The Connective โPublicโ and the Chinese Logic of Citizenship Education (Journal of Educational Studies; Vol. 13, No. 2)
- ์ ์
- Qiu KunshuYan Yajun
- ๋จ์ฒด ์ ์
- Beijing Normal University
- ISBN
- ISSN 1673-1298
- ํํ์ฌํญ
- p. 13-19
- ์๋ ์ธ์ด
- ์ค๊ตญ์ด
- ๋ฐํ ์ฐ๋
- 2017
- ์๋ฃ ์ ํ
- ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ / ํ์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ
- ๊ต์ก ๋จ๊ณ
- ๋นํ์๊ต์ก๊ธฐํ
- ์ง์ญ
- ์์์ ํํ์ ์ง์ญ
- ์ถํ์ง์ญ
- Beijing
Cultural tradition has pre-conditionality on citizenship education. From the point of view of cultural tradition, the โpublicโ in citizenship education has different meaning in China and the West: Chinese โpublicโ is mainly a kind of connective โpublicโ, while the western โpublicโ mainly means domanial โpublicโ. This lead to the difference in Chinese and modern western main stream values. The former emphasizes the common goodness of the whole society, social responsibility and virtue which is favorable to harmony, while the later emphasizes individualist rights and priority of freedom. They represent two kinds of ethics language and position. It is essential to maintain high cultural awareness for the implementation of citizenship education in China and the localization of exotic โcitizenship educationโ. Guided by Marxism and rooted in Chinese cultural tradition, Chinese citizenship education should be based on โpeople in relationโ, use the actual support of โstate-societyโ cooperation, and offer ultimate concern to โthe free and comprehensive development of humanโ.

Envisioning the Future of Assessment in Transformative Education: A Synthesis Report of the Expert Meeting on Evaluation and Assessment for Transformative Education: Towards and Beyond 2030
UNESCO Prize for Global Citizenship Education 2025 Laureates
Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education: From Asia-Pacific Perspectives