Securitising Education to Prevent Terrorism or Losing Direction?
- ์ ์
- Bill Durodie
- ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์
- Society for Educational StudiesTaylor & Francis
- ํํ์ฌํญ
- 14p
- ์๋ ์ธ์ด
- ์์ด
- ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋
- 2016
- ํค์๋
- CitizenshipTeacher educationCurriculum
- ์๋ฃ ์ ํ
- ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ / ํ์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ๊ธฐํ
- ๊ต์ก ๋จ๊ณ
- ๊ณ ๋ฑ๊ต์ก๊ธฐํ
- ์ง์ญ
- ์ ๋ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ๋ฏธ ์ง์ญ
- ์ถํ์ง์ญ
- London; New York
This article examines the growing relationship between security and education, particularly in the light of the UK governmentโs Prevent Duty that seeks to tackle radicalization in a variety of milieus, including universities. However, rather than seeing this process as being merely one-way, through a so-called securitization of education, what is explored here is the dialectic between these two spheres. It is suggested that a heightened sensitivity to the supposed consequences of inflammatory rhetoric on the well-being of supposedly suggestible or vulnerable students has been in existence within education for quite some time.

Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education from Asia-Pacific Perspectives
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit; Country Case-Australia
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea