The Connective โ€œPublicโ€ and the Chinese Logic of Citizenship Education (Journal of Educational Studies; Vol. 13, No. 2)

์ €์ž
Qiu KunshuYan Yajun
๋‹จ์ฒด ์ €์ž
Beijing Normal University
ISBN
ISSN 1673-1298
ํ˜•ํƒœ์‚ฌํ•ญ
p. 13-19
์›๋ž˜ ์–ธ์–ด
์ค‘๊ตญ์–ด
๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„
2017

Cultural tradition has pre-conditionality on citizenship education. From the point of view of cultural tradition, the โ€œpublicโ€ in citizenship education has different meaning in China and the West: Chinese โ€œpublicโ€ is mainly a kind of connective โ€œpublicโ€, while the western โ€œpublicโ€ mainly means domanial โ€œpublicโ€. This lead to the difference in Chinese and modern western main stream values. The former emphasizes the common goodness of the whole society, social responsibility and virtue which is favorable to harmony, while the later emphasizes individualist rights and priority of freedom. They represent two kinds of ethics language and position. It is essential to maintain high cultural awareness for the implementation of citizenship education in China and the localization of exotic โ€œcitizenship educationโ€. Guided by Marxism and rooted in Chinese cultural tradition, Chinese citizenship education should be based on โ€œpeople in relationโ€, use the actual support of โ€œstate-societyโ€ cooperation, and offer ultimate concern to โ€œthe free and comprehensive development of humanโ€.