相关资源
探索丰富的全球公民教育资源，深化理解，促进研究、倡导、教学与学习。
共找到154条结果
2014 syllabus: character and citizenship education: primary 出版年份: 2014 机构作者: Singapore. Ministry of Education. Student Development Curriculum Division Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) has always been at the heart of Singapore's education system. In CCE, students learn to be responsible to family and community; and understand their roles in shaping the future of nation. The emerging trends and global developments that impact the society, such as social changes, globalisation and technological advancements are taken into consideration in the development of the CCE curriculum.The goal of CCE is to inculcate values and build competencies in students to develop them to be good individuals and useful citizens. Since 1959, various key programmes have been introduced to inculcate values, habits, competencies and skills in students. Some of these programmes include Civics and Moral Education (CME, 1992), National Education (NE, 1997), Social and Emotional Learning (SEL, 2005), and learning experiences such as Co-Curricular Activities (CCA). The new CCE curriculum shifts focus from programmes to a common purpose. The desired outcomes of CCE are aligned to the Key Stage Outcomes (KSOs) and Desired Outcomes of Education (DOE). CCE is central to the Framework for 21st Century Competencies and Student Outcomes. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of the core values, social and emotional competencies and civic literacy, global awareness and cross-cultural skills that are critical for character and citizenship development of students. Citizenship, identity and education: examining the public purposes of schools in an age of globalization 出版年份: 2006 作者: Fernando Reimers 机构作者: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) Educational institutions exist to achieve public purposes. One of those purposes is to develop citizenship. In the 21st century, citizenship includes global citizenship. In an era of globalization effective citizenship includes the knowledge, ability and disposition to engage peacefully and constructively across cultural differences for purposes of addressing personal and collective needs and of achieving sustainable human–environmental interactions, this requires internalizing global values. Addressing these challenges of globalization will require making citizenship education and the development of global values an explicit objective of efforts to improve quality throughout the world, critically examining theories and evidence about the effectiveness of various approaches to developing citizenship and global citizenship and supporting activities aligned with this public purpose. This public purpose should support the development of a political culture that fosters the rule of national and international law and respect of human rights, the development of understanding to support trade and economic and peaceful bilateral and international diplomacy as the preferred means to solve international disputes, the development of the capability to understand and address the serious environmental challenges facing humanity and to collaborate across national boundaries in the creation of sustainable forms of human–environmental interactions and in the development of the skills to promote rationality in deliberation and action, and to advance science and technology as means to improve human health and well-being. At present, however, many education systems and reforms are insufficiently focused on quality, or focus instead on a very narrow and self-referenced definition of quality. It is possible to educate people to understand and appreciate cultural differences and to understand and accept human rights in a framework of global values that includes compassion and caring, concern for others, respect and reciprocity. These values, dispositions, knowledge and skills can be developed in a range of institutions that societies have to pass on what they value to the young, and to re-create culture: families, religious institutions, the media, workplaces, political institutions and also schools. While there is no reason to assume that schools can be more effective in this task than any of these other institutions, they have greater potential to be aligned with transnational efforts to promote global civility. They are a public space, and consequently also a globally public space, in ways in which families and religious institutions are not. If schools actively engage in teaching hatred or intolerance, or if they fail to prepare students adequately for global civility, these failures can be noted by international institutions that can potentially mobilize resources to support national and local efforts to prepare students for global citizenship. There is not a similar network linking national and transnational institutions, public and private, governmental and non-governmental, that attends to the dynamics of families and other ‘‘private’’ spaces. Citoyenneté, identité et de l'éducation: l'examen des fins publiques des écoles à l'ère de la mondialisation 出版年份: 2006 作者: Fernando Reimers 机构作者: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) Les établissements d'enseignement existent pour parvenir à des fins publiques. L'un de ces objectifs est de développer la citoyenneté. Au 21e siècle, la citoyenneté comprend la citoyenneté mondiale. Dans une ère de mondialisation citoyenneté effective comprend les connaissances, la capacité et la disposition à engager pacifique et constructive entre les différences culturelles aux fins de répondre aux besoins personnels et collectifs et de réaliser des interactions humaines-environnementales durables, ce qui nécessite l'intériorisation des valeurs globales. Pour relever ces défis de la mondialisation, il faudra faire de l'éducation à la citoyenneté et le développement des valeurs mondiales un objectif explicite des efforts pour améliorer la qualité dans le monde entier, l'examen critique des théories et des preuves sur l'efficacité des différentes approches pour développer la citoyenneté et la citoyenneté mondiale et soutenir les activités alignées cet effet public. Cet objectif public devrait soutenir le développement d'une culture politique qui favorise la primauté du droit national et international et le respect des droits de l'homme, le développement de la compréhension pour soutenir le commerce et la diplomatie bilatérale et internationale économique et pacifique comme le moyen privilégié pour résoudre les conflits internationaux, le développement de la capacité à comprendre et à relever les défis environnementaux humanité face à de graves et de collaborer à travers les frontières nationales dans la création de formes durables d'interactions homme-environnement et dans le développement des compétences pour promouvoir la rationalité dans la délibération et de l'action, et de faire avancer la science et la technologie comme moyen d'améliorer la santé humaine et le bien-être. À l'heure actuelle, cependant, de nombreux systèmes d'éducation et les réformes ne sont pas suffisamment axées sur la qualité, ou se concentrent plutôt sur une définition très étroite et auto-référencé de la qualité. Il est possible d'éduquer les gens à comprendre et à apprécier les différences culturelles et à comprendre et à acept droits de l'homme dans un cadre de valeurs globales qui comprend la compassion et la compassion, le souci des autres, le respect et la réciprocité. Ces valeurs, les dispositions, les connaissances et les compétences peuvent être développées dans un éventail d'institutions que les sociétés doivent passer sur ce qu'ils apprécient le jeune, et de recréer la culture: les familles, les institutions religieuses, les médias, les milieux de travail, les institutions politiques et aussi écoles. Bien qu'il n'y ait aucune raison de supposer que les écoles peuvent être plus efficaces dans cette tâche que l'une de ces autres institutions, ils ont un plus grand potentiel pour être aligné avec les efforts transnationaux visant à promouvoir la civilité mondiale. Ils sont un espace public, et par conséquent aussi un espace public à l'échelle mondiale, dans les façons dont les familles et les institutions religieuses ne sont pas. Si les écoles participent activement à l'enseignement à la haine ou l'intolérance, ou si elles ne parviennent pas à préparer les étudiants de manière adéquate pour la civilité mondiale, ces échecs peuvent être notées par les institutions internationales qui peuvent potentiellement mobiliser des ressources pour soutenir les efforts nationaux et locaux pour préparer les élèves à la citoyenneté mondiale. Il n'y a pas un réseau similaire reliant les institutions nationales et transnationales, publiques et privées, gouvernementales et non-gouvernementales, qui assiste à la dynamique des familles et d'autres «espaces» «privés». 
Living with Controversy: Teaching Controversial Issues through Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights (EDC/HRE); Training Pack for Teachers 出版年份: 2015 机构作者: Council of Europe Learning how to engage in dialogue with people whose values are different from one’s own and to respect them is central to the democratic process and essential for the protection and strengthening of democracy and fostering a culture of human rights. Yet in Europe young people do not often have an opportunity to discuss controversial issues in school because they are seen as too challenging to teach, e.g., issues to do with extremism, gender violence, child abuse, or sexual orientation. Unable to voice their concerns, unaware of how others feel or left to rely on friends and social media for their information, young people can be frustrated or confused about some of the major issues which affect their communities and European society today. In the absence of help from school, they might have no reliable means of dealing with these issues constructively and no one to guide them. The idea for this Pack came out of a call from policy-makers and practitioners in a number of European countries for more effective training for teachers in the teaching of controversial issues. 
Using Civic Participation and Civic Reasoning to Shape Our Future and Education (Background Paper for the Futures of Education Initiative) 出版年份: 2020 作者: Sarah M. Stitzlein 机构作者: UNESCO Actualizing a preferred future relies on citizens who are prepared to effectively engage perhaps the most fundamental civic question: ‘What should we do?’ (Levine, 2016; Dishon & Ben-Porath, 2018). It is a question that arises when people face a problem, must reach a decision, or must figure out how to flourish together as a group. This question is closely tied to the key question posed by the International Commission on the Futures of Education: ‘What do we want to become?’ Engaging both questions is a useful way for us to envision education in the future. These questions push us to consider not only what we merely can do, but also what is right for us to do in light of our responsibilities to others.Civic reasoning is the sort of reasoning we do as we answer the question, ‘What should we do?’ Civic discourse is a means or method by which people engage in civic reasoning. Efforts to envision improved education and futures should foreground civic reasoning and discourse as both a means and ends of citizen participation. They are important for the ways in which they directly engage citizens and for their products, which lead to future civic action and better futures. Education and Training in a Changing Word: What Skills Do We Need? 出版年份: 2015 机构作者: UNESCO Bangkok What skills do learners need in today’s world? While academic skills have often been the focus of education systems, other skills that help us to better learn to live together and prepare us for the world of work must not be underestimated. This video highlights key messages on the importance of these skills, such as critical thinking, creativity, teamwork and empathy among many others as we enter a new era for Education 2030: towards inclusive and quality education and lifelong learning for all. 
التعليم والمواطنة: الجامعة الصيفية 2016 出版年份: 2016 作者: Abdullah Saaf 机构作者: General Delegation for Prison Administration and Reintegration (DGAPR) الفيديو عبارة عن محاضرة القت للسجينات في المغرب، وهو برنامج لاعادة التأهيل. المحاضرة للدكتور عبدالله ساعف يتحدث فيها عن المواطنة، والاندماج في المجتمع، ويناقش علاقة التعليم بالمواطنة. Education and Citizenship: Summer University 2016 出版年份: 2016 作者: Abdullah Saaf 机构作者: General Delegation for Prison Administration and Reintegration (DGAPR) This video is a lecture given to women prisoners in Morocco, and it is a rehabilitation program. The lecture by Dr. Abdullah Sa`f talks about citizenship and inclusion in society, and discusses the relationship between education and citizenship. 
2014 syllabus: character and citizenship education: primary 出版年份: 2014 机构作者: Singapore. Ministry of Education. Student Development Curriculum Division Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) has always been at the heart of Singapore's education system. In CCE, students learn to be responsible to family and community; and understand their roles in shaping the future of nation. The emerging trends and global developments that impact the society, such as social changes, globalisation and technological advancements are taken into consideration in the development of the CCE curriculum.The goal of CCE is to inculcate values and build competencies in students to develop them to be good individuals and useful citizens. Since 1959, various key programmes have been introduced to inculcate values, habits, competencies and skills in students. Some of these programmes include Civics and Moral Education (CME, 1992), National Education (NE, 1997), Social and Emotional Learning (SEL, 2005), and learning experiences such as Co-Curricular Activities (CCA).The new CCE curriculum shifts focus from programmes to a common purpose. The desired outcomes of CCE are aligned to the Key Stage Outcomes (KSOs) and Desired Outcomes of Education (DOE). CCE is central to the Framework for 21st Century Competencies and Student Outcomes. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of the core values, social and emotional competencies and civic literacy, global awareness and cross-cultural skills that are critical for character and citizenship development of students. 2014 课程标准 品格与公民教育 小学 出版年份: 2014 机构作者: Singapore. Ministry of Education. Student Development Curriculum Division Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) has always been at the heart of Singapore's education system. In CCE, students learn to be responsible to family and community; and understand their roles in shaping the future of nation. The emerging trends and global developments that impact the society, such as social changes, globalisation and technological advancements are taken into consideration in the development of the CCE curriculum.The goal of CCE is to inculcate values and build competencies in students to develop them to be good individuals and useful citizens. Since 1959, various key programmes have been introduced to inculcate values, habits, competencies and skills in students. Some of these programmes include Civics and Moral Education (CME, 1992), National Education (NE, 1997), Social and Emotional Learning (SEL, 2005), and learning experiences such as Co-Curricular Activities (CCA). The new CCE curriculum shifts focus from programmes to a common purpose. The desired outcomes of CCE are aligned to the Key Stage Outcomes (KSOs) and Desired Outcomes of Education (DOE). CCE is central to the Framework for 21st Century Competencies and Student Outcomes. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of the core values, social and emotional competencies and civic literacy, global awareness and cross-cultural skills that are critical for character and citizenship development of students.