Ressources
Explorez une large gamme de ressources sur le GCED afin d’approfondir votre compréhension et de renforcer vos activités de recherche, de plaidoyer, d’enseignement et d’apprentissage.
684 résultats trouvés
The Butterfly Effect on Social Networks Année de publication: 2021 Auteur institutionnel: Canada Learning Code This video shows the dangers of the internet and social networks through the story of 12-year-old Amira in the form of a comic strip. L'effet papillon sur les réseaux sociaux Année de publication: 2021 Auteur institutionnel: Canada Learning Code Cette vidéo montre les dangers d'internet et des réseaux sociaux à travers l'histoire d'Amira 12 ans sous la forme d'une bande dessinée. 
Fighting Against Disinformation and Hate Speech Année de publication: 2024 Auteur institutionnel: Association of Guinean Bloggers (ABLOGUI) This online MOOC is completely free. It is offered by the Association des Blogueurs de Guinée (ABLOGUI) through the IMPACT project (Implication of Digital Media in the Active Prevention of Conflicts and Tensions). It aims at raising awareness among young Guineans of the dangers of misinformation and hate speech, and to equip them with the knowledge and skills they need to combat information disorder in a digital world. Lutte contre la désinformation et les propos haineux Année de publication: 2024 Auteur institutionnel: Association of Guinean Bloggers (ABLOGUI) Ce MOOC en ligne est entièrement gratuit. Il est proposé par l'Association des Blogueurs de Guinée (ABLOGUI) dans le cadre du projet IMPACT (Implication des médias numériques dans la prévention active des conflits et des tensions). Il vise à sensibiliser les jeunes Guinéens aux dangers de la désinformation et des discours de haine, et à les doter des connaissances et des compétences nécessaires pour lutter contre le désordre de l'information dans un monde numérique. 
Are Journalists Objective?: The Keys to the Media Année de publication: 2021 Auteur institutionnel: Centre pour l’éducation aux médias et à l’information (CLEMI) Dans cette vidéo proposée par Clemi nous suivons l'arrivée d'une nouvelle professeur de mathématiques dans un collège. Chacun a un avis très tranché sur elle. Kamel l’adore, Cindy ne comprend rien à ce qu’elle raconte, Leonard la trouve sévère et Fama l’aime bien. Qui a raison, qui a tort ? Peut-être un peu tout le monde… Chacun la regarde selon son point de vue. Cette comparaison permet de s'interroger sur l'objectivité des médias. In this video from Clemi, we follow the arrival of a new maths teacher at a secondary school. Everyone has a very strong opinion of her. Kamel adores her, Cindy doesn't understand a word she says Leonard thinks she's harsh and Fama likes her. Who's right, who's wrong? Maybe a bit of everyone... Everyone looks at her from their own point of view. This comparison raises questions about the objectivity of the media. Les journalistes sont-ils objectifs ? : Les clés des médias Année de publication: 2021 Auteur institutionnel: Centre pour l’éducation aux médias et à l’information (CLEMI) Dans cette vidéo proposée par Clemi nous suivons l'arrivée d'une nouvelle professeur de mathématiques dans un collège. Chacun a un avis très tranché sur elle. Kamel l’adore, Cindy ne comprend rien à ce qu’elle raconte, Leonard la trouve sévère et Fama l’aime bien. Qui a raison, qui a tort ? Peut-être un peu tout le monde… Chacun la regarde selon son point de vue. Cette comparaison permet de s'interroger sur l'objectivité des médias. In this video from Clemi, we follow the arrival of a new maths teacher at a secondary school. Everyone has a very strong opinion of her. Kamel adores her, Cindy doesn't understand a word she says Leonard thinks she's harsh and Fama likes her. Who's right, who's wrong? Maybe a bit of everyone... Everyone looks at her from their own point of view. This comparison raises questions about the objectivity of the media. 
Digital Resource Guide: Media Education Against Hate Speech Année de publication: 2022 Auteur institutionnel: Esplai Foundation We could define hate speech as the set of communicative actions aimed at defending, promoting or instigating hatred, humiliation or contempt of a person or group of people. Although hate speech is not something exclusive to the Internet, but is part of the reality beyond the networks, it is true that the potential of the networks facilitates the movement of communication flows, because it facilitates both the production and the creation of messages. Hate speech has also benefited from this and, in addition, has found in the networks other characteristics such as anonymity, brevity, free messaging services or legitimacy granted by the number of followers. With this guide we want to provide digital tools for the creation of this counter-discourse that allows for the creation of messages that offer a positive alternative to extremist propaganda. Guía de recursos digitales: Educación mediática contra el discurso de odio Année de publication: 2022 Auteur institutionnel: Esplai Foundation Podríamos definir el discurso de odio como el conjunto de acciones comunicativas orientadas a la defensa, promoción o instigación al odio, la humillación o el menosprecio de una persona o grupo de personas. Si bien el discurso de odio no es algo exclusivo de Internet, sino que es parte de la realidad más allá de las redes, es cierto que el potencial de las redes facilita el movimiento de los flujos comunicativos, porque facilita tanto la producción como la creación de mensajes. Los discursos de odio también se han visto beneficiados por esto y, además, han encontrado en las redes otras características como el anonimato, la brevedad, los servicios gratuitos de mensajería o la legitimidad otorgada por número de seguidores. Con esta guía queremos aportar herramientas digitales para la creación de ese contradiscurso que permita realizar mensajes que ofrecen una alternativa positiva a la propaganda extremista. 
Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report Année de publication: 2024 Auteur institutionnel: United Nations (UN) The United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on AI’s Final Report, “Governing AI for Humanity,” builds on months of work, including extensive global consultations, and the publication of an interim report in December 2023. Proposals for Global Governance on AI This report outlines a blueprint for addressing AI-related risks and sharing its transformative potential globally, including by:• Urging the UN to lay the foundations of the first globally inclusive and distributed architecture for AI governance based on international cooperation;• Proposing seven recommendations to address gaps in current AI governance arrangements;• Calling on all governments and stakeholders to work together in governing AI to foster development and protection of all human rights. This includes light institutional mechanisms to complement existing efforts and foster inclusive global AI governance arrangements that are agile, adaptive and effective to keep pace with AI’s evolution. Extensive Global Consultations The report is the product of extensive consultations, involving more than 2,000 participants across all regions of the world, including via: • 18 deep-dive discussions on key issues with top experts• More than 50 consultation sessions across all regions• More than 250 written submissions from over 150 organizations and 100 individuals The Advisory Body also commissioned an AI Risk Global Pulse Check – the most comprehensive global horizon scanning exercise on AI risks to date – and an AI Opportunity Scan to crowdsource expert assessments of emerging AI trends. 
유네스코 이슈 브리프 2024년 제1호: 유네스코 「인공지능 윤리 권고」 이행을 위한 한국의 ‘준비도 평가’ 및 ‘윤리 영향 평가’ 대비 현황과 전망 Année de publication: 2024 Auteur: 이상욱 Auteur institutionnel: 유네스코한국위원회 Ⅰ. 유네스코 「인공지능 윤리 권고」 (2021)의 의의Ⅱ. 준비도 평가의 국제 현황 및 국내 대응Ⅲ. 윤리 영향 평가의 국제 현황 및 국내 대응Ⅳ. 인공지능 국제 거버넌스 현황과 「권고」 대응 전략