Uzbekistan: Why Should the State Weaken Control Over the Institute of Makhalla?
- ์ ์
- Kodir Kuliev
- ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์
- Central Asian Bureau for Analytical Reporting (CABAR)Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR)
- ํํ์ฌํญ
- html
- ์๋ ์ธ์ด
- ๋ฌ์์์ด
- ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋
- 2019
- ์๋ฃ ์ ํ
- ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ / ํ์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ
- ์ถํ์ง์ญ
- ะขะฐัะบะตะฝั
One of the vital conditions for the functioning of democracy in any society is the existence of citizensโ self-governing bodies (CSB) within that system. In Uzbekistan, such social responsibility is assumed by โmahallaโ โ the Uzbek citizensโ self-governing institution. Since the beginning of 2017 Uzbekistan has been carrying out large-scale reforms. Important laws and regulations are being adopted, which should create favorable conditions for quality life and ensure freedom for the Uzbek people. With mahallas, however, such positive change in the long-run seems to be just a lip-service. The main challenges mahallas are facing today are, inter alia, obscured freedom they have in ruling themselves and controlling their own affairs and incapability to effectively tackle citizensโ problems, thus leaving peopleโs trust unjustified.

Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education from Asia-Pacific Perspectives
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit; Country Case-Australia
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea