Securitisation, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent
- Автор
- Aislinn O'Donnell
- Корпоративный автор
- Society for Educational StudiesTaylor & Francis
- Язык ресурса
- Английский
- Год публикации
- 2016
- Ключевые слова
- Educational qualityCitizenship
- Тема
- Гражданственность / Гражданство / ДемократияГлобализация и социальная справедливость / Международное взаимопониманиеПредотвращение насильственного экстремизма и геноцида
- Тип ресурса
- Исследовательские работы / журнальные статьи
- Уровень образования
- Высшее образованиеОбучение на протяжении всей жизни
- Регион
- Европа и Северная Америка
- Место публикации
- London
This paper outlines some of the implications of counterterrorist legislation, including Prevent, for the pedagogical relationship and for educational institutions. The concept of ‘radicalization’, central to the Prevent Strategy, is one that is contested in the field of counterterrorism, yet educators are now expected to identify and refer students ‘at risk of radicalization’. Based on the experience of teaching IRA and INLA prisoners in the Republic of Ireland, the author outlines a set of philosophical and ethical principles that ought to underpin education. It is argued that education must not be subordinated to security and intelligence agendas on pragmatic, educational and ethical grounds.

Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education from Asia-Pacific Perspectives
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit; Country Case-Australia
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea