News
Follow the newest trends and news in GCED.
1,659 Results found
2nd Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED gathers youth voices from around the world 20 July 2016 The 2nd Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED kicked off on 12 July and will last until 16 July 2016 . APCEIU co-organized the 2nd Youth Leadership Workshop on Global Citizenship Education (GCED) with the UN Secretary General’s Global Education First Initiative (GEFI) at the Busan University of Foreign Studies in Busan, Republic of Korea. For this event, Busan University of Foreign Studies(BUFS) and Geumjeong District of Busan Metropolitan City will be working as cooperation partners. The workshop aims to build the capacity of dynamic young leaders and facilitate international exchange among participants from 5 regions (North America-Europe, Asia-Pacific, Africa, Latin America, Middle East and North-Africa) to lead and advocate for GCED. A total of 49 youth leaders from 38 countries are attending the workshop, selected on the basis of their current engagement and future commitment in educating youth at the local and national levels around GCED. Members of the Youth Advocacy group of the UN Secretary General, previous GCED Youth workshop participants in different regions of the world and APCEIU staff are leading the workshop as the five main facilitators for discussion to construct GCED Youth network. In the opening ceremony, Dr.Utak CHUNG, Director of APCEIU, gave opening remarks to participants. Following his words, Ms. Min-Jeong KIM, head of secretariat of GEFI and Dr. Jeong-Bae LEE, vice president of BUFS also gave welcoming remarks. The congratulatory remarks were delivered by Mr. Jeong-hee WON, mayor of Geumjeong District. Dr. Utak CHUNG emphasized the importance of the GCED Youth network to amplify the voice of youth. He stated in his opening remark, “This (GCED Youth) network will become an invaluable resource of advancing the GCED agenda beyond 2015, in a way that resonates with the voice of youth and their needs.” He asked participants’ to actively engage with all components of the workshop, saying he truly hopes participants make this workshop “for the youth, and by the youth.” Ms. Min-Jeong Kim said that UNESCO believes in the power of energy, innovativeness and dynamism of youth. She encouraged participants by saying: “Imagine the transformative change that could be brought by collective action of 1.8 billion young people in the world.” Mr. Jeong-hee WON commented in his congratulatory remark, “The following 4 days will be an important asset to achieve participants’ dream, which will work to give hope to everyone in the world.” During the first day, participants had lessons on understanding concepts of SDGs, SDG 4.7 and GCED, and the ways in which APCEIU is working on targeting youth while promoting GCED. There were also sessions in which the youth shared their recommendations on the previous GCED youth workshops and had the opportunity to made friends with each other while taking part in icebreaker activities. The workshop consists of a wide variety of interactive sessions and activities, such as - plenary sessions to understand GCED, exploring local initiatives on GCED with local youth, discussion on the GCED youth network etc. The workshop aims to enable the participants to build a common understanding of GCED and its key priorities, to elaborate on leadership strategies suitable for implementation at the local and national levels, and concretize plans for the establishment of a GCED Youth Network to advance the GCED agenda and UN SDGs. Throughout the workshop, participants are expected to share their previous GCED leadership experiences based on the three principal motos of GCED; Think, Share and Act. At the end of the workshop, participants will propose leadership strategies as the outcome of their group discussions and identify future activities to participate in for the GCED youth network. URL: 2nd Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED gathers youth voices from around the world > APCEIU News - APCEIU (unescoapceiu.org) 
UN discusses innovative solutions to prevent violence extremism through education 9 June 2016 It is critical that young people experience positive values in a safe, open and inclusive learning environment to build their resilience against violent extremism. This was a key message at a UN roundtable discussion on the prevention of violent extremism at the United Nations headquarters, on Thursday 2 June, at UN Headquarters, in New York.The discussion, organized by the UN Secretary-General Global Education First Initiative, in cooperation with the Permanent missions of the Principality of Andorra, the Republic of Korea and Tunisia to the United Nations, was part of an on-going dialogue for policy-makers, practitioners and researchers to share innovative solutions and exploring the role education can play in the different contexts where young people might be susceptible to movements and organizations promoting violent extremism.“Global citizenship education is an entry point to respond to violence and extremism, as it equips youth with skills, values and knowledge to empower them as global citizens through the practice and promotion of tolerance, human rights, social justice and acceptance of diversity,” said Jorge Sequeira, Director of UNESCO Chile Field Office and UNESCO Representative to the cross-agency UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force, who moderated the discussion. One of the key initiatives presented was UNESCO’s Teacher’s Guide for the Prevention of Violent Extremism published in May. The Teacher’s Guide provides practical advice and tips to teachers on how to discuss these issues in the classroom setting. ”Schools have to provide room for dialogue and not avoid “taboo” subjects”, said UNESCO Director of the Division for Inclusion, Peace and Sustainable Development and UNESCO’s focal point on education to prevent violent extremism Soo-Hyang Choi who presented the publication. Yet she stressed that education should not be looking at individuals but rather at the breeding grounds of violent extremism and radicalization.Two UNESCO guidance tools on the prevention of violent extremismThis roundtable discussion comes at a useful juncture: following the presentation in January 2016 of the UN Secretary General’s launch of a Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism and the development of two UNESCO guidance tools for teachers and education policy makers for the prevention of violent extremism.Ms Choi also presented key recommendations of a Policy Guide on the prevention of violent extremism to be published later this year. For reducing the risk of youth turning to violent extremism, the following strategic approaches: revising of curricula to eliminate negative values and promote positive values; improving learning environment with particular attention to integration of all students; and fostering closer links with families and communities.Both guides will be presented at the “International Conference on the Prevention of Violent Extremism: Taking Action” that will be organized by UNESCO in cooperation with Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development in New Delhi, India, on 19 and 20 September 2016.As a follow-up to the Conference, UNESCO will continue its work in this field through capacity-building activities of policy-makers and teachers in cooperation with its partners, notably the Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding. 
UNESCO conference highlights good practices in intercultural dialogue to prevent extremism, with the Delegations of United Kingdom and Lithuania 7 June 2016 On 19 May 2016, the Conference on “An Alternative to Extremism: Cooperation among the Communities of Different Religious Faiths in Multinational Cities” was held at UNESCO, co-organized by the Permanent Delegation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to UNESCO, the Permanent Delegation of the Republic of Lithuania to UNESCO, the Woolf Institute, Cambridge (UK). The conference brought together scholars, expert stakeholders, and representatives of non-governmental organizations: The discussion was moderated by Prof. George Joffe, Research Fellow at the Centre of International Studies, with the participation of H.E. Mr Hatem Atallah, Executive Director of the Anna Lindh Foundation; Dr Valdas Mackela, Assistant Professor in Catholic Theology; Ms Radia Bakkouch, President of the Interconvictional Movement of the Young "Coexister”; Dr Shana Cohen, Deputy Director of the Woolf Institute and Dr Angus Ritchie, Director of the Contextual Theology Centre. Mr Qian Tang, UNESCO Assistant Director-General for Education highligthed the importance of cities as spaces for multiculturalism and intercultural encounters to learn to live together. The Permanent Delegate of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, H.E. Matthew Sudders underlined the relevance of such meetings, bringing together people of different faiths and scholars, to better understand the issues at stake in the current international context. The Permanent Delegate of Lithuania, H.E. Arunas Gelunas, highlighted violent extremism as a major obstacle for building cohesive societies, in a vicious circle where attacks and violence fuel hatred and prejudices towards specific communities or faith. All participants highlighted the need to foster education of global citizenship and to build a more comprehensive and strategic approach for intercultural dialogue, building the new “cultural literacy” to equip young people with the skills they need to interact in societies today. Cooperation and dialogue between faith communities play a important role in today’s multicultural cities. The extent to which community organization and grassroot social action encourage constructive interaction across individuals and groups of different beliefs was also discussed.The Executive Director of the Anna Lindh Foundation, Mr Hatem Atallah, argued that the most influential factor in violent extremism propaganda today is the absence of a counter- narratives demonstrating that cultural diversity and cultural exchanges are at the roots of all civilizations. Dr Valdas Mackela raised the issue of intolerance among religious communities in Lithuania and the related deficiencies in the adaptation and recognition of religious diversity. Rather than tolerance, however, the concept of “active coexistence” was proposed by Ms Radia Bakkouch, as a relevant alternative response to extremism.The Conference focused on innovative practices experienced in London and other relevant projects in Paris, Berlin, Rome, Delhi and Doha. Dr. Shana Cohen from the University of Cambridge shared the results of a study on alternatives to extremism. She underscored the need to develop a much stronger dialogue between citizens on one hand, especially community and religious leaders, and political elites on the other hand. “Lack of communication and cooperation creates exclusion and fuel prejudice, misunderstanding at the heart of religious and ethnic conflicts.” she said.A second project was presented by Dr Angus Ritchie, Director of the Contextual Theology Centre at the Royal Foundation of St Katharine (London), who focused his intervention on one practice of a broad-based community-organizing initiative in Great Britain. He highlighted the importance of learning from best practices and of having a pluralist and inclusive conception of community-organizing, which offers valuable opportunities to upscale interfaith and interreligious cooperation and to counter extremism on a more solid basis. The conference concluded with a round table discussion on the previous presentations and offered valuable insights relating to innovative ways of reinforcing social cohesion and mutual knowledge amongst religious communities. 
Identity 2016: 'Global citizenship' rising, poll suggests 4 May 2016 People are increasingly identifying themselves as global rather than national citizens, according to a BBC World Service poll. The trend is particularly marked in emerging economies, where people see themselves as outward looking and internationally minded. However, in Germany fewer people say they feel like global citizens now, compared with 2001. Pollsters GlobeScan questioned more than 20,000 people in 18 countries. More than half of those asked (56%) in emerging economies saw themselves first and foremost as global citizens rather than national citizens. In Nigeria (73%), China (71%), Peru (70%) and India (67%) the data is particularly marked. By contrast, the trend in the industrialised nations seems to be heading in the opposite direction. In these richer nations, the concept of global citizenship appears to have taken a serious hit after the financial crash of 2008. In Germany, for example, only 30% of respondents see themselves as global citizens.Are you a global citizen? Graphic showing how respondents from 18 countries answered a question about whether they viewed themselves more as a According to Lionel Bellier from GlobeScan, this is the lowest proportion seen in Germany since the poll began 15 years ago. "It has to be seen in the context of a very charged environment, politically and emotionally, following Angela Merkel's policy to open the doors to a million refugees last year." The poll suggests a degree of soul-searching in Germany about how open its doors should be in the future. It says 54% of German respondents approved of welcoming Syrians to their country. In the UK, where the government has resolutely capped the number of Syrian refugees, the figure was much higher at 72%. A significant proportion of Germans also sat on the fence when they were asked about issues to do with immigration and society.What are your views on intermarriage between different races/ethnic groups? Graphic showing the breakdown of results from Spain, the UK, France, Germany and Russia on the question of intermarriage On the question of whether intermarriage was a welcome development, for example, 46% of German respondents were not sure how to respond or they tried to qualify their answers by saying it depended what the circumstances were. This is in stark contrast to other European countries, such as France, where people were much more emphatically in favour of marriages between people from different racial or religious backgrounds. These grey areas on the bar charts could suggest Germany is still grappling with whether it wants to welcome newcomers or not. "There is a lot of uncertainty there," says Mr Bellier. "German respondents are showing a high level of indecisiveness when they are asked if they approve or disapprove of these developments and whether they accept the fact that their country is taking a lead on refugees." Jump media playerMedia player helpOut of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue. Media captionIdentity 2016: Are you a global citizen? According to the data, there are some clear divides in attitudes within continents. In Europe, it is Russia which has the strongest resistance to intermarriage, with 43% of Russians actively disapproving of marriages between different races and ethnic groups. Compare that with Spain, where only 5% would be opposed to such matches. Spain also noticeably has the most respondents who see themselves as global citizens Russia appears to have the strongest overall opposition to immigration. Only 11% of the Russians polled would approve of accepting refugees from Syria, for example. On the other hand, Spain would be the most welcoming of all the countries polled when it comes to receiving refugees from the Syrian conflict. There, an eye-catching majority - 84% - believe they should take in more of those fleeing the five-year civil war.What are your views on accepting Syrian refugees? Graphic showing the breakdown of results from Spain, the UK, France, Germany and Russia on the question of accepting refugees from Syria The figures suggest there is also an interesting divide emerging in North American attitudes to refugees. Of those Canadians asked, 77% said they would approve of accepting Syrians fleeing their home country. But in the United States that figure drops to 55%. Indonesia has the weakest sense of national citizenship (4%). Instead, it seems Indonesians have a much stronger sense of localism, with over half of respondents seeing their immediate communities as the most important way of defining themselves. In general, religion plays a much smaller part how people define themselves compared to nationality. The big exception to that rule is Pakistan, with 43% of Pakistanis appearing to identify themselves first and foremost by their religion - considerably higher than any other country. The polling on religion also reminds us of one of the defining differences between old-world Europe and the United States. In the US, 15% of those asked would who define themselves first and foremost by religion. In European countries that figure is only 5%.What is 'global citizenship' anyway? One problem with polling attitudes on identity is that "global citizenship" is a difficult concept to define and the poll left it open to those taking part to interpret. For some, it might be about the projection of economic clout across the world. To others, it might mean an altruistic impulse to tackle the world's problems in a spirit of togetherness - whether that is climate change or inequality in the developing world. Global citizenship might also be about ease of communication in an interconnected age and being able to have a voice on social media. And for many, it will be about migration and mobility. We are, after all, witnessing the biggest movements of people since the World War Two. This is not just driven by war and conflict. It is also because the world as a whole is becoming more prosperous and air travel is becoming more affordable to the rising middle classes. 
Living together in Inclusive societies: A challenge and a goal 3 May 2016 Representing UNESCO’s Director-General at the 7th Global Forum of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) held in Baku, Azerbaijan, Qian Tang, Assistant Director-General for Education, emphasized “the immense need for social cohesion and intercultural dialogue in these turbulent times”. Addressing the UNAOC Group of Friends High Level Meeting on 26 April, Mr Tang underlined the challenges facing UNESCO in fulfilling its mission to contribute to peace, the eradication of poverty, and the promotion of sustainable development and intercultural dialogue through education, the sciences, culture, communication and information. He reiterated the central role of education as the world faces “the real danger of losing young women and men to violent extremism and forced migrations (...) There is no stronger foundation [than Education] for recovery, and reconciliation,” he said. Mr Tang said that, in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, notably SDG 4 on education, UNESCO works towards “inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.” He underlined that Global Citizenship Education “nurtures respect for all, a sense of belonging to a common humanity and helps learners become responsible global citizens in a diverse and increasingly complex world”. He also highlighted the pertinence of initiatives led by UNESCO such as #Unite4Heritage global media campaign, the Abdullah bin Abdulaziz International Programme for a Culture of Peace and Dialogue and the UNESCO-UNAOC-UNITWIN Network on Media and Information Literacy and Intercultural Dialogue. The Assistant Director-General for Education ended by recalling UNESCO’s Director-General statement during the previous World Forum on Intercultural Dialogue held in Baku: “Cultural diversity is the other name for human dignity and human rights. All cultures are interlinked, and we need to embrace them all, to fully feel ourselves, to fully feel human”. During his visit to Baku, Mr Tang met Azerbaijani government officials, including the Minister of Education, to discuss cooperation between Azerbaijan and UNESCO in the field of education. 
Experts meet to produce technical guide on education to prevent violent extremism 18 April 2016 International experts in education and in the prevention of violent extremism met to develop the outline of a Technical Guidance document designed to support education policy-makers. The consultation meeting, held at UNESCO Headquarters on 21-22 March 2016, brought together experts from around the world to share experiences and advise on the preparation of the technical guide. The guide will support the work of policy-makers within ministries of education to prioritize, plan and implement effective and appropriate education-related actions that can address the drivers of violent extremism. It will also complement the publication designed for educators, A Teacher’s Guide on the Prevention of Violent Extremism, which is being finalized at the moment. A holistic and pragmatic approach to the prevention of violent extremism through education The meeting focused on the role and responsibilities of the education sector in preventing violent extremism in view of ensuring that the guide provides realistic and pragmatic support to policy-makers. Participants identified critical issues to be addressed in the guide such as the specific responsibilities of teachers, key skills and competencies that can help build resilience to violent extremist messaging and effective approaches to engage other sectors of society and educational stakeholders in prevention efforts. The guide will be designed as a policy tool adaptable for education sectors in different world contexts. A first draft will be made available during the Global Meeting on Prevention of Violent Extremism, set to take place in September 2016. 
UNESCO and the Commonwealth team-up for peace and education through sport 18 April 2016 UNESCO and the Commonwealth have entered into a new agreement to cooperate in the areas of Education, Youth and Sport and Peace-building and Dialogue. The agreement will focus on collaborative approaches so that, for example, the Commonwealth’s on-line Education Hub can be used to support UNESCO’s programme in Global Citizenship Education.Following the signing ceremony with the Commonwealth’s Secretary-General, UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova underline the importance of deepening cooperation across the board. “I believe the time has come, indeed to update it, to strengthen cooperation, with a focus on education, on youth empowerment, on promoting intercultural dialogue,” said Irina Bokova. The Commonwealth’s Secretary-General, Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC, said by working together, the two organisations can empower young people so they can tackle some of the world’s most pressing problems, from climate change to ending poverty. “I am confident that this renewed partnership will lead to concrete results in a range of areas, from the development of curricula to support the Sustainable Development Goals to the creation of alternate narratives to those of extremist recruiters, in order to counter violent extremism.” During her visit, the Commonwealth Secretary-General addressed UNESCO’s Executive Board, briefing them on her priority areas: ending domestic violence, reducing the impact of climate change and creating opportunities for young people. UNESCO and the Commonwealth first signed a memorandum of understanding in 1980. This latest renewal will last for five years and will strengthen their ability to deliver concrete programmes on the ground. 
Irina Bokova In defense of Pluralism through Education 4 April 2016 “What education do we need to build a more peaceful and sustainable future for all?” In a roundtable discussion at the Global Centre for Pluralism in Ottawa, UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova outlined new approaches to living together in increasingly diverse and vulnerable societies.Welcoming Ms Bokova, the Centre’s Secretary General, John McNee, affirmed that“finding ways of living together in diverse societies is one of the biggest challenges of the 21st century. If diversity is valued and accommodated, societies are more peaceful.”The Director-General concurred that “violent extremism is one of the biggest threats to peace, security and living together. We have to understand the root causes and bring the full force of UNESCO’s mandate to bear in the response. More than ever we need to bridge cultures through dialogue on the basis of respect and understanding, we need to make the most of diversity.”She affirmed that education - but not just any education - is one of the most powerful tools for countering violent extremism, while cultural heritage offers a formidable channel to promote diversity and common understanding. She stressed the need for new approaches and mindsets to empower youth with skills for critical thinking, with cultural competences and opportunities for civic engagement.She outlined UNESCO’s action to promote education for global citizenship and prevent violent extremism, citing two global forums, with the third to be held in Ottawa in 2017, and the forthcoming launch of a teachers’ guide.An animated discussion focused how to strengthen the forces of pluralism and make it work in practice.Mr Khalil Shariff, Chief Executive Officer of the Aga Khan Foundation Canada, pleaded for a “bifocal vision” on education that prepares young people for the job market and to play their role in democracies. Multilingualism,the role of education in reconciliation, new trends in teaching and learning and the sharing of best practices, including in the integration of refugees, were among the topics raised by representatives from government, NGOs and the education community.The Centre for Global Pluralism is the result of a partnership between the Government of Canada and His Highness the Aga Khan, to advance the vision of diverse and plural societies. 
UNESCO’s YESPeace Network taps the power of youth worldwide to change the future 30 March 2016 “We have to bring young people back into society and what they need is identity and meaning,” said Dr Anantha Kumar Duraiappah, Director of the UNESCO Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (MGIEP) in New Delhi.MGIEP is UNESCO’s specialist institute on education for peace and sustainable development and named in tribute to the non-violent, sustainable living principles of Mahatma Gandhi.Dr Duraiappah, who was interviewed after participating in a UNESCO experts’ consultation on preventing violent extremism through education, says the YESPeace Network is part of the institute’s response to just such challenges.Unifying youth around peace and sustainable development“Young people want a voice and they want dignity,” he said. “They live in an interconnected increasingly small world and they are surrounded by social media chatter. We want to build a platform that unifies them around our mandate of peace, sustainable development and global citizenship.”The network is one element of the institute’s Youth Programme, which aims to empower young people through education to construct a peaceful and sustainable future. It brings them together to focus on the Sustainable Development Goals, and in particular SDG Target 4.7 which relates to Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and which MGIEP has taken ownership of. “We spoke to youth about the target and they told us it was fuzzy and didn’t mean much to them whereas real issues such as poverty, clean water, equal access to education and health did, so we took that on board,” he said.In response MGIEP is developing a knowledge base from youth-led monitoring of Target 4.7 which includes a mobile app so that they can directly upload real life examples of behaviour change from the community in relation to ESD.“We want to put youth in the driving seat to implement and monitor the SDGs,” he said.No one size fits all’ solutionDr Duraiappah says that young people are searching to believe in something and as a result some end up being influenced by extremists but cautions against a ‘one size fits all’ solution.“We have to remember that what drives a young person in Afghanistan or in Syria is very different from what drives a young person in Canada or elsewhere,” he said.“We want to show young people how to become global citizens, that multiple identities within society are to be embraced and that self-doubt is not a sign of weakness but a strength.”Youth-led campaign on global citizenshipIn addition to the YESPeace Network, MGIEP runs the Campus Ambassadors Programme which promotes intercultural dialogue and is developing the Changemakers Programme which focuses on training and leadership based on humane and compassionate values. Each year the institute holds the event TAG 2016, Talking Across Generations, which in 2016 was devoted to Violent Extremism and Education and included a first time ever joint concert by Pakistan band Junoon and Indian band Indian Ocean. Coming up, a second major music concert with the two bands is planned for October 2 which is International Day of Non-violence and the birthday of Mahatma Gandhi. 
With Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Irina Bokova reiterates UNESCO’s commitment to UN Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism 22 March 2016 “Preventing violent extremism calls for new forms of action, by States, by international organizations, at every level”, said Director-General Irina Bokova at a high-level luncheon hosted by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on the occasion of the annual retreat of the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Taskforce (CTITF) on 17 March, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York.The event brought together principals and senior representatives from CTITF entities, including a large number of UN agencies, to explore the way forward on the Secretary-General’s Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism.Together with the Secretary-General, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad al Hussein and UN Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, the Director-General highlighted the importance of coordination and urgent mobilization across the UN to act and achieve greater impact in preventing violent extremism. “What we do know is that “hard power” is not enough to counter a threat fueled by exclusive ideological visions, based on distorted interpretations of faith, hatred and ignorance - we must seek to prevent it”, stressed Irina Bokova, “It must begin by empowering young people, especially young women, so that they can live up to their potential as positive change actors”, she added. This echoed Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s statement that “prevention should come first” in the UN’s collective efforts to address violent extremism, considering its added-value in addressing the multiple and complex political, economic and social root causes of radicalization. “The UN needs to think urgently together, to act and deliver as one to counter the threat of violent extremism”, concluded the Secretary-General.