Uzbekistan: Why Should the State Weaken Control Over the Institute of Makhalla?
- Author
- Kodir Kuliev
- Corporate Author
- Central Asian Bureau for Analytical Reporting (CABAR)Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR)
- Collation
- html
- Resource Language
- Russian
- Year of publication
- 2019
- Topic
- Civic / Citizenship / DemocracyHuman rightsGlobalisation and social justice / International understanding
- Resource Type
- Research papers / journal articles
- Level of education
- Secondary educationHigher educationLifelong learningTechnical and vocational education and trainingNon-formal educationOthers
- Place of publication
- Ташкент
One of the vital conditions for the functioning of democracy in any society is the existence of citizens’ self-governing bodies (CSB) within that system. In Uzbekistan, such social responsibility is assumed by “mahalla” – the Uzbek citizens’ self-governing institution. Since the beginning of 2017 Uzbekistan has been carrying out large-scale reforms. Important laws and regulations are being adopted, which should create favorable conditions for quality life and ensure freedom for the Uzbek people. With mahallas, however, such positive change in the long-run seems to be just a lip-service. The main challenges mahallas are facing today are, inter alia, obscured freedom they have in ruling themselves and controlling their own affairs and incapability to effectively tackle citizens’ problems, thus leaving people’s trust unjustified.

Confronting Inequality through GCED: Toward Justice, Inclusion, and Transformation (SangSaeng; No.65, 2025)
Educator's Guide to Global Citizenship Education from Asia-Pacific Perspectives
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit; Country Case-Australia
Supporting Change in Practice: Case Studies on the Use of the ACER-APCEIU Global Citizenship Education Monitoring Toolkit: Country Case-Republic of Korea