ตญ์ ์ฌํ ๋ฐ ํ๊ณ์์ ์ผ๋ จ์ ๊ธฐ์ค๋ค์ ์ ์ํ์์ง๋ง ์ฌ์ ํ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ์ ๋ํ ๋น๊ต์ ๋
ผ์๋ ๋ณต์กํ๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก, ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก, ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก, ํํ๊ต์ก์ ๊ณ์ด์ ํน์ฑ์ ์ดํด๋ด์ผ๋ก์จ 5๊ฐ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ๊ฐ ํน์ง์ ๊ท๋ช
ํ๋๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด 2000๋
๋ถํฐ 2018๋
๊น์ง ๋ฐํ๋ ๊ตญ๋ด ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ ๋ฐ ํ์ ์ง 3,072๊ฑด์ ๋ถ์ํ์๊ณ , ๋คํธ์ํฌ ํ
์คํธ ๋ถ์(NTA)์ ํตํด ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฃผ์ ์ด์ ํน์ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด๊ณ๋ฅผ ํ์ธํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 5๊ฐ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ์ ๋คํธ์ํฌ ๊ทผ์ ์ค์ฌ์ฑ๊ณผ ๋งค๊ฐ์ค์ฌ์ฑ์ ํตํด ๋ด๋ก ๋ค์ ๊ณตํต์ ๊ณผ ํน์์ฑ์ ๋ฐ๊ฒฌํ์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก, ๋ค๋ฌธํ๊ต์ก, ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ ์ ์ฌํ ์์ญ์ด ๊ต์ฐจ๋์ด ๋
ผ์๋์ด์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์ค ๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก์ ๋ค๋ฌธํ์ฌํ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ์ผ๋ก ํ ๊ต์ก์ ์ง์คํด ์จ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก๊ณผ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์งํฅํ๋ ๊ฐ์น๊ฐ ๊ตฌ๋ถ๋๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ํ์ธ๋์๋ค. ๋ง์ง๋ง์ผ๋ก ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ์ดํด๋ณธ ๊ต์ก๋ด๋ก ์ ๋ํ์ฌ ํ๊ต, ์ง์ญ์ฌํ์ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ๊ฐ ์๋ ํ์ํ์ต ์ฐจ์์์์ ์ ๊ทผ๊ณผ, ์์์ ํ๊ต์ก์ด๋ผ๋ ์ธ์๊ณผ ๊ด๋ จํ ๊ต์ก์ ์์ฌ์ ์ ์ ์ํ์๋ค.
Global Citizenship Education and Ecopedagogy at the Intersections: Asian Perspectives in Comparison (Asian Journal of Education; Vol. 17, Special Issue) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2016 ์ ์: Greg William Misiaszek | Lauren Ila Misiaszek ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Seoul National University. Education Research Institute This article provides a preliminary comparative analysis of environmental pedagogies in the context of widening spheres of citizenship due to intensifying globalization, with a particular focus on the East Asian context. In it, the authors specifically focus on Global Citizenship Education models and critical, Freirean-based ecopedagogies. The article includes analysis of research with expert scholars of citizenship and/or environmental pedagogies from six continents that focused on the intersectionalities between these two pedagogies and the effects of globalization on this work. The authors further explore the ways self-identified East Asian participants perceive differences in conceptualizations of citizenship between East Asia and the โWest.โ
Critical Understanding on Global Citizenship Education in Post 2015 Context (Theory and Research in Citizenship Education; Vol. 57, No. 1) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2015 ์ ์: Jinhee Kim ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Korea Association of Social Education It is notable that global citizenship education has recently gained prominence in Post 2015 context. This study attempted to explore diverse discourses of global citizenship education in theoretical dimension and it also analyzed the current status of global citizenship education as a new global education agenda. Major findings displayed issues and challenges; de-contextualization against local dimension; vague conceptualization of global citizenship education; limitation of transformative pedagogy and learning discourse; indicator development and monitoring issues; a paradigm shift for global citizenship education engaging with lifelong learning. Eventually, this study argues that comprehensive vision and long term road-map should be established to enhance global citizenship education. Lifelong learning approach is crucial to reshape global citizenship education while interacting with life-world context and life experience, which can promote an epistemology of learning to live together.
์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก๊ณผ ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์์ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ (๊ตญํ ์ง๋ฆฌํํ์ง; Vol. 53, No. 4) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2019 ์ ์: ๊น๋ถ์ฑ ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: ๊ตญํ ์ง๋ฆฌํํ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ โ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก(๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก)โ์ ๊ด์ ์์ โ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์โ์ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ต์ก๊ณผ์ ์ ๊ฒํ ํด๋ณธ๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ธ๊ณํ์ ๋์ ์ ๋ํ ์ปค๋ฆฌํ๋ผ ๋์์ฑ
์ผ๋ก ๊ตญ์ ์ ยท ์ํธ ๋ฌธํ์ ยท ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์์ฑ, ์ง์, ์์ฌ์ํต ๋ฐ ์ดํด๋ฅผ ์ด๊ตฌํ๋ค. ์ฆ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฏธ๋์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ์ ์ก์ฑํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. 1968๋
์ ์ค๋ฆฝ๋ ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์(ํ์ฌ IB, ์์ ์ IBO)๋ ๋น์๋ฆฌ ๊ต์ก์ฌ๋จ์ผ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก(๊ตญ์ ์ดํด๊ต์ก)์ ์ํ 4์ข
๋ฅ์ ํ๋ก๊ทธ๋จ์ ์ ๊ณตํ๋ค. ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์์ฌ๋จ์ ๊ณต์ธ์ ๋ฐ์ ํ๊ต๋ง์ด ์ด ํ๋ก๊ทธ๋จ์ ์ด์ํ ์ ์์ผ๋ฉฐ ์ธ๊ณ 150์ฌ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์ ๊ณต์ธ ๋ฐ์ 5,000 ์ฌ ๊ฐ์ IB ํ๊ต๊ฐ ์๊ณ , ์ผ์ข
์ ๋ํ์
ํ์๊ฒฉ์ฆ์ธ ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์ ๋ํ๋ก๋ง๋ ์ธ๊ณ ๋ง์ ๋ํ์์ ์ธ์ ํด์ฃผ๊ณ ์๋ค. ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์๋ ๋์ ์์ค์ ๊ต์ก์์ค๊ณผ ํ์๋ค์ ์ฑ์ทจ๋ ๋ฟ ๋ง ์๋๋ผ ๋ฌธํ ๊ฐ ์ดํด์ ์กด์ค์ ๊ฐ์กฐํ๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์ ๋ช
ํ๋ค. ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์ ๋ํ๋ก๋ง ๊ณผ์ ์์ โ๊ฐ์ธ๊ณผ ์ฌํโ ๋ผ๋ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ์ค์ ํ๋๋ก ์ ํํ๋ ์ง๋ฆฌ ๊ต๊ณผ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ฃผ์ (๊ณํต์ง๋ฆฌ)๋ณ๋ก, ์ธ๊ฐ์ ์ด์ ์ ๋ง์ถ์ด ์กฐ์ง๋์ด ์๊ณ ๋ค๋ฃจ๋ ๋ฒ์๋ ์ ์ธ๊ณ๋ฅผ ๋ง๋ผํ๋ค. ๊ทธ ํต์ฌ์๋ ์ธ๊ตฌ, ํ๊ฒฝ, ์์ ๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ ์ด๋ผ๋ ์ํธ ์ฐ๊ด๋ ์ฃผ์ ๋ค์ด ์๋ค. ๊ตญ์ ๋ฐ์นผ๋ก๋ ์ ์ง๋ฆฌ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ฃผ์๋ชฉ์ ์ ํ์๋ค์๊ฒ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ธ ์๊ฐ์ ๊ฐ์ถ๊ฒ ํ๊ณ ์ธ๊ณ์ ์ํธ์์กด์ฑ ์ ๋ํด ์ธ์ํ๋ฉฐ ๋น๋ฉดํ ์ธ๊ณ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋ถ์ํจ์ ์์ด ์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ ์ฉ์ฑ์ ํ๊ฐํ ์ ์๋ ๋ฅ๋ ฅ์ ๊ฐ๋ฐํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค.
Global Citizenship Education and Geography Curricula in International Baccalaureate (Geographical Journal of Korea; Vol. 53, No. 4) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2019 ์ ์: Boosung Kim ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: Korean Association of Professional Geographers This study aims to examine the geography curricula in International Baccalaureate(IB) from the viewpoint of โGlobal Citizenship Education(GCE)โ. GCE purports to address the challenges of globalization through curricular that promote international, intercultural, and global sensitivity, knowledge, communication, and understanding. In short, GCE is concerned with educating the global citizens of tomorrow. Founded in 1968, IB(formerly IBO) is a non-profit educational foundation offering four highly respected programmes of International Education. The IB has a presence in over 150 countries throughout the world. IB World Schools must be authorized, by the IB organization, to offer any of the programmes and universities worldwide recognize the strength of IB Diploma Programme. The IB has a hard-earned reputation not only for high standards of teaching and student achievement, but also for intercultural understanding and respect it promotes. As part of the curriculum group โIndividuals and Societiesโ, geography is thematic (systematic) in organization, human in focus, global in coverage. At its core are the interrelated themes of population, environment, resources and development. The aims of geography course in IB are to enable students to develop a global perspective and a sense of world interdependence and to appreciate the relevance of geography in analysing contemporary world issues.
Post 2015 ๋งฅ๋ฝ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด๋ก ๋ํฅ๊ณผ ์์ ๋ถ์ (์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ฐ๊ตฌ; Vol. 57, No. 1) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2015 ์ ์: ๊น์งํฌ ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: ํ๊ตญ์ฌํ๊ณผ๊ต์กํํ ์ต๊ทผ ๊ตญ์ ์ฌํ๊ฐ 2015๋
์ดํ ์๋ก์ด ๊ต์ก์์ ๋ฅผ ์ค์ ํ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ฐ์ด๋ฐ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ด ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ๊ต์ก์์ ๋ก ์ฒ์์ผ๋ก ์์ ๋๊ณ ์๊ธฐ์ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ์ ๋ฐ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ธ๊ณ๊ฐ ์ํธ์ฐ๊ด์ฑ์ด ์ง์ ์ผ๋ก ์ฆ๋๋ ์ค๋๋ , ๊ตญ์ ์ฌํ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์ค์ฒ์ ์์ง์์ ํ๊ตญ์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ด๋ค ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก ์ธ์ํ๊ณ ๊ต์ก์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ด์ ๋ผ ๊ฒ์ธ๊ฐ๋ผ๋ ์ด๋ก ์ , ์ค์ ์ ๊ณ ๋ฏผ์ ์๋ฐํ๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์๋ โPost 2015โ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ๋ด๋ก ๋ํฅ์ ๋นํ์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ๊ณ ๊ทธ๊ฒ์ ๋๋ฌ์ผ ์์ ์ ๋ถ์ํจ์ผ๋ก์จ, ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ด ํธ๋ ๋์ ์ ๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก ํํธํ๋๋ ๊ฒ์ ๊ทน๋ณตํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ์ฑ์ฐฐํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ง์ญ์ฑ๊ณผ ํน์์ฑ์ ๋ํ ํ๋งฅ๋ฝํ๋ผ๋ ์์ ์ ํ์ธํ์๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ๋ชจํธํ ์ ์ฒด์ฑ๊ณผ ์ค์ฒ์ ํ๊ณ๋ ํ์ ์น์ฑ์ผ๋ก ์ธํ ๋๋ ๋ง๋ฅผ ๋ํ๋๋ ์ง์ ์์ ๋ณด์ฌ์ฃผ์๋ค. ๋ํ ํ์ฌ์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ํ๋ค๊ณ ์ง์ ํ๊ณ์ ํ์ต๋ด๋ก ์ ์์ธ๋ฅผ ์ง๋ฉดํ๊ณ ์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ์์ผ๋ก ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก์ ์ ์ ํ ์งํ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๋ฐํ๊ณ ๋ชจ๋ํฐ๋งํ๋ ๊ณผ์ ๊ฐ ๋จ์ ์์์ ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ๋ง์ง๋ง์ผ๋ก ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ํ์ํ์ต์ผ๋ก์์ ์ธ๊ณ์๋ฏผ๊ต์ก ํจ๋ฌ๋ค์ ์ ํ์ด ์์ฒญ๋๊ณ ์์์ ์ญ์คํ์๋ค.
Promotional and Constraint Factors of Global Citizenship Education (GCED) Theme Selection: Focusing on GCED of Leading Teacherโs awareness (The Journal of Korean Teacher Education; Vol.35, No.4) ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋: 2018 ์ ์: Keunah Park | Soonyoung Oh | Jaewoon Hwang ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์: The Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that affect the selection of the themes of Global Citizenship Education (GCED). Specifically, it tried to help teachers to select the themes of GCED and explored specific factors that restrict the selection. For the goal of this study, it interviewed 13 researchers who participated in GCED as leading teachers. It collected data, performed coding of extracting core phrases and analyzed the transcribed interviews. The main analysis results are as follows. First, the factors that promote teachers to choose the themes of GCED were the experience of teachers, students, social issues, areas and teaching and learning materials. Second, the factors that restrict teachers to choose the themes of GCED were institution, parents of students and areas. Based on the result of the study, it described the necessity of developing field-friendly teaching and learning materials in relation to GCED and the importance of raising awareness among the educational players on GCED. 