Ressources
Explorez une large gamme de ressources sur le GCED afin d’approfondir votre compréhension et de renforcer vos activités de recherche, de plaidoyer, d’enseignement et d’apprentissage.
1,456 résultats trouvés
Final Report: 18th Asia-Pacific Training Workshop on EIU Année de publication: 2018 Auteur institutionnel: APCEIU This report is the summary of the 18th Asia-Pacific Workshop on EIU (APTW) held in the Republic of Korea from 20 to 28 July 2018. Designed as TOT (Training of Trainers), the Workshop has invited 31 teacher educators/trainers from the Asia-Pacific region, strengthening their capacities to carry out Global Citizenship Education in their respective institutions and countries.
World Development Report 2018 and Its Policy Implications for Education Development in China Année de publication: 2018 Auteur: Liu Ji 2018 comprehensively describes a crisis that is looming worldwide: Schooling does not equalize learning. Drawing on key insights from the report, this study provides a high—level summary and relates the findings to common and critical issues that China is today. Specifically, this study highlights five important policy implications for education development in China: Education quality monitoring, adaptive policies, evidence-based decision, expanding human capital investments, and building stronger ties with international organizations.
如何应对全球学习危机——世界银行((2018世界发展报告》述评 Année de publication: 2018 Auteur: Liu Ji 作为世界银行最重要的旗舰报告,《世界发展报告》四十年来首次以教育为题,深入探讨如何应对全球学习危机、提高教育质量、优化人力资本结构、应对人类发展重要难题。从政策理念上看,世行教育策略的革新代表着世行在人力资本政策上较大的方向性改变:由关注教育投入转向教育产出和学习结果。同时,《2018世界发展报告》总结了适用于各教育阶段的大量实证研究和国际成功政策经验,对全球教育政策具有风向标的重要意义、对我国发展新时期的教育与人才策略有积极启示。本文通过对报告结论详细梳理,结合我国国情提出五点政策建议。
Notre diversité créatrice: rapport de la commission mondiale de la culture et du développement Année de publication: 1996 Auteur institutionnel: World Commission on Culture and Development This report is designed to address a diversified audience across the world that ranges from community activists, field workers, artists and scholars to government officials and politicians. We want it to inform the world’s opinion leaders and to guide its policy-makers. We want it to capture the attention of the world’s intellectual and artistic communities, as well as the general public. We aim to have shown them how culture shapes all our thinking, imagining and behaviour. It is the transmission of behaviour as well as a dynamic source for change, creativity, freedom and the awakening of innovative opportunities. For groups and societies, culture is energy, inspiration and empowerment, as well as the knowledge and acknowledgment of diversity: if cultural diversity is ‘behind us, around us and before us”, as Claude L&i-Strauss put it, we must learn how to let it lead not to the clash of cultures, but to their fruitful coexistence and to intercultural harmony. Just as in the tasks of building peace and consolidating democratic values, an indivisible set of goals, so too economic and political rights cannot be realized separately from social and cultural rights. The challenge to humanity is to adopt new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing itself in society, in short, new ways of living. The challenge is also to promote different paths of development, informed by a recognition of how cultural factors shape the way in which societies conceive their own futures and choose the means to attain these futures. I have for some time been concerned with the “culture of peace”. There is now considerable evidence that neglect of human development has been one of the principal causes of wars and internal armed conflicts, and that these, in turn, retard human development. With government complicity and with the intention of raising export receipts, private businesses continue to sell advanced military technology, nuclear materials and equipment for the production of bacteriological and chemical warfare. The concept of state sovereignty which still prevails today has increasingly come under scrutiny. In the area of peace-keeping, the distinction between external aggression and internal oppression is often unrealistic. The predominant threat to stability are violent conflicts within countries and not between them. There is an urgent need to strengthen international human rights law. Many of the most serious troubles come from within states – either because of ethnic strife or repressive measures by governments. Conditions that lead to tyranny and large-scale violations of human rights at home sooner or later are likely to spill over into a search for enemies abroad. The temptation of repressive states to export internal difficulties is great. Consider the Soviet Union’s invasion of Hungary and Czechoslovakia after it had used domestic oppression and the persistent refusal - for many years - of the previous South African governments to grant independence to Namibia. An ounce of prevention is better than a ton of punishment.
Thinkpiece on education and conflict Année de publication: 2009 Auteur: Lynn Davies Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO This paper looks first at the learning sites generally (violent schools, schools as a weapon of war, curriculum and textbooks). It then focuses on specific groups in conflict – gender, language, refugees, child soldiers. Thirdly it discusses education policy and donor intervention; and finally talks of the role of research. All these overlap hugely. This is not a prescription for how the Global Monitoring Report should be structured, but identification of themes and lessons learned that seem the most significant.
Pensez pièce sur l'éducation et les conflits Année de publication: 2009 Auteur: Lynn Davies Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Ce document examine d'abord les sites d'apprentissage en général (écoles violentes, les écoles comme une arme de guerre, programmes et manuels). Elle se concentre ensuite sur des groupes spécifiques dans les conflits - le sexe, la langue, les réfugiés, les enfants soldats. Troisièmement, il discute de la politique de l'éducation et de l'intervention des bailleurs de fonds; et, enfin, parle du rôle de la recherche. Tous ces chevauchent énormément. Ce n'est pas une prescription pour la façon dont le rapport Suivi mondial devrait être structuré, mais l'identification des thèmes et des leçons apprises qui semblent les plus importants. 