Ресурсы
Изучайте широкий спектр ценных ресурсов ВГГ, чтобы углубить своё понимание и повысить эффективность исследований, просветительской деятельности, преподавания и обучения.
Найдено: 154
Mémoire et Histoire de la Shoah à l'école Cette publication est organisé selon trois thèmes: «L'histoire de l'Holocauste», la «citoyenneté» et «arts et de la transmission". Il est un guide précieux pour les enseignants de l'enseignement primaire, où ils peuvent trouver des suggestions et des matériaux atelier pour une première approche du sujet de l'Holocauste. Citizenship education: does it have a place in the curriculum? Год публикации: 2005 Автор: Carol Mutch Организация-автор: NZCER Press The call for citizenship education as a compulsory part of the curriculum has met with a varied response worldwide. While everyone would espouse the ideals of ensuring our young people grow up to be active and fair-minded citizens, why does citizenship education not figure more prominently in our curriculum?This article discusses the past, present, and possible future of citizenship education in the New Zealand curriculum. L’éducation à la Citoyenneté: a-t-il une place dans le programme? Год публикации: 2005 Автор: Carol Mutch Организация-автор: NZCER Press L’appel à propositions sur l'éducation à la citoyenneté comme une partie obligatoire du programme a rencontré une réponse variée dans le monde entier. Alors que tout le monde serait épouser les idéaux de sorte que nos jeunes grandissent pour devenir des citoyens actifs et équitable d'esprit, pourquoi l'éducation à la citoyenneté figurait pas une place plus importante dans notre programme? Cet article décrit le passé, le présent et l'avenir possible de l'éducation civique dans le programme Nouvelle-Zélande. Democracy and diversity: principles and concepts for educating citizens in a global age Год публикации: 2005 Автор: James A. Banks | Cherry A. McGee Banks | Carlos E. Cortes | Carole L. Hahn | Merry M. Merryfield | Kogila A. Moodley | Stephen Murphy-Shigematsu | Audrey Osler | Caryn Park | Walter C. Parker Организация-автор: Center of Multicultural Education, University of Washington The Center for Multicultural Education at the University of Washington convened—with support from the Spencer Foundation—a Diversity, Citizenship, and Global Education Consensus Panel. The Panel’s goal was to develop a set of principles, concepts, and guidelines that school practitioners can use to build or renew citizenship education programs that balance diversity and unity and prepare students to become effective citizens in a global context. An important resource for the Panel’s work was the book that resulted from an earlier conference sponsored by the Center, Diversity and Citizenship Education: Global Perspectives (Banks, 2004a).The Consensus Panel developed four principles and identified ten concepts, which are detailed in this publication. The Panel also developed a checklist that is designed for use by educators who want to consider the extent to which the principles and concepts identified by the Panel are reflected in their classrooms and schools.PRINCIPLESSection I Diversity, Unity, Global Interconnectedness, and Human Rights1. Students should learn about the complex relationships between unity and diversity in their local communities, the nation, and the world.2. Students should learn about the ways in which people in their community, nation, and region are increasingly interdependent with other people around the world and are connected to the economic, political, cultural, environmental, and technological changes taking place across the planet.3. The teaching of human rights should underpin citizenship education courses and programs in multicultural nation-states.Section II Experience and Participation4. Students should be taught knowledge about democracy and democratic institutions and provided opportunities to practice democracy. Démocratie et diversité: principes et concepts pour l'éducation des citoyens dans un âge global Год публикации: 2005 Автор: James A. Banks | Cherry A. McGee Banks | Carlos E. Cortes | Carole L. Hahn | Merry M. Merryfield | Kogila A. Moodley | Stephen Murphy-Shigematsu | Audrey Osler | Caryn Park | Walter C. Parker Организация-автор: Center of Multicultural Education, University of Washington Le Centre pour l'éducation multiculturelle à l'Université de Washington a convoqué-avec le soutien de la Fondation-a Spencer Diversité, Citoyenneté et Éducation Globale Panel Consensus . L'objectif du Groupe est de développer un ensemble de principes, des concepts et des lignes directrices que les praticiens de l'école peuvent utiliser pour construire ou de renouveler les programmes d'éducation à la citoyenneté que la diversité de l'équilibre et de l'unité et de préparer les étudiants à devenir des citoyens efficaces dans un contexte mondial. Une ressource importante pour les travaux du Groupe spécial était le livre qui résulte d'un earlierconférencesponsored par le Centre, la diversité et l'éducation à la citoyenneté: perspectives mondiales (banques, 2004a). Le groupe de concertation a élaboré quatre principes et identifi é dix concepts, qui sont détaillées dans cette publication. Le Groupe spécial a également mis au point une liste de contrôle qui est conçu pour être utilisé par les éducateurs qui veulent examiner la mesure dans laquelle les principes et les concepts identifi és par le Groupe sont refl ète dans leurs salles de classe et les écoles. PRINCIPES Section I Diversité, Unité, Global interconnectivité et droits de l'homme 1. Les élèves devraient en apprendre davantage sur les relations complexes entre l'unité et la diversité dans leurs communautés locales, la nation et le monde. 2. Les élèves devraient en apprendre davantage sur les façons dont les gens dans leur communauté, de la nation et de la région sont de plus en plus interdépendantes avec d'autres personnes dans le monde et sont reliés aux changements économiques, politiques, culturels, environnementaux et technologiques qui ont lieu à travers la planète. 3. L'enseignement des droits de l'homme devrait soutenir les cours et les programmes d'éducation à la citoyenneté dans les États-nations multiculturelles. Section II Expérience et participation 4. Les élèves doivent apprendre les connaissances sur la démocratie et les institutions démocratiques et a fourni des occasions de pratiquer la démocratie. L’éducation à la citoyenneté en Egypte Год публикации: 2013 Автор: Madeline Waddell Организация-автор: University of Puget Sound Le printemps arabe a apporté l'espoir d'un Moyen-Orient démocratique pour beaucoup dans la communauté internationale. Alors que la littérature sur les transitions démocratiques comprend un ensemble de composants, les chercheurs sur la région se sont concentrés sur les développements institutionnels tels que les élections et les constitutions. Bien que ces composants structurels sont essentiels, ce document préconise pour l'éducation à la citoyenneté comme un autre élément crucial dans les transitions démocratiques. Bien que généralement pas partie de cette littérature, l'éducation à la citoyenneté implique la construction d'une population informée et active capable de contribuer à une culture totale de la démocratie. Cet article analyse ces efforts pédagogiques en Egypte transitoire par contraste le rôle de l'État dans l'éducation à la citoyenneté avec celle de la société civile. Ce contraste conduit à la conclusion que l'aCECnt mis sur le troisième secteur est nécessaire pour la réalisation des objectifs de l'éducation à la citoyenneté apolitique. Le système scolaire de l'Egypte est non seulement le plus robuste dans le monde arabe, mais a toujours été utilisé par différents régimes autoritaires pour faire avancer des objectifs politiques. Lorsque juxtaposée à l'immergence d'une abondance des ONG après la révolution 2011, il devient un cas d'étude idéal. L'analyse est basée sur les théories de l'éducation à la citoyenneté et à la recherche du système éducatif égyptien, et est complétée par des entretiens informels dans le pays. Citizenship education in Egypt Год публикации: 2013 Автор: Madeline Waddell Организация-автор: University of Puget Sound The Arab Spring brought hope of a democratic Middle East to many in the international community. While the literature on democratic transitions includes an array of components, scholars on the region have concentrated on institutional developments such as elections and constitutions. While these structural components are essential, this paper advocates for citizenship education as another crucial element in democratic transitions. Although not typically part of this literature, citizenship education entails building an informed and active populace able to contribute to a total culture of democracy. This paper analyzes these pedagogic efforts in transitional Egypt by contrasting the State’s role in citizenship education with that of civil society. This contrast leads to the conclusion that an emphasis on the third sector is necessary for carrying out the goals of citizenship education apolitically. Egypt’s school system is not only the most robust in the Arab world, but has historically been utilized by different authoritarian regimes to advance political goals. When juxtaposed with the emergence of an abundance of NGOs after the 2011 Revolution, it becomes an ideal case study. Analysis is based on theories of citizenship education and research of the Egyptian education system, and is supplemented with informal interviews in the country. Informe de referente regional 2010: oportunidades de aprendizaje escolar de la ciudadanía en América Latina: currículos comparados Год публикации: 2010 Автор: Cristián Cox Donoso Организация-автор: Sistema Regional de Evaluacion y Desarrollo de Competencias Ciudadanas (SREDECC) This report has three purposes, the first, to describe the contexts and challenges of education for citizenship education in Latin America; secondly, to describe the process of implementation and creation of the Latin American version of the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) test and compare the categories of both evaluation tools; lastly, to characterize, in a comparative way, the citizenship education curricula of Colombia, Chile, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, and the Dominican Republic. The results of the report rise from the analysis of secondary sources on the socio-educational contexts in which citizenship education is based upon in Latin America, as well as a comparative analysis of the original educational curricula of the six countries of this project. The structure of the chapters and the sections of this document are arranged according to the referred purposes. The first chapter focuses on the sociocultural context of the educational system that is in charge of shaping citizens. Recent evidence on beliefs and democratic practices in the region will be examined. Later, the evolution of the school systems in the last decade and a half will be described. Finally, in order to establish a “base line” on the role of citizenship education in education policy, first the curricula, pedagogies, and teacher formation and evaluation will be examined. The second chapter focuses on the process of generation of the Latin American evaluative method, part of the ICCS test. Then, in a detailed manner, a comparative analysis of the categories or evaluation criteria of both tests will be presented in order to show the predominant opinion of citizenship education in the 6 countries. Trying to identify certain patterns, the report concludes with a chapter that makes interpretations and projections about the tendencies observed in current curricula and propose new criteria for the development of new education curricula. 2014 syllabus: character and citizenship education: primary Год публикации: 2014 Организация-автор: Singapore. Ministry of Education. Student Development Curriculum Division Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) has always been at the heart of Singapore's education system. In CCE, students learn to be responsible to family and community; and understand their roles in shaping the future of nation. The emerging trends and global developments that impact the society, such as social changes, globalisation and technological advancements are taken into consideration in the development of the CCE curriculum.The goal of CCE is to inculcate values and build competencies in students to develop them to be good individuals and useful citizens. Since 1959, various key programmes have been introduced to inculcate values, habits, competencies and skills in students. Some of these programmes include Civics and Moral Education (CME, 1992), National Education (NE, 1997), Social and Emotional Learning (SEL, 2005), and learning experiences such as Co-Curricular Activities (CCA). The new CCE curriculum shifts focus from programmes to a common purpose. The desired outcomes of CCE are aligned to the Key Stage Outcomes (KSOs) and Desired Outcomes of Education (DOE). CCE is central to the Framework for 21st Century Competencies and Student Outcomes. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of the core values, social and emotional competencies and civic literacy, global awareness and cross-cultural skills that are critical for character and citizenship development of students. Citizenship, identity and education: examining the public purposes of schools in an age of globalization Год публикации: 2006 Автор: Fernando Reimers Организация-автор: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) Educational institutions exist to achieve public purposes. One of those purposes is to develop citizenship. In the 21st century, citizenship includes global citizenship. In an era of globalization effective citizenship includes the knowledge, ability and disposition to engage peacefully and constructively across cultural differences for purposes of addressing personal and collective needs and of achieving sustainable human–environmental interactions, this requires internalizing global values. Addressing these challenges of globalization will require making citizenship education and the development of global values an explicit objective of efforts to improve quality throughout the world, critically examining theories and evidence about the effectiveness of various approaches to developing citizenship and global citizenship and supporting activities aligned with this public purpose. This public purpose should support the development of a political culture that fosters the rule of national and international law and respect of human rights, the development of understanding to support trade and economic and peaceful bilateral and international diplomacy as the preferred means to solve international disputes, the development of the capability to understand and address the serious environmental challenges facing humanity and to collaborate across national boundaries in the creation of sustainable forms of human–environmental interactions and in the development of the skills to promote rationality in deliberation and action, and to advance science and technology as means to improve human health and well-being. At present, however, many education systems and reforms are insufficiently focused on quality, or focus instead on a very narrow and self-referenced definition of quality. It is possible to educate people to understand and appreciate cultural differences and to understand and accept human rights in a framework of global values that includes compassion and caring, concern for others, respect and reciprocity. These values, dispositions, knowledge and skills can be developed in a range of institutions that societies have to pass on what they value to the young, and to re-create culture: families, religious institutions, the media, workplaces, political institutions and also schools. While there is no reason to assume that schools can be more effective in this task than any of these other institutions, they have greater potential to be aligned with transnational efforts to promote global civility. They are a public space, and consequently also a globally public space, in ways in which families and religious institutions are not. If schools actively engage in teaching hatred or intolerance, or if they fail to prepare students adequately for global civility, these failures can be noted by international institutions that can potentially mobilize resources to support national and local efforts to prepare students for global citizenship. There is not a similar network linking national and transnational institutions, public and private, governmental and non-governmental, that attends to the dynamics of families and other ‘‘private’’ spaces.