相关资源
探索丰富的全球公民教育资源，深化理解，促进研究、倡导、教学与学习。
共找到1,898条结果
Human Rights and the Digital Challenge 出版年份: 2021 机构作者: Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ICESCO) The file is a report on the international symposium "Human Rights and Digital Challenges". The organization of this symposium came in line with the commitments of both ISESCO and the Kingdom of Morocco in the field of promoting the principles of human rights in their holistic sense. And also to spread the values of peace, the principles of citizenship and positive coexistence. The symposium is considered a prelude and a path to keeping pace with the most important challenges facing human rights, strengthening cooperation and exchanging experiences and expertise among ISESCO member states. 
[Summary] Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state Actors in Education; Who Chooses? Who Loses? 出版年份: 2022 机构作者: UNESCO يمتد دور الجهات الفاعلة غير الحكومية إلى ما هو أبعد من توفير التعليم ليشمل التدخلات على مستويات التعليم المختلفة ومجالات التأثير. إلى جانب استعراضه للتقدم المحرز نحو الهدف 4 من أهداف التنمية المستدامة ، بما في ذلك الأدلة الناشئة على تأثير جائحة COVID-19 ، يحث التقرير العالمي لرصد التعليم 2021/2 الحكومات على رؤية جميع المؤسسات والطلاب والمعلمين كجزء من نظام واحد. يجب أن تساعد المعايير والمعلومات والحوافز والمساءلة الحكومات على حماية واحترام وإعمال الحق في التعليم للجميع ، دون إبعاد أعينهم عن الامتيازات أو الاستغلال. لا يلزم توفير التعليم الممول من القطاع العام بشكل عام ولكن يجب معالجة التفاوت في عمليات التعليم ونتائج الطلاب وظروف عمل المعلم. الكفاءة والابتكار ، بدلا من أن يكونا أسرارا تجارية ، ينبغي نشرها وممارستها من قبل الجميع. وتحقيقا لهذه الغاية ، يجب الحفاظ على الشفافية والنزاهة في عملية سياسة التعليم العام لمنع المصالح المكتسبة. نداء التقرير - من يختار؟ من يخسر؟ - يدعو صانعي السياسات إلى التشكيك في العلاقات مع الجهات الفاعلة غير الحكومية من حيث الخيارات الأساسية: بين الإنصاف وحرية الاختيار ؛ بين تشجيع المبادرة ووضع المعايير ؛ بين مجموعات مختلفة من الوسائل والاحتياجات ؛ بين الالتزامات الفورية بموجب الهدف 4 من أهداف التنمية المستدامة وتلك التي يتعين تحقيقها تدريجياً (مثل التعليم ما بعد الثانوي) ؛ وبين التعليم والقطاعات الاجتماعية الأخرى. 
An Analysis of the Factors Affecting East-Asian Adults’ Global Citizenship: Social capital, Threat Recognition, Information Media Utilization (Journal of Education for International Understanding; vol.16, no.3) 出版年份: 2021 作者: Seongkyeong Jeong | Yura Lee | Hwanbo Park 机构作者: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) This paper puts an in-depth study on identifying the characteristics of factors related to global citizenship in adults from South Korea, China, and Japan and analyzing the elements affecting them. For this purpose, data from the 7th World Value Survey which was undertaken in South Korea, China, and Japan were used, and they were examined with three different perspectives of social capital, threat recognition, and information media utilization to get to know the influence of variables from various aspects. Multiple regression was applied for this and the results are as follows. Firstly, the global citizenship of adults was high in the order of China, Japan, and South Korea, and the factors influencing global citizenship depend on the country. This implies that contextual factors are acting differently in the formation of the global citizenship of adults even they are from the same East Asian region. Secondly, simple contact with immigrants and foreigners in China and Japan has negative effects while having a positive effect on trust in foreigners. This suggests that an educational mechanism is required to raise trust and empathy beyond understanding immigrants simply to foster global citizenship among Chinese and Japanese adults. Thirdly, depending on the hierarchy of the sense of belonging, the impact on global citizenship was different in South Korea. Educational activities and programs should be implemented to establish the sense of global citizenship of adults in South Korea. Fourthly, the treat perception of social safety and employment insecurity in South Korea and China did not have statistical significance to global citizenship. While the higher the social safety perception the heavier the employment insecurity, adults in Japan had higher global citizenship awareness. This implies that Japanese adults perceive the problems of immigration as a matter of national or social situation and structure. Finally, the utilization of information media in all countries revealed statistical significance, which means that attitude for immigrants would vary depending on which information medica is used from those three countries. 동아시아 성인의 세계시민의식 관련 요인 분석: 사회자본, 위협인식, 정보매체활용을 중심으로 (국제이해교육연구; vol.16, no.3) 出版年份: 2021 作者: 정성경 | 이유라 | 박환보 机构作者: 한국국제이해교육학회 본 연구는 한국, 중국, 일본 성인의 세계시민의식 관련 요인 특성을 밝히고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 비교 분석하기 위해 수행되었다. 본 연구는 분석을 위해 세계가치관조사 7차 조사의 한국, 중국, 일본 데이터를 활용하여 사회자본, 위협인식, 정보매체활용이라는 세 가지 차원에서 살펴보았다. 분석방법은 중다회귀분석을 적용하였다. 주요분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 성인의 세계시민의식은 중국, 일본, 한국의 순서대로 높게 나타났으며, 성인의 세계시민의식에 미치는 영향요인은 국가별로 다르게 나타났다. 이는 같은 동아시아 지역이더라도 성인의 세계시민의식 형성에 있어서 맥락 요인이 각기 다르게 작용하고 있음을 의미한다. 둘째, 중국과 일본에서는 이민자, 외국인에 대한 단순한 접촉은 부정적 영향을, 외국인에 대한 신뢰는 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 이는 중국과 일본 성인의 세계시민의식을 높이기 위해서 이민자를 단순히 이해하는 것을 넘어서 신뢰와 공감을 끌어내는 교육적 기제가 필요하다는 것을 시사한다. 셋째, 한국에서는 소속감의 위계에 따라 세계시민의식에 미치는 영향이 상이하였으며, 한국 성인의 세계시민의식을 향상하기 위해서는 세계 소속감을 교육 활동과 프로그램에 적극 활용할 필요가 있다. 넷째, 한국과 중국에서는 사회안전인식과 고용불안이라는 위협인식이 세계시민의식에 아무런 통계적 유의성을 보이지 않았으며, 일본에서는 사회안전인식이 높을수록 고용불안이 앉을수록 세계시민의식이 높았다. 이는 일본 성인은 이민자 수용의 문제를 국가나 사회적 상황과 구조의 문제로 인식하고 있음을 시사한다. 마지막으로 모든 국가에서 정보매체활용이 통계적 유의성을 보였으며, 이는 세 나라 모두 어떤 정보매체를 활용하느냐에 따라 이민자 태도가 달라질 수 있음을 의미한다. 
Discourses on Global Citizenship Education in Africa: Questioning and Answering from a Post-Colonial Perspective (Journal of Education for International Understanding; vol.16, no.3) 出版年份: 2021 作者: Yoonjung Choi | Yeji Kim 机构作者: Korean Society of Education for International Understanding (KOSEIU) Theoretically framed by post-colonialism and critical global citizenship education(GCED), this study explored major discourses on and practices of GCED in African countries through the use of a systematic review method. The findings demonstrated that studies related to GCED in African countries pointed out the limitations of state-centered civic education based on uncritical patriotism and passive citizenship, and further emphasize the importance of promoting more critical and reflective GCED. In addition, research emphasized the implementation of alternative and unique GCED education unique built on indigenous African knowledge and philosophy. This study provides significant insights into GCED in the context of South Korea and discusses the pursuit of globally oriented, sustainable GCED aiming for peace and solidarity around the world. 아프리카 세계시민교육의 동향과 비전: 탈식민주의 시각에서 묻고 답하다 (국제이해교육연구; vol.16, no.3) 出版年份: 2021 作者: 최윤정 | 김예지 机构作者: 한국국제이해교육학회 본 연구는 탈식민주의 인식론과 비판적 세계시민교육 이론을 기반으로 아프리카 세계시민교육에 대한 연구 동향과 사례, 주요 담론을 체계적 문헌고찰 방법을 통해 탐색하였다. 연구 결과, 아프리카 지역의 세계시민교육 연구들은 무비판적 애국심과 수동적 시민성을 강조하는 국가중심 시민교육의 한계를 지적하고, 탈식민주의적 세계시민교육의 필요성을 강조하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 아프리카에서의 세계시민교육 실천에 대해 서구의 이론과 방법을 답습하는 것이 아니라 탈식민주의와 토착 지식에 기반을 둔, 지역적으로 맥락화된 세계시민교육을 구축해야 한다는 점을 역설하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구는 아프리카 지역의 세계시민교육 담론과 실천이 한국의 맥락에 주는 시사점과 의의를 찾고 나아가 평화와 공존, 연대, 지속가능성을 위한 보다 ‘세계’적인 세계시민교육의 의미를 논의한다. 
¿Cómo convivir (con culturas diferentes) sin morir en el intento? 出版年份: 2022 机构作者: CuriosaMente Este video presenta una perspectiva sobre las diferencias culturales, cómo es posible identificarlas, comprenderlas y adaptarse a las mismas. Responde las preguntas ¿Qué es la interculturalidad? ¿Cómo podemos vivir entre diferentes culturas? [Summary] Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state Actors in Education: Who Chooses? Who Loses? 出版年份: 2022 机构作者: UNESCO Non-state actors’ role extends beyond provision of schooling to interventions at various education levels and influence spheres. Alongside its review of progress towards SDG 4, including emerging evidence on the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact, the 2021/2 Global Education Monitoring Report urges governments to see all institutions, students and teachers as part of a single system. Standards, information, incentives and accountability should help governments protect, respect and fulfill the right to education of all, without turning their eyes away from privilege or exploitation. Publicly funded education does not have to be publicly provided but disparity in education processes, student outcomes and teacher working conditions must be addressed. Efficiency and innovation, rather than being commercial secrets, should be diffused and practiced by all. To that end, transparency and integrity in the public education policy process need to be maintained to block vested interests. The report’s rallying call – Who chooses? Who loses? – invites policymakers to question relationships with non-state actors in terms of fundamental choices: between equity and freedom of choice; between encouraging initiative and setting standards; between groups of varying means and needs; between immediate commitments under SDG 4 and those to be progressively realized (e.g. post-secondary education); and between education and other social sectors. [Resumen] Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2021/2: Los actores no estatales en la educación; ¿quién elige? ¿quién pierde? 出版年份: 2022 机构作者: UNESCO El papel de los actores no estatales se extiende más allá de la escolarización a las intervenciones en diferentes niveles educativos y esferas de influencia. Junto con su revisión del progreso hacia el ODS 4, incluida la evidencia emergente sobre el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19, el Informe de Seguimiento de la Educación en el Mundo 2021/2 insta a los gobiernos a considerar a todas las instituciones, estudiantes y docentes como parte de un solo sistema. Los estándares, la información, los incentivos y la rendición de cuentas deberían ayudar a los gobiernos a proteger, respetar y cumplir el derecho a la educación para todos, sin apartar la vista de los privilegios o la explotación. La educación financiada por el estado no tiene que ser proporcionada por el estado, pero se debe abordar la disparidad en los procesos educativos, los resultados de los estudiantes y las condiciones de trabajo de los maestros. La eficiencia y la innovación, en lugar de ser secretos comerciales, deben ser compartidos y practicados por todos. Con este fin, se debe mantener la transparencia e integridad del proceso de formulación de políticas de educación pública para bloquear los intereses creados. El grito de guerra del informe: ¿Quién elige? ¿Quién pierde? – invita a los responsables de la toma de decisiones políticas a cuestionar las relaciones con los actores no estatales en términos de elecciones fundamentales: entre equidad y libertad de elección; entre fomentar la iniciativa y establecer estándares; entre grupos de diferentes medios y necesidades; entre los compromisos inmediatos bajo el ODS 4 y los que se lograrán gradualmente (por ejemplo, educación postsecundaria); y entre la educación y otros sectores sociales. [Résumé] Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation, 2021-2022: Les acteurs non étatiques dans l’éducation; Qui décide? qui est perdant? 出版年份: 2022 机构作者: UNESCO Le rôle des acteurs non étatiques s'étend au-delà de la scolarisation à des interventions à différents niveaux d'éducation et sphères d'influence. Parallèlement à son examen des progrès vers l'ODD 4, y compris les preuves émergentes sur l'impact de la pandémie de COVID-19, le Rapport mondial de suivi sur l'éducation 2021/2 exhorte les gouvernements à considérer tous les établissements, étudiants et enseignants comme faisant partie d'un système unique. Les normes, l'information, les incitations et la responsabilité devraient aider les gouvernements à protéger, respecter et réaliser le droit à l'éducation de tous, sans détourner les yeux des privilèges ou de l'exploitation. L'éducation financée par l'État n'a pas à être fournie par l'État, mais la disparité dans les processus éducatifs, les résultats des élèves et les conditions de travail des enseignants doit être abordée. L'efficacité et l'innovation, plutôt que d'être des secrets commerciaux, doivent être diffusées et pratiquées par tous. À cette fin, la transparence et l'intégrité du processus d'élaboration des politiques d'éducation publique doivent être maintenues pour bloquer les intérêts acquis. Le cri de ralliement du rapport – Qui choisit ? Qui perd ? – invite les décideurs politiques à questionner les relations avec les acteurs non étatiques en termes de choix fondamentaux : entre équité et liberté de choix ; entre l'incitation à l'initiative et l'établissement de normes ; entre des groupes aux moyens et aux besoins variés ; entre les engagements immédiats au titre de l'ODD 4 et ceux à concrétiser progressivement (par exemple, l'enseignement postsecondaire) ; et entre l'éducation et les autres secteurs sociaux.