Securitisation, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent
- ์ ์
- Aislinn O'Donnell
- ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์
- Society for Educational StudiesTaylor & Francis
- ์๋ ์ธ์ด
- ์์ด
- ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋
- 2016
- ํค์๋
- Educational qualityCitizenship
- ์ฃผ์
- ์๋ฏผ / ์๋ฏผ์ฑ / ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์์ธ๊ณํ ๋ฐ ์ฌํ ์ ์ / ๊ตญ์ ์ดํดํญ๋ ฅ์ ๊ทน๋จ์ฃผ์ ๋ฐ ์ ๋ ธ์ฌ์ด๋ ์๋ฐฉ
- ์๋ฃ ์ ํ
- ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ / ํ์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ
- ๊ต์ก ๋จ๊ณ
- ๊ณ ๋ฑ๊ต์กํ์๊ต์ก
- ์ง์ญ
- ์ ๋ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ๋ฏธ ์ง์ญ
- ์ถํ์ง์ญ
- London
This paper outlines some of the implications of counterterrorist legislation, including Prevent, for the pedagogical relationship and for educational institutions. The concept of โradicalizationโ, central to the Prevent Strategy, is one that is contested in the field of counterterrorism, yet educators are now expected to identify and refer students โat risk of radicalizationโ. Based on the experience of teaching IRA and INLA prisoners in the Republic of Ireland, the author outlines a set of philosophical and ethical principles that ought to underpin education. It is argued that education must not be subordinated to security and intelligence agendas on pragmatic, educational and ethical grounds.

Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education from Asia-Pacific Perspectives
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit; Country Case-Australia
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea