Ressources
Explorez une large gamme de ressources sur le GCED afin d’approfondir votre compréhension et de renforcer vos activités de recherche, de plaidoyer, d’enseignement et d’apprentissage.
1,456 résultats trouvés
Informe de síntesis sobre la aplicación por los Estados Miembros de la Recomendación de 1974 sobre la Educación para la Comprensión, la Cooperación y la Paz Internacionales y la Educación relativa a los Derechos Humanos y las Libertades Fundamentales Année de publication: 2013 Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO Background: In accordance with 34 C/Resolution 87, 177 EX/Decision 35 (I) and 184 EX/Decision 20, the Executive Board has monitored the implementation of the 1974 Recommendation concerning Education for International Understanding, Cooperation and Peace and Education relating to Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Pursuant to 192 EX/Decision 20 (III), the Director-General hereby submits the consolidated report on the implementation by Member States of the Recommendation.Purpose: This document reports on the results of the Fifth Consultation on the Implementation of the Recommendation concerning Education for International Understanding, Cooperation and Peace and Education relating to Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (covering the period 2009-2012). The analysis was prepared on the basis of 55 national reports from Member States received by the Secretariat. 
2nd European congress on global education: education, interdependence and solidarity in a changing world; final report Année de publication: 2012 Auteur institutionnel: North-South Centre of the Council of Europe | Global Education Network Europe (GENE) | CONCORD Europe | Portuguese Institute of Cooperation and Language | Portuguese NDGO Platform | University of Lisbon | European Commission The 2nd European Congress on Global Education: Education, Interdependence and Solidarity in a Changing World took place on 27 – 28 September 2012 in Lisbon. It was organised by the North-South Centre of the Council of Europe (NSC) in partnership with Global Education Network Europe (GENE) and CONCORD Europe, in cooperation with the Portuguese Institute of Cooperation and Language - Camões, the Portuguese NDGO Platform and the University of Lisbon and with the financial support of the European Commission. This Congress brought together approximately 200 stakeholders in global education, in particular international organisations, governments, parliamentarians, local and regional authorities, civil society organisations, as well as educators from Europe and beyond, using the principle of “quadrilogue” and a holistic approach to global education. This two-day event built on the efforts of the North-South Centre (NSC) and other stakeholders to promote global education since the Maastricht Congress Declaration (2002) which established a European strategy framework for improving and increasing global education in Europe to the year 2015. Thematic dialogue and exchange of ideas and practices together with a reflection on the political dimension of global education contributed to the formulation of a Lisbon Statement and the revision of the proposed Strategic Recommendations for Strengthening Global Education till 2015. The resume of the thematic dialogues, the Lisbon Statement on Global Education and the Strategic Recommendations represent an integral part of this report. This is also complemented with a short concluding section with follow-up proposals. 2nd European congress on global education: education, interdependence and solidarity in a changing world; final report Année de publication: 2012 Auteur institutionnel: North-South Centre of the Council of Europe | Global Education Network Europe (GENE) | CONCORD Europe | Portuguese Institute of Cooperation and Language | Portuguese NDGO Platform | University of Lisbon | European Commission Ce rapport national sur l'éducation globale en Autriche fait partie du processus d'évaluation intra-européenne Éducation Mondiale, qui a été lancé en 2002 dans le but d'augmenter et d'améliorer l'éducation mondiale dans les États membres du Conseil de l'Europe. Ce rapport est l'aboutissement d'un processus d'examen par les pairs mené par une équipe d'examen international par des pairs. Grâce à la recherche et des entrevues avec des intervenants clés, des informations ont été recueillies et des perspectives critiques développé sur l'état actuel et les perspectives d'avenir pour l'éducation mondiale en Autriche. Ce processus long de l'année, facilitée par le Centre Nord-Sud du Conseil de l'Europe, a été développé en partenariat avec le Groupe Stratégie autrichienne pour l'éducation mondiale comme la contrepartie nationale dans le processus. Il a impliqué le Ministère des Affaires étrangères, le Ministère de l'Education, l'Agence Autrichienne de Développement (AAD), KommEnt, et les ONG et les milieux universitaires. Ce rapport d'évaluation intra reconnaît la relativement forte tradition d'éducation mondiale en Autriche. le soutien autrichien de EM se reflète dans l'éventail des organisations engagées impliquées dans EM, et les nombreuses initiatives et projets dans les secteurs formels et non formels d'éducation, et dans la société civile. Le chapitre 1 ci-dessous fournit une introduction au rapport et le processus général. Le chapitre 2 décrit le contexte de l'éducation mondiale en Autriche. Le chapitre 3 examine l'éducation mondiale dans le secteur de l'éducation formelle. Le chapitre 4 met l'accent sur le travail important et varié qui se déroule dans l'éducation non formelle, les organisations de la société civile et d'autres secteurs dans ce domaine. Le chapitre 5 fournit, de façon sommaire, un aperçu des observations et recommandations de l'examen par les pairs clés. 세계 교육에 관한 제 2차 유럽 의회: 변화하는 세계에서의 교육, 상호 의존 및 연대; 최종 보고서 Année de publication: 2012 Auteur institutionnel: North-South Centre of the Council of Europe | Global Education Network Europe (GENE) | CONCORD Europe | Portuguese Institute of Cooperation and Language | Portuguese NDGO Platform | University of Lisbon | European Commission 오스트리아 글로벌 교육에 관한 이 국가 보고서는 유럽 의회 회원국들의 글로벌 교육을 증진 및 향상시키기 위한 목적으로 2002년에 시작된, 유럽 글로벌 교육의 공동 심의 과정(the European Global Education Peer Review Process)의 일부이다. 이 보고서는 국제 공동 심의 과정 팀에 의해 주도되는 공동 심의 과정의 정점이다. 리서치 및 주요 이해 관계자들과의 인터뷰를 통해서 정보를 수집하고, 오스트리아 글로벌 교육 현황 및 미래 전망에 대한 비판적 시각도 발전시켰다. 유럽 의회 남북 센터가(the North-South Centre of the Council of Europe)가 추진한 이 1년 과정은 현재 진행중인 국가적 대응 사업으로서, 글로벌 교육을 위한 오스트리아 전략 그룹(Austrian Strategy Group for Global Education)과 협력하여 개발되었다. 여기에는 외무부, 교육부, 오스트리아 개발기구(ADA), KommEnt, NGO 및 학계가 포함된다. 이 피어 리뷰 보고서(Peer Review report)에서는 오스트리아 글로벌 교육의 상대적으로 강한 전통을 인지하고 있다. 글로벌 교육(이하 GE)을 위한 오스트리아 국가 서포트와 GE와 관련된 열성적인 조직과 공식 및 비공식적 교육 분야, 시민 사회 내의 다수 이니셔티브 및 프로젝트에 반영이 되어 있다. 다음의 제 1장에서는 보고서와 프로세스 전반에 대한 소개를 제공한다. 제 2장에서는 오스트리아 글로벌 교육의 맥락을 개략적으로 보여준다. 제 3장에서는 정규 교육 부분에서의 글로벌 교육에 대해 살펴본다. 제 4장에서는 비정규 교육, 시민사회 조직 및 다른 부문에서 일어나는 중요하고 다양한 교육 작업에 중점을 둔다. 제 5장에서는 요약 방식으로, 피어 리뷰의 권고안들 및 주요 관찰에 대한 아웃라인을 제공한다. Citizenship, identity and education: examining the public purposes of schools in an age of globalization Année de publication: 2006 Auteur: Fernando Reimers Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) Educational institutions exist to achieve public purposes. One of those purposes is to develop citizenship. In the 21st century, citizenship includes global citizenship. In an era of globalization effective citizenship includes the knowledge, ability and disposition to engage peacefully and constructively across cultural differences for purposes of addressing personal and collective needs and of achieving sustainable human–environmental interactions, this requires internalizing global values. Addressing these challenges of globalization will require making citizenship education and the development of global values an explicit objective of efforts to improve quality throughout the world, critically examining theories and evidence about the effectiveness of various approaches to developing citizenship and global citizenship and supporting activities aligned with this public purpose. This public purpose should support the development of a political culture that fosters the rule of national and international law and respect of human rights, the development of understanding to support trade and economic and peaceful bilateral and international diplomacy as the preferred means to solve international disputes, the development of the capability to understand and address the serious environmental challenges facing humanity and to collaborate across national boundaries in the creation of sustainable forms of human–environmental interactions and in the development of the skills to promote rationality in deliberation and action, and to advance science and technology as means to improve human health and well-being. At present, however, many education systems and reforms are insufficiently focused on quality, or focus instead on a very narrow and self-referenced definition of quality. It is possible to educate people to understand and appreciate cultural differences and to understand and accept human rights in a framework of global values that includes compassion and caring, concern for others, respect and reciprocity. These values, dispositions, knowledge and skills can be developed in a range of institutions that societies have to pass on what they value to the young, and to re-create culture: families, religious institutions, the media, workplaces, political institutions and also schools. While there is no reason to assume that schools can be more effective in this task than any of these other institutions, they have greater potential to be aligned with transnational efforts to promote global civility. They are a public space, and consequently also a globally public space, in ways in which families and religious institutions are not. If schools actively engage in teaching hatred or intolerance, or if they fail to prepare students adequately for global civility, these failures can be noted by international institutions that can potentially mobilize resources to support national and local efforts to prepare students for global citizenship. There is not a similar network linking national and transnational institutions, public and private, governmental and non-governmental, that attends to the dynamics of families and other ‘‘private’’ spaces. Citoyenneté, identité et de l'éducation: l'examen des fins publiques des écoles à l'ère de la mondialisation Année de publication: 2006 Auteur: Fernando Reimers Auteur institutionnel: UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE) Les établissements d'enseignement existent pour parvenir à des fins publiques. L'un de ces objectifs est de développer la citoyenneté. Au 21e siècle, la citoyenneté comprend la citoyenneté mondiale. Dans une ère de mondialisation citoyenneté effective comprend les connaissances, la capacité et la disposition à engager pacifique et constructive entre les différences culturelles aux fins de répondre aux besoins personnels et collectifs et de réaliser des interactions humaines-environnementales durables, ce qui nécessite l'intériorisation des valeurs globales. Pour relever ces défis de la mondialisation, il faudra faire de l'éducation à la citoyenneté et le développement des valeurs mondiales un objectif explicite des efforts pour améliorer la qualité dans le monde entier, l'examen critique des théories et des preuves sur l'efficacité des différentes approches pour développer la citoyenneté et la citoyenneté mondiale et soutenir les activités alignées cet effet public. Cet objectif public devrait soutenir le développement d'une culture politique qui favorise la primauté du droit national et international et le respect des droits de l'homme, le développement de la compréhension pour soutenir le commerce et la diplomatie bilatérale et internationale économique et pacifique comme le moyen privilégié pour résoudre les conflits internationaux, le développement de la capacité à comprendre et à relever les défis environnementaux humanité face à de graves et de collaborer à travers les frontières nationales dans la création de formes durables d'interactions homme-environnement et dans le développement des compétences pour promouvoir la rationalité dans la délibération et de l'action, et de faire avancer la science et la technologie comme moyen d'améliorer la santé humaine et le bien-être. À l'heure actuelle, cependant, de nombreux systèmes d'éducation et les réformes ne sont pas suffisamment axées sur la qualité, ou se concentrent plutôt sur une définition très étroite et auto-référencé de la qualité. Il est possible d'éduquer les gens à comprendre et à apprécier les différences culturelles et à comprendre et à acept droits de l'homme dans un cadre de valeurs globales qui comprend la compassion et la compassion, le souci des autres, le respect et la réciprocité. Ces valeurs, les dispositions, les connaissances et les compétences peuvent être développées dans un éventail d'institutions que les sociétés doivent passer sur ce qu'ils apprécient le jeune, et de recréer la culture: les familles, les institutions religieuses, les médias, les milieux de travail, les institutions politiques et aussi écoles. Bien qu'il n'y ait aucune raison de supposer que les écoles peuvent être plus efficaces dans cette tâche que l'une de ces autres institutions, ils ont un plus grand potentiel pour être aligné avec les efforts transnationaux visant à promouvoir la civilité mondiale. Ils sont un espace public, et par conséquent aussi un espace public à l'échelle mondiale, dans les façons dont les familles et les institutions religieuses ne sont pas. Si les écoles participent activement à l'enseignement à la haine ou l'intolérance, ou si elles ne parviennent pas à préparer les étudiants de manière adéquate pour la civilité mondiale, ces échecs peuvent être notées par les institutions internationales qui peuvent potentiellement mobiliser des ressources pour soutenir les efforts nationaux et locaux pour préparer les élèves à la citoyenneté mondiale. Il n'y a pas un réseau similaire reliant les institutions nationales et transnationales, publiques et privées, gouvernementales et non-gouvernementales, qui assiste à la dynamique des familles et d'autres «espaces» «privés». The education we want: youth advocacy toolkit Année de publication: 2015 Auteur: James Edleston | Dan Smith, Sumaya Saluja | David Crone | Chernor Bah | Emily Laurie Auteur institutionnel: UN Global Education First Initiative - Youth Advocacy Group (YAG) | Plan | A World at School This toolkit is for anyone who believes passionately in the power of education as a force for good in the world and the right for all children to get a good quality education, no matter where they are and what the circumstances. We hope this toolkit will support you to carry out your own advocacy campaign. If you are just beginning to think about taking action on education, you can work your way through the toolkit from start to finish. But you can also dip in to pick up useful hints or activities to help you carry out your existing plans. We know this toolkit doesn’t cover everything you might need and we’ve tried to sign-post you to other resources where possible. Included in here are lots of real stories of change, led by young people, from all over the world. We hope they inspire you. The young global movement for education is growing, and you can be part of it. 
Religion and Belief Issues in the Countries of Central Asia (Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan) and Russia in the Media; April 2016 - April 2017 Année de publication: 2017 Auteur: Evgeny Zavyalov Auteur institutionnel: Open Position (Kyrgyzstan) This publication is a review of news on religion and belief issues that appeared in the media from April 2016 to April 2017, in Central Asia (Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan) and Russia. The materials included in the publication were distributed monthly on a newsletter including members of religious communities and experts working on issues of religion and belief. Вопросы религии и убеждений в странах Центральной Азии (Кыргызстан, Казахстан, Узбекистан, Таджикистан) и России в материалах СМИ. Апрель 2016 г. - апрель 2017 г. Année de publication: 2017 Auteur: Evgeny Zavyalov Auteur institutionnel: Open Position (Kyrgyzstan) Настоящее издание представляет собой обзор новостей по вопросам религии и убеждений, вышедших в СМИ в период с апреля 2016 по апрель 2017 года, по странам Центральной Азии (Кыргызстан, Казахстан, Узбекистан, Таджикистан) и России. Вошедшие в публикацию материалы ежемесячно рассылались по рассылке, включающей членов религиозных общин и экспертов, занимающихся вопросами религии и убеждений. 
Education: global citizenship education in context Auteur institutionnel: Global Hive In a fast-changing and globalized reality, there are many who believe that education can, and should, help young people to meet the challenges they will confront now and in the future, and that educating for global citizenship is now more important and urgent than ever before. Upon reflection back over this decade of work, however, there is an indication that not a lot of progress has been made in expanding education for global citizenship (Schulz, 2007; Canadian Council for International Cooperation, 2004). In the early 1990s, with the financial assistance of the Canadian International Development Agency and inspired by visions of global solidarity, Canadian schools and community organizations joined together in efforts to educate students on global society, though since then funding has been cut drastically, and coordinated efforts across sectors have decreased, as schools and NGOs face their own budget cuts. In a recent poll conducted by VisionCritical and the Inter-Council Network of Provincial and Regional Councils for Global Cooperation, it was found that one third of Canadians rank global poverty (hunger in the world) among the first, second and third most concerning issues to them globally. Moreover, the majority of Canadians believe there is a human rights obligation to reduce global poverty, and believe there are significant benefits to doing so, including improving Canada’s international reputation, reducing global conflict, and reducing risks of pandemics. Global Citizenship Education is essential for the following reasons: Education for Global Citizenship gives young people access to the knowledge, understanding, skills, and values that they need to participate fully in ensuring their own and others’ well-being, and to make a positive contribution both locally and globally. Global Citizenship Education involves children and youth fully in their own learning through the use of a range of activities and participatory learning methods. This engages the learner, but also develops confidence, self-esteem, and skills of critical thinking, communication, cooperation and conflict resolution. Current use of the world’s resources is inequitable and unsustainable. As the gap between the rich and the poor widens, poverty continues to deny millions of people around the world their basic human rights. Education is a powerful tool for changing the world because tomorrow’s adults are the children and youth we are educating today. For teachers interested in promoting global citizenship, the next and most immediate question is how: How can I integrate and teach global citizenship education when I have so many other pressing curriculum requirements to get through with my students? How does Global Citizenship Education relate to English Language Arts or Physical Education? This toolkit seeks to provide information on how global citizenship education can be integrated into many areas of the curriculum, offer some tools and methods by which to do so, and present some illustrative case studies to provide inspiration and guidance.