Ресурсы
Изучайте широкий спектр ценных ресурсов ВГГ, чтобы углубить своё понимание и повысить эффективность исследований, просветительской деятельности, преподавания и обучения.
Найдено: 53
L'éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale et solidaire : Une autre façon de coopérer Организация-автор: Les ONG membres d'ACODEV L’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale et solidaire est un processus qui vise le changement social. Elle a pour but de permettre aux individus de s’approprier une conviction empreinte de solidarité internationale et de la manifester par des engagements concrets, individuels et collectifs. Objectifs généraux: Faciliter une compréhension globale des enjeux du développement et des mécanismes d’exploitation injustes qui engendrent des relations inégalitaires entre le Nord et le Sud ; Accompagner l’acquisition d’un regard conscient et critique de la réalité, tant au niveau de relations microsociales qu’au niveau macro ; Favoriser un meilleur dialogue entre les citoyens à travers une approche interculturelle basée sur le respect mutuel et l’égalité ; Promouvoir des valeurs, attitudes, et aptitudes liées à la solidarité 
We Make Europe: Active Citizenship and Lifelong Learner Год публикации: 2013 Организация-автор: European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning (EUCIS-LLL) This material captures some of the sparks of civic engagement and aimed to contribute to the debates that took place in the context of the European Year of Citizens 2013. Its purpose was to bring together various perspectives and experiences in order to show the wealth and dynamism as well as the limitations and pitfalls of what is active European citizenship nowadays. 
Peace Education: Making the Case Год публикации: 2019 Автор: Darijn Dilia Zwart Организация-автор: Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA) This publicaiton shows how peace education has responded to difficult political contexts over the decades and demonstrates that peace education is relevant to conflict prevention and peacebuilding today. The report makes the case for a multi-layered approach to peace education which requires a cohesive, coordinated strategy for peace education as a peacebuilding and conflict prevention tool across relevant EU internal and external policies and programmes. 
L'éducation à la citoyenneté dans l'école en Europe Год публикации: 2005 Организация-автор: Eurydice. European Unit Cette analyse comparative est basée sur les descriptions de pays fournies par les Unités nationales d'Eurydice. Afin de recueillir des informations à leur sujet, un Guide du contenu, comprenant des lignes directrices et des définitions communes, a été élaboré par l'Unité Européenne d'Eurydice (UEE) en consultation avec les Unités nationales au début de 2004. Le Guide du contenu visait à garantir que Les descriptions de pays ont été rédigées conformément à une structure commune pour faciliter la comparaison entre pays des informations fournies. Citizenship education at school in Europe Год публикации: 2005 Организация-автор: Eurydice. European Unit This comparative analysis is based on country descriptions supplied by the Eurydice National Units.To collect information for them, a Guide to Content, including common guidelines and definitions, was prepared by the Eurydice European Unit (EEU) in consultation with the National Units at the beginning of 2004.The aim of the Guide to Content was to ensure that the country descriptions were drafted in accordance with a common structure to facilitate subsequent cross-country comparison of the information provided. 
Global Citizenship Education: Solidar Foundation Policy Paper Год публикации: 2020 Организация-автор: Solidar Foundation | Erasmus+ The purpose of this paper is to provide recommendations supported by our members, based on their work in formal, non-formal and informal education, to expand GCE at national and European level. Considering how GCE is linked many times with formal education, the recommendations reveal the work of our members outside of this, building upon the need for a multi-stakeholder approach that spans across the entire learning process. This policy paper guides SOLIDAR Foundation’s work in influencing developments related to the EU’s Updated Skills Agenda, European Education Area, Action Plan for the Implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, and the European Green Deal, given how all provide an opportunity for GCE to be embraced as a necessity rather than an added-value. 
Adult Learning and Gender: EAEA Background Paper Год публикации: 2020 Автор: Agatha Devlin Организация-автор: European Association for the Education of Adults (EAEA) Gender sensitivity in adult learning and education (ALE) is about more than trying to improve targeted outreach programmes for men and women who seem to be slipping through the gaps. By providing gender sensitive education opportunities, people are not only more likely to engage but also more likely to get the most out of their experiences. This background paper explores the problems that gender sensitive adult education could attempt to solve, good practices and examples to help make current structures more gender sensitive, and the wider benefits of gender sensitivity in ALE.This background paper takes various subtopics or examples of gender sensitivity in adult education and analyses them as individual areas, making its content easier to navigate according to the reader’s interests or concerns. 
Risks in the Fight for Justice and Human Rights in Central Asia: Protecting Civil Society in the Region in 2017 Год публикации: 2018 Организация-автор: International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) This 2017 report provides an overview of the main trends regarding civil society in five countries of Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The report is mainly based on the results of monitoring conducted by Central Asian organizations in their countries and on regular reports prepared jointly with IPHR as part of the CIVICUS Monitor initiative aimed at monitoring the state of civil society worldwide. Риски в борьбе за справедливость и права человека в Центральной Азии: Защита гражданского общества в регионе в 2017 году Год публикации: 2018 Организация-автор: International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) В этом отчете за 2017 год представлен обзор основных тенденций, касающихся гражданского общества в пяти странах Центральной Азии: Казахстане, Кыргызстане, Таджикистане, Туркменистане и Узбекистане. Отчет главным образом основан на результатах мониторинга, проведенного центрально-азиатскими организациями в своих странах и на регулярных отчетах, подготовленных ими совместно с МППЧ в рамках инициативы CIVICUS Monitor, направленной на отслеживание состояния гражданского общества во всем мире. 
Monitoring education for global citizenship: a contribution to debate Год публикации: 2015 Автор: Harm-Jan Fricke | Cathryn Gathercole | Amy Skinner Организация-автор: DEEEP | CONCORD DARE Forum 1. This report aims to provide a stimulus for further thought, work and debate in the design of assessment frameworks for an education that supports people in leading fulfilling lives in a changing, globalised world, and in particular within the context of debates around post-2015 universal targets and indicators that are relevant to an education for global citizenship (EfGC). 2. In providing that stimulus the report addresses the following questions: a. What are the key differences and similarities between diverse forms of ‘adjectival educations’ that contribute to, or generally express themselves as allied to an ‘education for global citizenship’? b. What do they contribute to an education for global citizenship? c. How, if at all, do they interpret the notion of ‘transformation’? d. What do practitioners consider to be the major challenges and opportunities for monitoring (transformative) education for global citizenship? e. Which approaches and means of monitoring and assessing transformative education for global citizenship appear to be feasible? 3. The report is based on information obtained from: a. Literature reviews; b. Workshops, involving 65 educators in total, held in Brazil, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and three locations in Europe; c. Responses to a questionnaire completed by 218 educators working in more than 50 countries, albeit with a predominance of respondents based in Europe. 4. The origins and key characteristics of development education, global education and global learning, human rights education, and education for sustainable development are explored, leading to statements about their commonalities and contributions to an education for global citizenship. These commonalties appear to be particularly in the areas of their shared global orientation, pursuit of personal and/or societal transformation, active and enquiry based teaching and learning methodologies, and overlapping content. 5. The commonalities which the discussed educations contribute to - and share with – education for global citizenship appear to be particularly around: a. values and dispositions which enable a response to, and advocacy for, change, b. engagement with diverse ideas, opinions and understandings, c. a stimulus to investigate and develop creativity by means of learning, d. building skills and capacities as part of a process of lifelong learning, e. a generic educational approach that aims at involvement in an explicit process of change. 6. Within such a context differences appear amongst practitioners and theoreticians in the use, meaning and function of the term ‘global citizenship’, with some seeing it primarily as a tool in advocacy while others view it primarily as a means of explanation of human relations globally. 7. Critique on the usefulness and use of the terms ‘global citizenship’ is outlined and the world-wide, universal, use of the term ‘education for global citizenship’ is questioned. However, its intentions as an approach of transformative education for critical and active engagement in a globalised society are seen as having universal relevance. 8. That approach is described as “a learning process for people’s critical and active engagement in and with global society, involving people in developing their capacities, capabilities and motivation to be actively engaged in personal and collective human development. It does this by drawing on a critical understanding and consideration of global processes and interdependencies, of other people’s perspectives and interests, of environmental opportunities and limitations, and of universal rights.” 9. The approach is further defined by a number of ‘core signifiers’ (which can form the basis for indicators of achievement) relating to: a. pedagogy – characteristics of the teaching process, b. capacities and capabilities – regarding the learner’s competence, c. values – as exhibited in the teaching and learning process, d. content – the learner’s acquisition of core understandings, e. outcome – regarding the learner’s dispositions, f. social transformation – regarding the learner’s contributions to community and wider society. 10. The report continues by providing a summary review of selected literature regarding the design of monitoring frameworks that appear pertinent to an education for global citizenship. It discusses work done in relation to universal targets and indicators, country based frameworks, education institutional monitoring, educator competence, and learner outcomes. It draws particular attention to the importance of quality assessment, the need to involve the range of education stakeholders in the design, application and interpretation of indicators, and the need to enable learning from experiences. 11. Further information about the challenges and opportunities for monitoring education for global citizenship is obtained from ideas and opinions given by workshop participants and questionnaire respondents. Respondents recognise that developing a universal monitoring framework can help to clarify the purpose and meaning of EfGC for both practitioners and policy makers. However, they also recognise that there is a risk that agreement might be reached around a lowest common denominator approach. The importance of participation by practitioners in, and their ownership of, the monitoring content and process is highlighted. The potential uses of monitoring data and analyses in demonstrating the impact of EfGC on broader cross-curricular outcomes and educational achievements, is seen by respondents as a means to gain further recognition of the value of EfGC. 12. Based on the foregoing, the final chapter of the report provides a number of suggestions as a stimulus for further work, thought and debate. These suggestions focus on: a. a monitoring framework that addresses the holistic nature of EfGC; b. an assessment framework to do with learning outcomes that exemplify the core signifiers mentioned in paragraph 9 above; c. indicators and a monitoring approach that is applicable at national levels, enabling monitoring of progress for specific sectoral aspects of EfGC (teacher education is given as an example of such a sectoral aspect); d. a universal target that builds on the description of EfGC given in paragraph 8 above; e. indicator groupings that can show progress against such a universal target.