Ressources
Explorez une large gamme de ressources sur le GCED afin d’approfondir votre compréhension et de renforcer vos activités de recherche, de plaidoyer, d’enseignement et d’apprentissage.
1,172 résultats trouvés
Apuéstale a la ciudadanía global en Colombia Année de publication: 2015 Auteur: Nathalia Sarmiento El blog de la Universidad Externado de Colombia define lo que es la ciudadanía global y sus cometidos, y propone una ciudadanía de este tipo para Colombia. Asegura que desde una perspectiva humanista y universal, comprometida con el desarrollo humano, promoverá mayor libertad, igualdad, justicia, ciudadanía activa y la educación de ella. 
Second UNESCO Forum on Global Citizenship Education video Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Highlights of the Second UNESCO Forum on Global Citizenship Education (GCED) Building peaceful and sustainable societies: preparing for post-2015 (28-30 January 2015, UNESCO HQs, Paris). The Forum was organized by the Division for Teaching, Learning and Content, Education Sector, UNESCO, with the support of Austria, the Sultanate of Oman and the Republic of Korea, and the UN Secretary-General's Global Education First Initiative (GEFI). Second UNESCO Forum on Global Citizenship Education video Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Faits saillants du deuxième Forum de l'UNESCO sur l’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale (ECM) Construire des sociétés pacifiques et durables: la préparation pour l'après-2015 (28-30 Janvier 2015, Siège de l'UNESCO, Paris). Le Forum a été organisé par la Division de l'enseignement, l'apprentissage et du contenu, Secteur de l'éducation, l'UNESCO, avec le soutien de l'Autriche, le Sultanat d'Oman et la République de Corée, et Première Éducation Mondiale Initiative du Secrétaire Général de l'ONU (PISG). 
Learning to Leapfrog: Innovative Pedagogies to Transform Education Année de publication: 2019 Auteur: David Istance | Alejandro Paniagua | Rebecca Winthrop | Lauren Ziegler Auteur institutionnel: Center for Universal Education at Brookings This report follows up on the book “Leapfrogging Inequality: Remaking Education to Help Young People Thrive,” published in 2018 by the Center for Universal Education (CUE) at the Brookings Institution. The book argued the importance of education leapfrogging–creating transformative shifts rather than incremental evolution by harnessing the power of innovation to advance a breadth of skills. The book put forth a framework for leapfrogging that outlined two core elements (teaching and learning, and recognition of learning) and two support elements (people and places, and technology and data).This report focuses on the teaching and learning element of the leapfrog framework, especially on pedagogical approaches and the role of teachers, but draws on the others as relevant. It does not attempt to be exhaustive and does not pretend to address neither all education policy variables, nor critical system factors such as political will and adequate funding, nor demand-side factors such as student and parent support for innovative approaches. 
[Video] Global citizenship is ... Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Participants of the Second UNESCO Forum on Global Citizenship Education (GCED) Building peaceful and sustainable societies: preparing for post-2015 (28-30 January 2015,UNESCO HQ, Paris) reflect on what Global Citizenship is. The Forum was organized by the Division for Teaching, Learning and Content, Education Sector, UNESCO, with the support of Austria, the Sultanate of Oman and the Republic of Korea, and the UN Secretary-General’s Global Education First Initiative (GEFI). La citoyenneté mondiale est ... Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Les participants du deuxième Forum de l'UNESCO sur l’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale (ECM) Construire des sociétés pacifiques et durables: la préparation pour l'après-2015 (28-30 Janvier 2015, Siège de l'UNESCO, Paris) à réfléchir sur ce que la citoyenneté mondiale est. Le Forum a été organisé par la Division de l'enseignement, l'apprentissage et du contenu, Secteur de l'éducation, l'UNESCO, avec le soutien de l'Autriche, le Sultanat d'Oman et la République de Corée, et First Éducation Mondiale Initiative du Secrétaire général de l'ONU (GEFI). "Education First" - UN Secretary-General's video message Année de publication: 2012 Auteur: United Nations. Secretary-General, 2007-2016 (Ban, Ki-moon) UN Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki-moon launched a Global Initiative on Education (Education First), which aims to achieve quality, relevant and inclusive education for every child on 26 September, 2012. "Education First" - UN Secretary-General's video message Année de publication: 2012 Auteur: United Nations. Secretary-General, 2007-2016 (Ban, Ki-moon) Secrétaire général de l'ONU, M. Ban Ki-moon, a lancé une initiative Mondiale sur lÉducation (Education First), qui vise à atteindre une qualité, une éducation pertinente et inclusive pour tous les enfants le 26 Septembre, de 2012. 
The war in our minds: is global citizenship the answer? (Blue Dot issue 1) Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (MGIEP) Feature Global Citizenship Education: A New Educational, Pedagogical and Political Narrative in the World System? (by Carlos A. Torres) In Pursuit of a Global Civics (by Hakan Altinay) Global Citizenship: Necessary and Possible (by Paul and Anne Ehrlich) Cover Story YOUth Speak for a better today and tomorrow (by Piyali Sarkar Debnath, UNESCO MGIEP) Essays Unlocking the Civic Sense of Young Minds (by Karthik Shankar) Shared Home, Shared Hopes and Shared Actions (by Trang T. Nguyen) Redesigning the Education System for Global Citizenship (by Ayodeji Ojo) Youth Voices Who is a global citizen? News What we have been up to UNESCO MGIEP Crossword Event Calendar Monitoring education for global citizenship: a contribution to debate Année de publication: 2015 Auteur: Harm-Jan Fricke | Cathryn Gathercole | Amy Skinner Auteur institutionnel: DEEEP | CONCORD DARE Forum 1. This report aims to provide a stimulus for further thought, work and debate in the design of assessment frameworks for an education that supports people in leading fulfilling lives in a changing, globalised world, and in particular within the context of debates around post-2015 universal targets and indicators that are relevant to an education for global citizenship (EfGC). 2. In providing that stimulus the report addresses the following questions: a. What are the key differences and similarities between diverse forms of ‘adjectival educations’ that contribute to, or generally express themselves as allied to an ‘education for global citizenship’? b. What do they contribute to an education for global citizenship? c. How, if at all, do they interpret the notion of ‘transformation’? d. What do practitioners consider to be the major challenges and opportunities for monitoring (transformative) education for global citizenship? e. Which approaches and means of monitoring and assessing transformative education for global citizenship appear to be feasible? 3. The report is based on information obtained from: a. Literature reviews; b. Workshops, involving 65 educators in total, held in Brazil, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and three locations in Europe; c. Responses to a questionnaire completed by 218 educators working in more than 50 countries, albeit with a predominance of respondents based in Europe. 4. The origins and key characteristics of development education, global education and global learning, human rights education, and education for sustainable development are explored, leading to statements about their commonalities and contributions to an education for global citizenship. These commonalties appear to be particularly in the areas of their shared global orientation, pursuit of personal and/or societal transformation, active and enquiry based teaching and learning methodologies, and overlapping content. 5. The commonalities which the discussed educations contribute to - and share with – education for global citizenship appear to be particularly around: a. values and dispositions which enable a response to, and advocacy for, change, b. engagement with diverse ideas, opinions and understandings, c. a stimulus to investigate and develop creativity by means of learning, d. building skills and capacities as part of a process of lifelong learning, e. a generic educational approach that aims at involvement in an explicit process of change. 6. Within such a context differences appear amongst practitioners and theoreticians in the use, meaning and function of the term ‘global citizenship’, with some seeing it primarily as a tool in advocacy while others view it primarily as a means of explanation of human relations globally. 7. Critique on the usefulness and use of the terms ‘global citizenship’ is outlined and the world-wide, universal, use of the term ‘education for global citizenship’ is questioned. However, its intentions as an approach of transformative education for critical and active engagement in a globalised society are seen as having universal relevance. 8. That approach is described as “a learning process for people’s critical and active engagement in and with global society, involving people in developing their capacities, capabilities and motivation to be actively engaged in personal and collective human development. It does this by drawing on a critical understanding and consideration of global processes and interdependencies, of other people’s perspectives and interests, of environmental opportunities and limitations, and of universal rights.” 9. The approach is further defined by a number of ‘core signifiers’ (which can form the basis for indicators of achievement) relating to: a. pedagogy – characteristics of the teaching process, b. capacities and capabilities – regarding the learner’s competence, c. values – as exhibited in the teaching and learning process, d. content – the learner’s acquisition of core understandings, e. outcome – regarding the learner’s dispositions, f. social transformation – regarding the learner’s contributions to community and wider society. 10. The report continues by providing a summary review of selected literature regarding the design of monitoring frameworks that appear pertinent to an education for global citizenship. It discusses work done in relation to universal targets and indicators, country based frameworks, education institutional monitoring, educator competence, and learner outcomes. It draws particular attention to the importance of quality assessment, the need to involve the range of education stakeholders in the design, application and interpretation of indicators, and the need to enable learning from experiences. 11. Further information about the challenges and opportunities for monitoring education for global citizenship is obtained from ideas and opinions given by workshop participants and questionnaire respondents. Respondents recognise that developing a universal monitoring framework can help to clarify the purpose and meaning of EfGC for both practitioners and policy makers. However, they also recognise that there is a risk that agreement might be reached around a lowest common denominator approach. The importance of participation by practitioners in, and their ownership of, the monitoring content and process is highlighted. The potential uses of monitoring data and analyses in demonstrating the impact of EfGC on broader cross-curricular outcomes and educational achievements, is seen by respondents as a means to gain further recognition of the value of EfGC. 12. Based on the foregoing, the final chapter of the report provides a number of suggestions as a stimulus for further work, thought and debate. These suggestions focus on: a. a monitoring framework that addresses the holistic nature of EfGC; b. an assessment framework to do with learning outcomes that exemplify the core signifiers mentioned in paragraph 9 above; c. indicators and a monitoring approach that is applicable at national levels, enabling monitoring of progress for specific sectoral aspects of EfGC (teacher education is given as an example of such a sectoral aspect); d. a universal target that builds on the description of EfGC given in paragraph 8 above; e. indicator groupings that can show progress against such a universal target.