相关资源
探索丰富的全球公民教育资源，深化理解，促进研究、倡导、教学与学习。
共找到18条结果
The Connective “Public” and the Chinese Logic of Citizenship Education (Journal of Educational Studies; Vol. 13, No. 2) 出版年份: 2017 作者: Qiu Kunshu | Yan Yajun 机构作者: Beijing Normal University Cultural tradition has pre-conditionality on citizenship education. From the point of view of cultural tradition, the “public” in citizenship education has different meaning in China and the West: Chinese “public” is mainly a kind of connective “public”, while the western “public” mainly means domanial “public”. This lead to the difference in Chinese and modern western main stream values. The former emphasizes the common goodness of the whole society, social responsibility and virtue which is favorable to harmony, while the later emphasizes individualist rights and priority of freedom. They represent two kinds of ethics language and position. It is essential to maintain high cultural awareness for the implementation of citizenship education in China and the localization of exotic “citizenship education”. Guided by Marxism and rooted in Chinese cultural tradition, Chinese citizenship education should be based on “people in relation”, use the actual support of “state-society” cooperation, and offer ultimate concern to “the free and comprehensive development of human”. 连带的“公”与公民教育的中国理路 (教育学报; Vol. 13, No. 2) 出版年份: 2017 作者: Qiu Kunshu | Yan Yajun 机构作者: Beijing Normal University 文化传统对公民教育具有预制性。从文化传统来看，中西方社会和文化语境中的“公”并不相同：中国 的“公”主要是连带的“公”，而西方的“公”主要是领域的“公”，由此而导致中华文明的价值与现代西方主流价值的 差异，前者强调社会共同的善、社会责任和有益于和谐的美德，后者则强调个人主义的权利和自由优先，它 们 分 别 代表了两种不同的伦理学语言和立场。在中国开展公民教育，只有保持高度的文化自觉，作 为 舶 来 品 的“公 民 教 育”才可能落地生根。以马克思主义为指导，根植于中 华 文 化 传 统，中国公民教育需要以“关 系 中 的 人”为 立 足 点， 以“国家—社会”的互构合作为现实支撑，以“人的自由全面发展”为终极关怀。 
Research on Digital Competence of EU Citizens: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Dig Comp1.0, 2.0 and 2.1 (International and Comparative Education; No. 6) 出版年份: 2020 作者: Zheng Xudong | Fan Xiaoyu 机构作者: Beijing Normal University The explosive development of digital technology has revolutionized the competences of social citizens. In 2006, EU proposed digital competence, based on it, EU established A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe (Dig Comp 1.0). After releasing two revisions of Dig Comp 1.0, the Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (Dig Comp 2.1) was officially released in 2017. Compared with the former versions, Dig Comp 2.1 expanded digital competences areas, revised the competences names, no longer described the specific competences from KSA (knowledge, skill and attitude) perspective, and the proficiency of the competences were divided into more detailed 8 proficiency level. The Dig Comp 2.1 contained the following values: a. the transformation of the concept of digital citizenship education; b. paying attention to the competences of complex problem solving and innovation; c. looking forward to the future development of intelligent society; d. supporting the development of lifelong learning and developing qualified digital citizens. Dig Comp 2.1 has enlightenment for building a learning society in China, and that of improving the digital competences of Chinese citizens. 欧盟公民数字胜任力研究: 基于三版欧盟公民数字胜任力框架的比较分析 (比较教育研究; No. 6) 出版年份: 2020 作者: Zheng Xudong | Fan Xiaoyu 机构作者: Beijing Normal University 数字科技的爆发式发展对公民的能力素养产生了革命性影响。欧盟在 2006 年 提出数字胜任力的基础上，于 2013 年制定了欧盟公民数字胜任力框架 1.0，在经过连续两 次修订后，于 2017 年正式发布了欧盟公民数字胜任力框架 2.1。与旧版相比，新版框架对 胜任力域进行了拓展，修订了具体能力的名称，不再从知识、技能和态度方面描述具体能 力，能力熟练度也划分成更详细的 8 个水平。新版框架体现了欧盟数字公民教育的理念转 变，对复杂问题解决与创新创造能力培养的重视，对终身学习能力和合格数字公民培养的 关注，以及对未来智能社会发展需求的前瞻，对我国建设学习型社会、构建全民终身学习 体系和提升国民数字胜任力具有借鉴意义。 
The History, Practice and Thinking of the Development of Italian Civic Education 出版年份: 2020 作者: An Yangchao | Jia Lishuai 机构作者: Beijing Normal University Italian civic education has a long history and has gone through three historical stages, namely, the period of dissociation between the government and the Catholic church, the period of politicization and the period of development under the background of “global citizenship”. Related measures taken by the government include Italian civic education courses, schools and multi-organizations to carry out civic education practice activities, and expanding the off-campus civic education path and other ways. As a whole, it shows the characteristics of changing from “non-standard” to “policy”, from “training learning” to “experiential learning”, from “single school curriculum” to “diversified subject participation”. 
A Discussion of the Concept of ‘Community of Human Destiny’ Guiding the World Citizenship Education Ethos in the New Era (Journal of Educational Studies; Vol. 14, No. 3) 出版年份: 2018 作者: Song Qiang 机构作者: Beijing Normal University In the new era, the concept of “Community of Human Destiny” has gradually been accepted and recognized by the world, and it is necessary to spread and pass this concept by means of education. It is of significance to seize the opportunity of world citizenship education, which is widely accepted in the west, and guide the World Citizenship Education Ethos by the concept of “Community of Human Destiny”. In terms of connotation, the World Citizenship Education Ethos corresponds with the concept of “Community of Human Destiny”. However, the World Citizenship Education Ethos, to some extent, is still Western-oriented and attached with Western values. Its essential features are also presented with conflict. Based on the concept of “Community of Human Destiny”, it is of necessity to guide and reconstruct the concept of citizenship, the concept of citizenship education, the dominant party, the theoretical basis and the thought domain of the World Citizenship Education Ethos using the concept of “Community of Human Destiny”, and empower it to become an ideological weapon helping China to integrate into world and exhibit its open-mindedness and inclusiveness. 新时代‘人类命运共同体’ 理念引领世界公民教育思潮的理路 (教育学报; Vol. 14, No. 3) 出版年份: 2018 作者: Song Qiang 机构作者: Beijing Normal University 新时代“人类命运共同体”理念已逐渐成为被世界广泛接受和认同的理念，而要将这一理念传播和传 递下去需要通过教育。当前需要利用西方广泛接受世界公民教育的时机，以“人类命运共同体”理念引领世界公民 教育思潮。世界公民教育思潮与“人类命运共同体”理念在内涵上有广泛的契合之处。但世界公民教育思潮某种 程度上还是一种由西方主导，附带西方价值观的思潮，其本质特征也呈现矛盾性。需 要 以“人类命运共同体”理 念 为指引，引领与重构世界公民教育思潮的公民资格观、公民教育观、主导主体、理论基础和思潮版图，使其成为中国 融入世界、展现开放包容的思想武器。 
Global Citizenship Education: Confusion and Clarification (International and Comparative Education; No. 3) 出版年份: 2019 作者: Rao Shuqi 机构作者: Beijing Normal University As a debatable and controversial area, global citizenship education has not been elevated to the center of practical agenda due to three confusion surround the term. From the aspect of regarding citizenship as status, the absence of global political community makes global society unimaginable. However, as the legal status of global citizen originates from the confirmation of intimate interpersonal relationship, global citizenship education enjoys legitimacy. From the aspect of conceiving citizenship as rights, the absence of global political community leads to global citizenship vacuous in essence. However, as the landscape of rights and responsibilities has been transformed, the contents of global citizenship education are enriched by pervasive human rights and responsibilities. From the aspect of considering citizenship as identity, global identity runs a risk of diminishing the need for national identity. However, given the consensus concerning the discourse of multidimensional identity, global identity should be developed on the basis of national identity. The perception of global citizenship education should not be confined within the traditional nation-state framework. Global citizenship education is not an alternative to national citizenship education.