Ressources
Explorez une large gamme de ressources sur le GCED afin d’approfondir votre compréhension et de renforcer vos activités de recherche, de plaidoyer, d’enseignement et d’apprentissage.
3,432 résultats trouvés
Management of Transboundary Water Resources in the Danube and the Sava River Basins Année de publication: 2019 Auteur: Aksulu Kushanova Auteur institutionnel: Regional Environmental Centre for Central Asia (CAREC) This analytical work “Management of transboundary water resources in the Danube and Sava River Basins” conveys knowledge and information on the management of the transboundary water resources by acknowledging the importance of the WEF Nexus in the Danube and Sava River Basins. Firsthand information was received during face-to-face meetings with the ICPDR and the ISRBC and the summarized work at hand shares the European experience with a wider audience.The analytical work narrates the institutional and legislative frameworks within the sectoral characteristics on the management of two River Basins: the Danube River Basin, which is the largest and the most international one in Europe, and the Sava River Basin, which serves as the greatest tributary to the Danube River. The study reviews the operations of the ICPDR and the ISRBC and technical tools applied at the basin level, which include accident emergency warning systems, monitoring networks, flood forecasting and more. Управление трансграничными водными ресурсами в бассейнах рек Дунай и Сава Année de publication: 2019 Auteur: Aksulu Kushanova Auteur institutionnel: Regional Environmental Centre for Central Asia (CAREC) Настоящая аналитическая записка «Управление трансграничными водными ресурсами в бассейнах рек Дунай и Сава» передает знания и информацию по вопросам управления ТВР, которые еще раз подчеркивают важную роль взаимосвязи (нексуса) «вода-энергия-продовольствие» (ВЭП), в данном случае на примере трансграничных рек Дунай и Сава. Информация из первых рук была получена в ходе рабочих встреч с представителями МКОРД и МКБРС и впоследствии обобщены для ознакомления с европейским опытом более широкой аудитории.В настоящей аналитической работе описываются институциональные и нормативно-правовые принципы построения и характеристики систем управления двумя речными бассейнами, а именно, бассейном р. Дунай – крупнейшим в Европе с наибольшим количеством прибрежных государств, и бассейном р. Сава – самого крупного притока Дуная. В документе анализируется деятельность МКОРД и МКБРС и технический инструментарий, применяемый ими на бассейновом уровне, включая системы предупреждения о чрезвычайных ситуациях, мониторинговые сети, системы прогнозирования наводнений и др. 
Reconsidering EU Education Assistance to Central Asia (EUCAM Policy Brief No. 37, June 2019) Année de publication: 2019 Auteur: Sebastien Peyrouse Auteur institutionnel: Europe-Central Asia Monitoring (EUCAM) This paper is based on broader research on education in Central Asia that includes interviews with local stakeholders (teachers, parents and students) in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. Some views were taken from Sebastien Peyrouse, ‘How to Strengthen Western Engagement in Central Asia: Spotlight on EU Education Assistance in Uzbekistan’, PONARS Policy Memo, no. 524, April 2018,http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/strengthen-western-engagement-central-asia-spotlight-eu-education-assistance-uzbekistan. Новый взгляд на содействие ЕС образовательному сектору в Центральной Азии (Брифинг EUCAM No. 37, сентябрь 2019) Année de publication: 2019 Auteur: Sebastien Peyrouse Auteur institutionnel: Europe-Central Asia Monitoring (EUCAM) Этот брифинг основан на более углубленном исследовании системы образования в Центральной Азии, которое включает интервью в регионе (с учителями, родителями и учащимися) в Казахстане, Кыргызстане и Узбекистане.Ряд выводов позаимствованы из работы Себастьяна Пейруза ‘How to Strengthen Western Engagement in Central Asia: Spotlight on EU Education Assistance in Uzbekistan’, PONARS Policy Memo, no. 524, апрель 2018,http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/strengthen-western-engagement-central-asia-spotlight-eu-education-assistance-uzbekistan. 
Intercultural Multilingual Education in Latin America: Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Paraguay, and Norway Année de publication: 2011 Auteur institutionnel: Internacional de la Educación para Latinoamerica This document deals with Intercultural Bilingual Education (IBE), its current status and the concepts and processes driving it today – and in a certain way the conflicts encompassing it. It contains information on Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Paraguay, and includes some data and comments on Norway. Certainly all Latin America is involved in the topic, one way or another, but for now this is the geographical scope of the paper. It seeks to give an overview of the whole and profile a few specific aspects by country. 
Water and peace for the people: possible solutions to water disputes in the Middle East Année de publication: 2008 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO This book proposes practical and objective solutions to the entrenched water conflicts in the Middle East. The author reveals and clarifies the complexity of the water conflicts, drawing on years of experience facilitating and chairing water negotiations in the region. The bottom line is: Unless the countries involved co-operate, the consequences will be devastating. The lack of plentiful and clean water for the people will not only result in severe human suffering, but could also have grave geopolitical consequences. 
Critical Understanding on Global Citizenship Education in Post 2015 Context (Theory and Research in Citizenship Education; Vol. 57, No. 1) Année de publication: 2015 Auteur: Jinhee Kim Auteur institutionnel: Korea Association of Social Education It is notable that global citizenship education has recently gained prominence in Post 2015 context. This study attempted to explore diverse discourses of global citizenship education in theoretical dimension and it also analyzed the current status of global citizenship education as a new global education agenda. Major findings displayed issues and challenges; de-contextualization against local dimension; vague conceptualization of global citizenship education; limitation of transformative pedagogy and learning discourse; indicator development and monitoring issues; a paradigm shift for global citizenship education engaging with lifelong learning. Eventually, this study argues that comprehensive vision and long term road-map should be established to enhance global citizenship education. Lifelong learning approach is crucial to reshape global citizenship education while interacting with life-world context and life experience, which can promote an epistemology of learning to live together. 
التعليم والمواطنة والاندماج الوطني Année de publication: 2014 Auteur: Radwa Ammar Auteur institutionnel: Social Contract Center تعتبر هذه الورقة البحثية مقدمة توضح دور تعليم المواطنة كأساس لبناء مجتمع متماسك قادر على مواجهة التحديات من خلال استعراض مفاهيم وتجارب دولية مختلفة لإلقاء الضوء على أهمية إجراء دراسات متعمقة ميدانية لبحث العلاقة بين تعليم المواطنة والاندماج الوطني بين أفراد المجتمع، وتحديد أهم الموضوعات، وسُبل الطرح التي تتوافق مع المجتمعات المستهدفة من قبل هذه البرامج التعليمية، ووضع استراتيجية للمؤسسات التعليمية في الدولة لكي تتبنى هذا النوع من الدراسات.ولا تتعرض هذه الورقة بالرصد والتحليل للواقع المصري لأن أي دراسة وصفية دون البحث الميداني في الوقت الراهن لن تعرض سوى آراء مبنية بالأساس على انطباعات لا تُمكِّن من التصدي للأزمات التي يواجهها الواقع في ظل غياب دراسات متعمقة تتناول العلاقة بين تعليم المواطنة والتغييرات التي شهدها المجتمع مؤخرًا، وسُبل مواجهة التحديات. Education, Citizenship and National Integration Année de publication: 2014 Auteur: Radwa Ammar Auteur institutionnel: Social Contract Center This research paper is an introduction that explains the role of citizenship education as a basis for building a cohesive society capable of facing challenges. The paper reviews various international concepts and experiences to shed light on the importance of conducting in-depth field studies to discuss the relationship between citizenship education and national integration among members of society. It also aims to identify the most important topics, and ways of offering that It is compatible with the targeted communities by these educational programs, and to develop a strategy for educational institutions in the country to adopt this type of studies. 
A Comparative Study on Global Citizenship Education between Korea and ASEAN Année de publication: 2015 Auteur institutionnel: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) This research is the second-year study for a three-year project (2013-2015) focused on the global citizenship education of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). In the first-year study (2013), the current global citizenship education presented in the social studies curriculum of each country was analyzed based on literature research, and the global citizenship of students from each country was examined through surveys. Based on the analysis of the current global citizenship education of Korea and ASEAN overall and the characteristics of global citizenship of students from each country, this study is designed to make an in-depth analysis of global citizenship education and to seek direction for the joint global citizenship education programs between Korea and ASEAN to be employed in the third-year research.The students from the two countries, Indonesia and Thailand, among the 10 ASEAN countries are selected as participants because these two countries also participated in the previous international comparison study. The purposes of this study are as follows; (1) comparing the current global citizenship education of the national-level curriculum of Korea, Indonesia, and Thailand, (2) finding the similarities and differences by analysing the characteristics of global citizenship education of Korean, Indonesian, and Thai students, and (3) proposing the direction and themes of global citizenship education which will be mutually applied in Korea and ASEAN countries based on the research results.To conduct this study, various methods including literature study, interviews through visits to local schools, conferences for specialists, and international seminars were used. First, the meaning and goals of global citizenship education were established by reviewing literature and the concepts of ‘Humanity’, ‘Global Identity’, and ‘Global Participation’, which are the three sub-indices for global citizenship extracted from the first-year study, were used. Based on this framework, interview protocols for students, teachers, and policy makers were composed.The research team visited Indonesia and Thailand, carried out semi-structured interviews with students, teachers, and policy makers of national-level curriculum and classroom observations, and collected data related to global citizenship education. In addition, by conducting an international seminar with policy makers of curriculum of each country’s Ministry of Education and UNESCO specialists, we aimed to seek direction for joint global citizenship education in Korea and ASEAN and to reinforce educational cooperation.The major findings of this research can be suggested according to the research purposes in the following way.First, in the analysis of the national-level curriculum made for the comparison of current global citizenship education of Korea, Indonesia, and Thailand, the curriculum of each country is found to include elements of global citizenship education. However, countries show discrepancies in their actualization of curriculum, and citizenship education is still centered on national citizenship rather than global citizenship. Therefore, a more systematic attempt is needed for the advancement of citizenship education from nation-centered to globally oriented.Second, the findings from the interviews with students of each country carried out to define the characteristics of global citizenship of Korean, Indonesian, and Thai students indicate that while students’ responses showed a number of similarities in general, differences were found in specific answers as well. High school students provided more logical answers with greater depth compared to middle school students, and their responses differed based on their cultural contexts and experiences rather than their gender or religion. Therefore, while taking an approach which considers the level of students’ cognitive development as well as the cultural distinctiveness of each country, a way to expand opportunities for specific activities and experiences rather than an abstract way of teaching should be considered.Third, based on the analysis results, the directions and themes for global citizenship education to be jointly applied in Korea and ASEAN countries are proposed as follows: (1) The curriculum for global citizenship education should be focused on reinforcing the competency of citizens to participate in communities rather than that of individuals to ensure international competitiveness. (2) It is necessary to educate students to confront various conflicts and solve them by themselves rather than teaching them the abstract answers to the conflicts. (3) Global citizenship education should move beyond knowledge-based education and aim to lead bring changes in students’ behavior thereby empowering them to settle global issues. (4) For the actual implementation of curriculum, the cultural distinctiveness of each country and the differences by groups should be considered. (5) It is important to help students spread their interest to diverse countries beyond Western countries or ‘developed countries’.With these points in consideration, the objective of global citizenship education to be jointly promoted in Korea and ASEAN is suggested as the following: “Citizens are cultivated to form their identity as Asians based on their interest and knowledge of Asia and to participate in settling global issues. Through this, their qualities to participate in issues concerning all humanity are eventually cultivated.” The specific themes may include understanding Asia and ASEAN, social justice and equality, diversity, globalization and interdependence, conflict and peace, as well as sustainable development and environment. To improve effectiveness of joint global citizenship education of Korea and ASEAN and to reinforce educational cooperation, we made the following three suggestions.First, the standardization of global citizenship education across the nation is required. Having defined global citizenship education as the cultivation of the qualities of citizens based on the perception of human rights (Humanity) and with the identity as a global citizen (Global Identity) who can participate in settling the issues of global society (Participation), global citizenship education will yield the greatest efficiency when carried out together by all beyond national boundaries. Therefore, it is suggested that research for developing and expanding the joint curriculum by regions be supported and close cooperation be formed between policy makers of national curriculum and officials of International Training and Cooperation.Second, the reinforcement of global citizenship education through teacher training is required. For the effective implementation of joint global citizenship education in each country through the standardization of global citizenship education, the cultural diversity and distinctiveness of each country should be reflected. For these reasons, various practical bottom-up strategies are needed. Teacher training is a mandatory prerequisite for global citizenship education that is appropriate for the situations and contexts of each country. Therefore, it is suggested that researchers find out how to reinforce global citizenship education in teacher training based on solid research.Third, global citizenship education should be expanded by the exchange of human resources. As confirmed in this study, the exchange itself can bring a positive influence on the cultivation of global citizenship, and the sharing of the strategies for global citizenship education in each country can contribute to the development of a model for better global citizenship education. Therefore, it is suggested that the research for the joint promotion of project-based global citizenship education and the opportunities for mutual exchange of students and teachers between Korea and ASEAN countries should be expanded.